Communism doesn't wor-

communism doesn't wor-

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

> leaf

How did that turn out after World War 2?

b but he's right!

>set up gulags
>literally exploit the workers

Gommunism werks guise.

>intentionally stopping at 1933

Intellectually dishonest, like all Democrats. :^)

And it only cost like 10 million lives to achieve.

>volume of industrial output
>work hard or gulag

Uh whats a 200% of almost nothing?

1) Source ? Pravda and affiliated don't count
2)It's like saying African countries are great because thay have a 10% GDP growth.
3) Millions of slaves to work for fre until they die

>Be communist
>Put people to work to death
>People die of starvation
>Kill the one that can't keep working
>itwasn'trealcommunism

Stalin was based. He did a lot of great things. Told the Jews to fuck off, killed Trotsky, made communism into a nationalist ideology.

>like all Democrats

Communists aren't democrats.

We want to send democrats to the gulag same way we want to send you fascists to the gulag.

>Live near a warring nation about to invade the only barrier between the two of you
Hmmm I wonder why the Ruskies would suddenly put all effort into building weapons in 1929 while a country far away doesn't...

>per cent of 1929
Could you cherry pick data any harder?

>the point of life is labour

Yeah, working really well.

And yet they collapsed by literally spending themselves to death trying to keep up with Reagan's "star wars" meme

Literally national socialism. Then again every existing communist country became nationalistic and a living hell. So the real question for Sup Forums, were USSR, DPRK, Democratic Kampuchea "not real NatSoc"?

>literally make everyone slaves with production quotas
>literally starve while working 20 hours a day


WE DID IT REDDIT

>going from 100% of 2 factories to 200% of 4 factories

wow great job

The USSR literally went from agrarian to industrialized within a 5 year period.

So of course the output is going to increase. And it has nothing to do with MUH COMMUNISM, other than being in complete control of all facets of life.

100% increase of 500 bottles of vodka, 100 rifles, and 15 rustbucket tanks isnt very much

Going from zero industrialization to a little is a huge percentage jump.

Stalin hated kikes like you though. Modern fascists have a million times more in common with soveits than modern commies do. Soviets discarded Marxism in all but name (because Marx was a retard) and created a real working nationalist and white supremacist communism.

>percent of 1929
>meaning that everyone else got hit by the great depression
>meaning that the USSR just got out of the devastation of WW1 and the revolution

it's easy to increase output when your output is low, idiot

They were a lot different.

...

Why don't you post a graph of the amount of people who died starving due to this growth?

...

Hitler did not had "national communism", he privatised instead.

"I absolutely insist on protecting private property... we must encourage private initiative"

"privatized were the Deutsche Reichsbahn (German Railways), at the time the largest single public enterprise in the world, the Vereinigte Stahlwerke A.G. (United Steelworks), the second largest joint-stock company in Germany (the largest was IG Farben) and Vereinigte Oberschlesische Hüttenwerke AG, a company controlling all of the metal production in the Upper Silesian coal and steel industry. The government also sold a number of shipbuilding companies, and enhanced private utilities at the expense of municipally owned utilities companies."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Nazi_Germany

>Have one factory
>Open one more factory
>"Le 200% increase reddit! Communism works!"

And it only cost 50,000,000 lives. Wew.

I thought it was understood that slavery improved production for at least 6,000 years

USSR was also recovering from a devastating civil war between that raged after the revolution in the 1920s.

>comparing low quality and slavery to high quality free world products

A F U C K I N G L E A F

The Soviet Union was unscathed by the Great Depression, that's why its output didn't dissolve, its because you don't show how little industrial output it was creating compared to the other countries. Sure it was more than in 1929, but from rock bottom the only way is up

Yes. It can work short term. Eventually emergency measures must relax. You can't keep them up. Take a look at industrial output during the actual war. You will find that the capitalist market kept it up far better and longer then the soviets. (All puns intended)

Reason Soviets did so well, was Stalin was a heartless bastard that would human wave the Germans and bury them under his own dead to give him time to build up his industry.

It had nothing to do with Communism. Just pure heartless brutality.

You can live in that. Enjoy.

How much do they teach you about Nazi and Hitler in Germany today in school? Total history, bullshit history, or shame?

LMAO, even Italy was better than the USSR in 1938, in around 13 years they surpassed it.

>Mussolini did nothing wrong.

> from rock bottom the only way is up

It managed to reach the level of Hungary and Bulgaria.

See here:

Brazil is the USA of the future.

>Send plant managers to the gulags if they don't report good progress
>"Hey guys, look at all this progress we're making"

Even with that much industrial output, Russia still turned out to be a shithole

This shows how much communism really sucks idiot.

It is all from the perspective of the allies. Even the soviets are "liberators".

Slave labor always works to build empires. The USSR and the USA are no exceptions.

Food must not count as industrial output

Why Ukraine hates Russia 1932-33
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor