He has a point, and you have no argument

He has a point, and you have no argument.

Your a fag, that's my argument

Not stealing isn't "giving" anything.

Do Democrats even want to give tax breaks to the poor? Because if so, I'd be all for that.

false equivalence.

>stealing less money vs stealing more money to give to someone else
really activates my almonds

>help veterans and poor families
lmao since when

>Democrats helping vetrans
8 years of creating military quadriplegics and orphans for Muslim sand may not qualify as "help".

Because the way you "help the poor" is to steal from the rich, rather than incentivizing the poor to work for themselves. You give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, and he'll never go hungry.

>democrats
>helping veterans

> What are assets and liabilities?

False equivalence but you'd also be hard pressed to find an average right wing Joe who agreed with the bailouts.

Economic freedom must include the freedom to fail. Bailouts only prolong the inevitable.

Oh shit guys, a Brazilian. Everybody run!!!!

What if the man is unable to fish? He gets a bullet behind the head?

>why is it that when we stop taking people's money, Republican call it free enterprise, but when Democrats try to give people money, it's called socialism?

really makes me think

Both parties are crony capitalists.
Democrats are marginally worse because they tend to tax and spend more.
Also, newsflash, corporations (a legal fiction) don't really pay tax. They charge customers (real people) and then give a cut to the government.

Everyone has the ability to learn to fish. If they physically and mentally cannot fish, then certainly an exception can be made.

Build a man a fire, he is warm for a night
Set him onfire,he is warm for the rest of his life
ue-toi toi-même, toi, mon putain, papa à ventre tendre homme

>Democrats
>helping veterans
>helping poor citizens over illegal immigrants
ahahahahahaha

The disabled can be made to fish

Are you trying to LARP as 2008 Facebook or something?

>He has a point, and you have no argument.

The difference is, that "given tax break" means, that state takes less of their money, they are not giving anything, just taking less.

Helping poor families is fine with me, if it is justified, but you also didn't name it correctly. It is not helping, it is redistributing someone else money.

So my argument is, that you do not correctly name things, with the possible intention to mislead people.

Corporation and companies create added value, a part of that can go directly to the population in form of wages and salary,

The less taxes equal higher salary, wages, or simply more investment and more jobs.

Able bodied workers can go directly to the companies and get that salary/wage instead of living off state handouts, feeding neverending corruption and rotten policians.

Taxes should be redirected only to help those
who can't work due to health problems or injuries.

Let the poors be helped by community efforts rather than state ones. Let the communities give these people a chance to start over or to get a normal living if they are willing to work hard for it.

Veterans deserve compensation and have contributed to our freedoms other than niggers who literally make certain freedoms questionable because they can't handle it

This. Thanks, Balkanbro.

>we are here to help you

...

It all depends on why he cannot fish.
Is he too fat to fish? Is speedy Gonzalez fishing illegally and taking the fish? Or can he not catch fish because he is taking his therapy llama with him everywhere and it's spit scares the fish away.

These are important things to know. If it's that last one, I support the bullet to the back of the head fix.

>we rule over all the ghettos in the country... so we are the good guys, and we are good at helping people!

Hitler built Berlin wall?
What are those guys at Occupy Dems smoking?

One is letting them keep money they EARNED!

The other is giving away money they DIDNT!

Its really not hard.

Uh, because the latter is socialism?

That's the definition.

They don't. They keep income tax on the impoverished who barely make ends meet, then raise minimal wage to put them on welfare and keep them voting democrat for gibs.

this


but also this

>democrats
>helping the poor
>caring about veterans

L

O

L

Democrats hate cops and military veterans with a passion. What democrat party are you talking about?? As for poor people after 80 years of blacks and hispanics voting democrat what have they gotten, besides a huge victim complex??

No one wanted the bailouts, that was lobbyist bullshit.

You don't belong here, get out.

this cannot be real.

>They charge customers (real people) and then give a cut to the government.
>tfw people don't realize that
Also how would one go to change it? Make companies pay for an arbitrary license to operate before selling?

i believe governemnt should only provide army, police, roads and diplomacy, so the only taxation on the people is a poll tax, alternatively adding unemployment tax (if you're a NEET you have to pay extra), and certain VAT on products that are harmful, like drugs and booze

Increased life expectancy, increased economics, more opportunities, more diversity and representation the media and businesses, representation in government, affirmative action, civil rights, reparations for Japanese, increased minimum wage, access to more health care (wip), and less people wanting to LITERALLY hang me for flirting with a white Girl, just to name a few things.

>tax breaks are the same as gibs
>liberal logic

this is b8 anyway

Best help would be removing taxation from the poor.

these

you're*

> He has a point, and you have no argument.

No, he doesn't have a point, only a single misrepresentation... and it's not even his.

>When corperations are given billions of dollar in tax breaks, it's called free enterprise

This is because corperations lie to get free gibs.

>When Democrats try to help poor familes it's called socialism

That's because it IS socialism because you are redistributing wealth.

>Helping veterans is socialism...

I don't agree with the inclusion of veterans in that sentence at all...

Not only is it NOT socialism, but democrats don't give a fuck about veterans.

Democrats HATE the military.

>Slovakia
>Balkan

The former is letting people keep their money. The latter is taking people's money and giving it to others. Now fuck off.