I'm an Agorist but I'm against illegal immigration
> Is it possible?
I'm an Agorist but I'm against illegal immigration
Illegal by definition is not voluntary on all parts.
don't ask stupid questions.
also being a kekbertarianist is retarded imo.
You basically have to call your country extended private property or something like that with a mutual agreement not to let outsiders in.
that is what a country is leaf
it's liek kekbertarians want to reinvent the wheel. we did that already.
Your country got raped soo....
How i see it is illegal immigration is a sign of force.Coming in without permission of the citizens of the united properties of Agoria.
>NOT ARGUME.......
and so on
Fine. involuntary immigration.
>involuntary immigration.
STEFAN! Ready the free market nukes! We have a violator of the NAP here!
Yeah No using nukes would be a violation of the Nap. because it causes undue harm.There would be mutually assured destruction.
t. irresponsible nuke user
He/she would get nuked right back.
>He/she would get nuked right back
read
nuking someone without fucking with the NAP of course.
don't be a leftist kekbertarian if you're gonna be kekbertarian.
>Agorist
One of the more uncommon forms of anarchy, right?
Explain in 3 lines, pls.
the use of black/grey markets to overthrow the state.
if one person gets nuked it would have already violated the nap.
lurk moar and get the context kekbert
>to overthrow the state
any plans for afterwards?
usually im on Sup Forums but its full of traps and new fags so i apologize if i don't fully get all of the lingo.
just lurk my friend.
>any plans for afterwards?
Permanent anarchist revolution. We gang-march the communists and fascists into helicopters or into the ocean then we conquer the stars.
Live a comfortable life of tax-free,force-free and central bank-free luxury all thanks to a revolution brought on through counter economics.
Or this i like this aswell.
Would any form of self-organization be allowed? If no, how would you prevent it? After all it could lead to another government structure, right?
>
>luxury
same question. Self-organization to run a business must be allowed then, right?
yes friend. and no it wouldn't due to competition.
Bump.