I'm an Agorist but I'm against illegal immigration

I'm an Agorist but I'm against illegal immigration
> Is it possible?

Illegal by definition is not voluntary on all parts.

don't ask stupid questions.

also being a kekbertarianist is retarded imo.

You basically have to call your country extended private property or something like that with a mutual agreement not to let outsiders in.

that is what a country is leaf

it's liek kekbertarians want to reinvent the wheel. we did that already.

Your country got raped soo....

How i see it is illegal immigration is a sign of force.Coming in without permission of the citizens of the united properties of Agoria.

>NOT ARGUME.......

and so on

Fine. involuntary immigration.

>involuntary immigration.

STEFAN! Ready the free market nukes! We have a violator of the NAP here!

Yeah No using nukes would be a violation of the Nap. because it causes undue harm.There would be mutually assured destruction.

t. irresponsible nuke user

He/she would get nuked right back.

>He/she would get nuked right back
read
nuking someone without fucking with the NAP of course.

don't be a leftist kekbertarian if you're gonna be kekbertarian.

>Agorist
One of the more uncommon forms of anarchy, right?
Explain in 3 lines, pls.

the use of black/grey markets to overthrow the state.

if one person gets nuked it would have already violated the nap.

lurk moar and get the context kekbert

>to overthrow the state
any plans for afterwards?

usually im on Sup Forums but its full of traps and new fags so i apologize if i don't fully get all of the lingo.

just lurk my friend.

>any plans for afterwards?
Permanent anarchist revolution. We gang-march the communists and fascists into helicopters or into the ocean then we conquer the stars.

Live a comfortable life of tax-free,force-free and central bank-free luxury all thanks to a revolution brought on through counter economics.

Or this i like this aswell.

Would any form of self-organization be allowed? If no, how would you prevent it? After all it could lead to another government structure, right?

>
>luxury
same question. Self-organization to run a business must be allowed then, right?

yes friend. and no it wouldn't due to competition.

Bump.