Post yfw this 8...

Post yfw this 8.6/10 HAPA cute bitch made the best Classical Liberal counter-arguments against white nationalism so far and basically, your views are based on nothing more than objection to skin color.

youtube.com/watch?v=ZfSTbUVimTg

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=0jFGNQScRNY
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Domesticated_Red_Fox
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
home.uchicago.edu/~tholt/racemixing2003.doc
scribd.com/doc/84235846/Three-Effects-of-Outbreeding
counter-currents.com/2010/09/miscegenation-the-morality-of-death/
majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/genetic_structure_and_outbreeding_depression
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/udry10302003.html
majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_health_consequences_of_race_mixing/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282974
genomebiology.com/2009/10/12/R141/table/T1
time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html
nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/techmemos/tm30/tm30.html
t1nyurl.com/6tr9e6t
jstor.org/pss/1537084
youtube.com/watch?v=F0_NsS1Zdlk
benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

post her nudes

would fug

Yeah I watch her vid. She is only half right and woes is right the other half. But no its more then skin color. It takes a poor understanding of Geopolitics, history, and psychology to think that

Why do female hapas turn out so well and yet male hapas not so much?

I watched some of this live and ended up exiting out of it because I'd heard all the arguments a hundred times before. Listen to the interview Mike Enoch had with Thomas J. Main if you want some interesting discussion, it turns into a debate about halfway through.

Wow, I had no idea that skin color is the only thing affected by evolutionary divergence. And here I was thinking evolution could affect things like intelligence and temperament as well!

It takes a poor understanding of individual identity not to realize that NAXALT cancels out anything more to race than skin color. To believe in ethnonationalism requires an ideological blindness to the extremely numerous exceptions included in every racial stereotype.

>nothing more than objection to skin color
>race is only skin color

You're a fag and an idiot.

It especially takes a very poor understanding of Biology and evolution to think that

white nationalists really need to get their shit together. all they did the entire time whine about how theyre insecure and afraid of non-whites and complain about not getting any pussy.

That was only interesting to you because Main didn't challenge anything Enoch said. You literally just admitted to tuning out as soon as your ideas were challenged.

Were we wrong, Sup Forums?

jeez "roaming millennial" how much more stereotypical can you get

Two reasons

1. Almost any girl is given attention and praise simply by being a girl
2. Women are much more likely to mold their sense of identity on that of the society around them and so don't have the identity issues that male hapas do

Sup Forums is always right

Nice strawman, you little bitch but no. Race is more than skin color, however your objection to multiracial societies amounts to nothing more than objection to skin color because race is a significant but not remotely determinant factor in predicting behavior.

NAXALT is a fallacy you dumb bastard, it's called cherrypicking.

Nice strawman, I said it turned into a debate halfway through, so clearly I was talking about the part where his views are challenged, and I admitted to tuning out as soon as I'd heard the same basic bitch liberal arguments I'd heard the counter-arguments to a hundred times prior. I could go to Facebook if I wanted that.

Nice digits.

You better be Flemish.

Cuck

My faith in white nationalism is restored. Praise Kek!

kys

>however your objection to multiracial societies amounts to nothing more than objection to skin color because race is a significant but not remotely determinant factor in predicting behavior.

What have you done to make sure Israel is a multiracial society?

Have you been calling out Jews and Israel for having an ethnic nation?

Why are you not focusing on them? People who actually have an ethnic nation unlike white people?

because asian genes are more feminine than white genes

an hour and 34 minutes of what sort of shit?

Do you people actually sit through this kind of idiocy?

maybe i would
if she was naked
and masturbating
while talking

whats it to you stranger

I like all this classical liberalism stuff the kids are getting into. Now they've found Paine, JS Mill and Locke they're a book away from getting it all right.

>debating
There's no debate to be had over eternal concepts.

>if she was naked
>and masturbating
>while talking

an hour

and thirty four fucking minutes

maybe 200 years ago people had this sort of attention span. I think I read somewhere that the Lincoln-Douglas debates lasted 10 hours or some such nonsense.

Nobody except a viagra addict can jerk off for an hour and 34 minutes.

A mongrel woman can't understand why people with heritage can identify with others.

She the best reason against having mixed children.

Why does she dye her hair???

Israel probably has a lower proportion of Ashkenazis at this point than America has whites. 25% of the population isn't even Jewish by faith.

And let's dispel once and for all with this fiction that Jews don't believe their own lefty bullshit. Go to Tel Aviv and tell me Jews don't believe their own lefty bullshit.

Shit meme. She's clearly not a centrist.

...

mah nigga

>Shanika Gunaratna
POO IN THE LOO

I knew you were a fucking kike.

How is having a debate idiocy?

or a good goy...

>How is having a debate idiocy?

If it's a legitimate debate then it's fine, even if it's a 12 hour series. I admit I didn't watch any of it; I assumed it's your typical youtube attention whore trying to sound intellectual.

My apologies if it's actually informed and articulate people.

Ah, OK... You're just a troll.

It's good to see how nobody can seriously defend civic nationalism. I can guess why.

I agree with her.
If you want to save whites just cut out mass immigration and be Australia tier with regards to immigration law and go Slav tier when it comes to requirements to asymilate.

>nobody can seriously defend civic nationalism.
>Unironically posts a headline as his argument

It's just your typical YouTube nonsense.

"Debates" are of little significance anyway. The only effective discussion is over a long period of time with distinct gaps in communication where each party collates information and forms a coherent argument on paper before returning correspondence. We need to go back to writing letters, honestly.

Two idiots on stage is a popularity and personality contest.

A debate that went nowhere. Woes was as solid as ever. Civic nationalists still make me laugh.

Good thing is that Woes and Greg got a nice platform and were showcased to the libcucks.

>Race, skin.
There is more to race than meets the eye, however what meets the eye is the easiest way to identify it.
When you and your friend see a cube, you know its a cube, what material its made off you maybe wont be able to figure out, but youll know its a cube.
Same with race, sure they are not all the same, but at this point im ready to claim majority of blacks commit crime.
There are studies that found out that genetically blacks are going to be more aggressive. Warrior gene, warrior gene representation in race.
Furthermore you can check the situation in zimbabwe since forbidding white farmers to work.
>Religion
I think its perfectly sensible for any sane person to not want to be part of an islamic state under sharia law. Stoning, honor killings are not a showcase of a civilised society. Even if sharia wont be established today, i dont want in the future for my kids to be restricted in terms of what to eat drink and how to act. And more so, i dont want them to be forced into a religion, they should find their own path.
And before you say "notallmuslims". Yes, all muslims, they all want to establish sharia law, that is their ideal society, even though every country under sharia law is a shithole, and if not every, most.
There was a muslim speaker, talking about donald trumps muslim ban in USA, he stated "all muslims will leave the country if that happens." Living in a place thats not a sharia law and wont be under sharia law in the future, is unfathomable to them. Even though through constitution and some states specifically banned it already. They still cannot comprehend the concept of living in a state thats not under it.
They dont care about culture of countries they go in, they only care about the money they can suck out off it, and they only care about turning it into another sharia law country.

>8.6/10
What the fuck is that rating? Why not add even more numbers to 10 grade scale? 8.62312412523636341421412 looks good? You fucking moron.
And nobody will watch some cunt rant for more than an hour, you either present her argument or fuck yourself out of here.

>objection to skin color.

Skin color is connected to hormones that effect behavior and probably why black people commit so much crime. The darker the tone the more aggressive the animal.

youtube.com/watch?v=0jFGNQScRNY

The result is that Russian scientists now have a number of domesticated foxes that are fundamentally different in temperament and behavior from their wild forebears. Some important changes in physiology and morphology are now visible, such as mottled or spotted colored fur. Many scientists believe that these changes related to selection for tameness are caused by lower adrenaline production in the new breed, causing physiological changes in very few generations and thus yielding genetic combinations not present in the original species.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_Domesticated_Red_Fox

>tfw to smart to fall for the "race is skin deep" meme

>thousands of years of divergent evolution
>ITS JUST SKIN COLOR GUISE

This bitch needs to read murray.

She has said that she's more of a conservative

Yeah, how about you fuck off with "muh individual" bullshit. Minorities do not act as individuals and "extremely numerous" is not a statistic.

c-cute

By todays standards, anyone who does not support chopping the dicks off children that had accidentally pick up a barby is a conservative.

This conversation from 30:00 onwards I think explains both of their positions but her statements are conflicting. One minute she says she's in favour of racial preservation and the next minute she says that she has no problem with race mixing on an individual basis.

The problem with this should be very obvious to her since she herself is both white an asian but as she says most of her friends are asian. She talks all about assimilation but she herself has not assimilated with American demographics, she has "self segregated" herself from white Americans. These in-group preferences are exactly what MW and the other guy are pointing towards as problems earlier in the discussion.

>skin color
>the same as genetics

Hahaha no. If everyone else gets to have racial pride and preferences, so do white people. Just because white people produce all the goods and services worth having, doesn't mean we have to tolerate being robbed or be called racist.

>not a determinant factor in predicting behavior
Yeah, no.

If anyone ever admits to thinking it's "just skin colour" then there's little reason to continue talking about it with them. You won't convince them otherwise because they fundamentally, dogmatically, oppose the very concept of inequality. By accepting difference they are accepting the potential for superiority or inferiority.

A 'conservative' can very easily be centrist.

>however your objection to multiracial societies amounts to nothing more than objection to skin color

lol no

Intelligence has been shown time and time again to be nurture, not nature. Retardation can be genetic, but that's pretty rare. Everything else you said is right

MY LAND MY PEOPLE!

SHE'S NOT MY PEOPLE!

SEND HER TO SIERRA LEON!

Got any source on that?

So is the IQ difference between mammals merely nurture?

Reducing discussion of wider societal concepts to individual differences is essentially special pleading, and often an attempt to avoid self-reflection as part of your demographic. You see people do it from every socio-cultural group.

It's an intellectually lazy criticism which is almost always applicable, so requires little understanding of the matter at hand, and yet also almost completely vacuous.

I keep trying to teach my dog to do algebra, but he just wont get it. He's was raised in the same environment as everyone else, but I'm beginning to think that is not the cause.

>muh x is just a social construct
kys subhuman maghreb nigger

Of course you don't, stupid nigger
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

Millenial Woes and the othet WN guy made good points which she could hardly refute, all while the nigger just sat there.

Even if i accept this untrue notion we get to a paradox of sorts.
Blacks dont finish schools because of nurture, you cannot change nurture of any black because they dont finish schools.
How would you solve this?

I'm not sure that's the case at all. The general trend I seem to be seeing is that nature is in fact far more important to every aspect of our being than was previously thought.

Whether that's due to an inherent bias on the research or just the result of new technology allowing us to explore areas previously unavailable is an interesting question.

Mixed race = slave race

>White nationalism
>In america

hahahah

Cuckservatives are the biggest centrists.

Reminder that Loaming Millennial made a video with Milo Stewart.

First lie at 6:50

nice one jew

> USA was a multi-ethnic state

NO

>Post yfw this 8.6/10 HAPA cute bitch made the best Classical Liberal counter-arguments against white nationalism so far and basically, your views are based on nothing more than objection to skin color.
>Only 30 minutes in she turns around and says she almost agrees with the two white nationalists and agrees with racial preservation

>Classical Liberal counter-arguments

I'm sorry, I cannot hear you over all these facts:
>Race-mixing is a cause and and contribution to various health issues
home.uchicago.edu/~tholt/racemixing2003.doc
scribd.com/doc/84235846/Three-Effects-of-Outbreeding
counter-currents.com/2010/09/miscegenation-the-morality-of-death/
majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/genetic_structure_and_outbreeding_depression

>Mixedrace children suffer from more health problems:
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1448064/
unc.edu/news/archives/oct03/udry10302003.html
majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/the_health_consequences_of_race_mixing/
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16282974
genomebiology.com/2009/10/12/R141/table/T1
time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1993074,00.html
nwfsc.noaa.gov/publications/techmemos/tm30/tm30.html
t1nyurl.com/6tr9e6t
jstor.org/pss/1537084

Pic source:
www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
1860a document 2 pg 10 and 1860b document 8 pg 64

>Intelligence has been shown time and time again to be nurture, not nature
Nope.

She's not a centrist at all. She's more like Gavin, PJW and the rest of the Alt-Light. They can agree with everything on the Alt-Right except when it comes to the race issue. She even said that several times in the video. I don't understand where the centrist label is coming from because she never labels herself as centrist. You guys are just extremely radically to the tribal authoritarian right. She's more LOLbertarian right.

I actually thought 8.6 was exactly on point and was going to praise OP for accurate taste.

She is totally hot and a very nice mix, but I couldn't listen to this for more than five minutes due to having heard all these arguments before.

Good for Woes though getting more exposure. She has a trillion more subs than he does but possibly she took her name in homage to him. I hope he realized this and made a move on her off-air.

I can't help but feel that I'm falling for bait, but no, it has never been shown to be "nurture"

She is clearly ashamed of her oriental DNA and wants to look more white.

You can put lipstick on a pig, but that doesn't make it a Sarah Palin.

>Alt-Light
Well... the Alt Light are basically centrists.

>You guys are just extremely radically to the tribal authoritarian right.
When you're fighting for survive you have to be extreme.

Sup Forums is pretty autistic, i wouldn't worry about it

>41:00
>I would have nothing against a group of white nationalists moving to a new place and founding their new home city
Yea, and they did. These are called France, Germany, England, Australia, etc. They are a bit bigger than cities, sure, but that was the idea.
>I encourage white people to be prosperous, but why must they do so in an ethnically homogeneous society?
Why do non-whites always feel compelled to come to white countries? Surely they can build their own prosperous societies? Why does diversity always HAVE to happen?

"Nurture" means environment. So get niggers out of my environment then we have a deal.

Keep niggers, change environment, everyone is dumber for it.

All your doing is making a case for subservience of those who exhibit undesirable traits.

African Americans exhibit low intelligence and violent tendencies. They should be told what to do and made to get in line so their environemnt can improve.

They have nothing to contribute beyond that which they are taught by whites.

That is why they are always trying to get away with the "We teach y'all how to break dance. Look at the service we provide"

You're not getting the point about "White" nationalism, as though "White" actually means something. To pretend that a white in Alabama and a white in a former Soviet Republic and a white Parisian all share the same cultural (and even genetic) lineage is retarded. White America wasn't even a thing when we overthrew British rule, being separate regions with remarkably different founding populations that had extreme difficulties co-existing (hence the complete failure of the Articles of Confederation).

Note that "Black" makes sense, but only in an American context, because you know you're speaking about the descendants of slaves taken from a particular area of Africa; it would be absurd to extend this to Philippine Negritos or Australian Aboriginals who also share the same skin color.

Additionally, even if there were a meaningful "White" culture, it would fall apart at the numbers we have; scale matters.

hit that happy pussy woesy

i mean i wont be hard dude
just be edging while doing some bicep curls

happa*

fuck

1:34:45
dropped

Because their countries are shitholes. I know that Sup Forums is full of weeaboos, but even Asian countries are places where normal people don't want to live. Europeans are the only ones who have created succesful societies. That's why they are coming here, even if they're going to ruin our societies with their presence.

The orthodox jews hold the reigns of power and they shit out like 7 kids each. Their are a fuckload of lefty non teligious jews though. Even ben shapiro admits it.

Bro, I think you just changed my life.

youtube.com/watch?v=F0_NsS1Zdlk

benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOPSYJ/TOPSYJ-3-9.pdf

I don't know what's she talking about nor do I care to hear it, but would I shove down my dick in her mouth and jizz over her pretty face?

Fuck yea...

Europeans are genetically pretty close.

Fuck off, leftypol