Why is the alt right so.... fascinated with homosexuality...

Why is the alt right so.... fascinated with homosexuality? I feel like on a daily basis the subject of homosexuality comes up on this board about as much as it does on r9k, and that's saying something! There also seem to be an oddly high concentration of homosexuals in the alt right, it's like every other person is the next Ernst Rohm.

Even prominent alt right figures that take a hard stance against homosexuality seem to have a certain mania surrounding it. It's like gay sex is all they think or talk about.

Other urls found in this thread:

discord.gg/rttJp
discord.gg/Qr4ez
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Because its hot. Because it is wrong.

I'M NOT GAY
SO STOP
I JUST LIKE PENIS AND CUTE BOYS

((()))

it's almost like jews have something to gain by discrediting a movement that is detrimental to their existence

they've never subverted a cause to destroy it (sarc)

I think most people agree that homosexuality is something that's just always going to be here, there's no use getting concerned over it or wasting your time and energy trying to stop it.

As for the daily gay threads on Sup Forums, I'm pretty sure most of them are either false flags or shills trying to turn Sup Forums either toward or against gays, I'm not really sure which.

Really? Already blaming da Joos? Mr Shekelstein isn't make you constantly talk about homosexuality, this board does that on its own.

h-hi

((()))
pic related

You know those parentheses originate with The Right Stuff, don't you? That alt right group in particular has a shocking number of open homosexuals. They talk about it so much their leader basically had to put out a gag order to make them stop talking about it even a little bit

((()))
pic related , schlomo

romans and Greeks did it, nothing more masculine than fucking a man

((()))
I'm aware, I don't play by your Marxist rules rat

you're using Nazi inventions yet are you a Nazi?!

>homosexuality
Take that fag shit elsewhere.
Sup Forums is completely hetero and is only concerned with tenderly loving cute girly boys as any other normal self respecting straight man would.

...

nothing masculine about weak impulse control

>tfw no bf to grow old with
;~;

...

((()))
pic related

((()))
30,000 patents were stolen by the (((allies))) after ww2 from Germany
top Nat Soc scientists and intellectuals were used to advance this country

fuck your hypocrisy you rats

>I feel like on a daily basis the subject of homosexuality gets brought up
By fudge-packers like you with pics like yours.

Get pozzed, literalfag, that is if you aren't already.

>homosexuality
>Using retarded term invented by pro-sodomy activist, commie sodomite in the 19th century.

Eat shit and die shill

I have noticed an increases in the number of threads with the focus on homosexuality, whith an equal amount focusing on why it is bad and why it is good. Is there a reason for this?

Fuck faggots

Common Filth was right, the (((alt right))) is inundated with gayboys and trannies

Join the OFFICIAL /polgb/ Discord:

discord.gg/rttJp

Gay people are more likely to be social outcasts

Social outcasts are more likely to be alt-righters

Terms like Homosexual, Queer and Faggot are an attempt (sadly successful) to legalize/normalize the act of Sodomy and Sodomites.

Never use the term homosexual or heterosexual again, avoid other more derogatory but still sodomite approved terms. Use sodomy and sodomite only.

Common "I watch 4 hours of hardcore gay pornography a week" Filth

((()))
antifa honeypot for doxxing

Gay people are some of the first victims of immigration, since immigrants tend to come from very homophobic cultures. Western civilization is the ONLY civilization that gives gay people the chance to have a somewhat normal life (without hiding in the closet, I mean), so they have much, much more to lose than average people, when it comes to immigration.

It's not very hard to see why a lot would gravitate towards the right or extreme right.

Setting aside your use of the term alt-right,

While we are deeply disgusted by the modern state of society, fags and other sexual degeneracy being a part of that, we also have to contend with the disturbing notion that, given the absolutely shitty state of modern women, being a faggot might not be the worst option.

Which brings us to the 'obsession' bit. It is so obviously wrong to us to have faggotry even considered as a reasonable course of action, so we attack that to preserve some semblance of sanity in an insane world.

tl;dr women have become so horrific and out-of-control that faggots actually can be the better option, but we get mad because that isn't a choice anyone should have to make

t. straight

alt-right doesn't exist

LMAO
>sodomites are in the closet or discreet about their behavior

French logic on display

Show me where he said that, otherwise I'll assume you're another one of the profligate gayboys/trannies from TRS who got triggered by his videos. You're quintessentially British, so I'm sure youre no stranger to "cottaging".

>"more likely" means that "they all are like X no exception"
>"social outcast" can only mean "in the closet" and nothing else
are you an idiot

Also this. While I certainly don't advocate gay """rights""", I really don't have much of a problem with it as long as they keep their buttfucking behind closed doors and not demand legal recognition of it.

See Women are generally incapable of showing honor, respect, loyalty, or other 'male' traits, and society no longer imposes these values on them. So some Sup Forumsacks naturally go through an identity crisis, seeking male traits in, well, men. Others, meanwhile, see that it's just further delaying a problem, like white flight from cities when desegregation was enforced--the underlying social problems must be solved, rather than just addressing the symptoms (according to the 'anti'-gay Sup Forumsacks).

>implying weak impulse control is just a gay thing
It's just that straight men have to get over the "women hold the cards" obstacle when it comes to sex,otherwise many of them would be just as slutty desu.

>Use sodomy and sodomite only.
But butts are disgusting,only bjs and frotting allowed desu.

Why do lesbians want to (((un-ironically)) look like Nazi twinks?

> sage this shit

Ever used GPS? That wouldn't exist without specifically Nazi technology.

Also not without jewish technology, ironically.

Maybe OP is just a fag.

>as long as they keep their buttfucking behind closed doors and not demand legal recognition of it
Well, as it turns out most people aren't willing to hide some of the most important and emotionally fulfilling aspects of their lives just to please strangers so yeah, not happening.

Yeah it's the ((((((jews)))))) that are secretly plotting to subvert the alt right by pushing homosexuality.

It's not like homosexuality has been common in Europe for literally thousands of years or anything. It's not like homosexuals aren't just people who happen to like the same sex and for the most part just want to be able to get married and be left the fuck alone (LGBT extremist fags not included). It's because of the (((((((((jews))))))))).

>just to please strangers
Fine by me, but I won't legally recognize their behavior, and if they still insist I do, off to the chambers. It should never be treated as a 'good' thing. At best, it is tolerable.

> just want to be able to get married
This is the fucking problem. It's suicide to destroy the social order for somebody's feelings--see women's suffrage.

Well, it's already legally recognized so yeah.

The problem I have with your mentality, I suppose, is that it just feels like denial. It feels like the equivalent of putting your hands on your ears and going "if I ignore them long enough maybe they'll stop existing". In real life, gay couples do exist, they form households, monetary unions etc and pretending that it doesn't exist just out of spite feels dumb.

You don't see anyone press judgement on straight couples they don't approve of (cousins, gold diggers, priest disguised as Elvis in Las Vegas etc) but for some reason it suddenly becomes important if it's gay people.

>It's suicide to destroy the social order
>Wanting to have visitation rights to the hospital or being able to include your spouse in your will is "destroying the social order"
Note that i'm in no way in favor of forcing churches to marry homos,that's gay.I do think though that they should be allowed some kind of "union" i guess (can't find a right word,not "marriage" either since this one has and will always have religious connotations).

>Alt-right
I've yet to figure out what the fuck is this shit. Is it National Socialism? Nationalism? Conservatives? Ancaps? Only people opposed to immigration or islam?

It's something that popped up right after the American elections and was meant to put everyone that didn't vote Hillary under one umbrella thus easier to target.

I criticize plenty of straight couples, but not for being straight, because that is the norm. It's a matter of degree, too. If there was a stable gay couple that just minded their own business, compared to some turbo-cucked open-marriage straight couple with 15 niglets, no shit, I'd prefer the gays. Doesn't mean I like it. Nor should it be actively promoted. The state's responsibility is to maintain social order, which means it should promote and make easier its components (e.x. child raising, marriage). That doesn't mean that it should actively suppress harmless cohorts like the aforementioned couple, but there is only risk and decay involved with aiding them.
That's my stance. Don't make their lives harder than necessary, but never go out of your way to make it easier, because that only encourages it.

Civil unions existed. Just list themselves as co-owners of a property, set up joint accounts, etc. And they can include anyone in their will, not a big concern.

To best honest this is true. It's obsessive, and it's a red herring.

They fall into the trap that liberal lay every time. There are far more important things to talk about, and far more things to say.

Edgy doesn't win people over. Conduct yourselves.

>what is the alt-right
Everybody who doesn't completely suck off one of our two (((establishment))) parties.

I will give you that it's more of a fringe issue compared to the damage done by women and mass immigration.

I like penis soooooooooo much.

It's not just lust, I actually do find penis* beautiful beyond belief

...

Join the OFFICIAL /polgb/ Discord:

discord.gg/Qr4ez

>Civil unions existed
Tbf,i do think that this whole LBGTQQMOARBTFO+:; movement is becoming feminism vol.2,basically already fulfilled its purpose but insane women are using it to push for as much shit as they can.Women,not even once.

post the rest of the comics or my digits reek havoc upon you all

Back to your containment board you sick freak. You're mentally ill.

>I criticize plenty of straight couples, but not for being straight, because that is the norm. It's a matter of degree, too
Yes, but what I mean is that you never see anyone arguing that those straight couples shouldn't be legally recognized as married.

And I don't think there's "only risk and decay involved with aiding [gay couples]", like you said earlier. If anything, to me a good thing about gay marriage is that it encourages gay people to settle down and get married, rather than just engage in the hedonistic lifestyles of the 70's and 80's.

Plus anyway, no government will ever make people gay. Nobody's gonna trn gay because the government makes it not shit for people to be gay.