You can't handle the Truth

What would it take for you to accept that your race-realist, patriarchal or xenophobic political views are based on a lazy intelectual heuristic which accepts simple answers to complex questions and which functions mostly as a defense mechanism to protect a fragile ego from the anxieties that it desperately tries to repress about it's percieved shortcomings and fears about the world ?

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A
news.ubc.ca/2015/05/06/how-your-brain-reacts-to-emotional-information-is-influenced-by-your-genes/
telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5
nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html
ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html
udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study
humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/
books.google.co.uk/books?id=BMXVZzvLXz8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false
amren.com/news/2006/06/scientists_stud/
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741
udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf
en.metapedia.org/wiki/Arguments_regarding_the_existence_of_races
penetrate.blogspot.com/2009/09/biological-differences-between-races.html
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/kissin-cousins/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/muslim-nations-inbreeding-levels-and-iqs/https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/fathers-brothers-daughter-marriage/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/muslim-uncle-niece-marriages/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/double-first-cousin-marriage/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/cousin-marriage-and-increasing-population-size/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/historic-mating-patterns-on-the-arabian-peninsula/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/family-type-in-egypt/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/big-summary-post-on-the-hajnal-line/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/09/23/core-europe-and-human-accomplishment/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/behind-the-hajnal-line/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/clannishness-defined/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/historic-european-homicide-rates-and-the-hajnal-line/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/outbreeding-self-control-and-lethal-violence
edge.org/response-detail/23838
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

yawn

Simple answers to complex questions are fine.

The problem is complex answers to simple questions, because that's where the happy merchants swindle you with the fine print.

it's = it is
perceived
C+

proof.

>What would it take for you to *sniffs* accept that your race-realist, patriarchal or xenophobic political views, as modalised through a kind of inverted liberal Hegelianism *sniffs* are based on a lazy intelectual heuristic which accepts simple answers to complex questions, and so it creates a kind of a paradox, a cosmic void *sniffs, wipes nose* and which functions mostly as a defense mechanism to protect a fragile reactionary ego, following it through to the end *sniffs* from the anxieties that it desperately tries to repress in a kind of Nietzschean reversal about it's percieved shortcomings and fears about the world ? *sniffs*

Communist belong in mass graves.

Do you genuinely think you're gonna change anyone's mind with this?

Fine print by definition is something that the observer isn't aware of, which to be accepted must be covered by a simpler abstraction.

This.

Schopenhauer > Hegel.
Zizek chose the wrong side.

occom's razor

Can you handle the truth that evolutionary forces created different changes to different populations of people located in different regions of the world over 10's of thousands of years? Can you handle the truth that Africans, with 0% Neanderthal DNA, have a significantly lower average IQ and lower levels of empathy among other differences?

Or do you cling to the believe that, magically, people are all the same on the inside even though they can be very different on the outside, like evolutionary forces acted only on external characteristics and not internal characteristics.

You worship a religion. You are anti science. You are a coward and a lier.

It would be nice to believe that we are all basically the same, that the next Nietzsche or Mozart or Newton could be African or Native American. But deep down you know that's not possible.

RACE REALISM DUMP

Do pigmentation and the melanocortin system modulate aggression and sexuality in humans as they do in other animals?
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912000840

Blacks are 55x more likely of having the "warrior Gene"that makes you violent and crazy
>5.5% of Black men, 0.1% of Caucasian men, and 0.00067% of Asian men carried the 2R allele
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A
50% of Whites have the empathy gene compared to 10% of blacks

news.ubc.ca/2015/05/06/how-your-brain-reacts-to-emotional-information-is-influenced-by-your-genes/

Intelligence is mostly inherited, blacks score on average 1 standard deviation or below whites on IQ tests meaning far more are near retard level while only a microscopic number can be called "geniuses"

telegraph.co.uk/news/science/science-news/12061787/Intelligence-genes-discovered-by-scientists.html


"Human genetic variation is geographically structured" and corresponds with race.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15508000

Race can be determined via genetics with certainty for >99.8% of individuals.
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15625622
Oral bacteria can be used to determine race.
medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-oral-bacteria-fingerprint-mouth.html

Race can be determined via brain scans.
cell.com/current-biology/abstract/S0960-9822(15)00671-5

There was "minimal gene flow" between archaic Europeans and Asians.
nytimes.com/2010/07/20/science/20adapt.html

Common-sense racial categories have biological meaning.
ln.edu.hk/philoso/staff/sesardic/Race2.pdf
Human intelligence is highly heritable.
nature.com/mp/journal/v16/n10/abs/mp201185a.html

Scientific consensus is that IQ tests are not racially biased.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289608000305

Very poor Whites are comparably intelligent to very wealthy blacks.
jbhe.com/features/49_college_admissions-test.html

Privately, intelligence experts hold more hereditarian views than they express in public.
udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1994egalitarianfiction.pdf

Black children raised in White households have similar IQs to black children in black households.
psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1977-07996-001


Environment accounts for little or none of the USA racial IQ gap:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Transracial_Adoption_Study

In academic standardized testing (which has a tight correlation to IQ), the wealthiest Black children (>200,000$ annual income) underperform all but the poorest White children (

IQ of offspring shifts towards the average for the race. If you have White parents of 95 IQ and Black parents of 100 IQ, bet on the White child to be smarter.

humanvarieties.org/2013/04/18/iq-regression-to-the-mean-the-genetic-prediction-vindicated/

books.google.co.uk/books?id=BMXVZzvLXz8C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q&f=false


Certain genes for large brains, linked to high IQ, are common everywhere except Africa.

amren.com/news/2006/06/scientists_stud/


The average African IQ is estimated at 79.
sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886912003741

The average African-American IQ is 85, compared to the average White IQ of 100.
udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/reprints/1997mainstream.pdf
Arguments Regarding the Existence of Races
en.metapedia.org/wiki/Arguments_regarding_the_existence_of_races

Biological Differences Between the Races
penetrate.blogspot.com/2009/09/biological-differences-between-races.html

Of course not

That's why we need gulags

Plus the Bartleby reference on his shirt is ill suited on a mush mouth like Zizek.

Most of the "questions" you refer to as complex are only complex because you subhuman left-wingers make them complex.

Most of it can be solved with gas.

mating patterns in muslim populations

hbdchick.wordpress.com/2010/09/09/kissin-cousins/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/03/04/muslim-nations-inbreeding-levels-and-iqs/https://hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/05/26/fathers-brothers-daughter-marriage/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/06/01/muslim-uncle-niece-marriages/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/07/07/double-first-cousin-marriage/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/cousin-marriage-and-increasing-population-size/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/historic-mating-patterns-on-the-arabian-peninsula/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/05/10/family-type-in-egypt/

SPOILER: They're extremely inbred.

See I've have won and you have lost.

I raped your beta boipucci so hard you orgasmed and called me daddy.

Goodnight cuck.

Fuck off, Shia, nobody wants you.

Why Europe is Great

hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/big-summary-post-on-the-hajnal-line/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/09/23/core-europe-and-human-accomplishment/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/01/16/behind-the-hajnal-line/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/clannishness-defined/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2013/01/18/historic-european-homicide-rates-and-the-hajnal-line/
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2012/01/25/outbreeding-self-control-and-lethal-violence

Very good post. If you're interested in the specific selection pressures that European populations were subjected to, I recommend checking out this link.
hbdchick.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/big-summary-post-on-the-hajnal-line/

Thanks, I'll check it out.

zizek is like stirner in that he has created an unfalsifiable yet ultimately useless paradigm that serves no real purpose once you've realized that your initial belief system is in need of refinement, it is the definition of entry-level philosophy encoded in humorous mannerisms and highly idiosyncratic personal dogma that aspires to overthrow the mainstream for no particular reason other than iconoclasm *sniff* and so on and so on

The word people that you used ascribes by definition a certain commonality to all of humanity. Any differences should then be subsummed in the common potentiality of all conscious and speaking beings born in language.

The very fact that these same arguments have been made by black/asian etc racial supemacists should prove the universality of human reason.

You can't cloud reality with big words. I judge reality by what I can observe and what I can deduce from facts. You deduce reality from what you've read in a book about how reality ought to work, from a book on political theory.

Empty rhetoric. There are genetically distinct, geographically delineated populations that have inborn differences in intelligence and temperament. That's a fact, and your sophistry doesn't change that.

The answer is so obvious that I feel dumb even saying it, but causality between genetics and human potentiality is really unprovable because it can clearly also be caused by historical and cultural factors. It's unprovable either way, and what remains is simply your ideological bias, which creates the lense for you interpretation of the facts.

>and what remains is simply your ideological bias, which creates the lense for you interpretation of the facts.
how can you be so bereft of self-awareness
>but causality between genetics and human potentiality is really unprovable
self-deception
you know that any living organism's potential is determined by its genetics. it's not like lions are dumber than humans because of their culture. they are what they are because they are what they are

Applying concepts such as 'dumb' to draw comparisons between humans and animals is philsophically moot, because they don't exist in the same 'horizon of meaning' to use an Heideggerian concept. Obviously genetics play a role in potentiality when it comes to genetical disfunctions like Down's syndrom, but when it comes to race in general there is ample evidence that all of them are able to produce deep political, artistic and scientific work and are furthemore sometimes capable of overcoming cultural biases and share lives together. Examples abound and they shouldn't require enumeration.

>It's unprovable either way
Not for long, considering the way behavioral genetics is advancing.
>SNP x is associated with an IQ increase of y points
>SNP x is found at a higher frequency in population z than other populations

Also see the 2r variant of the warrior gene.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monoamine_oxidase_A

The left is operating under the assumption that any difference in outcome is due to oppression when that's just not the case. They're crafting policies that are predicated on lies, and the trajectory of those policies leads to a Harrison Bergeron style dystopia. We need to be aware of the genetic basis of intelligence and temperament moving forward. Our future depends on it.

The Chinese are aware.
edge.org/response-detail/23838
>Given the Mendelian genetic lottery, the kids produced by any one couple typically differ by 5 to 15 IQ points. So this method of "preimplantation embryo selection" might allow IQ within every Chinese family to increase by 5 to 15 IQ points per generation. After a couple of generations, it would be game over for Western global competitiveness.

The deep political, artistic, and scientific work is produced by the outliers, which exist in all races. The issue here is the population as a whole.

>are furthemore sometimes capable of overcoming cultural biases and share lives together
sometimes being the key word

>What would it take for you to accept that your race-realist, patriarchal or xenophobic political views are based on a lazy intelectual heuristic which accepts simple answers to complex questions and which functions mostly as a defense mechanism to protect a fragile ego from the anxieties that it desperately tries to repress about it's percieved shortcomings and fears about the world ?

Well, your statement would have to be correct for me to accept it.

Which it is not.

So.....

Well done lads. You successfully hijacked this shitty forced Zizek thread.

>what remains is simply your ideological bias, which creates the lense for you interpretation of the facts.
The cognitive dissidence from Zizek and his fanboys is remarkable.

Using verbal gymnastics does not make something true faggot...even simple minded people know niggers are violent animals. Your pretentiousness is annoying and it makes me picture some limp writer nu male banging away on a keyboard rather than a girl..i know plenty of rural retards I'd rather spend time with rather than some vain pansy that used leftist buzzwords like you. Go get a thesaurus and see how many other words you can use for simple concepts you absolute cancer...then kys

Excellent

Our race realism redpills are actually very potent. Everyone should have an HBD facts list that they can dump at a moment's notice. A lefty university actually had a lecture on them.

...