>I hate Turkey for Erdogan,
He is the leader that /pol always wanted.
Did you not choose the exact same kind of man for presidency?
>its treatment of the Kurds
Apoist Kurds want to create a Kürdistan.
We don't.
Civilians aren't hurt.
There are millions of Kurds in Istanbul for example.
The conflict is very limited in scope.
>and its repeated threats to flood Europe with barbarians.
That's a good move because it forces Europe to do what we want.
>I hate Islam for constantly attacking the west,
Does the West just not attack Islamic countries?
English colonialism would disagree.
American interventionism would disagree.
>for attempting to spread its cancerous, barbaric, amoral way of living,
It's what /pol always wanted.
Just a different brand.
>for reducing people to savages who must live in absolute submission to a deity's every whim
Noone is that religious.
>and for being the antithesis of Western values,
Not really.
They have a lot of similarities.
>for its oppression of women,
The truth is: They are happy.
>for the cruelty and violence promoted by Sharia law,
Eye for an eye is not cruel.
It's simply justice.
>for its demand that the entire world must submit to its will or be destroyed.
In the beginning it was all about uniting Arabs so that policy is a leftover from those times.
>Tech development leads to moral development, by the way.
Like when?
Have you found a solution abortion moral problem?
>Or it leads to destruction. The fact that the west hasn't destroyed itself despite becoming more and more capable of doing so every day for the last hundred years shows moral development.
What was the World Wars user?
