How did belgium get away with killing 20 million dindus while we can't get away with 1 million armenians who died because of natural causes? Is there an art of denying genocide?
King leopold killed around 20 million africans and used them as slaves, here is pic of a man which her daughter's left hand and right cut by belgium army, she was only 5 five years old and she was a slave just like his father. Her crime was not gathering enough plastics.
I hope Leopold burns in hell for getting away with such crimes
Because we aren't stupid cockroaches.
They didn't deny it. And they was black, people tend to not really care then.
You did get away with killing those people. Did anyone go to jail? Have reparations been paid? Did you Islam have its Renaissance moment and ditch all the murderous pedo bullshit?
No none of it, you are too stupid to see you did get away with it.
Relevant webm for your enjoyment lads.
...
Those atrocities occured under the rule of The King. They were not supported by the Belgian Government.
The Belgian Government took over sometime in the early 1900s and things got better.
You can't blame a country for something a member of the monarchy did.
This showcases why monarchys are such a bad idea.
Some guy given loads of power just because he came out of a certain vagina.
There's almost no evidence for 20 million. The real number is closer to 1 million but there's still little to no evidence of that, it's just a more realistic since there were only ~5 million blacks in the Congo at that time. People don't care about it because Belgium is a literal non-country and so is the Congo.
>while we can't get away with 1 million armenians who died because of natural causes?
Actually you can. Whether a country's representative is a king, a president or a fuhrer doesn't excuse it from its atrocities.
Do not be mistaken, but no belgian of our present generation has studied or at the slightest fucking idea of what happened in the Congo at that time.
Just Ongo bongo bongo, I don't want to leave the Congo.
Belgium did nothin wrong
/Thread
the Congo "crimes" are greatly exaggerated
Being a nigger is a violation of the NAP.
Actually it does matter, Till Belgium took it over it was the personal land of the king. Belgium didn't run it till later. Just that the person who ran it also happened to be the king of Belgium.
Much like the Channel Islands are ruled by the queen of england, but are not part of the UK.
Also, it wasn't even a million people who died. Not that it was a nice place.
Kek'd
>That is clearly a foot.
>Don't you have some Kurds to be fighting?
Its pretty hilarious to see the continual degradation and humiliation of Turk-roaches.
Having said all of that...
SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE
SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE
SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE
SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE
>natural causes
kek'd
>some guy killed more than us so just forget about all the people we killed, eh?
I like how the number goes down and down, years of holocaust denying experience I assume.
You should, just because, there's no reason to not learn about your country history.
>This showcases why monarchys are such a bad idea.
Rubbish. Monarchy is literarily the best form of government together with a strong catholic church.
>not gathering enough plastics
Belgium forced those poor Congolese to pick plastic off the plastic trees.
Hear hear.
Fuck you
You fuck
>we can't get away with 1 million armenians who died of natural causes
Of course a roach would try to make it seem like starting a genocide was ok because "MUH BELGIANS AND THE OOGA BOOGAS" none of them were okay, you retarded cockroach. Also why do you care about the congo? There are just niggers over there.
If it ain't white it ain't right
>I like how the number goes down and down, years of holocaust denying experience I assume
A lot is also how to place blame.
Approx only five percent of the deaths where due to violence (source: Being Colonized: The Kuba Experience in Rural Congo, 1880–1960. Madison: University of Wisconcin Press.)
Both of the other deaths was due to illnesses, Between influenza, Sleeping sickness, and Dysentery killed most of the population.
Even if you take the highest death toll (10 million) the violence would have killed 500,000 people. And Historians agree that in near impossible to get a accurate idea of how many died since a census did not take place till much later.
Probably, but knowing that congolese come to belgium to study law, medicine and the economy to come back to the country later and change things, there is always this thought (even among the belgians) that we had nothing to do there.
This is not a shame of our history but common sense.
>How did belgium get away with killing 20 million dindus while we can't get away with 1 million armenians who died because of natural causes? Is there an art of denying genocide?
First of all, that's 15 million 'excess deaths', not '2 million people we marched into the desert and deprived of food'.
When King Leopold II (not Belgium) took over, the Bongo Bongo Congo was currently undergoing an outbreak of African Sleeping Sickness, which was what caused most of those deaths. Had the Belgians not been there, the only difference would have been that the deaths would have been undocumented.
The number it's not the problem, it's how they treated people, it's simple subhuman.
I think this it's a sane aproach and I have no place making you feel guilty, it's not your fault at all.
Yes, but that ship had sailed long before 1870.
Thanks for that, by the way.
>it's how they treated people, it's simple subhuman.
Just like the people, then.
Proofs?
This picture is real?... holy shit...
It was almost always africans doing awful things to other africans. There was not enough whites to do anything one way or another. In the entire congo there was at any time only 2000-3000 whites.
Africans are still chopping each other limbs.
Yep, some african tribals that where hired for police work did it, the white guy is a missionary who was trying to point out the horrors.
>20 million
The difference is that the 20 million figure is wildly exaggerated, along with Leopold's alleged crimes. Nobody has a clue what the population of what is now DRCongo was before the foundation of the Congo Free State.
The atrocities were invented and the crimes of a few nigger mercenaries hired to enforce rubber production quotas, acting against the orders of their white officers, were blown out of proportion by a globalist-controlled Belgian government whose paymasters wanted the Congo for themselves.
Leopold brought Christianity to the Congo and the Congo into the modern world---or as far as it's ever likely to be brought while it's still inhabited mostly by niggers.
The Congo "genocide" is a figment of globalist imagination. It never happened.
The Armenian genocide and Jewish Holocaust, meanwhile, were all too real, and are exhaustively documented. Today only Islamist scumbags like Erdogan deny that Turks murdered Armenians in their millions, simply because Armenians were Christians and had nicer things than Turks did (because Turks were Muslims and a Turkish woman only denied her husband sex if she wanted her throat cut).
Ataturk was not worthy to eat Leopold's shit.
I wouldn't say best, but it's a tried and true formula.
That's why you have a constitutional Monarchy.
Very well done flyer indeed.
Kek
It's because they killed Congolese. I'm proud of our former countrymen, to have punched so far above their weight. Belgian Congo should never have ceased to exist.
Niggers aren't people, you roach, so the Belgians never committed genocide. It was pest control at best.
>6 million lie
>Well documented
Too bad most of their sources were made from scratch as "recreations" like General Plan Ost and the "official" figure for the amount of ovens in Auschwitz which was a recreation presented as source material before Nuremberg.
Not to mention the fact that recently Deborah Lipstadt admitted that Jewish historians lied about there being 11 million total victims including gentile deaths.
There's a statue of Leopold in Belgium. There are a lot of Congolese in Belgium. Why hasn't anyone cut the statue's hands off?
Belgium is not a real country so it can't face charges.
A lot of the young turks were freemasons and jews. I think the Armenian Genocide was done to make ethnic cleansing familiar to peoples minds when the Holohoax was made up.
Note the
>worse than those perpetuated by Turkey in Armenia
>in WWI
to speak on behalf of Burgerstan:
"What's an Armenia?"
dindus are barely human and if left alone they probably would have killed that many anyway all on their own.
M'bubopbubebuway is always going to want to kill N'dindu N'uffin
violence is as African as it gets.
There aren't any records of barely more than a thousand belgians in the congo at any point during the king's direct rule. Some jew ((hochschild)) said said a tiny population of belgians killed millions in an area greater than western europe, and you retards gulp it up.
What King Léopold did in the Congo was nuts. All the other colonial powers were disgusted. It was silenced because it was a faraway place that was not influential in international affairs.
>man which her daughter's left
>her
Traps are gay.
>How did belgium get away with killing 20 million dindus while we can't get away with 1 million armenians
Because of being White and somewhat useful to the world.
How can you blame belgium when its not even a real country???
Read Heart of Darkness by Joseph Konrad
>it's how they treated people, it's simple subhuman.
>niggers
>people
>Jewish Holocaust
>exhaustively documented
That's why there are so many holocaust photoshoped pictures and pictures from other genocides like holodomor mixed in?