Lesbian Mother Permitted to Discuss Sexuality With Kids, Court Rules

king5.com/news/local/anti-gay-bias-permeated-custody-case-supreme-court-rules/430913475

The Washington state Supreme Court found that bias permeated court proceedings in a case involving a Pierce County woman and her then husband.

Rachelle and Charles Black were married for nearly 20 years and raised their three children in conservative Christian churches and schools in Tacoma, according to court documents.

In 2011 Rachelle told Charles she was a lesbian. Once they divorced, the court in Pierce County determined what would happen with the children

“When the court issued the parenting plan, it gave primary custody of the children to their father and gave our client very limited time with their kids after being a stay-at-home mother most of their lives,” said David Ward, Rachelle’s attorney.

The Washington state Supreme Court decision determined that the “trial court failed to remain neutral regarding Rachelle's sexual orientation and impermissibly favored Charles' religious beliefs.”

“What was most shocking to us in our parenting plan was that it included restriction on our client’s ability to discuss religion, homosexuality, or alternative lifestyle concepts with her kids. I haven’t see that kind of provision in a parenting plan in Washington state in 20 years,” said Ward. “Having those restrictions in a parent’s plan shows there’s a suspicion toward a gay parent that their children should view them as being different, that it’s even taboo for a parent to discuss her life with her kids.”

The case now goes back to a new judge in Pierce County where the court has to determine a new parenting plan.

So what?
Why shouldn't she be able to discuss whatever the fuck she wants with her own fucking kids?

It's brainwashing, indoctrination. You are what is wrong with Western society. Your "hands off" ideals don't work in the real world, and pretending they do is going to melt down civilization.

She is the one who suddenly changed her long held convictions, her new "beliefs" shouldn't be given preference to her underage children who need consistency and support.

Long held convictions aren't the problem. It would be fine if she were suddenly religious. Faggotry is the problem.

Nah if she suddenly became a Scientologist after 20 years of being a christian family and tried to whisk her kids away to Sea Org, the courts wouldn't have it.

>Rachelle

You don't even deserve a proper response.
What do you think of that, you
multi-gender theory buying, free-bleeding, wage gap believing, hair dying, Hill shilling, gun control lobbying, sanctuary city supporting, Obama cock sucking, pussy hat wearing, CNN trusting, Trump protesting, virtue signalling, Kinsey Scale wandering, morality hating, double standards wielding, dildo carrying, Huffington Post reading, Black Lives Matter posting, Islam apologizing, terrorism enabling, anal pumping, occupy democrats sharing, fan fiction writing, tinder using, white guilting, victim olympics competing, yaoi drawing, morbid obesity justifying, religion bashing, cross fit endorsing, pride parade marching, Orlando mourning, geek culture attention flagging, Orange is The New Black watching, Bruce Jenner worshipping, pop and rap listening, Lady Gaga obsessing, night clubbing, starbucks drinking, snopes citing, coal burning, tumblr blogging, J.K. Rowling Twitter following, netflix and chilling, open relationship having, promiscuous disease-ridden blue-waffled pansexual degenerate whore?

>It's brainwashing, indoctrination if she express view I don't agrree with
It's not how it work, bru.

>her new "beliefs" shouldn't be given preference
But it isn't given preference. that's the point. It's that her view were actually forbidden for her to express.

she is now being given equal grounds, not preference.

>court sides with the mother
how is this new?

Actually, court sided with the father. he has the guard.

she is being the right to give sex ed to her kid, like any parent can.

>It's that her view were actually forbidden for her to express.
Yes because she agreed to raise her kids under a certain belief set and she shouldn't be able to change their instructions so drastically on a whim until they are adults and can understand and make their own decisions giving her nonsense equal grounds is giving it preference since they agreed on different grounds when establishing the family.

>It's brainwashing, indoctrination.

According to your logic parents shouldn't be allowed to bring their children up as Christians then.

>Yes because she agreed to raise her kids under a certain belief set and she shouldn't be able to change their instructions so drastically on a whim
1. You don't know if it was on a whim
2. If you think no parents have ever chnaged their man on how to raise their kids, you are a moron.

Parents have the right to raise their kids in the way they believe is the best. If they view change along the way, they would be hyppocrit to no change their parenting.

As a matter of fact, if you set up a plan on how to raise your kids when they are just baby and barelly know how they will grow up and decide to not bulge from it no matter what, it's more likely to result in bad parenting.

Being a parent is a daily maintenance job and you learn new things every days.

So lets ban freedom of speech?

It's not more brainwashing that raising your children to be christian, muslim, atheist, left-wing, right-wing or anything

She didn't learn anything new about being a parent, she learned she was unfit to even breed since her new lifestyle literally removes her from the gene pool.

What is with the spam of 1 post by this ID threads lately on Sup Forums?

You are alright Stralia. I dont care what everybody else says about you.

Solid Kek

Menopause is a Helluva drug.

>She didn't learn anything new about being a parent,
Your own personal experience can and will affect how you think a kid should be risen no matter what. Parents will always primarly use their personal experience as a reference to how to rise kids.

>she was unfit to even breed since her new lifestyle literally removes her from the gene pool.
Ad yet she has kids... Maybe that "removing from the gene pool" thing doesn't work as well as you think.

She doesn't even have experience being a lesbian, she just decided she was one because he hormones are changing.

He old lifestyle enabled her to do that