Why isn't there a maximum wage?

...

Other urls found in this thread:

theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/the-panama-papers-how-the-worlds-rich-and-famous-hide-their-money-offshore
twitter.com/AnonBabble

because that's retarded

Wow, dat pic. It really made me think.

bcoz there is no limit to the value someone can bring to the marketplace.

income correlated with the value you give the markeplace.

Because there is no limit to human excellence.

>disincentives excellence
>unenforceable without global government
>communist

Who cares, jobs are a retarded way to earn income anyway. Think about it and compare with alternatives.

At a 40% tax rate, there technically will be an upper limit to what you can bring home.

/thread.

If a person knows what moves to make in the business world, they earned it. Everyone has the capability to be the best they can be. Some are either don't have what it takes or are just born without the proper means.

Don't drag other people down because you can't play the game or are envious.

PS. Taxation is theft

But only the CEOs and executives have the power to establish who's the most valuable. And coincidentally they value themselves the most.

This is as retarded as giving Congress power of the purse and coincidentally they give themselves raises every year.

>BASED.

Need more workers on boards.
Pay Ratios; Company does well everyone benefits, from the top through.

>Elon Musk gets cucked by the Maximum wage
>No longer invests in solar panels or SpaceX

Part of the reason people are given salaries is to invest. It is expected that someone who has successfully founded a business will be able to invest his money in the future. When he invests his money in a business that creates jobs, wealth, and economic growth.

yep, taxation is theft. Gotta call things what they are.

>thought 1
If those 1000 people aren't necessary for running the business, firing them makes sense.
>thought 2
Starting a new subsidiary and transferring loyal employees makes more sense.

problem is businesses are just sitting on cash and not investing

It's just the wage, you can have multiple jobs, it's what rich people has to do anyway.

because complacency is a shit ideology.

but mostly because jews dont want to cap their income.

>they invest it

Good goy

theguardian.com/news/2016/apr/03/the-panama-papers-how-the-worlds-rich-and-famous-hide-their-money-offshore

no, the market will decide what's valuable or not. If the CEO/Executive gets it wrong, their business suffers.

If the CEO doesn't value you, change CEOs or become CEO.

to bad. people should be capped and still excepted to put in the same amount of work. Think that is a hard truth? Deal with it.

If you want to be a CEO your max salary should be $1 million per year while still expected to preform to the same standard as someone making $50 million

Why? For the sake of everyone else. You simply can't be afforded that much wealth, off the backs of others. Think the pay is too low? Then don't be a CEO, someone who can gain another form of satisfaction other than money should do it.

>there are people who are richer than you boo uuu what a monsters, you are the one that deserves that money!
I know that life isn't fair, but that's how it works.

What does that even mean? You think they have a vault somewhere stacked with dollar bills?

Because their is an absolute minimum of work a human can do, to do no work and thus no value. But their isn't a true restricting to how much value you can produce if you ignore time. So there is already a maximum wage, it's the amount of time your alive.

I would say there is this thing called business ethics but that is a myth.

In truth it used to be that a CEO had to work with less because most of the money went toward the product. This is when a business first starts.

Most businesses today are past this phase and have established products that they can further refine and reduce costs for production. So CEOs think short term. Layoff employees and bump their stock up for the next quarter while their quality suffers.

some do. But maybe not in notes, but in cash investments.

this

Multinationals are sitting on cash deposits in offshore accounts because bringing that money back to the US to spend/invest would cost roughly 33% of the profits in tax

Because that's anti-Koch, you commie!

Yep, can be the owner/investor. Then the CEO/Executives are management agents for your business.

Your capital you invested works for you passively (virtually no time spent earning the profits)

This is where to be :)

>human
>excellence
This is already bewildering, but then you went further
>It's CEOs who are displaying it
You've just reached madness.

This lying sack of shit. He failed to mention the $5 billion+ he stole from taxpayers.

I know you are trying to turn back around, but no. There should be an absolute limit on what anyone should make, while still preforming at max results.

The top 1% don't get paid in wages you economic illiterate

>Horsey

>why is this shit on page 1
stop bumping this retarded 1-sentence question thread thread you fucking nu-retards

what?

Because with the stroke of a pen, a CEO can double the value of his company, or cripple it. It takes education and experience, both of which takes years of development. That's why they get the big dollars.

Bruce the janitor can't do that.

well the owner of the corporation has incentive to pay the CEO (An employee) as low as possible. So the question is, why are owner's happy to forego profit to pay them more?

If the CEO isn't paid as much, then it would be likely the owners would get higher dividends instead.

if there was a maximum wage successful people would just work a few months out of the year and then close down the shop til next january since theres no point for them to continue working

now that we got the retarded question from op out of the way lets discuss how retarded his picture is

>im worth x a year

this sentence makes no sense whatsoever, and no board would care how wealthy a ceo is, only how much he can improve the company

a lot of companies, including the one i used to work for, are operating at a loss, which means every year they earn slightly less than they spend. but we are talking about such large sums of money, and such large sums of people that they would rather borrow 100 million dollars to keep the company alive, because if the economy turns around they can make the money back in a decade or two, and in certain cases a government will intervene and either loan them the money at a ridiculously low interest, or simply force them to keep the company alive

tldr the economy sucks and people get laid off because of the government. because of high taxes and retarded rules that make it almost impossible for people to make money

what im trying to say is that if you unironically think there should be a maximum wage, just end your fucking life and spare us your retarded drivel

>meanwhile, congress voted to give themselves annual pay raises

Unless you're a member of the party, da?

Get a load of this retard.

That same margin of loss could be prevented by reducing the major operative cost that it's wages, but instead of reducing the workers wages you reduce the CEO wages, and at the end of the year you can operate on profit.

I didn't think there was a limit on results...unless you arbitrary put them there.

max results indeed... get out of your scarcity mindset and go learn how to find abundance.

What's the incentive for the CEO to work there then?

Keep in mind that the CEO would generally have years of education and experience in that role or similar roles. If the money's in owning the company, then why would anyone become CEO when your income is capped?

If there was a maximum wage the rest of the money would just be granted in bonuses or other loopholes. Not to mention what would giant companies do with all the excess money? Pay taxes?

>why isn't there a maximum King's ransom

that might be true if you are talking about a company with a hundred employees. but what if you have 100.000 employees in 50 different countries? you can either reduce the ceos wage by 100k or reduce each workers wage by 1 dollar

and theres plenty of examples of ceos just straight up removing their own wage for the sake of the company surviving

>Why isn't there a maximum wage?

Because we're not commie faggots who need to grow the fuck up, you dim cunt.

exactly.

Finding the price point for which an effective executive can be employed by the owner,

Owner wishes to minimise cost of CEO. CEO wishes to maximise their income. Market forces (with constraints/interference from regulations) to find price point.

But there's more example of CEOs that don't.

Enron comes to mind.

The problem isn't people having too much, it's people having too little. You're not helping the latter by punishing the former.

You know cash investments are investing in... things that make money.

Investing doesn't make money out of thin air, you gotta invest in companies that actually can turn enough profit to reward investors. That money is also taxed through various means.

Holy shit, stop smoking weed and get a job.

>why is there no limit on voluntary human interactions that i don't approve of?
>why aren't my arbitrary whims imposed on other people?
>clearly i should have a say on how much X can pay Y
Leftism is a mental illness.

Perhaps if more people learn how to effectively be a CEO of a corporation, then you could use market forces to lower their price. How about you get to it?

(Increase supply)

I'm a national socialist, but this is just retarded.
>let's cap achievement

There should be a proportional cap, though. That is, no more ridiculous instances of a CEO making over 1000 times the median worker's salary of his company.

What are you responding to?

That wasn't what was talked about.

Regardless of what you said (which your mostly correct), it was about whether or not corporations are sitting on cash. "Cash" can mean notes or other cash investments.

See
Your plan would execute the American private sector entirely. No private sector = no jobs. No jobs = no money for anyone. No money = America would fall. Although, I wouldn't doubt that that is what you really want.

Wow, I never thought of it that way. I guess we should just print money and hand it out to homeless people.

what a brainwashed little wage cuck, there is just no educating you, is there?

Communism has never worked, and will never work. Even China, which claims to be communist, is actually capitalist. Goes to show that Marxist and Leninist communism simply aren't compatible with the real world.

>pol supports stopping shitskin abortions
>pol supports a neocon war mongerer globalist president
>pol supports religion
>pol supports capitalism
hearty fucking kek

>The problem isn't people having too much
>global .01% own more wealth than the poorest 50%
>mfw social darwinists

is pol littered with millionaires or are they just plain stupid who don't see complete automation coming? you think your wage cuck paper pushing job will be around a few years from now or are you going to brag about being a plumber?

>Communism has never worked, and will never work
fucking moron, scandinavian countries are already having to resort to a universal basic income because of mass unemployment and guess what? all evidence so far shows it being a success. are you going to keep sucking corporate cock when your shit job is outsourced to some third world shit hole?

or are they clever and got out of a "job" and created businesses that automate businesses :)

The memes of production.

Some jobs are safe... prefer a massage from a hot chick rather than a robot thanks :)

>to bad
>It continues to happen in Capitalism
>B-But muh maximum wage
Fuck you, if I knew I was gonna stop earning more money with the work I do I'd work as hard as it capped at, period.

Because us Americans pay for that shit. They generally don't pay for things like militaries and such because we have our cocks firmly implanted in their rectums. Fuck off Bernie.

>. No private sector = no jobs

ignorantly wrong. the biggest employer in any country, ever is always the government. you know what countries do in urgent times? make government jobs and boost spending. money is fucking meaningless, don't fucking kid yourself thinking corporate interests are for humanity's well being. the private sector is only good at one thing, it's making as much money as possible from selling gullible retards like you useless shit at your and the planet's expense. eg: sugary drinks, plastic bottles, reality TV entertainment. the government is the only entity capable of accomplishing anything that actually matters like providing public goods and services, diplomacy, and research and development

pol is basically just retarded. they'll push their ideals no matter how ridiculous it becomes. anyone who actually defends the disgusting capitalist jew economy we live in and isn't a multi millionaire beneficiary is just a cucked fool.

it's like the poltards who started toting about god bullshit and muh religion after being atheist their whole lives because it goes against libtards

CEOs don't decide their own value retard. They're employed by the board who decide what they're worth

What???!

How does Government pay for government jobs?

Think about it...

>don't fucking kid yourself thinking corporate interests are for humanity's well being
>Thinks governments care about their citizens
Wew lad

what the fuck does the military have to do with anything? the army is nothing but a big government jobs program anyway, so what the fuck are you trying to say?

You are insane.

Government has the supermonopoly on immorality: theft, kidnapping and murder.

Government has trouble providing anything, and costs more than twice as much as a private offering.

I would suggest you go learn the basics...

Mike Maloney runs a good youtube video series: Hidden Secrets of Money.

I'm saying that the moment we stop supporting the socialist countries with our military, and the moment the EU crumbles, they would fail.
Look at Venezuela for instance. We help them with our military and they still fell.

>How does Government pay for government jobs?
yes it does, or are you a retard who thinks taxation is theft? it's constitutionally required for you to be taxed, jackass don't tell me the social contract triggers you. government pays for everything with revenue which it receives from taxes. tax money IS NOT YOURS

There is a minimum wage so that people can't legally pay someone 10 cents to do a job like a slave

We simply do not need this when we're talking about higher wages

>Take something from someone
>It's not yours because I have more power than you
Don't you have the midterms to worry about, Mr Sanders?

Good luck living in a country with only Government jobs.

It's really quite astonishing this has to be explained to people who aren't children.

you're likely an overweight, white, 25 year old with right wing extremist views who has the luxury of shitposting 24/7 from the comfort of his father's gated community home. unless you're black, brown, born in the ghetto with no job prospects other than being a gang banger peddling drugs on the street, i'd say government is doing a damn good job pampering your fat, privileged american dumb ass

I looked up the highest paid CEOs the other day. The top 10 all make well over 50 million dollars.

Meanwhile the CEO of my company makes 1.2 million euros. Really makes me think

Stop projecting Bernie. You're the one with 3 houses after all.

What company do you work at, user?

Why not? What if that's the best job they can find? How do you feel about internships that pay people NOTHING but learn a skill that will help them obtain a higher waged job? I think most internships are a scam unless they are for white collar jobs.

>CEOs don't decide their own value retard. They're employed by the board who decide what they're worth
>what is nepotism
>what is the capitalist scam
>what is making hand over fist in interest for simply being born into wealth

do you not see what the fuck is going on in the white house? don't kid yourself thinking the people at the top are holding each other to any kind of accountability

Using a company that went belly up 16-17 years ago as an example doesn't really strengthen your point.

The laffer curve does not apply to individuals.

Won't say but has 100k+ employees and is a top software company by sales

>>what is nepotism
>>what is the capitalist scam
>>what is making hand over fist in interest for simply being born into wealth

All different discussion points that are very weakly related to the laughable idea that there should be a price ceiling on CEO salaries

Taxation is theft by definition. There is no social contract.

Government steals from Makers to give to the Takers.

You have no Makers (entrepreneurs, businesses), and you Takers will starve.

Well said

40 percent of 100 dollars is 40
40 percent of 100 billion dollars is 40 billion

Sounds like terrible fucking planning to me.

and? They're a corporation they're doing everything they can to insure they maintain as much profit as they can.

>Rare
Sup Forums user who knows something past Econ 101
glad to see there are a few educated people on here

Fuck off commie.

t. colored boy who lived in the ghetto

let me explain the core evil of socialism/social welfare:

basically it reverses the natural order of man, it allows for someone who doesn't earn something to have a level of safety so they never push or strive for anything greater, look at europe completely cucked after beta breeding caused by socialism over 30-40 years. literally every communist / socialist society has grown or reversed its course v a competitive based society. that's why tribes still live in huts, if you don't ever need to do anything you won't.

Yep, I would avoid being mugged too.

>why no maximum wage
>because Jeb et al want a right to rise
>meaning he thinks everyone should be able to earn enough so that their family never needs to work ever for any generation until there is a global revolution.