Trump signs repeal of U.S. broadband privacy rules

reuters.com/article/us-usa-internet-trump-idUSKBN1752PR?il=0

A low energy response for an otherwise great man. Many such cases. Sad.

This weakens the position of the Jewish oligarchy (((Google and Facebook))). This is a good thing.

This bill did nothing it just prevented a change

Is this democracy?

Nobody wants this bill.

Almost by definition, it should never have been introduced to congress.

And now it's a law.

From the most do-nothing of the do-nothing congresses we finally get a bill nobody has ever even asked for.

Meanwhile;

- 18% of Americans die owing 62,000 to health insurance.

Letting Comcast sell my data is a good thing?

Please explain to me these mental gymnastics.

We didn't ask for it isp lobbyists did (and like it or not isp's are allowed to do this)

All this did was prevent the fcc from preventing isps from selling your data just like google and Facebook and YouTube do for advertising money that's how they make their nut.

So if course the isps want to prevent this massive hit to their income but this is literally keeping the status quo of the internet that's always been

Quit being ignorant

> WHAT DATA CAN AN ISP
NO ACCESS AND SELL?

- precise geolocation,
- financial information,
- health information,
- children's information
- and web browsing history

>you sign up for the internet and agree to let your info get sold for research and profit
>Comcast can stay open and provide internet for your t a cheaper cost as it is augmented by their advertising shekels
>you are happy with your service Comcast is happy with their money
>voluntary exchange of services is succefull agaon
>the nap was not violated

Why should the Jewish oligarchy have a monopoly on your data?

It helps if your brain doesn't work

they actually can't access any of that if you're not a fucking computer illiterate retard

> The bill repeals regulations adopted in October >by the Federal Communications Commission >under the Obama administration requiring >internet service providers to do more to protect >customers' privacy than websites like Alphabet >Inc's Google or Facebook Inc.

>The rules had not yet taken effect but would >have required internet providers to obtain >consumer consent before using precise >geolocation, financial information, health >information, children's information and web >browsing history for advertising and marketing.

>Is this democracy?
>Nobody wants this bill.

That's not how American """democracy""" works. What you want is pic related, which is formally called: direct democracy. It would be trivial to implement using modern technology, but our politicians would never allow us to have so much power...

• Friendo, I know you don’t exist. You’ve studied dank memes and /polspeak. You’ve got, what, 7-9 catgories of forum responses written on a laminated shill sheet. Think it through. No one in this cesspit thinks this is a good idea. All it does it make the privacy invasions we have had to suffer from google, Youtube and facebook, and extended them to double-hitler.

That is what I want. It's what most of us want.

Do you honestly want Shanaynay and Jebromiyah voting on issues?

• How exciting it must be to see a forum thread that matches your assigned SEO. So far in this “pro-privacy” thread you’ve used 3, 5 & 7 from the laminated shill sheet;

• 3. Persecute Jews. Pointlessly. (BTW, I love jews)
• 5. Assume Intellectual Superiority
• 3. Persecute Jews. Again
• 7. Angry post

So this means anyone can see my porn history?

Anything that isn't going over https (encrypted) is viewable and salable by your ISP.

Even if you are visiting a website that uses https, the ISP still has a record of when and how often you visited the site.

They can see your porn history
They can see your anonymous comment history.
They will use the first to stop your second

Bump