What is this type of argument called? I find it rather triggering

What is this type of argument called? I find it rather triggering.

>Criticism of some thing is in and of itself justification of the need for said thing

Does not this make any real, substantive discussion on a given issue impossible?

it's not about issues. pervertariat is playing "courage" card. So you have to ask to yourself - "what is the frequency of courage on 9/11 Kenneth?"

>violated copyright

Oh shit I forgot he has a trademark on bronze

yeah wtf does that even mean what copyright did the girl statue infringe on?

They're essentially stealing his art for their own art piece, how is it not copyright infringement?

It's the same as copying a video game, adding one character, and then selling it.

The addition of the fearless girl statue fundamentally changes the nature of his bull piece and it was placed without his approval. He's not wrong.

The sculptor has full rights to remove his bull. He should just get rid of the thing and have the girl standing up to nothing.

I'm guessing that by putting the girl there they used his piece and completely altered it. It would kind of be like taking the Paul Bunyan statue, building a big hardgay statue, having it stand beside him with his arm around Paul and saying that if the creator of the Paul Bunyan statue didn't like it he was a homophobe.

The Bart Simpson solution is always an option

Because without the bull, the girl statue means nothing. I.e. They altered the original artist work.

It is indeed a copyright issue. It was the first thing I thought when I saw this sculpture.

...

he should turn the bull 90degrees

the fearless girl would lose all his meaning, just like they changed the meaning of the bull

hes right though, its co-opted his work

What's funny is looking at it this way kind of wants me to keep the little girl statue up. At the end of the day, its a little girl standing in front of a 7500lb charging bull.

That's a slippery slope they are two separate statues The bull statue was not altered. At what amount of feet does it stop infringing? 5? 10?
50?

The thing that always seems to be left out is that Fearless Girl is a fucking ad for some index fund that only invests in companies led by women (it underperforms the s&p 500)

>you don't like something?
>well then that's proof that we have to have it
Liberals are immature and base their political views on feelings. If they don't like somebody (white men for example) their politics will reflect that. Genocide is still on the table

They aren't just two separate statues, they CLEARLY put the girl there to stand against the bull. It's not even close to slippery, it's cut and dry - don't use other peoples work.

this, except the bull statue is iconic. He should try moving it elsewhere in NY.

if any of these imbeciles knew anything about real bulls and bull fights, they would know that this is quite literally

a bull would gore a grown matador through the skull, it would eat this bitch alive

i dont see why the bull is in all these photos of the girl

unless they are using his art work (which they are)

Turn the bull so the rear is facing the girl and she basically gets a face full of balls.

A single blow from a sledgehammer would do it methinks.

T once broke up a cast iron tub that way.

Nobody in NY even likes Mayor DeGenerate. He's so bad the Democrats are going to have to abandon him because he does worse than Republican canidates in the polls.

Somebody should print out the porn images from rule 34 and leave flyers of it everywhere around that area just to troll those fuckers. Soon enough everyone will be talking about that porn shit and they will remove it because of the images it invokes.

That would be a more realistic representation of femenism

Move its ass directly in her face so she's looking up and sniffing it. "Women who don't like sweaty asses taking up space are exactly why we need, 'Smell My Ass Bull'

If they are indeed two different statues, there would be no issue whatsoever if they relocated the girl elsewhere in the vicinity and changed its orientation to have no interaction with the bull. However, if this happened, feminists would be the first to complain and prove that the two status are indeed related.

yeah but it could still have some meaning, like "the fearless girl calling the bull to look at her determination"

if the bull just turns 90 degrees, the fearless girl is just fucked

IRL the bull would show that stupid bitch something pretty and shiny and she would get all stupid and go buy it.

...

...

>have the girl standing up to nothing.
too close to reality

NYC liberals secretly love the boot on their necks. Case in point: Giuliani, LaGuardia, and to an extent Koch and Bloomberg.

I'm still waiting on the wolves.

>Criticism of some thing is in and of itself justification of the need for said thing

It's called circular logic. It's when people confuse saying something that sounds vaguely profound for something that makes actual fucking sense.

Are people in this thread really triggered by a statue of a little girl?

Linear thermite charge over its neck, melt its head off in 5 seconds.

Anyone who is triggered by something should do the world a favor and kill themselves.

I'm more disgusted that people think its heroic and needed any exposure.

The bull essentially represented what the little girl is now meant to represent.

And now the bull is the bad guy in this situation.

Let that sink in.

They're triggered by a violation of the NAP.

Will you people please invent your own dialect?

We're behind 50 layers of irony, but you guys can only stay a couple feet behind, "redefining" our slang.

>shadbase
A guy in my college has a tattoo made by that porn artist.

HAHAHA!

I was thinking the same thing. She's not fearless, she's fucking suicidal and trying to DISPLAY a [positive, socially approved character trait] to inflate the egos of women who are too stubborn to ever admit their wrongs, flaws and inadequacies.

It's symbolic in all the ways they didn't intend.

>Smell my ass bull

Had a hearty kek at that, lad

It's an inversion of values, making the masculine feminine, and the feminine masculine. At the end of the day, women don't make good men, and men don't make good women. The powers that be know that, and by having each sex trying to be the other, society will be like a warm piece of butter, much easier to be molded with far less resistance.

They don't stop until transsexuals are inseminating men converted into women who can have babies. This nightmare is only beginning if we let it continue.

You have no concept of art, and don't understand the meaning of slippery slope.

I like this idea. Move the pull so it's balls and ass are in her face because that's the real way women get jobs on Wall Street and in the finance industry -- kissing ass and sucking balls.

Nah, he just needs to turn it around.

Then "Fearless Girl" becomes a statue of a young girl ogling some giant brass bull balls, and looking very pleased with herself.

He should remove the bull and replace it with a bronze Truck with the Swedish, French, and German Flags on it, and red paint on the front.

Look at that pigeon though, he don't give a single fuck. Just gonna eat that shit on the ground

Stick a farting Pepe statue in front of the girl

BRAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAPPPPPPPPPPPPP

>Hard Gay
But it works because he's not actually gay and is Asian.

>implying any of the faggots on pol can afford a statue

49th Post Best Post

Only Jews care about copyright. Do you know how much further ahead humanity would be if copyrights weren't holding back the last 150 years of progress?

Chargin bull put that shit on the streets without permision, he keep the statue but NJ let them put that shit there, 30 years after that somebody do just the same .... If he doesn't like that just take your crap from there

The artist is obviously in the right, as the bull is an integral part of the fearless girl concept.

His work was used without his explicit approval. That the exact type of collectivist exploitation trademark and copyright laws are meant to prevent.

Fuck off commie.

Idiot spaniard

any NY pollack willing to run the statue over with a car?

In fact, don't even put a statue there.
Just remove the bull and part a truck inches from her face and paint the flags on the sides of the truck's carriage and squirt fake blood all over the front.

Call the art piece "The Price of Hubris"

Yes good goyim

>Bull was put there by an artist who spent nearly $400,000 dollars of his own money to make it.
>Girl was put there by an investment firm, and even has a plaque stating its corporate sponsorship at its feet.
Really the girl is the perfect symbolism of modern feminism.
Immature, full of hubris, focused only on what effects them personally, and standing in the way of progress, both financially and artistically.
And backed by the Jews.

Move the bull or turn it 180 so the girl is facing its ass.

>triggered
.... why do leftists try to imitate our shit? Can't they have their own lingo?

What next? We need a "safe space"?... you people are so fucking retarded it hurts.

yep

Make it look like the bull's about to shit all over her and she's got this literal shit-eating grin just standing there. Perfect symbolism of modern women.

>women standing up against a good economy just because men achieved it
really acitvates my almonds

Commies are Jews, you useful idiot.

+1

Yup, it's like adding patchy, ugly facial hair to the original Mona Lisa and saying it's for transgender rights and if you don't like it go fuck yourself.

Anyone want to move the bull out of the space and sculpt a pile of dead children around the fearless girl?

Man... you're so fucking stupid. He's NOT complaining about the statue, you piece of shit. He's complaining the fact that they're using his own piece as a complementary to some other artist's work.

Imagine you have a statue of Jesus Christ. And then suppose someone makes a statue of a guy looking at Jesus and rubbing one off. Would that be okay?

>women confirmed as thinking of themselves as weak little girls while men are giant muscly bulls

>a statue of a young girl ogling some giant brass bull balls, and looking very pleased with herself
Women love balls on their foreheads while they're sucking your dick. Don't you ever forget this lads.

I'm amazed that half of Sup Forums fails to understand how this isn't copyright

Clever and underrated post.

Lotta dumb idiots here nowadays

Maybe he should.

Let people think about that.

It means the girl statue needs the bull statue to have meaning, thus infringing on its work.
Same reason you can't write your own chapter of game of thrones or some shit.
Or put up amcdonald sign on the statue.

>just because something isn't illegal it means it's right

You're like the stupid leftists who protest right-wing conferences and then scream you have to respect their protest because of the 1st ammendment.

i bet the major of the city owns it. since he bough it from him basically.

WHITE KNIGHT LOCATED

LOCK AND LOAD

FIRE AWAY

THIS!

We should make some statue in front of some mosque so that shitskins can get angry so they have to take out the statue and while you're at it you bring the fearless girl with you too

Add a crying smaller girl in front of the 'defiant' girl, and suddenly she becomes a bully. See how the setting changes again?

The girl should be emoved.

>Americans have a statue of a bronze bull which represents their economic growth
I thought America was supposed to be a Christian country.

It's not a calf, sir.

Also, bulls represent passivism, which only India has a better claim for celebrating.

Kek my dude. If you think our society is headed towards being "molded" then you are part of the problem. What the statue combination really means is that we decadent people are going to try to stand up to a feral power in our weakness and get gored in the process.

The girl statue is a derivative work. It relies on the bull statue.

Why doesn't the artist just remove his statue?

If it's intended to stay forever why has no one yet made a bronze MAGA hat?

Guess it's time for anons to remove this shit.

It's easy. Just get a group of guys and put them in official looking overalls. Put up cones 'n shit.

>the mayor of new york thinks a statue of a girl is a real girl

Why can't we throw all these crazies into a padded room and forget about them?

>take a shit on the Mona Lisa
>wtf come on m8 I didn't even use paint this is a slippery slope!
Really bumbles my brambles

non sequitur (non starter)

It basically means that the argument doesn't logically follow, typically because the inference has nothing to do with the premises.

Women exist simply to ruin things. I can't think of anything that is made better by having a woman involved.

I'm not even gay and I bet fags have better sex than straight because there are not incompetent women involved.

It's like if you went to a portrait and painted a mustache on it. It's essentially vandalism, destroying the original.

Why don't I just show and live in your house without permission and you leave?

>I'm not even gay
Sure thing, user.