Reminder that Democracy is the ONLY legitimate form of government. There is absolutely no such thing as a good dictator

Reminder that Democracy is the ONLY legitimate form of government. There is absolutely no such thing as a good dictator.

Other urls found in this thread:

chnm.gmu.edu/history/faculty/kelly/blogs/h312/wp-content/sources/codreanu.pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=DSiOIM1wEQ4
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Constitutional Monarchy is the only legitimate form of government, faggot

what about DickTators?

yeah, its a pity bombing a country to fuck doesn't automatically promote democracy eh?

Cos you burgers are dead good at that.

>democracy = you have the power
>but it has to be done the way we do
Why am I not surprised by your flag ?
>fucking degenerates

then why install pro-US dictatorships all over LatAm?

Not for Americans, because a king needs to be a part of the people. And there are too many different kinds in of people in America.

The United States of America are a Republic, silly burger.

You're a fucking DICKtater.

Sorry.

but America isn't a democracy

your elections were between a Kike and a Kike

Hi. What on fucking earth are you babbling about?

but what if the people agrees with the dictatorship?

Fuck (((democracy)))

Corneliu Zelea Codreanu
A Few Remarks On Democracy (1937)
chnm.gmu.edu/history/faculty/kelly/blogs/h312/wp-content/sources/codreanu.pdf

>sub human arab shitskins can function under western-style democracy

>democracy
>legitimate

Democracy is also a (milder) form of slavery.
I stand with Hoppe on this one:
Aristocracy > Monarchy > Democracy

Why?

they will drag us into their stupid shit again Brit

Democracy is a delusion fucking nigger. It's lay of the jungle; get a gun take over a block; then start recruiting. How? Give the men the women they want and tempt them with other goodies, then arm them. Police come after you? Well congrats your armed with a following threaten mutual destruction and that's enough for them to be wary, everyone wants to live. This is a slide thread so i'm not going to bother continuing. Sage.

cyrus the great.

Democracy is a jewish trickery.
Absolute monarchy is the true redpill.

Democracy eventually leads to socialism

>tfw no German constitutional monarchies

depends on who is being governed; if it's a secular well-armed well-educated landowning population with significant local powers then yes
in case of religiously indoctrinated disarmed ignorant landless subhumans without any local powers then no

9/10 a monarchy would be preferable to letting ignoramuses vote for gibs, buying into propaganda, lies and feels

Democracy is a stopgap measure when the plebs get to uppity.

Just as there is one country, one government, one state, so too must there be one ruler.

And against Russia too.

I just want the christian world to unite against islam desu.

Fuck democracy.

Democracy is okay if you have a redpilled civilisation. Since there is no way to ensure that, democracy doesn't work.

Democracy is a legitimate form of government, but enlightened/constitutional monarchism works just as well, if not better.

Stoics make for excellent statesmen but terrible fathers.

THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A "GOOD" JEW

>US was proven to be a deep state dictatorship
>D-dictatorship is bad!
Is this what they call cognitive dissonance?

>Reminder that Democracy is the ONLY legitimate form of government.
Democracy can be cheated. You would know first hand if you lived in a muslim country where muslims and kurds make 16 babies.
>There is absolutely no such thing as a good dictator.
Ataturk was a good dictator.

>Reminder
“There never was a democracy, yet, that did not commit suicide.” — John Adams

Dictators are a bad thing, yes. But, they are better than ignorant muslims making policies that can have global ramifications.

Just More refugees to destroy Europe

Fuck kikes

Plato said that all democracy eventually leads to tyranny and he was right.

Tyranny doesn't mean that there has to be a single dude or dudette at the top telling everyone what to do. It can also mean a soft consensus by a clan of elites allowed to run amok unimpeded, to which all objections are considered to be illegal or otherwise evil.

>There is absolutely no such thing as a good dictator.
There is no such thing as "good" in a solid sense as it is a subjective remark. However we can sort some certain characteristics in a dictators rule which can qualify it as beneficial. Ataturk is an example.
It can be cheated but it is still the only legitimate form of government. Some people making many babies doesn't cheat democracy by the way, it is still legitimate.

How was he right? Do we witness this in world history?

False. In a democracy, a person can only maintain power if he has a wide base of support from large swaths of the population, whereas in a dictatorship, it is possible to obtain power with a very small (but very violent and committed) base of supporters. Thus, it is impossible for a democracy to be tyrannical, and likewise it is impossible for a dictatorship to NOT be tyrannical.

Case in point: U.S. of A. Not a tyranny yet, but steadily leaning in that direction.

Another case in point: Bonapartism in France after the Revolution.

>In a democracy, a person can only maintain power if he has a wide base of support from large swaths of the population

A wide swath of the population can behave in a tyrannical way (Bolshevism).

> in a dictatorship, it is possible to obtain power with a very small (but very violent and committed) base of supporters.

No. Rule by a small group of violent and committed supporters is the definition of dictatorship, regardless of whether a single guy/dictator is their leader or not. However, a _take over_ of power in a dictatorship by another small group of violent supporters is actually harder to pull in a dictatorship off than in a democracy.

Daily reminder that Murica is a terrorist country

youtube.com/watch?v=DSiOIM1wEQ4