Guys since trump is found to be a neocon now, I just got a horrorifying idea in my head...
>Trump loses 2020 election
>New /ourguy/ turns out to be another neocon
>Turns out all of /ourguy/s in europe are neocons as well
Guys what if this is true? What if everyone we meme into power is secretly a neocon globalist.
What do we do when this happens Sup Forums? What do we do?!
Other urls found in this thread:
davidduke.com
mises.org
twitter.com
are you sure you understand this military encryption behind "Me, Myself, third party, we, us, our, ... , n-order effect or target"?
Did you notice how neocons shapeshifted for the duration of Obamas presidency PNAC->CNAS?
You neckbeards are really going off the fucking deep end. "We can never use military force because then we are neocons and neocons have no redeeming qualities." Piss off.
Well what else did you expect from electing a pathological liar and TV gameshow host? Of course he was always going to be manipulated by smarter people around him.
Business as normal is returning.
The only chance for real change is to elect a proper populist in the mold of Bernie Sanders. We have to get behind this for the next election.
>trump found to be a neocon
nice try share blue
honest question, what is objectively wrong with neocon?
Shills stopped pretending to be NatSoc opponents of Trump, and are just shilling open leftism now. I knew it.
Putting it succinctly neocons think we can solve the problems of third world hell holes by making them capitalist democracy. So if you have a problem with a belligerent piece of shit like Saddam you just depose him and replace him with democracy and hey presto you have another Japan.
Neocons are just watered-down leftists.
They are more in favor of capitalism, but they flood the country with brown Marxists, so it's self-defeating.
Trump isn't a neocon. He's not a Ron Paul libertarian either. He's not an ideologue at all. He's a pragmatist. Yet Sup Forums only sees Trump in black and white.
>what do we do?!
When ballots don't work, bullets do
Populism is neither left nor right. It's just a proper form of democracy that allows the people to live freely without being fucked over by those in power. Trump has shown he won't stand up for the small guys. He can't even enact his major election promises.
The Jews have assumed control user.
They have always been 6 gorrillion steps ahead of us.
>capitalist
>democracy
Neocons dont believe in either capitalism or democracy
They attack genuine nationalists in other countries and basically are just retarded warmongerers. All of them being against Assad just because he doesn't want to lick US boots is disgusting. Just slaves for jewish cock.
How stupid do you have to be to actually say that with conviction?
This is going to happen for sure with anybody. The only thing we can do is focus all of our efforts and memes on jews. The jews are the problem and we are foolish to get distracted by anything else so long as the jews remain existence.
What we need to do is meme the masses into exterminating them
>secretly a neocon globalist
>secretly
this is not a surprise if you knew ANYTHING about Trump before voting for him
davidduke.com
...
Neoconservatives have certainly appealed to American patriotic platitudes in advocating war throughout the Middle East—gushing about spreading American democracy and freedom to the area, while leaving unmentioned their own strong ethnic ties and family links to Israel.
...
All the Jewish intellectual and political movements I studied were typified by a deep sense of orthodoxy—a sense of “us versus them.” Dissenters are expelled, usually amid character assassination and other recriminations.
This has certainly been a feature of the neocon movement. The classic recent example of this “We vs. They” world is David Frum’s attack on “unpatriotic conservatives” as anti-Semites. Any conservative who opposes the Iraq war as contrary to U.S. interests and who notes the pro-Israeli motivation of many of the important players, is not to be argued with, but eradicated. “We turn our backs on them.” This is not the spirit out of which the Anglo-American parliamentary tradition was developed, and in fact was not endorsed by other non-Jewish pro-war conservatives.
...
Jewish intellectual and political movements have typically had ready access to prestigious mainstream media channels, and this is certainly true for the neocons. The anchoring by the Washington Post of the columns of Charles Krauthammer and Robert Kagan and by the New York Times of William Safire’s illustrates this. But probably more important recently has been the invariable summoning of neoconservatives to represent the “conservative” line on the TV Networks. Is it unreasonable to suppose that this may be somewhat influenced by the famously heavy Jewish role in these operations?
How stupid do I have to be to be right?
Pat Buchanan terms neoconservatism "a globalist, interventionist, open borders ideology."
nothing screams democracy like killing elected leaders and imposing dictators
nothing screams capitalism like expansionist government and un-elected bureaucracy.
You just don't get it user. Gabbard 2020! More imm- err, peace.
>Pat Buchanan
Taking anything this blowhard says seriously.
mises.org
A second, somewhat older but nowadays almost indistinguishable branch of contemporary American conservatism is represented by the new (post World War II) conservatism launched and promoted, with the assistance of the CIA, by William Buckley and his National Review. Whereas the old (pre-World War II) American conservatism had been characterized by decidedly anti-interventionist foreign policy views, the trademark of Buckley's new conservatism has been its rabid militarism and interventionist foreign policy.
In an article, "A Young Republican's View," published in Commonweal on January 25, 1952, three years before the launching of his National Review, Buckley thus summarized what would become the new conservative credo: In light of the threat posed by the Soviet Union, "we [new conservatives] have to accept Big Government for the duration—for neither an offensive nor a defensive war can be waged . . . except through the instrument of a totalitarian bureaucracy within our shores."
Conservatives, Buckley wrote, were duty-bound to promote "the extensive and productive tax laws that are needed to support a vigorous anti-Communist foreign policy," as well as the "large armies and air forces, atomic energy, central intelligence, war production boards and the attendant centralization of power in Washington."
Not surprisingly, since the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, essentially nothing in this philosophy has changed. Today, the continuation and preservation of the American welfare-warfare state is simply excused and promoted by new and neo-conservatives alike with reference to other foreign enemies and dangers: China, Islamic fundamentalism, Saddam Hussein, "rogue states," and the threat of "global terrorism."
>New /ourguy/
lol, what makes you'd think we'd even want a new /ourguy/.
You mean one of the originators of the philosophy along with William Buckley and the spooks?
>He's a pragmatist.
You are right but it sucks when pragmatism dictates some missile strikes so that MSM doesn't attack you much.
Elect me, I will gas all of you. This is the only way to cleanse the world of Jews.
if that's the case it will probably take some form of drastic action...