What exactly is wrong with globalism? shouldn't the end goal of humanity be to group together?

What exactly is wrong with globalism? shouldn't the end goal of humanity be to group together?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=NeocujVAXdc
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

It opens up global tyranny.

Globalism is what brings pestilence to our crops and our bodies. There's a way to do it without forcing anyone.

Besides, "one world" singular culture is doom. We adapted different cultures to match our environments.

There will be no more white people. Duh.

Slavery is bad m'kay

>equality is a false god and with no competition leads to stagnation and death.

the issue is the current players who want to globalize the world are all liberal pro immigrantion anti gun bureaucrats. If the world was one USA I wouldn't have a problem tbqh.

race is a social construct. iq is not genetic but changes due to different socio-economic conditions. white people not existing wouldn't change anything as long as everyone lived like white people.

This is depressing as shit.

File Name
and what is wrong with stealing a image and renaming it Shareblue-Sample-07.png

In theory yes, but the problem is there are people within those global powers with their own interests at heart, and they have no issue screwing over everyone else. This is why a single giant government is a terrible idea.

When you concentrate more power in fewer hands, the best interests of the people are thrown away in exchange for the interests of the corporate and political elites. Every single instance of globalist influence has been in this direction, which is a direct contradiction of democracy.

only certain countries should unite

not financially but usa uk europe and russia and japan

fuck everyone else

your version of globalism is global civilisation with humans ruling together in harmony and peace.
the current one is just a corrupt global oligarchy

also aus can nz and british overseas lands of course

nothing is wrong with globalism. we should start by banning guns worldwide.

You have to look at the worst case scenario and what is likely to happen. Humanity is naturally incompetent and selfish.

This is why government should be as small as possible, so in the scenario that an evil person gets in power, they can't do a lot of damage.

Plus if the position doesn't have much power in the first place evil people will be drawn to it less.

If it was we would not nor could not evolve and we would all be the same.

Corruption always occur when power is in fewer and fewer hands. It always happens. No one can escape it. Globalism will often results in dystopia because more power until eventually it becomes a monarchy but all around the world. This is the sad but true statement

Boys boys boys. Can you not see this kind of shill? Asking a retarded question that has no substance other than causing division amongst us. Don't give in.

Each time you ask this boundlessly stupid question, you will get the same answer.

"You should have read more books and watched less 'Even Stevens'."

I say our destiny is to be diverse and evolve into different lifeforms.

This desu. Democracy is already hard enough to make work at the nation scale. Some globalism is good and it should increase over time, slowly. The current globalization trend is just power hungry people trying to enslave the world though. And when they take over, there will be no other alternatives left. Globalism doesn't have to be so oppressive.

the only good government is one in which the leaders have a plausible fear of the subjects. Right now, if the mayor tried to pass a law saying he could buttfuck town citizen, we could feasibly band together and burn his house down when he sleeps. Same with the governor and all the way up the ladder until you have to start crossing oceans.

That's the problem with globalism. It would be tough and take a long time, but if it ever came down to it, me and everybody I know could walk to the capital to burn it all down. its a safe assumption that a globalist government has enough control of the seas to stop all of us from hijacking a cargo tanker and sailing around the world to burn shit down.

So race mixing is to be banned all population groups that are racially distinct must be allowed to evolve separately in order to maximize adaptibility, homogenous species is an extinct one.

Welcome to Sup Forums

>What exactly is wrong with globalism?
Pic related.

A globalist system would require huge amounts of bureaucracy to be feasible. Not only would there be corruption in the despotism of the higher ups, but also corruption at the local levels of government leadership. The system would quickly become rotten and collapse.

fpbp.

This is an interesting perspective.


Globalism IS the end goal. But if you try to force it humanity will devour itself. Plain and simple.


We've got about 1,000 more years of social and biological evolution before the concept of globalism has a place in our world.


Serious question for all the
lefties out there. Just who do you intend to cede America's sovereignty to? How long do expect to live after making that move?

;)

So you burn down your local office and wait for them to come to you for the fight, like we did in 1776

Globalism is not THE end goal is is the end goal of globalist a and the end goal of racialists is to destroy the links and evolve seperately to distinct different species bringing diversity to lifeforms on earth.

But they don't live like whites and we shouldn't kill our race just so some third worlders can live in the lap of luxury.
Even if you don't care about race, there are plenty of nonwhites who do and want us dead. If you're white and not having kids and supporting our interests, you are part of the problem. Haiti, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Angola, and Mexico are all examples of how bad things get when nonwhites are allowed to rule. You can ask them to act white all you want, but the group never will. I can see you enjoy the comforts of living in a white land, and this comfort has made you soft, but if you don't take action to secure the existence of your people, others will and your children will be forced to grow up in a darker future because you chose the path of tolerance and comfort.

youtube.com/watch?v=NeocujVAXdc

You get a gold star for paying attention in school or whatever.

>iq is not genetic

Are you joking?

The white species can not be put down or destroyed by the foreign races.

Can not be outbred*

There are no post-ethnic states, only holocausts waiting to happen.

yes but not under the jews

Globalization, defined as the mutual cooperation between the separate nations and races, is a good thing, but globalization, as in the mixing of peoples and cultures for the purposes of consolidating power into the hands of a few psychotic kikes is literal cancer.

It wont work in the future anyways due to tech advances. Even the globalists are starting to admit its falling apart.

until we have free energy this will be impossible. the monetary system we have now will not allow globalism unless you want to live like peasants as the elites hoard everything on the planet.

When a race forsakes its purpose in reproduction then that race goes extinct and it's unique traits are removed from the earth.

The problem with globalism is that it allows the powerful to exploit loopholes and screw over others.

>America has a strong steel industry.
>China has more factories with more workers who are paid for less money to produce lower-quality steel.
>American and foreign companies naturally want to save money.
>Buy from China.
>Put Americans out of work.
>Cut trade deals to reduce restrictions to save more money from buying Chinese.

The more global our society gets the less restrictions or borders there are, so the power ultimately lies with people who already have the largest companies as well as the governments whom they bribe and vice versa.

In the end the people who are screwed over are those who live in the wrong country where jobs have been outsourced.

Globalism is ultimately the most effective and efficient form of doing business as it allows a freer market, but that freedom only applies to those who have taken it for themselves and only themselves.

Nationalism may be anti-capitalist in some respects, but it protects people who would have lost their jobs to a Chinese factory with little to no scruples.

They are not the kind of people we want to be doing business with. And from a humanistic point of view globalism will only exhort people like the Chinese to be even less fair to their workers.

Think about it: If you make a product and suddenly don't have to worry about quality control or competition then the only thing keeping you doing good work is your own moral code. Sounds a lot like communism, right? If the central government holds all the power we get Soviet Russia, but if a few large multinational corporations also hold all the power then you have globalism. They both lead to inferior products, the death of competition, exploited work forces, and the death of national industry.

We can if we don't take action and seek to stop it. The invaders are not acting alone, someone opens the gates for them and encourages them to come here. But the answer as to whom that is... is very politically incorrect.

>shouldn't the end goal of humanity be to group together?
nej
I do not want to end up in a group with all you fucking mutts, niggers, mudslimes and what have you. Its not in any functional people interest to give all that up to belong to some global cesspit.

A strong race is one that reproduces a weak race is one that doesn't this is taught in biology, natural selection and survival of the fittest, the fittest reproduce more than the unfit, and thus is more successful.

Aside from the tyranny, slavery, and all of that terrible stuff, it would also lead to a lack of innovation. There wouldn't be competition anymore. The suffering would probably still exist but no competition means complacency and eventual apathy.

Ok it's the 'end state' of humanity, but should not be a 'goal' we are rushing towards. It's likely one step before moral norms implode or we stagnate as a species or some other horrific finale. Who knows, but it's way down the line and I think we can all agree here humanity is NOT ready for whatever comes next.


Globalists really should be considered mentally unstable for professing such dangerous views.

It's basically invasive species screwing up the native environment's ecology on a more complex human level.

Right.

That's why I encourage jews to race mix with australian aboriginals.

First reproduce to secure future strength of the race, we must flood our lands with the white race and declare we are fit to exist on this earth!

>shouldn't the end goal of humanity be to group together?

why?

...

It is not an end state of anything but your will.

No, it's not.

Who the fuck told you that?

Don't forget to weed out the traitors that are already lost to us.

No. A completely mixed world does not have to be the end state of humanity. Only if we sit back and watch will it be.

Irrelevant to do unto others, first reproduce, it is the primary goal of all races not attacking others.

Because humanity would need a ruler or ruling organization that makes sure everyone plays by the same rules but also is not corrupt. Which is basically impossible. I say we should work towards extrateresstial colonies on Mars and Jupiter's moons and travel to the stars and just leave and let humanity rot on earth.

If others do not attack then it is in races interest to not attack.

Well no shit. The implication is always 'if nothing is done'. Otherwise I would have said something else.
So basically,

YES. I UNDERSTAND.

There are a lot who don't understand. They are who we need to reach.
I'm sorry if the message is repetitive, but it has to be said.

no its not

people that oppose it.

We both know even with a thousand years of selection for community and family care, intelligence, and a calm disposition the child races will never act like white people

please go back to plebbit, your stupid raid failed.

whats plebbit?

Humans are not rational enough to have a planet state.

just give me the shareblue file name of the image and ill go away

>humanity
yes, not niggers and the exploding camel cavalry though

THIS.

A better future for humanity and scientific breakthroughs would come at a faster rate if globalization were to be done right.

but right now it's just power hungry corrupt stupid cunts that desire it for the most mundane of things.

fuck off nigger

Wouldnt that still be nationalism?

also, hi neighbor

But we are at peak breakthrough point for STEM. Were you glued to your smartphone 7 years ago?

how can you trust a single small group of people to do whats best for humanity? its impossible. absolute power corrupts absolutely.

>Wouldnt that still be nationalism?

Howdy, southern man.

I think it would be nationalism, but at the same time believe that a nation could rise without doing so at the direct expense of other nations. I can foresee times when cooperation would be beneficial and possible without negatively impacting the "uniqueness" of the various nations, races, or cultures.

I agree. Ive been leaning toward NatSoc for this reason. A nation has a lot more bargenign power on economics alone when the people whom it should protect are behind it. I realized in the libertian phase that if people needed to pay for protection that people must be, by nature, agressive or it would not be needed.

Though I must say, we live in intresting times. If some one had asked me 10 years ago where I stand politically I would have only thought of two options.

because localized tyranny is so much better

globalism is the first step to mass depopulation for the good of the elites.

Honestly, if aliens showed up tomorrow, even the worst white supremacists would suddenly be on team Earth.

whats wrong with diversity? Its good to have different races. or is that not what the lefties are pushing? I'm pretty sure democrats are against white men all together to be honest.

>whats wrong with Nations being turned into corporations controlled by Jews??

fuck off retard

What is it with this retard board thinking National Socialism just means being really really nationalist? It's your own people being oppressed and your economics gets ruined because of the word socialism being in it.

Because helping your own people elevates the whole.

>parroting the standard retarded argument

As long as people are allowed to fuck who they want to fuck, I don't care. That's how the white race originated in the first place, by free agency (aka natural selection).

uhh yeah at least you can leave on tyranny and try out another for a while fagit

the were on the same side of the argument kiddo.

ur moms pussy

fucking /thread. that's it. that's the most serious and unaddressable problem with globalism and why it can't be allowed to succeed.

>What exactly is wrong with globalism?
>your corporation's HQ is in TAX paradise while rest of the facilities aren't, reaping benefits of tax supported infrastructure and social / medical programs but giving nothing back
>corp makes their manufacturing facility in the 3rd world country without any kind of worker and environmental protection laws (or if there are any they are easily circumvented by bribes of insignificant value), if shit hits the fan and public realizes you're basically a slave driver poisoning the country you post formal apology and make shell corp own by someone else on parer to continue with the exploitation
>you hire 3rd world workers for your call center
I don't think I have to explain this one in detail, do I?

>shouldn't the end goal of humanity be to group together?
Yeah, but that's not what globalization is about.
It's all about allowing rich abusing the poorer countries under the guise of bringing work there.

the problem is that large systems become exponentially complex. The more agents interacting with each other, the more chance that something unexpected will happen. This emergence can sometimes be beneficial, but it can also be catastrophic. If you look at countries, the ones with large populations are rarely the ones that are the richest, and most free of crime. The one's at the top are often the one's with the least population, whereas the larger countries often struggle. I'm convinced this is due, in part, to the complexity problem which I just described. Consider also this: many political ideologies can work within very small communities of 20-100, but are a disaster when implemented at an international level. You can live communally with a group of friends, and their friends, but communism seems to lead to economic collapse and atrocity, when scaled up. So globalism is the biggest possible system we can imagine. It's at least fair to allow other people to voice skepticism of such an arrangement. One thought that always comes in to my head: where do you go if globalism gets fucked up? You're fucking trapped at that point.

Nothing. Globalism is where we are headed whether people like it or not. It isn't really a question of if but how. We can do this proactively or we can fuck up over and over and over again on the path toward globalism.

GLOBALISM IS JUST LARGER SCALE NATIONALISM.

Most languages are dying out. English is taking over. Culturally we export Californication and it is spreading the world over. Officials all over the world even wear the same business attire. The youth all over the world increasingly resemble eachtother in fashion and musical tastes.

So whats your argument, its better when globalised and not localized?
Retard

If globalism is so great, why does it require world wars and violent suppression against dissent?

i wonder whos trying to be the global tyrants? :^)

Thats where your wrong. people hate california. hollywood is a joke these days. people are canceling thier cable subscriptions in droves over 100k a month. people are sick of the propaganda. only the very stupid watch anything but nature and history shows anyway. Its over for them.

You have had and will have the same thing with nationalism.

people are getting pretty tired of the military industrial complex as well. we have not had a year that there wasnt war. Everyone knows what the problem is and when the boomers die off there will be no stopping the change of power.

No we weren't.

>people hate california
Hate us cus they aint us. Same reason they bitch about the US at large while dressing like us, adapting our memes, and listening to our music.

>people are cancelling their cable subscriptions
Good ISPs are overpriced. Netflix, Hulu, and piratery are a better alternative for consumers.

>people are sick of the propaganda
You mean people are sick of 10 min commercial interruptions for 15 mins worth of abysmal content. People have been "sick of propaganda" for forever. Welcome to reality millennial fucking shit.