/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL: Comfy Sunday evening discussion edition

This thread is for Discussion of Libertarianism, Capitalism, Anarcho-Capitalism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace.

Unofficial Discord:

Reading:
pastebin.com/FKTP3BCh

Videos:
youtube.com/watch?v=t31z2s_NZQg
youtube.com/watch?v=K2_dPLBlvDI
youtube.com/watch?v=9GuDq88lO4M

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/aMNDY
lewrockwell.com/author/hans-hermann-hoppe/
mises.org/system/tdf/Economics and Ethics of Private Property Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/A Short History of Man — Progress and Decline.pdf?file=1&type=document
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf
mises.org/system/tdf/Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, A_4.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy_Hoppe_Text 2014.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Myth of National Defense, The Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Economic Science and the Austrian Method_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/What Must Be Done_7.pdf?file=1&type=document
archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch16.html
archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch75.html
lewrockwell.com/author/murray-n-rothbard/
mises.org/system/tdf/Man, Economy, and State, with Power and Market_2.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/sites/default/files/Anatomy of the State_3.pdf
mises.org/sites/default/files/Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays_2.pdf
mises.org/system/tdf/The Ethics of Liberty_0.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/What Has Government Done to Our Money_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/Americas Great Depression_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/system/tdf/For a New Liberty The Libertarian Manifesto_3.pdf?file=1&type=document
mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-over
mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia
discord.gg/NjFKVBf
youtube.com/watch?v=dIEemKcy-4E
books.google.com/books?id=ot2nTzyw7v8C&pg=PA237&dq=gilded age real wages growth&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPx_KA95jTAhUn_IMKHdlKDcUQ6AEIKjAB#v=onepage&q=gilded age real wages growth&f=false
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

my faggot self forgot to add the discord

discord.gg/aMNDY

HOPPE READING LIST:

>Articles by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
lewrockwell.com/author/hans-hermann-hoppe/

>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property
mises.org/system/tdf/Economics and Ethics of Private Property Studies in Political Economy and Philosophy_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline
mises.org/system/tdf/A Short History of Man — Progress and Decline.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Democracy - The God That Failed
riosmauricio.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Hoppe_Democracy_The_God_That_Failed.pdf

>A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism
mises.org/system/tdf/Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, A_4.pdf?file=1&type=document

>From Aristocracy, to Monarchy, to Democracy
mises.org/system/tdf/From Aristocracy to Monarchy to Democracy_Hoppe_Text 2014.pdf?file=1&type=document

>The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production
mises.org/system/tdf/Myth of National Defense, The Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>The Private Production of Defense
mises.org/system/tdf/The Private Production of Defense_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Economic Science and the Austrian Method
mises.org/system/tdf/Economic Science and the Austrian Method_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>What Must Be Done
mises.org/system/tdf/What Must Be Done_7.pdf?file=1&type=document

ROTHBARD READING LIST:

Articles by Murray Rothbard:

>Big-Government Libertarians
archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch16.html

>Race! That Murray Book
archive.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/ir/Ch75.html

>More on LewRockwell.com
lewrockwell.com/author/murray-n-rothbard/

Books:

>Man, Economy, and State with Power & Market
mises.org/system/tdf/Man, Economy, and State, with Power and Market_2.pdf?file=1&type=document

>Anatomy of the State
mises.org/sites/default/files/Anatomy of the State_3.pdf

>Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays
mises.org/sites/default/files/Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays_2.pdf

>The Ethics of Liberty
mises.org/system/tdf/The Ethics of Liberty_0.pdf?file=1&type=document

>What Has Government Done to Our Money?
mises.org/system/tdf/What Has Government Done to Our Money_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>America's Great Depression
mises.org/system/tdf/Americas Great Depression_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto
mises.org/system/tdf/For a New Liberty The Libertarian Manifesto_3.pdf?file=1&type=document

>b-but Gary Johns...

Shut it you low energy fag. We ain't some retarded 420 blaze it faggots. We want liberty and the responsibility that goes with it.

>b-but somalia a-and warlords ???

Gotta read that shiet
mises.org/library/wouldnt-warlords-take-over
mises.org/library/anarchy-somalia

Somalia is the corpse of a fucking socialist state and it's better off now than before it collapsed.

>b-b-but .. ROADS !

If there's a need for roads, they're going to be built by private construction companies, payed by covenants and maintained my said construction companies. They even generate money, because it's like that parts or the road are for rent in order to set up advertisements at the sides.

Or there's no need for roads, because we're the fucking gyrocopter master race.

Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Lib-Shits need to fuck off.

Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.

Now, formalities out of the way, wassap homes? How are you securing a free and prosperous future for yourself?

this, libertarianism needs teeth

Thanks, we can't have our movement taken over by pussies that just want to smoke weed all day.

Any Illinois anons here?

I want to try to organize a push to get a libertarian governor in the 2018 election running on a strong anti-corruption platform. We have to stop these fucking politicians from stealing our money via graft.

sorry man. not an illinoisfag

illinois user reporting in.
i concur

...

How do we go about doing this? I've put some thought into it because I think we can really drive a message along the lines of:

"Illinois pays one of the highest state tax rates in the Union. What do we have to show for it? Do we have expensive and large infrastructure projects? No. Do we have incredible assistance programs? No. All we have to show for our incredible tax burdens are kick backs for the politically connected. Illinois has both the highest tax burden as well as being notoriously the most corrupt and these things two things are completely related. We have to stop the graft so we can let our people keep more of their hard earned money. Neither republicans nor democrats are exempt from this, they both have shown a long history of morbid corruption and neither will ever bother to address it."

I think we need to start trying to drive up support now, and make it known to the Libertarian Party in IL to attract a strong candidate.

What's your guys' stance on immigration?

Productive noncommie degenerates only.

discord expired
discord.gg/NjFKVBf

The threads that start uncucked are always slow, please bump this thing.

So even non-whites?

I will accept some non-whites as long as they are productive. I will not however pander to their gibsmedat horseshit. I still favor my kin.

better cuck them then

>What's to stop a warlord from taking over?

Is that a meme question or did you not see ?

>p-please bump

>better cuck them then
Yeah I'm not going to create an "inclusive" or "tolerant" environment for any shitty minority groups

bump

It's gotta be done. The fag libertarians like to hang in our thread.

>We ain't some retarded 420 blaze it faggots.

So does that mean you DON'T think marijuana should be legalized?

>tfw a nazi tells you the ideal economic system is based on the labor theory of value and then claims to be "right wing" and "not a communist"

I hate natsoc for the socialism but can't get behind libetarianism if you can't favor ethnonationalism

There shouldn't be a state to legalize anything. Private property, private law.

...

...

I don't believe a stateless society is even possible, a least not in the context of a modern nation with a large population and a half-way decent economy.

...

Historical ethno states accept other ethnic groups into their countries. Do some research on the Jews that served in Hitler's regime. Or don't accept shitskins into your community, either way I don't care what you do if it doesn't harm me.

Can I get a new link? That ones expired

Preferably whites only. Blacks have a lower average IQ and will never really be a positive force

>Shilling for commies
Fuck off.
Think of it as decentralized. Like a Confederacy.

I totally agree with what you said here. I don't know have a fucking clue with what we can do to drive up actual support other than showing the corruption and why libertarian is the way to go.

I don't think any proper right libertarian would have a problem with ethnonationalism, they just don't think it's 100% optimal. Feel free to form an ethnonationalist convent and prove them wrong

Libertarianism != stateless. The state still exists to enforce the NAP and run the military

Oh really? Because usually when I invade these threads, people tell me that having ANY sort of government is equivalent to living in the USSR.

Your criticisms are actually correct. People are naturally corruptible because human nature isn't good or evil, its programmable. And in relation to your second meme, yes money is ultimately a foreign subversive control mechanism to classify and weed, groom, and breed psychopaths for the elite to continue rule through the centuries. I think while your criticisms are heeded, they are NOTHING compared to what kind of evil is happening in the world at the moment BECAUSE we support institutional authority (behind the scenes sacrifice, child rape, dismembering, blood drinking, cannibalism, mass blood letting rituals, etc.). There is just too much going on that we don't know about. What we do know about is bad enough already... all the loss in purchasing power, we don't even follow the constitution man, bad immigration policies. The constitution is supposed to be a reflection of the Natural Moral Objective Laws of the Creator that man has inherited the ability to understand because of his neo-cortex. You're right, but that surely doesn't justify the other dialectic, Satanism, or Moral Relativity.

Btw I love how American this thread is. Even the shills are American

What's a libertarian method of making this happen?

Libertarians differ on the state, and we have left libertarian cucks latching onto our thread everyday.

I consider myself an Anarcho Capitalist, but I understand using the state to acheive a libertarian society.

...

You left out
>without a government, how will I know that fucking dogs and doing heroin is bad?

kek I forgot the "who will stop me from sucking dicks?" poster. Will add it in.

>no 'no roads'
i am dissapoint

Who else /Minarchism/ ?

If people can get together and form courts and police, why can't they get together and form a dam? Or a road? Or any other institution? Minarchism is logically fallacious, but I'll readily admit you're almost there. You just haven't come across Natural Law yet.

youtube.com/watch?v=dIEemKcy-4E

Pragmatically I'd say so, but its all about the endgame libertarian society for me.

>no milton friedman reading list

Make one and I will add it. I make a lot of content in these threads. But I can't make everything.

Me.

I also want constitutional bans on communist/socialist/social democratic political parties running.

>>no milton friedman reading list
He was a commie faggot who supported central banking.

...

>Libertarians need teeth
Sure, but you guys don't know how to provide that besides aping the alt-right buzzwords.
You idiots look at how libertarians are portrayed on the internet and think it's 1:1 with the public perception. This isn't true. So the Internet thinks Libertarians are liberals who REALLY want to smoke pot and only support the various freedoms Libertarians endorse because this allows cringeworthy or selfish behavior.

Meanwhile, to the public, if they even know about Libertarians, think they are so far up their own ass that they are better ignored than engaged. So there's never a discussion, learning or growth. Not because of the libertarian belief system, no but because Libertarians have always acted like the atheists of politics. Quick to condescend, quick to make flippant remarks or barely restrain their smug superiority. Libertarians are already known as selfish assholes. Acting like more of an asshole is not going to swell the ranks, it's just gonna drive the normies away. And I'm sorry, but if you want your libertarian paradise you need to convince the normies. So yeah, be educated, be proactive, defend your politics and challenge others. Do it with strength and gusto.
Please, please just cut out the
>sit down motherfucker fags, sit down and let me drop fucking libertarian truth fucking epic bomb.
Find your own niche don't be the alt right lite, it detracts from some of the wonderful sources that are present in the OP.

Also, before anyone says, being an unrepentant asshole worked for Donald Trump; you're no Donald Trump. The libertarians have no Trump. The closest thing is Austin Petersen and he's a medium talent troll.

There's a time and place to be an asshole. Making it your "sthick" isn't going to help the cause.

I agree with Rothbard and Hoppe that libertarianism is a right wing movement, and that our leftist elements are useful idiots at best, and a cancer that can only be cured by one way helicopter rides at the far more likely worst.

We're not "stealing your memes, bro."

We are true Sup Forumsacks and we belong to this culture. I have no issue with you. Deal with it.

I quite like Nozick's defence of some state functions: a state is at least required to defend natural rights, something that isn't a requirement in something like a private dispute resolution service as opposed to a court

>Communists or democrats?
>In my libertarian social order?
>So to speak.
>FREE PHYSICAL REMOVAL

i need this meme tbf

Daily reminder, you're not a libertarian if you don't support the space elevator. It's the only way to end taxation, and taxation is theft.

What you see here is genuine. Our movement has been invaded by leftist kikes that interpret non aggression poorly and pervert it to a leftist Utopian fairy tale. I refuse to let such a noble cause to go down in history as the garbage it is presented as today.

How are we going to create a libertarian social order? The only way I can think of is buy a lot of property in a remote state and raise a large family instilled with the values of liberty, and then they go out and repeat the process.

You don't like Jews either?
We should form a covenant.

No fuck Jews. I like rothbard, but he's dead so don't worry about him.

Yeah own land away from the city. Aside from property tax you're now living in a libertarian social order.

Libertarian society does not preclude the idea of contracts.


It would, instead, become financially infeasible to try and operate as someone who plays fast and loose with someone else. Corporations would not be able to guarantee that investors would be financially insulated from any risk associated with owning part of the company, and criminals would instead be stuck working off the value of whatever they, say, happened to steal. The problem is that this would most likely lead to a situation where by humans all live in some version of a gated community. Think of modern trends in the US where people demand to live in a community that perfectly reflects their values, and give it crack.


You can make use of something without agreeing with the underlying principals it represents. Otherwise you're suggesting prisoners who consume prison provided food agree with their prison sentences, or that every tax paying citizen agrees with any war the government is involved in. In the case of roads, you don't really have a choice; failure to pay taxes would obliterate your credit score and the IRS has the right to completely ass ram you for it too. You may make use of them, and pay for them, but it doesn't mean you have to like the system.


Phones on the other hand? You have a right to some leeway. Buy an older, used phone, use your phone well past the point where you cellphone company tries to get you to step up to the latest model.


...and the enforcement of contracts. Libertarian states recognize the need for government but refuse to allow any organ of it to be remotely corruptible.

yeah, you only think that because you're in the internet sphere and not the public one

bump

Do you know where you are?
How many layers or role playing are you on right now?

On a more serious note, what part of any of those images are Libertarians being smug or assholes? The images seem to advocate for standing up for your true values. Sorry if that's not a popular opinion but libertarianism is more about sticking to your principles than dumbing them down for normies.

What are the benefits of AnCap or Hoppean Lib over NatSoc?

There is no single point of failure in an libertarian society.
All the (((enemy))) has to do to beat NatSoc is subvert the leader.
A libertarian society is also more moral than a NatSoc one. The only justification for NatSoc is basically the ends justify the means.

>What are the benefits of AnCap or Hoppean Lib over NatSoc?
Higher levels of production.
Having to work much less harder.
Much more leisure time to spend with your family.
Freedom
Guns
Fun things

...

It really is peculiar that the U.S has so many libertarians. It's like they fell in love with the image of America and not America itself.

The U.S has literally never had the kind of free trade libertarians talk about and for almost all of it's history has had varying degrees of protectionism and high tariffs, even across state lines.

They would have been much better without these tarriffs

There is more to libertarianism than free trade.

America in 1880-1910 was a pretty special time

Careful what you wish for. The Gilded Age was only good for 5% of population. The rest lived in poverty and social issues were rampant.

>Careful what you wish for. The Gilded Age was only good for 5% of population. The rest lived in poverty and social issues were rampant.
Kill yourself
the gilded age dramatically increase living standards for the working class
wages rose while prices fell every year

obviously they werent as economically productive as today but they were far far far better than EVERYTHING that came before it

we need to go back to gilded age laws

I think that was more to do with the industrial revolution and mass immigration than the free market.
Most of the bad things that happened in that time were literally due to the government and big corporations being in cahoots.

why?

user are u ready for Bizzrkeley next week?

its time

>the gilded age dramatically increase living standards for the working class

So what? Economic inequality and poverty are still huge problems.

I mean, economic inequality is literally the best marker for how much crime a society has.

>Economic inequality
lmao this means ABSOLUTELY NOTHING
and people who use the inequality argument are simply delusional and extremely confused

The congo has the least amount of income inequality, do you want to go there?

>I mean, economic inequality is literally the best marker for how much crime a society has.
No it's not lol.

You've fallen hard for the leftist propaganda. They love to portray the Gilded Age as an era of abject poverty and misery, so they can paint the elitist progressives like Wilson and Roosevelt as the knights in shining armor who saved the people from "robber barons". Utter bullshit.

In reality, the Gilded Age was marked by an enormous increase in the quality of life for all, absolutely unparalleled in the decades since. Individuals, from the poorest miner to the richest entrepreneur, enjoyed a rate of increase in real wages QUADRUPLE of what we have today.

Source: books.google.com/books?id=ot2nTzyw7v8C&pg=PA237&dq=gilded age real wages growth&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjPx_KA95jTAhUn_IMKHdlKDcUQ6AEIKjAB#v=onepage&q=gilded age real wages growth&f=false

>tl;dr lassiez-faire is good

>No it's not lol.

Yes it is. The higher a country's Gini coefficient the more murder it has.

It's literally one of the most well researched and well-documented correlations in all of sociology and economics.

>The higher a country's Gini coefficient the more murder it has.
Correlation does not equal causation. The idea that these things are correlated is absolutely retarded.

According to your logic, the congo should have the lowest murder rate.
Also Japan has high income inequality, so does Switzerland. They've got extremely low murder rates.

>It's literally one of the most well researched and well-documented correlations in all of sociology and economics.
This statement is hilariously flawed and you're a useful idiot for believing it.

So, what is the cause of the insane numbers of murders in a country like the U.S then?

People just like to kill each other in America?

>So, what is the cause of the insane numbers of murders in a country like the U.S then?
Several other factors?

Mainly blacks.

Income inequality isn't a good measure of living standards for the working class. It's pretty useless.

>Mainly blacks.

Yeah and blacks as a group are poorer than whites and Asians in the U.S, hence inequality.

>So what? Economic inequality and poverty are still huge problems.
To say "so what?" to the fact that the same people you claim to defend had their living standards heavily increased is ridiculous. A lot of claims and myths regarding the Gilded Age are simply false or misleading, like the Standard Oil meme. If what you and the left say about the Gilded Age were true, how do you reconcile that with the fact that the US at the time experienced an unprecedented amount of immigration from all over the world? Do people go out of their way to move to countries where they will be stomped on by the elite?

What exactly is false and misleading about the fact that for most of the Gilded Age, there was abundant child labor and there was no 8 hour work day?

I'm not denying the economic progress, but what kind of cost are you willing to produce?

I mean, slavery would also be extremely efficient. You just have to pay them for food and shelter, and you can literally work them till death.

at what kind of social cost are you willing to increase production*, I meant to say.

Blacks are poorer than Whites because they have a lower IQ.

Also, this post is dishonest by omission. Was the time period before the Gilded Age more prosperous?

>social issues were rampant
Could that be because right before the Gilded Age, the United States ended a Civil War?

Social unrest.

Like in trance, the young man went into the changing room of the production complex and absently opened the baggy sheet door of his spint. ..Dismissal" - this word sounded like
the cut of a razor in the ear of each listener in this time. It was related to the word ..liquidation", because it was the destruction of the social existence. Being dismissed meant
to get no more Globes, as the international currency was called since the year 2018. If Frank would not find a new employment as soon as possible, he could lose his apartment, his food and finally also his life. Any social security, warranted by the state, had completely been abolished since the total collapse of world economy in winter 2012/13. And it was more than difficult, to find work in a time, in which the industrial production in old Central and Western Europe had mostly been outsourced to the Third
World. Therefore, millions of Europeans tried to survive by doing extremly bad paid jobs in this dark present. They had nothing to lose, so they were glad about every breadline wage they could get. Those, who were not able to find a
possibility to earn some money in any way, ended as beggars and homeless people, hanging around under bridges or in vacant house ruins.

>Yeah and blacks as a group are poorer than whites and Asians in the U.S, hence inequality.
>poverty is the reason black people kill people
Do you REALLY want to start up this discussion again, on Sup Forums of all places?