Oy Vey delete this goy

Oy Vey delete this goy.

Also reported to the mods for eceleb shit.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/h3h3productions/comments/632ub7/h3h3_messed_up_video_was_monetised/
twitter.com/h3h3productions/status/848698945114996737
twitter.com/h3h3productions/status/848699232169021441
youtube.com/watch?v=y983TDjoglQ
twitter.com/AlokinSugar/status/848669993814433793
youtube.com/watch?v=6zImIxBHNoU&feature=youtu.be
youtube.com/watch?v=mamR19Zw4iw
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

>Jew takes down big media conglomerate.

You can play ads on demonetized videos. h3h3-Jew fucked up, lol. SHEKELS INCOMING.

72c.jpg
18 KB JPG
This h3 shit has already been debunked by reddit. Evan is literally peddling fake news. This is why we need reputable papers like the wsj

reddit.com/r/h3h3productions/comments/632ub7/h3h3_messed_up_video_was_monetised/

Shareblue go away.

Not exactly... While you are right and the video was claimed by Omnia Media, that doesn't mean that it is eligible to receive ads. If a video does not meet the YouTube Adsense criteria then it cannot receive ads, but can still be claimed by a company although it will be more or less useless to them.
Due to its title the video would not have received ads.

Wtf is share blue

Your shit meme response doesn't make my post false lel xd

nope

>yfw sjw google and sjw mainstream media are at war with each other

this is very good.

Pls tell me they will be Gawker'd

>Jews jewing jews

While I am not saying you are wrong, and maybe h3h3 has made a mistake in their research:
Wouldn't the author of the articles by now have made a tweet about how he didn't doctor the screenshots and everybody should fuck off and blame h3h3?
He hasn't done anything on twitter since his article except apparently blocking people.
Neither has wsj itself issued a statement on their Twitter where everyone of there tweets gets spammed by people with torches and pitchforks.

The silence doesn't seem very confident.

maybe he's just afk or something you cunt

Wrong

>video unavailable

well wtf

It's been REDACTED

>tfw schlomo was wrong and the lefties/SJWs continue to buttfuck us all into socialism

Video got taken down what did it say?

What the fuck where did the video go

Where are the mirrors?

maybe fell into some good pussy

>quads

Basically proof that they were using a fake screenshot, but Schlomo and Friends forgot that you can still have ads running on demonetized videos.

CHECKED

The leaf gets something right.

Wtf indeed.

>the goyim know
>shut it down

Kek has spoken. So what should we say?
Meme war!

You guys do realize that Ethan is in the wrong here right?

Its been debunked that ads were still running on the video as it was claimed by some media group.

can confirm

who cares, it's just some annoying fat jew

they finally did something right once

just go to h3h3s twitter

>This is why we need reputable papers like the wsj

ahahahaha

HAHAHAHAHA

this is fucked. it was hitting on Google and YouTube and calling them out for not monetizing anything the WSJ deemed inappropriate. Stoping pay of the big YouTubers is one thing but it's happening lots around bigger channels deemed to large an influence.

>Its been debunked that ads were still running
Some information debunks that, so let's say, maybe screenshots were fake, maybe they were not. Basicaly, Schrodinger's screens.

But you can't control the wave Ethan created and majority of people will believe in what thay want to believe.

So just enjoy the ride, becouse all the hate towards WSJ and cunts working for them is fucking hilarious.

jws

No. Ads don't play in demonetized videos.
But the reason the uploader had no ad income might have been something else. A copyright claim by Omnia Media.
We would need Omnia Media to show us records of their income to see whether or not the video showed ads during that period.

I guess the guy made the video private until he can confirm from the claimant if the video was playing ads or not.

oh vey, goy - SHUT IT DOWN NOW.

go home jack nickas, you're drunk

your shit is doctored

yer fucking done m8

>this video is private

Why is the video gone?

I think h3h3 deleted the video

F

SHUT IT DOWN

They probably made a mistake. The video was claimed by a 3rd party and could've thus shown ads.

I just looked at his twitter. They set it private to do more investigation or some shit. Probably found out they were wrong.

twitter.com/h3h3productions/status/848698945114996737
twitter.com/h3h3productions/status/848699232169021441

I hurt myself today...

Kek, have you seen the guy?

That attribution tag is on demonised videos regardless, so it's a matter of whether a copyright claim can assume attribution of after that happens.

youtube.com/watch?v=y983TDjoglQ

Send that to h3h3

It is hilarious, the shitstorm is great and this will backfire on the virtuous ecelebs, shredding their credibility and shekels.

sure

nice IP address.

A murdoch property, what a shock.

even if h3h3 is wrong, he has 2 screenshots with 2 different adverts with the same view count on the video, isn't this proof alone that the screenshots were faked?

what happened my normie firend shared this but the video is down?
did he get a little redpilling?

Video is gone. What's happening?

I don't think so, AFAIK view counts don't raise immediately on less popular vids, especially if someone is just sitting there refreshing over and over to find an incriminating ad

Do not lewd the Reisen.

Views don't instantly update. And I don't think it even counts as a view if you refresh the page quick enough to prevent bots from endlessly F5'ing and manipulating views.

You just fucked up. I'm infiltrating your firewall as we speak. Nice try kiddo.

Also, refreshing over and over to check an ad is usually not counted as a "view", most of the video would have to be watched and after a certain amount of time (among other factors YT implements) only then does it add a "view."

I figured Schlomo would know this based on how often he attacks the platform he's currently defending

this whole thing is flocking normies into binge watching nigger-hating music of the south and what not
>mfw

do you have the original pic? I can't find it using any reverse image search tool.

That dom element is also on every page. It's whether .ytp-ad-progress is set to display:none or not in css that's important, which it is in the other cache versions, just like other demonitised videos.

I'm thinking that yahoo scrapes different versions and combines them together for their cached page.

lel. you done fucked up, Achmed. delet this.

In case anyone wants to see the video
mirror.ninja/6329c5

not my screenshot

...

...

WSJ screen shots are photoshopped

twitter.com/AlokinSugar/status/848669993814433793

what does this show to someone unfamiliar with exposing supposedly well photoshopped photos?

Can some autists describe the significance of these photos?

Smoking gun. Help me spread this.

Beware, shills everywhere. Screenshots are FAKE.

Explanation from guy claiming proof of photoshop in pic

jesus christ this retard is back

Apparently Ads COULD have possibly been playing because it was a claimed video, so he might have jumped the gun a bit.

disprove this then. protip: you can't

Beware of shills guys, they're trying to lead you the Omni red herring path. Screenshots ARE FAKE

I'm not trying to disprove anything, just informing. Ads are possible because of the claim, but sometimes they claim the video, but still can't run ads because of nigger being in the title. But I don't know if there could be a youtube glitch where the claim over takes nigger.

So basically you're saying if we can prove that,
>monetization/ads don't run on "nigger" videos
then my proof of the fabrication seems very plausible, right?

Why not just upload a video with "nigger" and then try to monetize it, see what happens?

That's already been proven by just looking up nigger on youtube. I went through 4 pages and not one ad popped up. This is a special case where we need to see if it being content claimed overrides nigger being in the title.

Okay just post a video then and I'll claim it as my content? Literally just show the picture I made here. How hard is that?

I don't fucking get what's going on here or why it matters. Someone please give me the quick rundown.

Needs to be a big company like nintendo or a music company. Cause they have bots that detect their stuff that put immediate ads on them.

WSJ claims YouTube is running ads for Fortune 500 companies on racist videos.

Fortune 500 companies stop paying for ads on YouTube.

Everyone on YouTube crying because even their normal videos are losing ad revenue because no one wants to run ads on YouTube.

Turns out WSJ may be full of shit.

What level of chess is this?

youtube.com/watch?v=6zImIxBHNoU&feature=youtu.be

Thanks, but again... why does it matter?

Screen from actual add is photoshoped on the screen from nigger video. Basicaly, the screens in the article ARE fake.

Yeah, and by the way, author of the picture, aka
should simpy state that in meme war/propoganda pictures like this. So that people can quickly get that without thinking or asking questions. Also, if you want it to be spreaded everywhere, you shouldn't use chan lingo, like "shills" etc Text shoud be simple, in you face, so that reader is like: "oh, ok i get it, this is how they faked it, fuck WSJ"

(((They))) shut it down.

Could mean the end for either WSJ or YouTube, or both

whered it go?

Ethan put it to private until some facts are set straight about ads running on the video

mirror
youtube.com/watch?v=mamR19Zw4iw