>ELVERUM, Norway — An explosion just a few feet away rocks the unmarked station wagon as it travels along a dirt road in the Norwegian woodland.
>
>Immediately, two soldiers jump from their front seats and run for cover behind the carcass of an old, rusty tank. Firing their weapons at targets along the snow-covered hillside, they call for support from the rest of their unit.
How old were you when you grew out of misogyny?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
All female units make a lot more sense then mixed units.
All female units are fine for some operations I guess.
Despite browsing Sup Forums for a decent amount of time, I never fell in the misogyny meme. Reality is always way more complex than what Sup Forums tries to make you believe.
That sounds very discriminatory against men
it's better to create a female "special forces" unit, than to integrate them with the real special forces, and have feminist politicians remove minimum requirements just so girls can call them selves special too
An all female unit is better than mixed because they won't have the issue of needing to drag a 6'4" 220 lbs man in gear back to safety.
This
NORWAY YES
Someone had to leave the tank and engage the enemy...
Sitting around waiting to be raped while wearing a military uniform doesn't mean "women are soldiers too".
> taking Sup Forums seriously enough that you have to say you didnt fell for x or y meme
They will have the issue, however, of having to carry themselves. Will they be of some potential use? Sure. Should they be anywhere near a combat zone? No.
Exactly. im all for equal deaths but women cant drag down male performance.
This is fine. The majority of problems with women in the military comes from mixed units (although women are still comparatively weak as hell). As long as they remain segregated this is peachy
I'm not saying they will be as effective as men, but that this segregated solution is better than mixing, which is realistically the only other option in the short term because feminists won't stop this nonsense for a awhile yet.
I think under ideal conditions women should not be in any combat arms, because biologically speaking the loss of a female is more damaging to societal fertility than the loss of a man.
They are going to War, not the Olympics. Can they perform under stress, hunger, fatigue and chaos?
Well, yes with enough training. We have to defagotify women.
All female units will never work and neither will mixed ones.
If you have to spend much more money to get the same quality of fighters, you are wasting taxpayer money. It's pretty safe to assume this is the case, if we are honest.
This is essentially expensive virtue signalling with other peoples money.
Except that all woman units have proven themselves in combat...
It can be tried surely.
i think if u made an all female unit specialising in clearing rooms buildings and intel gathering type stuff it would be good.. i would have them operating on the front line but not behind enemy lines lol.. leave the real special forces type stuff where they are dropped in the desert miles from the target to those who can meet the physical standerds
Let them LARP, they are so gullible
I always thought they should recruit kids like those banji girls for spec ops, because they're small so they can fit in vents and hide behind things well but they're dancers so they're pretty strong for their size, and if they get captured the bad guys will probably rape them before they kil them which would give them time to plan an escape
The individual female soldiers will be spread out to operational units so they have a female soldier capable of dealing with muslin women
This guy makes a pretty good case of what happens to women's intellectual performance under pressure as seen in gaming and chess.
Can happen to men as well. I tried my hand at pro-gaming back in the day, but caved under the pressure because I was anxious to do well with my fellow team.
>all-female
perfect. I dont mind this at all
I can and it happened. Many men suffered from Shell Shock in wars. But in theory women are more susceptible. And in the context of a Special Ops unit it gets worse. Can you maintain your ability to improvise in a bad situation? Can you coordinate your group when morale is low or in an emergency? Remains to be seen.
oy vey misogynist
A man can only provide two hands in the fight for the tribes survival, but a woman has the chance to have children and provide ten more hands that can fight for future of the folk.
having woman fight on the frontlines is not a good idea, when they could be doing what they are best at
> Expensive virtue signalling with other people's money
So Nordic socialism in a nutshell then?