Assad and Trump

Ok Sup Forums i have been off the internet for a couple of days, can anyone give me a quick rundown on the whole Assad thing i hear so much about.

Other urls found in this thread:

globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-approved-delivering-libyas-sarin-gas-to-syrian-rebels-seymour-hersh/5522647
pastebin.com/85VejUcP
strategic-culture.org/news/2016/04/28/seymour-hersh-hillary-approved-sending-libya-sarin-syrian-rebels.html
youtube.com/watch?v=h0cNuPd2CDk
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>Trump: "we dont wanna fight syria "
>Assad: *gasses children*
>Trump *fires 50 tomahawk missiles*

>Assad is a secular arab leader (just like Saddam)
>this threatens the jew
>rebels make a false flag chemical gas attack and blame it on Assad
>like the kike he is, trump breaks his promise of not getting involved in syria, and throws a crapload of tomahawks on syrian air force airfield

TLDR trump is obama/bush 2.0

It was the rebels who used the chemical weapons, retard, not Assad.

lmao gud boy assad didndu nuffin

You should be given the best goy award, nice digits though

>best goy award
I'm not even saying gassing muslims is bad
I'm just saying he did it

> Assad is winning the war at long last
> Jihadi rebel scum use children and gas them on the spot, claim Assad dids it

> MSM (as usual) gets on her high horse and starts yelling bloody murder.
> Again many pictures of children (very important)
> USA decides to fire some tomahawks at an airfield because grrrrrr

What will happen next?

No, it was the rebels
globalresearch.ca/hillary-clinton-approved-delivering-libyas-sarin-gas-to-syrian-rebels-seymour-hersh/5522647

>Find out in the next episode of America Empire Khai!

>Centre for Research of Globalization
lmfaaao I can hear the goblintalks from here

Does the US have any proof of Assad doing this?

Is it time for the proofster memes already?

No. that's the problem, they accused assad without any proof.
(The same way they accused Saddam of having WMDs without any proofs)

I gave you a source and now you keep dodging? fuck off already

>Centre for Research on Globalization
nice source here is mine
pastebin.com/85VejUcP

My source is well cited, fucktardo

It's an alex jones tier conspiracy website retard

Even my sources have sources, nigger
strategic-culture.org/news/2016/04/28/seymour-hersh-hillary-approved-sending-libya-sarin-syrian-rebels.html

I just hope the Russians and Iranians will go all out after this. Total war and domination of the land. Please happen

Another article is not a source retard link to a reporter with a well established body of work or fuck off

>It links to the globalresearch at the bottom of every page
Oh my god its actually put out by the same people

REDPILL TIME
>Ron Paul on Syria gas attack: 'It doesn't make sense. Zero chance Assad did this.'

youtube.com/watch?v=h0cNuPd2CDk

gg, instead of reading the source you plugged your ears

i hope you have another dresden

Did you read the pastebin I linked??
No you just dismiss it without even looking into its legitimacy

This so much
It's all explained in the docu Hypernormalisation (Adam Curtis)
The Arab world was becoming great and peaceful, that triggered the Jew Kissinger, so he made the Arab world fight each other over a shitstain that's called Israel.
Also super pissed about Trump, I knew it was coming cause he's basically the same as Putin and other world leaders, but I didn't knew it'd come so soon

Do you even know who seymour hersh is, fucktard?

Where does Seymour Hersh present evidence that this attack was done by the rebels?

Yes, read the long ass god damned source

and don't come back until you've read it

The article was put out in June ffs
The attack was on tuesday jesus christ man

April* my bad, point still stands

Yes you dumbfuck nigger because this wasn't their first gas attack.

How do you know it was an attack by the rebels at all??

Because their first attack was confirmed it was done by them

is this your first day turning news on?

>quick rundown
Trump lied to Sup Forums

How can an article put out in april 2016 (now this is a year ago) be evidence for an attack done on tuesday this week (Thats 4 days ago)?

Keep in mind the following inequality:
4 days < 1 year

theres no proof and furthermore looking at who benefited from this attack strongly suggests he didnt do it