What race was Jesus Christ? My friend thinks he was African American

What race was Jesus Christ? My friend thinks he was African American.

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=mkH2PhyqKB0
youtube.com/watch?v=nnkQFCZ_y4Q
youtube.com/watch?v=zbD-wPqMC6I
pastebin.com/9cxmXPCB
popularmechanics.com/science/health/a234/1282186/
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

We don't know

But he easily could have been pic related

Jewish duh. Probably looked like one of those tanned Israelis you see nowadays.

Definitely wasnt a nigger

I dunno, but I doubt he was black, probably looked like Assad or some shit.

He was a Semite.

Christianity is and will always be a foreign Semitic faith.

He was Jewish.

red pills incoming

>"Puffed Up Black Hebrew Israelites" (Independent Fundamental Baptist Preaching)
youtube.com/watch?v=mkH2PhyqKB0

>"The Black Hebrew Israelite Cult" (Independent Fundamental Baptist Preaching)
youtube.com/watch?v=nnkQFCZ_y4Q

Not African American, just a good old fashion red blooded American from the heartland.

Tell your friend his race doesn't matter.

It's his message that counts.

Jewish

A man from the Levant after centuries of European occupation? He was 100% not black

>American
You friend is a retard.

You can judge a man by the company he keeps.

Your friend is either a dumbass or a nigger, but I repeat myself.

You're friends an idiot America didn't exist 2k years ago. ERGO he couldn't be African American.

...

>African
>American

*Nigger

>My friend thinks he was African American

This is dumbest thing i've ever heard.

>"Jesus in the Book of Revelation" preaching by Pastor Steven L Anderson
youtube.com/watch?v=zbD-wPqMC6I

Ok here is a full detail description of Jesus. Long story short, he wasn't black.

Jews are fucking idiots.

...

Jews are just the most worthless, subhuman piece of shit race that ever lived, fucking scum.

No memes but early depictions of Jesus show him as a black dude. Say it with me...

WE

Caucasian.

As in Caucus mountains.

Dumb as fucking shit, those stupid retarded worthless hooknosed hunchbacked crooked toothed subhuman kikeroach untermenschen.

Sub fucking human, these worthless freaks.

They are pests that just need to dealt with like any other insect infestation.

Anderson is a great guy, I'd love to go to his church someday and talk with him about the hall of cost for hours after bible study

see here:

> African American

....Jesus was an American, huh?

whoops, i mean here:

Nice posts m8.

I honestly don't know why burgers and eurocucks tolerate these worthless animals in their governments.

HE WAS JEWISH YOU BIBLICAL ILLITERATE!

Hes an honorary white

He wasn't an actual person and the religion would have died if the Romans didn't vote to allow it.

He was Persian! No, lie.

FUCK OFF! YOU INBRED RETARD!

Most likely this. Like a Jew.

They accused him of being Samaritan, so he probably looked like Assyrians, Greeks and Jews mixed.

You know, none of you shills has ever given source for that artist.
Shroud of Turin is more reliable than some modernist kike pushing for wewuz.

He was a carpenter, so a manly jew before two thousand years of inbreeding. Your pic may very well be truthful.

...

That's fine tell him he was black and that means the Jews killed off black Jesus. See how well that sits with him.

Depends whatever jews are considered

He actually appears to you as your own race, and even if you talked about it to your Nani or, god did some voodoo so you both would think you were talking about the same thing. Jesus doesn't obe the rules we do.

There are two opinions on race nowadays...

The first is the one held by scientists, anthropologists and historians: that the old race model was like the theory of miasmas, wrong based on observable genetic evidence.

The second is the one held by bigots, neo-nazis and various kurmudgeons and cranks under the banner of "Race Realists" and "Racialists": which says that race is real and that the overwhelming evidence which shows racism to be a crock is the fabrication of some convoluted Jewish conspiracy to wreck the world for no good reason.

I assume He was a middle-eastern Jew.

Fuck Jew!!!!

Considering he was born of a virgin, He may not have even had a race. Else, pretty sure He was Jewish which is why the (real) Jews are God's chosen people.

>It's """foreign""" so it's bad
Sorry, faggot, but you're not going to valhalla or into any kind of """nothingness"""
Christianity is Not Jewish
pastebin.com/9cxmXPCB

>African-American
>American
wat

Those are the same thing. You're an idiot. But I'm sure you took off else you wouldn't be deluded.

THE REAL FACE OF JESUS!

popularmechanics.com/science/health/a234/1282186/

>Matthew's description of the events in Gethsemane offers an obvious clue to the face of Jesus. It is clear that his features were typical of Galilean Semites of his era.

>It was the Bible, however, that resolved the question of the length of Jesus's hair. While most religious artists have put long hair on Christ, most biblical scholars believe that it was probably short with tight curls.

>Would Paul have written "If a man has long hair, it is a disgrace to him" if Jesus Christ had had long hair? For Neave and his team this settled the issue. Jesus, as drawings from the first century depict, would have had short hair, appropriate to men of the time.

>Since Jesus worked outdoors as a carpenter until he was about 30 years old, it is reasonable to assume he was more muscular and physically fit than westernized portraits suggest. His face was probably weather-beaten, which would have made him appear older, as well.

WEEE

Technically, half jewish.

I don't support adulterous
Gods.

He was a Jew, and born by two Jews in Jewland, so go figure

Jews are by far the dumbest race on earth.

they're not the same thing. Race is a social construct, not a biological one.

Lets be honest here, no-one that ugly could create their own religion without threatening them with death. Jesus had to be handsome as fuck like pic related

>I don't support adulterous
>Gods.
I think you might have schizophrenia.

false dichotomy

i meant spread his teaching, pls dont take this out of context

>1 post by this id

It was posted by a Jew.

Jews know how to play liberals and pagans and atheists like a fiddle.

Wind them up and watch them go...

he was a Jew from Galilee, which is in northern Israel and historically, quite near where the Samaritans are from.

he probably looked like a lot of the people in that area prior to the Muslim conquests. Google what Samaritans and Assyrians look like. basically, a light-skinned middle easterner.

pic related, although a painting, is actually pretty good at describing the races I'm talking about.

I get the joke, but any deity that preaches against adultery should probably respect the sanctity of marriage.

How can you be here and be so deluded? Either you're a newfag, you purposely don't listen to anyone, or you're roleplaying.
>trying to use the appeal to hypocrisy fallacy against God
lol wew lad, you atheshits are gettinng creative.

That's Ethiopia, which is the second nation to adopt Christianity, Armenia is however the first so they made him look like them.

probably like this

...

...

>that chart
gg 'race is social construct' posters

Jesus (if he existed, this isn't a guarantee as there is no actual evidence of him existing) wouldn't be black, that's just fucking stupid. He wouldn't be white either, he'd be middle eastern, think olive skinned.

Not an argument.

Also, he was half Jewish at most.

Jesus was an epic memester that created some of the most successful memes of all time, he also refreshed a lot of old Jewish copypasta.

>Not an argument.
You say this like it's a meaningful statement.

Here's two arguments, guy who can't think for himself and thus must parrot molymeme:

1. All arguments that commit an informal fallacy are invalid.
2. Appealing to hypocrisy is an informal fallacy.
3. To claim God should "practice what He preaches" so to speak is to commit the appeal to hypocrisy fallacy.
4. Therefore your contention is invalid.
5. All invalid contentions are nonsensical.
6. Therefore your contention is nonsensical.
7. People who make nonsensical contentions are idiots.
8. You are an idiot.

1. "Adultery" is, according to google, "voluntary sexual intercourse between a married person and a person who is not his or her spouse."
2. God did not have sex with Mary.
3. Therefore God did not commit adultery.
4. Therefore your claim is false.
5. False claims are ill-conceived.
6. Ill-conceived claims are proposed by people who are not good at thinking.
7. People who aren't good at thinking are idiots.
8. You are an idiot.

...

Normal people just betray him as their own race because the race of Jesus isn't the point of Christianity

Why shouldn't God practice what he preaches?

Jesus looked a lot like Peter Steele.

Not an argument :^)

Besides, I've shown He doesn't not... You'll have to go search your favorite butthurt atheist blogs and podcasts for a different contention.

Also, you seemed to ignore the "should respect the sanctity of marriage" part, and focused your autism on the definition of adultery.

I will concede it's much closer to rape than adultery based on your definition.

Canonically this.

So we shouldn't hold one to one's own standards?

You sound incredibly Jewish. One set of rules for us, a different set for the goyim.

One needs to have sex to rape, you idiot.

1) Show me in the bible where it says to "respect the sanctity of marriage."
2) Explain how causing Mary to be with child without having sex with her is disrespecting the sanctity of marriage.

I can't believe you're still holding on to this. I guess you don't have a choice, lest you have to admit your heros Sam Harris and Lawrence Krauss just might be fucking retarded. Now, I've given you your tasks.. Run along now

I didn't say that, you idiot. You have to be 18+ to browse this site.

Hebrews 13:4 Let marriage be held in honor among all, and let the marriage bed be undefiled, for God will judge the sexually immoral and adulterous.

1 Corinthians 7:1-40 Now concerning the matters about which you wrote: “It is good for a man not to have sexual relations with a woman.” But because of the temptation to sexual immorality, each man should have his own wife and each woman her own husband. The husband should give to his wife her conjugal rights, and likewise the wife to her husband. For the wife does not have authority over her own body, but the husband does. Likewise the husband does not have authority over his own body, but the wife does. Do not deprive one another, except perhaps by agreement for a limited time, that you may devote yourselves to prayer; but then come together again, so that Satan may not tempt you because of your lack of self-control.

What I got out of that is that everyone should respect marriage except for God because reasons.

Acting indignant and inventing a strawman by naming random people you disagree with adds nothing.

On to number 2 then... I'm waiting.

Additionally, it's occurred to me that an angel told them ahead of time that they would have Jesus, and they were overjoyed, so comparing it to rape just further doesn't make sense.
>What I got out of that is that everyone should respect marriage except for God because reasons.
>What I got out of that is that everyone should respect marriage except for God because reasons.
That isn't even implied there. The fuck did you get that from?
>Acting indignant and inventing a strawman by naming random people you disagree with adds nothing.
It adds to your butthurt if I'm right that they're your heroes.

>Additionally, it's occurred to me that an angel told them ahead of time that they would have Jesus, and they were overjoyed, so comparing it to rape just further doesn't make sense.

So she agreed to it then. That's adultery.

I will concede it isn't immoral if you claim Jesus was neither of Mary or Joseph, meaning holds zero genetic material from either, and was created wholly outside by God and Mary was merely a vessel.

> WE
> WUZ
> DA
> KANG
> AN'
> SHEEEEEIIT

You can't have adultery without sex. Don't make me repeat myself again.

>I will concede it isn't immoral if you claim Jesus was neither of Mary or Joseph, meaning holds zero genetic material from either, and was created wholly outside by God and Mary was merely a vessel.
If this is even a possibility (not only if, mind you), your contention just further carries zero weight.

I'm still waiting for a valid argument for number 2.

You can still dishonor marriage without adultery. To knowingly carry another man's seed is dishonor.

However, my second part covers a scenario where it would not be dishonorable, akin to in-vitro fertilisation.

I'll eat shit if you say it's a possibility that the seed of Jesus was created outside of Mary and planted by God, without her genetic material.

>WE WUZ DA KANG OF KANGS N SHIIEEEEEEET

>KANG OF KANGZ*
how autistic do you have to be to correct a meme?
>To knowingly carry another man's seed is dishonor.
Why? And God isn't a man.
>However, my second part covers a scenario where it would not be dishonorable, akin to in-vitro fertilisation.
Why are the genetics of the child relative to the mother relevant?
>I'll eat shit if you say it's a possibility that the seed of Jesus was created outside of Mary and planted by God, without her genetic material.
Anything not proven to be an impossibility is by definition a possibility. It's a (epistemic) possibility. I guess you'll be eating shit then.

Well I mean, story goes that Jesus literally taught this girl how to paint.

So... She would know.

Great. That was my long winded way of getting a christfag to say it's possible that Jesus is 0% Jewish.

Sorry if I offended you, faggot.

It's epistemically possible He wasn't genetically Jewish; I think I agree with that. He was an is God. Even if He was, though, you still haven't shown how Mary having Jesus was dishonorable to marriage. Doesn't really matter, though, because you've already invalidated your contention by admitting the possibility that He didn't (trivially) have her genes.

If jesus took a 23andMe, his European % would be 0.0.

Guy, I just want to get the idea that he's Jewish out of people's heads, hence why I focused on the genetics so much.

I left the Catholic church after Ratzinger stepped down, and felt really guilty about saying God was complicit in adultery. The purpose was to expose the flaw in "Jesus was Jewish" thinking.

I also prefer to believe Jesus was completely divine, and that Mary was just a vessel.

You seem to like arguing though, so I'll play devil's advocate.

Shouldn't her virginity be saved for her husband? A la "let the marriage bed be undefiled?"

Not that you could call what God did "defiling," rather, Mary had lost her virginity once Jesus was born. A virginity that had belonged to her husband alone.

Pro tip : he didn't exist

>let the marriage bed be undefiled
I think this passage very obviously is talking about having sex, not virginity. Mary wasn't necessarily not still a virgin after having Jesus anyway, but that would require quibbling about a silly thing like what "virginity" is.

Oldest pictures had him as Arabic.