If you're a Nazi, you can't be patriotic

> You're saluting a foreign flag that represents a political ideology and party rather than your own country.
> You're praising a single man who may not even be native to your country.
> You don't need Nazism to get rid of Jews: (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisemitism#Manifestations).
> Nazism is a socialist ideology. It is literally called the "National-SOCIALIST German Workers' Party" and Hitler himself stated that he looks up to socialism and despises capitalism, despite the father of socialism being Karl Marx who is a Jew.
> Nazism gives too much power to the government, screwing over citizens in the process.
> Hitler attempted to take over other countries and spread his ideology, making him a globalist.

Stormfags who think they are doing it for their country are so far up their arses they can see the perfect representation of Hitler: a steaming pile of shit.

Don't worry, anglo, you weren't and you will never be a nazi, even a fascist. Bye.

natsoc is bullshit anyways

"Nazis" don't CALL themself Nazis you idiot. That's an insult made up by Jews. They're National Socialists, it's an ideology that has nothing to do with Germany specifically.

I'm not even Anglo, am Pajeet and Muslim. FYI, Hitler sucked Muslim cock (pic related).

> They're not called "Nazis".
What fucking difference does it make? It's still a failed socialist ideology.

Never said that or suggested that.

Sorry spaghetti boy, but in the eyes of hitler the italians were like lazy germans.

Hitler hated socialism and communism and worked to destroy these ideologies. Nazism, confused as it was, was based on race, and fundamentally different from class focused socialism.

>defying the NSDAP aesthetics
You must a special type of faggot.

Nationalism Socialism inevitably had to take place against the jewish influence and and was more of a Nationalist enlightenment but even it failed, you can rest assure that what Nazism did to the west might just the ethics we've needed to fire up another stand up against post-modernism and Marxism's hypocrisy in general. And you can see it today through the popularization of "alternative media" and the rise of (hopefully not fake glöbalist) right wing politicians/parties.

Honestly after seeing how "national socialists" post and what they believe, I'd say OP is right about them not being nationalists at all.

They are just reverse communists. They assume power through violence/oppression of opposition, believe in a centralized dictatorship/oligarchy and refuse any other alternative.

I don't think a nation keeps its identity if it goes Nazi or Commie. Either way, the end product is going to be a new country than the one it left behind.

Commies at least have the balls to admit they are trying to crash our nations and bring in a new era.
Natsocs are cowards latching onto conservatives and pretend to be nationalists for the current system; yet they aren't nationalists at all.

The biggest cancer of all is American Natsoc and Commies. Both of these are a complete betrayal of everything about our nation's founding.

If you told George Washington you were an authoritarian, he would probably call you a faggot.

>Hey KIKE! I'm a "National Socialist" not a "Nazi"...

Like fucking clockwork.

Nazis are fags, sanders for president

I bet Thomas Jefferson is rolling in his grave right now. Shame to see what has happened to your country.

> National socialists are bad.
> A socialist candidate is good.

Pick one.

>complete betrayal of everything about our nation's founding
And the current state of the country isn't?
60% of the country is obese, conservatives are the biggest losers, country is slowly turning brown.

If you told George Washington you were a civic nationalist and a republican who supports waging war overseas, he would have shot you between the eyes.

Nope, we wanted Trump.

However Trump actually doing the things he campaigned on is already turning Nazis off.
why?
Because they are realizing they aren't actually American nationalists. They are their own category: cancer

>we are gonna rebuild our military and play tough on the global stage again!
>America first!
Sup Forums cheers
>he actually starts doing it
WTF, KIKE SHILL, OMG!
I can't believe he would be in favor of the USA's geopolitical strategy!
I guess I'll just support Putin again, even though he is doing the exact same thing from a Russian perspective and openly hates Natsoc.

I forgot to mention the biggest laughing stock of the nation: libertarians

>Honestly after seeing how "national socialists" post and what they believe, I'd say OP is right about them not being nationalists at all.
What have they posted that makes you believe that?
>They are just reverse communists. They assume power through violence/oppression of opposition, believe in a centralized dictatorship/oligarchy and refuse any other alternative.
That doesn't really make them ideologically similar to communism. You might as well say they are monarchists. I think you just tend to view all authoritarian systems as the same when they aren't and that is a naive way of looking at things.
>I don't think a nation keeps its identity if it goes Nazi or Commie. Either way, the end product is going to be a new country than the one it left behind.
Well yes? When countries change leadership or government style it is a different country than before. The same could be said about the US when it stopped being a colony. So it is a uselessly vague point that doesn't mean a whole ton by itself.
>Natsocs are cowards latching onto conservatives and pretend to be nationalists for the current system; yet they aren't nationalists at all.
I tend to think they believe in self-determination for a people based off of shared history, culture, and values which I'd consider nationalist.
>The biggest cancer of all is American Natsoc and Commies. Both of these are a complete betrayal of everything about our nation's founding.
I will let you respond as to why you think that it Nazis are bad, but arguing to the values of the founding fathers is good persuasion, but bad logic.
>If you told George Washington you were an authoritarian, he would probably call you a faggot.
What is the Whiskey Rebellion?

If it failed, then why was Germany the most successful country in the world following WOW?

>inb4 WWII
That has nothing to do with National Socialism

Thomas Jefferson was cancer.
By far the worst founding father.
>had jungle fever
>fathered illegitimate half nigger kids
>wrote anti-slavery/nigger sympathy philosophy

Abraham Lincoln would be rolling in his grave though.
He had the right ideas. Ban alcohol/drugs, and send all nigs back to Africa. Declare the US a Christian state. etc etc.

GET MEME-C UCKED PLEBBIT FAGS

see
>inb4 your only defense is, blah blah wars for Israel conspiracy theory
>I hate jews!
we get it, thats the only strawman you have. However you are still a traitor.

Because it created an artificial economy created and regulated by the state. It nationalised its central bank.

natsocs thought they could ride on the patriotic tone of the Trump campaign. It turned out however that nobody wanted their flavour of socialism, and now they are butthurt.

Not even beady eyes himself?

>If you're not a nazi you're a commie

Jokes on you faggot i respect national socialism and want to learn from it,but of course i a continue a movement that started in my own country with owr own ideals,politics etc.

Muhammad sucked his own cock while covering himself in pig shit.

>a leaf
(you)

>the eternal anglo baiting aryans for his blood refineries
dont fall for the anglo's tricks

How can you be a Muslim and a patriot? Don't you know Muhammad wasn't from India? Didn't you know Muhammad took over other countries to spread his ideology, making him a globalist? Fucking Pajeets.

Nice try faggot.

Read the fucking Mein Kampf, it is about Germany you fucking burger

National socialism can be applied to any race like communism can.

The US (and Canada) have been Jewish controlled abominations for a long time. Patriotism is for unthinking faggots.

Your allegiance should lie with your race and not a country that is the breeding ground for hyper-liberalism and the military arm of ZOG.

Capitalism creates artificial power and influence through wealth, wealth isn't necessarily associated with intelligence or the capability to make important decisions for millions of people around the globe. Take trump, Soros and all those corrupt corporate multinationals who are directly making decisions for the people. Trump wouldn't be the president if he had no money, Soros wouldn't be able to achieve his political agenda if he didn't had money, the list goes on and on.

A free market is literally unsustainable because it relies on poorer countries to do production for you to sustain your own artificial living standard. Nationalism with free market capitalism would just turn 90% of the population into serfdom because they'll be endlessly exploited by the rich people.

And you know, the second that happens you won't be far away from a revolution, that's why the current system rather exploits shitskins so every pleb can own the latest tech and clothes in our first-world.

> Patriotism is stupid because Jews control countries.

You do know that love of one's country and culture does not equal love of authority, right?

>we get it, thats the only strawman you have. However you are still a traitor.
I didn't say anything like that. I have no problem with the strike on Syria. I am also not a stormnigger so please don't lump me in with them. The primary opposition I've seen to the strikes is /sg/ which I don't think are really Fascists and libertarians who don't believe in intervention.
Also liking the strike, if you actually do like it, while criticizing authoritarianism is stupid because employing force on others is the basis for it.

Nationalising your banks is by far the best thing a country can do for itself. It's the only thing that frees you from Jewish control.

But it transfers power to the government, making it more corrupt. Simply kick out Jews and the problem should fix itself.

North American "culture" has been shit tier for a long time. It's been Jewish pushed decadence since after the WW1.

Because white people would never take advantage of other white people over something so unnecessary as money.

I have bad news for you pal, your country was even willing to put them into death camps (south africa).

> A free market is literally unsustainable

Do you know fucking anything about basic economics? The free market is sustainable because it is one of the most efficient ways to allocate resources in an economy.

Pop culture does not equal Western culture. Pop culture is twerking. Western culture is intellect and art.

The only real nazis here are not nazis. Everyone knows that Sup Forums is only ironically racist and knows about the hardcore (((nazis))). Facts are not racist.

If you submit to the ZOG you aren't patriotic.

Neither is submitting to an inverted Hindu symbol.

>>Do you know fucking anything about basic economics? The free market is sustainable because it is one of the most efficient ways to allocate resources in an economy.
That would be sustainable if we were logical beings only concerned with efficiency, but we aren't. People are inherently irrational and therefore a perfectly rational system is not perfect for us.

The swastika is a universal symbol that has been used by pretty much every culture..

>Do you know fucking anything about basic economics?

Do you know anything about natural resources or climate change? A free market only works because you have a unlimited supply of cheap shitskins to produce your shit and pollute the air and heat up the climate. Corporate multinationals are literally poisoning your food and destroying the globe all for money, a human invention. They aren't the ones looking for a solution, they will just continue doing so until we stop them.

> Four books, all by the same author.

> Four books, all by the same author.

>The young man who joins a political party is a traitor to his generation and his race
The Iron Guard is the ultimate redpill. Respect.

The whole point of economics is to allocate natural resources since they are all inherently scarce (look up the "economic problem"). A free market, although imperfect, is highly efficient. Pick up a book instead of listening to leftist horseshite about muh climate change and muh rich people.

>> Four books, all by the same author.
Yes and? Seems like an easy way for you to dismiss the argument rather than refute it. Which is fine. I assumed you couldn't be convinced, but lurkers reading this might.
Also, going with a character style attack isn't very smart when Pat Buchanan isn't a Nazi/Stormnigger/whatever you want to call him. All it does is lend credence to the fact that "Y'know maybe those nazis weren't wrong about everything if other liberty minded individuals see the same issues". Bad persuasion.

Economic policies actually worked though

>too much power to the government
As opposed to the sellout puppet ones we have now or the libtardarian completely open borders

>spread his ideology
Yeah not like you capitalists haven't done that or anything

Thank whomever made that for pointing out that the true believers actually DO BELIEVE, and that they will do whatever it takes for their dream to come true.

That their dream is terrible is of no consequence to them.

If you showed George Washington the state of white countries today he'd probably become an authoritarian

Also you completely ignored my point about the basic issue with the premise of libertarianism. It is largely based around the idea that rational actors will compete with each other and that ultimately the best ideas will rise to the surface and everything will work out.

If people aren't rational actors, or if they are rational about only a small number of things, then the system no longer works even in principle.

>Thank whomever made that for pointing out that the true believers actually DO BELIEVE, and that they will do whatever it takes for their dream to come true.
>That their dream is terrible is of no consequence to them.
You sound like you've read some Machiavelli as well. Have you?

Yeah, they were big time hypocrites.

I agree, Libertarianism is retarded, but that does not change the fact that larger governments mean fewer freedoms for citizens and slow economic growth.

>t. r/efugee

>A free market is highly efficient

Stopped reading here, if you think producing a pair of jeans in Bangladesh is more efficient than producing a pair of Jeans in your own country then I don't fucking know anymore, yes it's more cost efficient for the one who is ordering the jeans in terms of profit, but that doesn't mean it's more efficient in terms of natural resources. A free market only works if you think in money.

You're just another brainwashed sheep who refutes anything socialist because he's been drilled to do so. Poor guy. The fact that you refute a simple fact like climate change shows just how retarded you really are.

>and slow economic growth

Ah, spotted the kike loving consumerist.

Except that I completely detest race mixing.

REDDIT GO AWAY

>it's ok user I don't like blacks either

wtf I love leddit now

>yes it's more cost efficient for the one who is ordering the jeans in terms of profit, but that doesn't mean it's more efficient in terms of natural resources

It is more efficient in terms of natural resources. Resources cost money. Producers want to maximise production with the least amount of resources. Study some basic economics and you can learn something.

If we're going down to that then I should be advocating for separation from Cuckada.
It's true there's no common culture across all of Canada but provinces do have common culture within themselves

>love of authority
No but if there was an authority to stop my land being flooded with nonwhites I'd support it for the time being

>I agree, Libertarianism is retarded, but that does not change the fact that larger governments mean fewer freedoms for citizens and slow economic growth.
It can and oftentimes does. You should limit government as much as you can afford to. That being said the other user I was talking to had a really shallow view Fascism. Whenever someone starts comparing Fascism with Communism and reaches the conclusion that they are similar I end up thinking they're stupid. They aren't similar other than that both are radical authoritarian movements. That is where the similarities end. Not saying that you believe those things, but this image ends up being what I think about those people.

It's more cost efficient in human resources, just how stupid are you exactly? How hard is it to grasp such a simple concept. You use just as many resources in bangladesh as you do in the UK, those resources might cost less, but you still use just as much which is what matters in the end.

There are some that should be restricted

For example race mixing should be bammed for all races there should be no mass nonwhite immigration Islam should be outlawed and Muslims kicked out Jews need to at very least be booted out of the country to Israel

Why would handing power to a government result in more corruption than handing power to a few big companies?

Logically it should be the exact opposite.

Do you know what opportunity cost is? What about the economic problem? Do you know what an AC curve is? You don't even understand secondary school economics.

Ever heard of wastage? It is economically inefficient to waste resources, which happens in socialist countries because of no profit motive.

Race mixing kills all races in the long run. I'm with you.

>Why would handing power to a government result in more corruption than handing power to a few big companies?
Because companies don't have the monopoly on force in theory.

>You will never be a miserable failed ideology that slaughtered millions from the flower of Europe
How will I sleep at night

you tell me, m8

>millions
Hmm I think you mean Stalin here.

>5 million jerries alone bled to death in Russian mud over some autistic shit about a polish corridor
Mm, nice try sweetie

Based anglo lays down the law.

I hope one day all these naive faggots on here will grow up and realize that regardless of the actions of the international jewry or the allies, Nazism would eventually result in a failed state.

But I completely understand that most of them either grew up without a strong father figure or are young men below 25 desperately looking for a strong, masculine anchor in their life. Rather than turn to an ideology or race or a strong man figure for affirmation, they should turn within- self-realization, the rugged individual.

Hitler was a j ew you fag