Syrian chemical weapons

Why would someone pull such a dumb move, as using chemical weapons on civilians?

Why would he risk every international relation and cooporation by killing 80 civillians with weapons that are prohibited in war?

Doesn't make sense.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack
nytimes.com/2016/11/21/world/middleeast/isis-chemical-weapons-syria-iraq-mosul.html?_r=0
hrw.org/news/2017/03/06/isis-accused-unleashing-chemical-weapons-mosul
blacklistednews.com/Pentagon_Trained_Syria’s_Al_Qaeda_“Rebels”_in_the_Use_of_Chemical_Weapons/57792/0/38/38/Y/M.html
thehill.com/policy/defense/269551-isis-used-chemical-weapons-against-the-kurds-us-officials-say
translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://www.kp.ru/daily/26663.4/3684165/&usg=ALkJrhjJSTYxuiWwseUZWEL8tftnzdaGtg
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

My conclusion is that he is too disconnected with reality to adjust to current circumstances. Sure just ignoring the US calls for regime change worked well for the last administration, but things have changed with Trump.

Also people have a big fear of chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. You can kill kids with artillery and say it was an accident or something, but doing it with chemical weapons doesn't work, because these things kill people, not military assets.

Its all a show an tell

Syria was testing the so called non-interventionist Trump regime to see if they would make a move. Then Trump fired back as a sign on strength.

Not sure why this board went full red alert over it.

also did Syria has an patent on using chemical weapons?

Assad brugte ikke kemiske våben (false flag). Hvis han gjorde, så er han så dum at han fortjener alt hvad der kommer.

It still makes no sense.

Why would everyone knowing go full retard? Just to rock the boat in a dick measuring contest?

It's a false flag just like the first fucking chemical attack back in 2013 holy fuck how is this still being argued about when the same narrative was spun 4 FUCKING YEARS AGO.
and the same pictures of dead children and crying news anchors to pull at the heart strings too.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghouta_chemical_attack

1. To end the war faster.
2. Because Trump said he was okay with Assad and got cocky
3. Someone lower in the chain fucked up

>Why would someone pull such a dumb move, as using chemical weapons on civilians?


WHEN YOU'RE EVIL CRAZY DICTATOR YOU DO THESE CRAZY THINGS!!!

BAD MAN VERY BAD MAN!

Yes, its essentially a test from Russia to see if Trump would make a move

It's just shills trying to build narrative on Sup Forums right now.
Of course Assad didn't do this and Sup Forums knows this. This shift isn't natural.
Real users are in bunkers while shills are shilling shills

If it was a false flag then wouldn't Syria and Assad being denying it?

They haven't denied it at all

He didn't do it purposely. From what I understand it was a regular airstrike on rebels. The airstrike burst a rebels owned and operated CW depot. That's why only 80 civilians died, not that much in a real CW attack. How and why rebels have a CW depot is beyond me.

They have countless times

A Macedonian on another thread proved the alleged impacts have a strong possibility of being fired from rebel controlled areas

Why would Hitler invade Russia?

>USS Maine
>Lusitania
>Pearl Harbor
>Gulf of Tonken
>Aluminum Tubes
>Mobile weapons lab
>Chemical weapons attacks

yawn

CNN now says it was Russia that gas bomb innocent rebels.

Read your news goy.

End Syria's Civil Conflict: Send Tomahawks Against the Real Problem

The conflict will only end when somebody actually targets the real causes of the conflict in Syria. Liberals always give a pass to the terrorist for the use of WMDs. End the civil conflict by eliminating the problem.

The Islamic State has used chemical weapons, including chlorine and sulfur mustard agents, at least 52 times on the battlefield in Syria and Iraq since it swept to power in 2014, according to a new independent analysis.

>nytimes.com/2016/11/21/world/middleeast/isis-chemical-weapons-syria-iraq-mosul.html?_r=0

ISIS Accused of Unleashing Chemical Weapons in Mosul The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) said in a statement that about twelve people, including women and children, were being treated for possible exposure to chemical weapons in a hospital in Erbil.

>hrw.org/news/2017/03/06/isis-accused-unleashing-chemical-weapons-mosul

Pentagon Trained Syria’s Al Qaeda “Rebels” in the Use of Chemical Weapons

>blacklistednews.com/Pentagon_Trained_Syria’s_Al_Qaeda_“Rebels”_in_the_Use_of_Chemical_Weapons/57792/0/38/38/Y/M.html

2016 ISIS used chemical weapons (sulfur mustard) against the Kurds, US officials say

>thehill.com/policy/defense/269551-isis-used-chemical-weapons-against-the-kurds-us-officials-say

Iran wants the USA to get drawn into a ground invasion like Bush Jr. They tried the same with Obama but it didn't work either.

>Why would
He didn't.
Either false flag, or the Syrians bombed a terrorist weapons depot, which also contained chemical weapons and they got released that way ... or terrorists were contacted that their depot would get bombed and released them intentionally.

He cray

>The conflict will only end when somebody actually targets the real causes of the conflict in Syria
Nobody wants to bomb Saudi Arabia/Qatar and give up their pipeline.
Sadly.

It was most likely the rebels just like last time. Anyone who claims it was Assad with no evidence to back it up are either retarded or kikes.

Time to buy some iodine pills, I guess.

Yes but we have to take into consideration that Assad did do this. We are going of speculation when the us military has a lot more information then we do on the whole thing. Besides why would Assad say it wasn't him?

>has a lot more information then we do on the whole thing
sure do.
Trust the kikes. Trust mass media.

Am I the only one who remembers a US airstrike that killed 200 civvies two weeks ago? Did I end up in a wrong timeline? What the fuck is going on? Why is this a big deal?

weak

>has a lot more information then we do on the whole thing
sure do.
Trust the kikes. Trust mass media.
Trust the "nurse".

It doesn't make sense and he probably didn't do it. DJT was just waiting for any reason to show China, Russia and the rest of the world who is Boss.

Because nobody does shit to him and he knows it. He is almost done with the rebels, the next thing he needs to do is win back people or go through the entire civil war thing again, he used chemical weapons as a precedent as in "if you don't calm down ill use chemical weapons on you". Chemical weapons scare people more than bombings do, so it would work much better in scaring people to acknowledge you as leader

False Flag duh

Why would he test them? Why with chemical weapons? How does testing them help his end goal

Because MSM focuses on the syrian dead (((babies))).

m-m-muh false flag

>Am I the only one who remembers a US airstrike that killed 200 civvies two weeks ago?
No. I also do.
However most 'muricans are simply fully retarded and can't even remember that they should clean their asses after taking a dump. Other western-stock-exchange-values folks are following the same path.

I find it quite funny regardless.
>kill millions of people using bombs in other countries
>totally fine
>shoot up countries with your nuclear waste
>totally fine, mutated babies are not a problem
>kill a few people with so called chemical weapons
>oh no, you didn't!!!

I hear tell the only difference between a Russian and an American is the American believes their own propaganda. Fuck Ivan, snap out of it, you are being slowly Americanized hanging out on a Mongolian basket weaving forum.

There's going to be more chemical attacks, obvious false flags. However, they was claim Assad is being intransigent. What Trump doesn't realize is he's given an incentive for ISIS and rebels to false flag chemical attacks. This means Assad must his airforce much more sparingly.

Aren't you supposed to be doing Nazi stuff?

What the fuck does he stand to gain by testing them?
Listen to yourself, the shit they're telling you to believe doesn't make any fucking sense

Gee it's like as if he never fired those weapons in the first place

You are forgetting two points that are more important than the why.

In 2013 a similar attack was carried by the rebels, international media blamed assad and wanted to bomb the shit out of him, after an investigation it was proven he wasnt the one that used the chemicals.

Bombing the shit out of Syria before an investigation now, is moronic, given the records show it probably is the same stupid rebels being played into auto gassing themselves to have an excuse to invade Syria.

"I'd never use Chemical weapons again!" - says man who produced over 1000lbs of chemical weapons for the tenth time today.

THE REAL STORY IS THAT SYRIA, FOLLOWING AN INTELLIGENCE TIP, BOMBED A REBEL MUNITIONS DEPOT. AFTER BOMBING THE GAS WAS RELEASED. THEY SPECULATE THAT THE SARIN GAS WAS PART OF THE REBEL MUNITIONS DEPOT.

ACCORDING TO INTEL THE REBEL WEAPONS WERE SHIPPED IN MOSTLY FROM IRAQ.

>GIVE REBELS SARIN GAS
>TIP OFF SYRIAN GOV'T TO REBEL ARMS DEPOT
>SYRIANS BOMB REBEL DEPOT, CAUSING SARIN TO BE RELEASED
>BLAME SYRIA FOR DROPPING POISON GAS BOMBS

PERFECT FALSE FLAG, JEWS.

>translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?act=url&depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&sp=nmt4&tl=en&u=http://www.kp.ru/daily/26663.4/3684165/&usg=ALkJrhjJSTYxuiWwseUZWEL8tftnzdaGtg