Why are artists almost always Leftist and not Rightist?

Why are artists almost always Leftist and not Rightist?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_reproduction
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

It's not always been that way.

Blame (((them))), as always.

There is no rightist, only right.

Because art is controlled by academia. It is academic journals that deem what is and what is not art. There are conservative artists out there, they just keep their mouths shut.

A lot of artists are emotional thinking (women mostly) and a lot of left ideals are emotional (veganism, refugees, immigration, etc.)

Because Rightists are practical and find an occupation with stability and the ability to support a family.

t. creative and artistic rightist with high paying IT career

Is that Amy Anderssen?

Because they dont work for a livng.

Oh and
>dem tiddies tho

There are many who are actually right wing but afraid to share their opinions because it would destroy their careers.

It comes from an extremely loose definition of """""artist""""".

Have you seen art these days? You can rub your feces into the shape of Donald Trump's face and people will call it "art". You won't see any leftist artist creating art like Christo Redentor any time soon.

Wow what wonderfully worded question that totally wasn't written by a bot to distract us from real issues

The planned system in socialism just appeals to "dreamer" or "visionary" type people. Same reason most scientists are left leaning

including me

Because people of the Right actually work

>Implying abstract art/trash is artist work

What gave it away, the obnoxiously awesome tits with no relevance to the post?

One reason is that the majority of artists are poor fucks, they believe $ does not dictate value which lead to movements like abstract/modern art, ironic as that went in a full circle.

The lead a life style that lends itself to the left.

>Why are artists almost always Leftist and not Rightist?

Most people who go out and accomplish something are mostly leftist, because they get energized by human interaction.

That's why all the Sup Forums shut-in keyboard warriors are so rightist. They want to live in their own independent imaginary world.

High on openness.

Lower IQ.

Because art is degenerate and has no place in the right.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_reproduction

So they can maintain the system that pays them.

Why is OP always a faggot who makes bait threads with factually incorrect premises?

t. peterson

Because attention seeking whore "artists" feel the need to band together in little cesspool communities to feel more important about themselves and to validate their "work".

Artists exist to leach off the system. Being revolutionary has less to do with being an artist than selling out does.

>making stupid shit that only elitist dumbasses place any value on whatsoever is accomplishing something
I knew someone who was once the most famous living artist. He literally said that it was a bunch of shit and how fucking cucked (not his words obviously) the art world is.

The short answer is that there is a lot of ass kissing in the industry which is turn is controlled by focus groups and TV executives. (Referring to Cartoon Network and CalArts in this case) Anyone with a remotely right-of-left opinion is quickly shunned from circles. I'm not saying that this is an absolute. Some just simply hide their power level. Some decent folk slip through the cracks. I used to know a few.

>implying that peterson is wrong

Because artists have always relied on patronage in order to survive. They also have to travel a lot, because you can only sell so much art to a community. Art isn't a consumable good. So you are either fully dependent on the aristocracy, or you have to a rootless wanderer. Is it any wonder that this would breed leftist traits like individualism, anti-tribalism, and resentment of power structures?

Because art in the west has been publicly funded throughout the time leftism has existed. Before that arts patronage took place. Artist know their position and try not to bite the feeding hand.

Then why aren't they at all open to the national socialist ideology?

Well thought out

because artists/performers have no place in a lean, functional society, they can only exist (successfully) in a gluttonous, liberal society.

If nukes went off and we entered some kind of apocalypse do you really think we'd be propping up the singers and artists and feeding, housing, and clothing them because they can sing or draw good? No, they'd be the first to get tossed out on their ass.

They succeed due to the excess we have in modern society.

I would like to paint her tits with my semen if you know what I mean

...

Because being open about your political views is a good way to kill your career if you're anything but left wing.

Because Artists want to do what they feel is right and have the freedom to do whatever they wish, whilst expressing themselves to the fullest.

To express oneself, you must make sacrifices and for an Artist, that's time. If you use up a lot of your time to express yourself in a piece of art work and are unable to generate a stable in-come from it, you need some sort of maintenance, which is Government Welfare.

This is one of the reasons why most Artists are all Liberal Progressive Leftists.

I go to an Art School myself and the Cultural Marxist indoctrination is unbelievable, but you must push through it. I managed to Red Pill my girlfriend, she's not ready to take the Blackpill and go full on Anti-Kike mode. Another of my mates is Liberal, but extremely politically incorrect and for myself, a Civic Nationalist.

Most Artists who pursue career with well paying Jobs, such as Graphic Designers, are more Centrists than the Fine Arts, Illustrative or Photography/Film disciplines.

This is true, my sister was raised like me (naturally conservative in a White Christian rural area) and she loved the classics. Her favourites included Turner, Rembrandt and Monet. Her paintings and drawings of landscapes and cityscapes were beautiful.

She moved to Berlin and became a degenerate practically overnight. Full on cultural Marxist and yes, her "art" now is splattered pictures of penises and modernist trash. She actually hates that art but it's all she could sell or get on display in Berlin. I guarantee the regressive views followed as soon as she had to change her artwork

Right wingers spend their time on work that actually earns them money.

Socialists are idealists by nature and supreficial just like most art is based on imaginary ideals that are supreficial.

I am an artist.
I am redpilled.
The art world is fully leftist, super hard to get out of their influence if you want to do something succesful.
It's all cause of money and reputation.
You're basically dead if you're far right or anything else on the right.

because of whatever boogieman you like, user

I am a romantic, an artist.
I want to save my people.

We're all romantic on pol. We have those grandiose hopes and beliefs for the future !

...

Right wing people get useful degrees or go into trades

95% of artists are talent less hacks.
My uncles an artist and a art teacher I would consider most of his art average.
Samples of things I've seen exhibited from many "modern artists" holly shit its literally garbage.

Why is modern art almost always shit and not great?

Leftist own Hollywood. You dont do what they say, you dont find work.

>top
Boring "art"
>the rest
Real creativity, true art.

There's a good reason Hitler never graduate, he was simply a shitty artist.

Because the right abandoned the arts in favor of "muh STEM"

Novelty-seeking leads to the creation of art. If you can't find the novelty you crave in the world, you make it yourself. So, artists inevitably become more tolerant out of simple exposure.

No one is born with an understand of what's good and bad for them - naturally, people love everything until it hurts them, or they see someone else getting hurt by it.

So, artists tend to love and tolerate everything out of sheer aesthetic rapture - they anticipate every form of degeneracy with the shivering spine of a child.

Sometimes they do hate things, and when they do they display that hate in their art. Lots of furry artists do this. Many right wing artists display their political philosophies in their art.

European culture really has been free falling for at least 50 years.

Everything that happens in nature is art. Art happens whether you like it or not. Only crazy people think art has to be created. Thus, most self proclaimed "artists" are crazy. It just so happens the left wing is more favorable to crazy people.

Glad I don't buy art based on your retarded ideals.

because when you are not smart you decide to become an artist

Memes are art created by anonymous people who don't desire recognition for their work. Right-wing memes > left-wing memes, therefore rightists are in fact better artists.

Dude, I honestly prefer leftist shit smeared on a wall compared to whatever I'm looking at here
Memes are fucking cringy

>we'd be propping up the singers and artists and feeding, housing, and clothing them because they can sing or draw good?

Artists in the past often served a religious purpose, art always finds a way to express itself. Leftist academicians hate art for this very reason, and that's why they push things like modern art which is often just pure garbage. They don't want people to experience the spiritual connection art can bring, they want to think art is for pretentious academicians only. They want you to think only they can truly judge the merit of artwork.

Because most leftists are jobless hacks who have all the free time they need to create (((art))), unlike right-winged people who actually have plans and a future to look up to.

>Boring "art"

He has good composition, good technique, the lighting and shadows pretty good, etc. That picture of the old lady is particularly impressive. You can really feel the melancholy in her eyes.
He's not a great artist, and you're right that he wasn't really breaking any new ground, but he was clearly at least moderately talented and had some potential.

The other portraits are far less expressive (they all have dead eyes and ambiguous facial expressions - utter shite), and just generally very poorly drawn (the exception being the lighting and shadows in the one with the whore).
Hitler wasn't very creative, but these portraits aren't even remotely creative or groundbreaking either (and they look like shit). It looks like some pretentious 13 year old's GCSE project.

As for the sculptures, those are actually really good. They explore the human form and they look pretty nice too.

Hitler wasn't a bad artist by any means. He was just old fashioned. He clearly had potential, and if he had sold out and jumped on board with the art trends of his time, he would have been admitted.

>being triggered by a cartoon frog this much

Because 2 reasons:
1. Puritanism from the right. (and now from the left.)
2. Virtue Signaling with leftist academic brainwash.

I'm the first one. The "muh feeling" leftist is the second one.
I'm an sensitive autist who suffered bulling all my infancy.
Manga and anime is where I run from this assholes.
Anything what makes anime and manga less fun is my enemy.
Even for a guy like me this "censor this because muh feelings" sounds bullshit.
Those guys is bullies who learned to use feelings instead of fists. Oh wait.

>The guy who were punched really were an white supremacist.
I don't give a fuck about who got a punched, for now.
Those "muh feeling" leftist is way more dangerous for me.

Okay then top MEMELORD! Kek, you really made me LOL. OMG I CAN'T wait for the new FACEBOOK EMOJIS. They are going to be totally L M A O

Most people agree with the premise of veganism, they just have cultural double standards. Actually breaking out of the double standard and acknowledging that sentient beings deserve basic individual rights, whether a dog or a pig, requires a lot of rational thinking.

this

Because liberals control the funding streams.

I get what you're saying but I don't think the art was what inspired religious motives but rather religious leaders hired artists to depict religious scenes or feelings in appropriate settings.

I do agree that some art (paintings, music, dance, etc) can be very powerful and inspirational but I don't think society NEEDS art and historically while there were artists/performers even through the lowest points in our history, they were often not appreciated or acknowledged during their own lifetimes.

It's usually only during times of peace and prosperity where a living artist or performer can achieve fame or monetary success because people have the luxury to enjoy these things without the looming threat of war or famine hanging over them.

The same reason why there's barely any conservatives or Christians in Hollywood, kike.

...

>artists
Art is dead, my friend.

Because right wingers are rednecks with no talents

>veganism
>inherently left-wing
Fuck off retard

Trait openness.
It biases towards left politics and creativity among other things.

Because you lot made sure that only commies get a job these days.

Pic related. Now gas yourself.

what is classified as art has changed

boring art nowadays is drawing something clear and awe inspiring, with a epic scale and vast detail

exciting is retarded shapes and blobs, misshapen "people" and autistic models, including shit and piss models

fuck you sven

badurr durr da nazi once did it so its redpilled durr

They lost the war though

Eduard?

Shit smeared on a wall, a bunch of sluts peeing in each other, a white wall and a trashcan full of ash.

That's (((art))) today.

Hitler removed it, and the kike trash brought it back, so no complaining now you tools.

Because artists are edgy and the right was in power for most of history. On the flipside,why do you think Ezra Pound went off to go be a fascist mouthpiece?

Edi baby, where are you?

I am a classical guitarist and not a leftist.
Many are left because music takes a LOT of work and they don't usually have time to research things. So they defer to mainstream public opiniom and propaganda. pretty simple.

My Art, funded by goym
Rate it on a scale of 6 Million

...

Fucking balloons.

...

This, but I wouldn't say just academia in current year. traditionalist and nationalist leaning artists are the new (((counter culture))). Unlike everything else, they try new things and have actual talent, and they're quite literally shoah'd.

...

Rightists simply copy what they know to already work, as opposed to creating new material from derived principles.

it is in the modern context m8 settle

>flag

...

Because openness to new ideas and creativity by their nature requires the ability to demolish that which is and recompose it. That is literally the definition of a liberal. Someone who views the current structure as needing change.

Temperamentally openness to new ideas and laziness makes you a liberal. While hard work and close mindedness makes you a conservative,

...

Because art has been co-opted by the globalist/progressivist religion as a tool of subversion and propaganda.

My name is Ed, how can I help you?