How on earth did Aboriginal Australians get to Australia from Africa?

How on earth did Aboriginal Australians get to Australia from Africa?

'These first humans did not arrive in Australia by boat. At the time the first Aboriginals came to Australia 50,000 years ago, humans were still in the Stone Age. They did not have the technology to build seagoing vessels of any kind. Since Australia was always separated from other countries by an ocean; humans could not have travelled to Australia on any sort of sea-going vessel such as rafts, canoes or boats. The final crossing to Australia was probably made by accident. It is most likely that the initial arrivals got to Australia unintentionally. These people were probably carried across the ocean on drifting debris as a result of a major flood or even a tsunami in a land somewhere further to the north. Some say, that given the genetic homogeneity of the aboriginal population, this could have even been just one pregnant female.'

'The first Australians branched off from an Asian population that had already separated from the ancestors of Europeans.'

The out of africa theory is quite obviously bullshit. This research took about 5 minutes.

panique.com.au/trishansoz/aborigine/aboriginal-indigenous-australian.html

genographic.nationalgeographic.com/migration-to-australia/

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Akhdam#Anthropology
file.scirp.org/pdf/AA20120200004_71596882.pdf
scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

That stick must have been massive.

>"Invented"
The word you're looking for is found.

Land bridge. 50,000 years ago earth was still in an ice age, with more earth's water frozen near the poles and in glaciers. That left the ocean levels lower leaving more land exposed.

Even if there wasn't a perfect bridge, it's not too outlandish to think of wading through the shallows between islands.

So they walked all the way from Africa to India, to asia and then to australia? Why? Australia doesn't have any plants suitable for farming - why would they willingly migrate into even hotter climates than asia?

I honestly don't believe in the race realism shit for most peoples, but Australian Aboriginals is where I draw the line. Pic related is a map of genetic distance between populations.

Because back then it was not viable to live in colder areas, thus is why they settled in Australia it wasn't that much hotter back then.

What about the whites? They lived in colder climates, forced to innovate due to cold climates, became the master race. White people > Anything

What I don't understand about the whole 'migration' fluff is this:

Why did some people stay put, but others leave? Amongst the ones that left to the middle east, why did some travel further afield instead of stay there were?

Also

If white skin, blond hair and blue eyes originated in cold climates, why do Eskimos have black hair, black eyes and dark skin? Where did asiatic eyes originate?

Doesn't make any logical sense.

the only possible reason is that there are four main races (caucasian, negroid, mongoloid and australoid)

Well the whites ended in Europe at that time it was much warmer climate but still fucking cold as well, to be fair they weren't totally fully whites at the time but a strand of genetic mutants lol in other words evolutionary development while migrating (Not kidding look it up) Anyhow the theory was the whites were more tolerant than blacks to the cold and were a tad more innovative and not so back tracked on their (WAYS)

wait ... didnt they start in australia? how are aboos more monkey like than actualy negroes?

The same reason natives decided to walk over the Bering strait to reach the Americas, which I don't know

Look at what the natives of New Guinea look like; they're the same people and the abos crossed over from there.

>Where did asiatic eyes originate?

Some people stayed put as they were comfortable with where they were, for example the Blacks Africans stayed in their (Homeland) so thats the starting point there. The ones that left were simply curious and if i recall a lot of different tribe adventuring out. Each tribe had their own reasons. Same thing honestly they just kept walking, some stay put again in middle east etc etc.

One thing you need to remember is that the human race all migrated form Africa and were black. White skin was a genetic mutation that came along with migration, they crossed the colder parts to get to where they were today and having white skin (is a theory) was for more warmth than having darker skin but thats just stupid i view it more of a genetic mutation. Same thing applies to blond hair and blue eyes it wasn't all based on the cold environment but a lot of it attributed to the evolution change. The reason why the Eskimos have black hair and black eyes and darker skin is because of the same reason, their group didn't have any genetic mutation or evolution in the case of black hair and eyes from the Africans but their skin was slightly changed dont know in depth with eskimo but thats my theory. Asians same shit i guess with the eyes etc.

less to do with cold and more to do with UVB exposure, dark skin blocks out UVB, which is good in high UVB areas, since it can fuck up cells, but UVB also helps in production of Vitamin D, so need some. When go to area with less UVB, having dark is is less advantageous because blocks almost all the UVB, which is no good. thus selection for less melanin over time.
so the theory goes.

So, whites - the ones that carried on wandering - turned out to just happen to have the most mutations and genetic variety even though they originated fro the same people as everyone else? Even though they invented and contributed more to this world than any other race? Bullshit.

Where did Neanderthals originate? They didn't come from Africa.

Australoids used to live in Eurasia. from india they went to SEA and Australia.

Indians, Papuans, Aetas... are a remnant group of Australoids in Asia

Basu et al. (2003) concludes that Veddoid/Australoid tribal populations entered India first from the Northwest corridor and much later some of them through Northeastern corridor.[20] Kumar et al. (2007) analyzed 25 Indian Austro-Asiatic tribes and found strong paternal genetic link among the sub-linguistic groups of the Indian Austro-Asiatic populations to Australoids.


there are still some abos in Yemen
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al-Akhdam#Anthropology

>suitable for farming
>farming
>abos
You're an idiot.
They were hunter gatherers.
So fish, roots, berries and whatever was easy to kill.

Yes because they evolved throughout their migration im not gonna get in depth about it, too many contributions, Environmental change, Genetic mutations, blah blah, it's an interesting subject though.

The Neanderthals originated from Africa mate, they just migrated much much earlier than Humans did.

file.scirp.org/pdf/AA20120200004_71596882.pdf

scirp.org/journal/PaperInformation.aspx?paperID=19566

Just found this - apparently the out of africa theory was debunked in 2012.

'The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of
the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.'

...

...

Humans originated in Africa but only thrived in the Fertile Crescent (modern Syria/Israel) and parts of china due to the presence of crops that could be easily domesticated,

From here they spread into Europe and into Asia, sea level was significantly lower back then so there was actually much less ocean to cross to reach Australia,

It is thought that people slowly island hopped untill reaching Australia (when sea level was lower there was only one channel of water where there was not a clearly visible island on the horizon), sea level then decreased leaving a population stranded on Australia to adapt to their region independently

It is thought that original populatiors of Australia had access to dug out canoes but quickly abandoned the technology upon becoming isolated

what did he mean by this?

...

...

actually Australia use to be a lush forest until the abbos used their "burn everything down" hunting tactics. over the course of 50,000 years the abbos basically turned Australia from tropical paradise to useless desert.

Sort of, one thing we do know is that they killed every single species of large mammal

nah, eucalyptus and koalas dont just change to fire-drought adaptation. neither to lizards n 'roos. OZ had more jungles, but the desert was there before apes existed.

Just saying that the African human y chromosome haplogroup (Regardless of mutation) is different from Europeoid's so its a theory saying that from the (Haplogroup's) whites did not migrate from Africa.

They started in pakistan, the mongo man started in straya but was wiped out 40-50k years ago.

Say what you want but he looks pretty good for 50,000 years.

Even though I don't support the out of Africa theory, I don't see how this contradicts it. Humans supposedly migrated in multiple waves, earliest being 100 to 90k years BC