so did Paul actually die in 1966?
So did Paul actually die in 1966?
Nah. The Beatles were just brilliant marketers.
what do you think George Harrison of the Beatles?
Fuck off George.
...
Bump
Pauls a dead man...miss him...miss him
100%
Turn me on, dead man
>so did Paul actually die in 1966?
He was eaten by a walrus
ku-ku-kachu
If he did then his replacement is a much better songwriter then Paul ever was.
2spoopy4me
Original Paul wrote Eleanor Rigby. Faul wrote all those Wings songs. I'm afraid you're dubbed a faggot for this comment
abbey road thinks so.
Turn me on dead man...
Reminder that ELO is what The Beatles would have sounded like if they had survived until the 80's.
It's goo goo gajoob faggot
Fuck Paul. Worst Beatle. Sage.
True, dead or not
>not understanding that that was a dig at Paul
Paul balanced out John's bullshit. Paul was pop while John was soul.
I meant if the band itself survived, not the members. My bad.
On hindsight I think George could have sufficed in that position, without all the dopey Paul tunes
>/x/
...
Is this a Mandela Effect thread?
Exact same nose and eyebrows in both photos. I don't even see how anyone could come up with a difference
When Paul McCartney does diexactly people will claim he didid in 1966 because of this rumour and we will get another so called Mandela effect
fucking leafs
Don't let the Jew World Order happen.
John Lennon's song 'Imagine' is a JWO anthem.
This is why you're a Nationalist...
this thread is full of fuckin boomers
Browsing the Sup Forums almost makes you wish for a nuclear winter
I agree and I don't necessarily like Paul as a musician. However, without him The Beatles wouldn't exist.
Who cares?
If it is a new guy he wrote the better songs anyway
I think it's a thing with the Mandela effect. New Paul sucks, though. He hangs out with a lot of the Spirit-cooking crowd, which is skeevy in and of itself. John is best Beatle.
*George is best Beatle.
ftfy