Thought the narrative was changing Drumpfkins? Think again. New breaking investigative journalism from the Washington Post CONFIRMS Trump/Putin collusion.
Drip... drip... drip
Eli Clark
Ryder Robinson
>washington post
Gabriel James
broofs?? :DDDD
Cameron Cooper
Trump didnt want to take your shit for having genuine discussions with Russia. He used back channels. This is logical.
How many vague connections are you guys going to dig up? Why are you guys hiding from reporting the rice unmasking?
Jonathan Gonzalez
>9 days before the inauguration
Literally nothing, again.
Jaxon Adams
"apparent effort"
If every Trump story in your paper is filled with words of conjecture like these then congrats...you're fake news.
Jordan Jenkins
...
Jaxson Richardson
Reeks of desperation, but I have to say I love seeing them give their hopes up time and time again.
Drumpf is finished it's over for him!
Camden Green
Every President has back channels... including Obama for fucks sake. Are people actually stupid enough to believe that it's somehow a nefarious thing that Trump was arranging back channels? Literally, all Presidents have back channels, including to Russia. Holy mother fucking christ people are idiots.
Parker Flores
>waah compost
shariablue
Brandon Sullivan
>WaPo
Andrew Cook
>January 11th 2017
Also archive that shit.
Parker Cooper
>washingtonpost
Oh sweetie, you're old enough to understand the idea of make-believe
Angel Jackson
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
>meanwhile, Gorsuch gets confirmed....
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Brandon Sanders
Predictable spin is predictable
Dominic Hernandez
What a desperate smokescreen.
Kayden Cox
shnicky-wicky snooky-kums oh honey oh darling oh ragtime gal
*sips tea*
Lucas Taylor
> Mercenary group hold meeting in Seychelles.
METAL GEARRR???
Jose Morgan
It's not spin it's truth you massive shilling faggot. Are you going to honestly tell me that it's somehow unusual for back channels to exist? Even though literally every President in modern history used back channels? Also, there's a lot of conjecture words in the articles... fucking Washington Post for fucks sake.
kys and do humanity a favor
Julian Reed
The real question is
How does Sup Forums NOT have an extramilitary mercenary """defense""" force yet?
William Jones
This
Daniel Moore
when they say "democracy dies in darkness", do they mean how reporters from Bloomberg and the NYT sat on their knowledge that the traitor susan rice ordered illegal spying on Trump?
Aiden Lopez
>literally every President in modern history used back channels
Brandon Jones
i dont know how you cant see that its a shit show on all sides
stop being a brain dead partisan hack
Adrian Thompson
This. Those poor Shareblue tools.
Hope they keep their boipuccis trimmed so they fetch a higher price in prison
Henry Rivera
>Back channel
I hate this fucking faux-operator poser lingo.
IT'S COMMUNICATION!!! IT'S MEETINGS! IT'S RELATIONSHIPS!
I.e. nothing at all unusual.
Alexander Bennett
Are you even aware of what a back channel is? It's just communication between two parties without the whole dog and pony show of bullshit that goes with politics.
Yes exactly. Like I said right above, it's just communication without the bullshit dog and pony show. So yea... nothing unusual at all like you said. People are really stupid and this situation is just over-hyped idiocy.
Owen Morgan
>article contains no proof of anything
If you had a case, there would be a trial.
Why do you think it's a bad thing for Trump to talk to Russia in the first place?
Luis Hughes
STANDING ON THE EDGE
OF THE CRATER