Have you swallowed a science pill?

Have you swallowed a science pill?
> world ruled by scientists
> everything should be dedicated to scientific progress
> low iq people gased
> aggressive cunts gased
> no wumin in science scholarships, scholarships for those who actually can move science forward
Why is it bad?

Other urls found in this thread:

longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4382996/Hammer-wielding-New-Jersey-woman-attacks-Porsche-owner.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Scientists can be cunts.

It is routine practice to withhold information in scientific articles in order to protect ideas and patents. Scientists won't tell you when they withhold critical information about reproducing the results of their experiment. This is 100% unethical and illegal but they do it anyway.

Because it's the fantasy of an autistic foreveralone who needs to feel validation for being a "high IQ" social outcast who spends time dreaming of a world where he is accepted. Hint: In the world you described you would be immediately gassed.

Most scientists could not be trusted to run a local community center let alone a country
t. scientist

scientists are not leaders user

>Scientists can be cunts.

>It is routine practice to withhold information in scientific articles in order to protect ideas and patents.

Actually no

>Scientists won't tell you when they withhold critical information about reproducing the results of their experiment. This is 100% unethical and illegal but they do it anyway.

"They" don't pass peer review or their publications are disregarded

You must really be super dumb to spout this shit

> an autistic foreveralone
When this place turned reddit?
Also brainies should be given free gfs, for them to be focused on science only.

Why?
Why do we still need alpha male leaders instead of smart managers in 21st century?

> aggressive cunts gased

Big mistake. We need aggressive cunts to fight and die for us. In peace time they can collide in stadiums to entertain the masses.

> fight and die for us
Strong, brave, healthy, but not aggressive, the only usage for aggressive people should be to
> collide in stadiums to entertain the masses.

Engineer here.

Most scientists I know are cuck lefty faggots who sit in ivory towers and live in a make-believe fantasy world.

Practitioners of science are said to have a sworn allegiance to 'facts' and 'evidence' but most of them jump the gun as quickly as most people, if not quicker. Most scientists have a stick up their arse about the right wing because "muh climate change-denying republicans" and along with their academic stature, look down upon anyone who isn't an academic and isn't a lefty.

God I fucking hate scientists

seems great

also you can only reproduce after the publication of 5 scientific articles

Why are scientists lefties? I understand why here, in ex-ussr country they are, but why in the uk?

...

Bunch of reasons spring to mind, one is that they're idealistic. They tend to swallow bluepills regularly such as BLM and Refugees Welcome.

Other reason is that most of them have a huge superiority complex. Since most scientists are atheists they tend to look down on those that are religious. Because the divide between atheists and religious is roughly the same divide between left and right most scientists are closeted Fedoralords who browse /r/atheism and argue with creationists on the internet in between writing there thesis. Look at most popular "PhD procrastinating" memes and a lot of times there is a reference to reddit somewhere.

So here's the problem.
>Diesel cars are more efficient
That's science. You can prove it and you can even make a reasonable estimate of how much money I'll save with a diesel car.
>Therefore you should buy one
That's not science. That's a judgement that depends on my personality and values. Maybe I care about having a car that isn't utter shit and I'm prepared to pay for the petrol and swallow the associated cost. The world shouldn't be "ruled" by anyone. Everyone should be left insofar as is possible to make their own minds up because everyone wants different things.

Commies chose to infiltrate our acedemia first, so it is full of your typical socialist doctrine.

Blame krauts, they gave money to start a commie revolution here.

Because if you're a gifted child and find school easy you skip through it without ever failing at anything. It's so comfy that you may never leave and you end up staying in college forever doing research and then teaching. You learn to be risk-averse and people who are risk-averse always lean left. THEN you have the fact that people who don't like sitting still in class but are still pretty smart come up with mad ideas and start businesses, and one in every 5,000 of those gets really rich. Mr. Scientist looks over at the unruly brat rolling in cocaine and bitches and thinks "BUT I'M SMARTER THAN THAT ADHD LITTLE FUCK WHY IS HE SO RICH?"
Conclusion? The system is broken and has to be rebuilt from the ground up with le fedora-wearing gentleman in charge. But it's really because Mr. Scientist was too timid to step outside the lab and try for a job that actually pays well

And this 1 in 5000 should give a significant part of his income to Mr Scietist, because while she was selling shit, Mr Scientist was doing really important stuff.

>ur face when modern science is an ideological cult that easily suppresses any information or papers by individuals that question the established scientific normality by attacking their character and convincing people they're fake scientists
>ur face when scientists rely on the government and cook study results all the time to push government agendas like global warming
>ur face when a government run by scientists will be 500x worse and more corrupt

longrangeweather.com/global_temperatures.htm

The reason is because scientists live in a bubble, surrounded by like minded people. Everyone in their lives went to college, did well, and has a passion for "doing science". Everyone they interact with passes through a filter, so their view of the world becomes biased. They don't understand racism, because all brown people they interact with are the top 0.01%. It makes sense for them to be lefties, because if everyone were like that (which is the world they live in), a leftist government would work.

t. research assistant

Because all scientists are homosexual.

also this idea that science is awsum and scientists should run the government is the biggest reddit idea you could ever have

>mfw mainstream tv scientists like neil degrasse tyson are praised like theyre gods by retards that only understand science if it's explained to them like theyre five years old

theories like the darwin's theory of evolution were picked up pretty much instantly by society without much question so now if you even so much as argue against it you're labelled a dumbass because it's almost as if these fake intellectuals' hubris from smelling smart peoples farts were genetically passed on to their descendants

Decolonize white science.

wouldn't that achieve the opposite effect though?
you would be focused on fucking your gf or pampering her instead of fucusing on science

When you are hungry you can think only about food, similar thing with gf.

Not if you kill all the fucks that do that. We could really dedicate ourselves to pure science if we wanted. But we would rather double cross and back stab each other than progress forward as a collective.

Ironically you will find that the person who calls himself the most intelligent is actually the most stupid, and the person who calls himself stupid is actually pretty smart

Because typically, the right-wing is pretty shit in regards to accepting scientific fact, and actively will hinder scientific research and progress. I.e. War on drugs blocking research into psychedelics, bans on stem cell research, climate change denial, etc. Also,

>theories like the darwin's theory of evolution were picked up pretty much instantly by society without much question

Except they're not. Right-wingers (at least in America) still deny this shit, fight to get Creationism taught in science classrooms. The fucking Vice President is a young earth creationist.

The scientific community does have a host of problems in terms of ethical research, dubious publishing, etc. But that's less of an issue than a majority of a population denying basic scientific fact.

Certified VirginPhantasy™

The white guy is right. Scientists are usually good in their field, but mostly shit in anything else. I bet OP meant to say philosophers (not the LOL PHILOSOPHY XD, the one where philosophists actually looked for knowledge)

> he expect something more from /pol9k/

>/sci/
>carl sagan image
Fuck off, redditor

...

It's odd that liberals who want some sort of technocracy don't recall the original Star Trek. Perfect example of why scientists should not be leaders. Look at Kirk and Spock; any time Spock is put into a position of absolute leadership or has the capacity to do so, he is shown to be an efficient but poor leader because while he has a superbly logical and rational mind, he lacks the empathy and social skills to be a leader of men.

...

stay thirsty, Ivan

...

...

>Why is it bad?
not bad at all. actually this is the biggest redpill. everything else is shit.

...

No the society should be ruled by leaders

if you actually knew anything you'd realize this is what is going on already, it's called the deep state and the new world order, they think you are a worthless useless eater and they treat you accordingly

>world ruled by people who lie about scientific findings that don't fit politicians agenda otherwise no mo' money for dem researchs

What could possibly go wrong.

...

...

> anti-atheism poland strikes again

DESU, I rarely see fedora neckbeards in my STEM classes (Biology).

I'd say the large majority of them dropped out in first year. They were the type of people to argue with the professor about inane points to act like they knew everything, but they'd flunk hard.

Not sure what computer science and engineering is like.

he has a point tho.

Holy fuck you are one stupid goy

would niggers and arabs be gassed senpai?

...

> low iq people gased
> aggressive cunts gased
So you are gassing yourself? Gassing someone is an act of aggression you retarded literal mongoloid.

This essentially will be fixed, scientists won't need to beg politicians for money, they will collect taxes by themselves.

...

...

...

Gassing someone because you just want him dead is a bad thing. Gassing someone because it will help the humanity is good.

Because science, being conducted by humans who are fallible to monstrosity, tend to use it on evil ways. Just like that jew scientist and his fucking atomic bomb that is now impending to deliver worldwide destruction.

...

Normal. People here are chill, but some professors have liberal mindset, though from what I've seen, it doesn't show in their classes.

Tfw you convince yourself existence has objective meaning.

Only those who are stupid.

IOcracy is the final redpill.

Pretty much this tbqhwyf.

There is more evidence against macro evolution than there is for it at this point. I don't know of any major scientist that still believes in Darwin's evolution.

>> no wumin in science scholarships, scholarships for those who actually can move science forward

>tfw the most intelligent person you’ve ever met is a female theoretical particle physicist

t. physics grad

I'd get rid of the Russians first, Dmitri

pascal?

Why do you hate Russians? I never said throw women away from science, just remove their special status.

>gased

Look up Dr. Bert Bolin and ask youirself if you want a guy like that in charge.

I'm only joking, lad. I like Russians

I no joke became a Genetic Engineer to create the equivalent of an Aryan (superhuman) without trans-humanism.

>Gassing someone because it will help the humanity is good.
That is subjective you retard. First you must define humanity's goal before you can make a decision on whether it will "help" humanity. This goal is subjective by nature.

For example: the jews think they are and should be the supreme leaders of all things, so they want to dumb everyone else down to create a servant class. Obviously you wouldn't agree with this method, but that is "helping humanity" if humanity's goal is to have the jews sitting on top forever.

> humanity's goal
Scientific progress

>Except they're not. Right-wingers (at least in America) still deny this shit, fight to get Creationism taught in science classrooms. The fucking Vice President is a young earth creationist.

same problem, different ideology

at this point i don't hate either "side", i embrace them as yin yang

I agree with the goal, but anyone can say anything else hinder's scientific progress to create a target, similar to how Israel is false flagging Syria to try to sick their US dogs of war on them for """crimes against humanity""". Most of the world backs taking Assad down based off of false info, and with your system it would be no different if you put a target on something like aggression.

>X COUNTRY SHOWING AGGRESSION! GLASS THEM INTO OBLIVION!!!
>Person X has shown aggression, sending them to re-education/gassing camps.

I would also argue that aggression is healthy for the species (natural selection of civilizations and people).

It may be a problem, but everything that involves humans is not ideal.
> aggression is healthy
To some extent. What I mean is dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4382996/Hammer-wielding-New-Jersey-woman-attacks-Porsche-owner.html

Jew Logic 101: Nazis were bad since their scientists performed experiments on Jews to advance scientific knowledge. We need to gas all low-iq people and be ruled by scientists that have no morality, since morality is anti-science.

>Anyone that isn't a scientist gets gassed.
>We need to keep society dumb by putting harmful chemicals in the food and water supply, while also bombarding them with culturally degenerate "entertainment" to keep the distracted from studying in school.

Nazis were bad only because they lost the war, and they lost the war because they were too stupid to not start the war with every world superpower, morality is a meme and is not even anti-science, but anti-nature.

>aggressive cunts gased
Just like in Texhnolyze

Einstein was an idiot.

Scientists are nerd virgins

Anyone who is just extremely stupid is, and only smart and healthy are allowed to reproduce. Also I didn't get what you meant by the second sentence.
Because women have too many rights.

> Texhnolyze
> I thought it just a bad transleet of some russian word
> it is actually an anime

Carl Sagan believed testosterone was a toxin

Turns out estrogen is the one actually harming us, giving us cancer and obesity

Scientists are often cucks unfortunately, cuckoldry is the thinking mans fetish

But no really they are

Basically since their field is so cerebral they never end up having to deal with niggers often except the rare one that's actually smart

This is why smart people in general aren't racist

It's just because they work jobs where they don't have to deal with subhumans

Second sentence refers to how gov't puts junk in food and water to keep the public "dumb and pacified", how they deliberately create a society meant to distract and keep people dumb (e.g. crap on television, teaching kids in school about how to have anal sex instead of teaching kids math, etc.). If the elites want a culture of scientists, and are willing to gas anyone that doesn't contribute to Science, then why aren't they actively trying to create a culture of scientists? Instead, they've created a culture of SJWs and idiots who watch MTV and Daily Show.

The joke is that all the aggressive/marginal types were sent to gulags to harvest resources for the technocrat elite
You should give it a try, it's one of the less cringy anniemays out there

No because they are low test social failures who project their inadequacies on women

> If the elites want a culture of scientists
They dont, that's the point, we need to make scientists a new elite.
> social failures
First of all, most of virgins are virgins because they are ugly, second, why being not funny, not interesting, not "alpha" should prevent a high iq person from sex?

> Carl Sagan
He was not a professional biologist, so his "believes"(as anyone's beliefs without any proof) have 0 value for other scientists.

k, wait a sec... who exactly is doing the "gassing of all non-scientists"? I'm assuming that non-scientists (i.e. idiots) aren't going to gas themselves, so that leaves... scientists? Elites? If the scientists/elites want more scientists and less idiots, why do they deliberately create a culture that produces idiots?

Elites should be changes.

(((peer review))) is just code for being approved by the Jews. The Bell Curve book isn't peer reviewed but the APA did a study on it and said virtually nothing about it was bad, the only point of contention is the implication that race is tied to IQ but that's pure politics at work not science.

> by the Jews
More like by elites. I have no idea why pol sees jews and white genocide everywhere when it is just politicians fighting for minority votes.

> I have no idea why pol sees jews and white genocide everywhere when it is just politicians fighting for minority votes.