Spend millions of shekels on a huge ass bomb

>spend millions of shekels on a huge ass bomb
>kill 30 sandniggers
>Abdullah makes a home made bomb
>Kills 50 people

Other urls found in this thread:

amazon.com/War-Racket-Antiwar-Americas-Decorated/dp/0922915865
myredditnudes.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

not their fault there werent that many people in the camp.

Yeah, I guess we could be a like a degenerate dune coon and just start blowing people up in town squares, hoping our child molester sand god will grant us virgins in sand nigger heaven for it.

Good luck truck bombing dispersed buried targets you idiot.

>Pakistan

Don't you have a woman to stone or something?

You can whine as much as you want, but paki is right

If the US wanted to kill 50 random sandniggers, it could do that easily. It's hard as fuck to kill Isis sandniggers while minimizing casualties on our side, though

the bomb was intended as a show of strength more than a sandnigger rampage.

That is why you re losing wars. Only true path to the victory is barren land, concentration camps and massive extermination. First to employ it was British Empire in Boer wars

And that's why we live in Nazi Germany right now, eh?

Mothballing costs money too

>Military superpower
>Cant fight literal stone age sand monkies
Hmmmm its almost like if the U.S wanted they could have finished them all off but something is preventing them

How hard would it have been to fly an apache over there? That must have been a cheaper option

I thought the bomb killed 100+ niggers?

based quasi-pooloo

Bombs expire in 2018 - gotta use them or it will be a literal waste of money


Used = not wasted

No, I was living under victorious communism. In WW2 you just pick up what Soviets left. And don't tell me that US did not implement same tactics in WW2. In Korea and Vietnam you were more merciful.

21,218–21,628 Killed (Afghanistan Insurgency)[5]
5,627 militants killed (Pakistan Insurgency)[28]
18,492–23,991 insurgent dead (Iraqi insurgency)[32]
6,370-10,800 killed (Saddam Hussein-era Iraqi Army)[3]
1,019 killed (Philippines insurgency)[29]
119 killed (Saudi militants)[9]
277-627 killed (Hezbollah)[20]
18 killed (Amal)[20]
12 killed (LCP)[20]
2 killed (PFLP-GC)[20]
10 killed (SSNP)[22]
2 killed (LDP)[22]
75 killed (2006-2008 Hamas and other militants allied to Hamas)
3,270-4,270 killed (Somali ICU)[30]
227 killed (Fatah al-Islam)[21]
5 killed (Jund al-Sham)[21]
7 killed (Lebanese bomber cells)[21]
450+ killed (Algerian GSPC)[26]
19 killed (Moroccan militants)
7 killed (Egyptian militants)
4 killed (Turkish militants)
3 killed (Kenyan militants)
6 killed (Yemeni militants)
5 killed (Spanish militants)
1,893+ killed (FARC)[33]

Total: 59,518–70,807

Now include Iraq and Syria

You have a long way to catch up achmed

How exactly are you going to round up ISIS fighters and put them in extermination camps??? Knock on their door and tell them to please quietly walk with you to the gas chamber???

Either nuke them to the oblivion, or systematic carpet bombing with massive invasion with complete killing with soldiers on fields. Neither of these scenarios are likely to happen because we are "civilised"

Otherwise be in a current standstill.

Send them a mail shot for money off at the DIY store with a scratch off panel so they think they have won a boat.

When they try to claim the boat, nab them.

>US forces have depleted isis fighting force by 2/3rds
>making huge as bomb makes shekels for the US companies
>its a huge racket, but the shekels stay in the country
Read this book fagget
amazon.com/War-Racket-Antiwar-Americas-Decorated/dp/0922915865

>not knowing what a field test is
Typical monkey

this

This is what Ive been saying. Our return on investments is terrible. How much did the Battle of Midway cost? And in return we got the Pacific Ocean. Now a days the spending is the same but in return we get 10 sand ninjas and some dirty valley in the middle of fucking nowehere.

Napoleon used to brag that he could lose 30,000 men a month. At this point Washington could barely lose 3000 in an entire war. They cant raise a republican army. DC is the head of a republic that cant raise a republican army. They may as well cede whatever power they have left to the states. They guard nuclear weapons. Thats all they do.

Killing unarmed civilians is indeed much cheaper than wiping a base of the map.
Now that you understand basic fucking economics you might be able to afford more sheep to fuck.

The strike was to destroy the caves they were storing weapons in the casualties were an added bonus

Embarrassing

Called asymmetrical warfare my friend. Might leads to hubris. Please take notes for When the revolution starts here against our UN OVERLORDS

In addition. Is it necessary to have a huge arsenal of icbm nukes like Russia to pose a threat. Or rather a small player like Kim who has short range nukes to get one on a container ship and do an emp strike. Then we just kill ourselves the first year or two and the chinks move in on plastic boats