Let's say a country invades one and wins, how many rapes will there be, and will it influence the whole race in later generations?
What i'm trying to say here is, have the greeks we see today the same dna as leonidas? Or are they all corrupted? Which would be really sad.
Are there some statistics or test on it?
Other urls found in this thread:
expressen.se
youtube.com
twitter.com
The sad reality is that most of the victory rapes are hard to report and record, so to give an estimate could be a bit of a problem
don't think cunts really gave a fuck back then about this pc non raping shit
the women were just considered spoils of war
Common in every invasion throughout history
but beyond the rape there is a weird phenomena of women finding conquerors more attractive so it isint always rape but a natural reaction women have to protect themselves from being mistreated.
Just look at Nam, the middle east is a bit of a different story due to teh extreme nature of Islam but in Jappan, Korea and Vietnam women through themselves at american soldiers.
not sure hans but your question reminds me of this speech and it will surely electrify the spirit
>Carolina Klüft hunted by a German stalker
expressen.se
youtube.com
forgot to post the vid
do a 23andme on your nation for russian DNA post ww2 and you will get your answer hans
Beautiful paleolithic woman.
Pretty damn common desu
Didn't change a lot genetic-wise.
Germans and Poles mixed for thousands of years even before Poland and Germany were a thing. And since Russians are just mongolized Polacks it didn't change a lot.
In Greek and Roman times, the more "civilized" way of going at it was to take over the households of the men you killed rather than just rape/kill the women and children. His wife, children and belonging are now yours, the pack was taken over by a superior alpha male and she'll be making your dinner now. This happened ALL the time, can you imagine that shit
Why even try anymore if you can't take a woman by force?
Fuck this gay peacock dating shit
Doubt it, mainly for pleasure but they wouldn't rape women and leave them there.. more enemy soldiers
Abortions were a thing in 1945, conquests probably had larger genetic impacts in olden days
So common that it has literally never NOT happened in war. Sure the "good" winners sometimes have a bunch of guys that don't do it, but you at least get a victory screw. For an example of this see Fury: the whole apartment sequence is legendary.
>woman alone in the wilderness
>no laws
>not a member of an advanced society regarding women's rights
Seriously user what would you do? Would the woman have ANY reason to resist you?
>"The greatest happiness is to scatter your enemy, to drive him before you, to see his cities reduced to ashes, to see those who love him shrouded in tears, and to gather into your bosom his wives and daughters."
>Gangis Khan
So you wuz saying the British Empire r whitez???? shiiiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeet
source
Women were spoils of war. The German women at the end of WWII lifted their skirts for invading Russkies. It wasn't even "rape" at that point. They had the chance to run, and didn't.
Think about that for a second.
>rape
Do you know how quick them women were to fuck the opposition?
Oh wait, germany..you know better
Extremely common, if China had struck first it would have been the Rape of Kyoto instead of Rape of Nanjing.
Pretty much EVERY side of war until relatively recently were committing mass rapes and slaughter.
...and aside from 'cut-and-dry' rape, gang rape in open fields for example, there are a lot of dubious consent where women on the losing side traded sex for food or the safety of their family members.
Rape used as a weapon of war is a side effect of rape culture where a woman's consent isn't really considered at all for most of history - when a woman is considered property or an extension of her family, rape of her was seen as an attack on the men who actually fought.
Before the Japanese army left Japan, they actually conscripted some of their OWN women to be comfort women! They see access to sex for the troops as an absolute right over the women's right to bodily integrity, and it was actually their view that the keeping some sex slaves for the army was a preventive measure against rape in the streets (which happened anyways) which would destabilize Japanese control over conquered territories. Prior to Hong Kong's Black Christmas and during the occupation, Japan delivered mass propaganda to the Chinese advocating themselves as benign rulers.
In addition to moral reasons for eliminating war rape, pragmatically, it must be stomped out because men could bring back disease, how they treat the enemy's women could bleed over to how they treat their own women, and peace is harder to archive with this level of grievance.
Ask your grandmother
You should know your own history.
10% of berlin women commited suicide after "the rapeof berlin" which apparently didn't happen.
but im half polish........i could have dirty german blood?!?!?!
>had the chance to run
>wasn't even "rape" at that point
wew lad, that's some spicy bait you got there
That actually doesn't sound that bad. You can still fuck over your enemies but you aren't a rapist and there is no blood and tears and dead kids. You still have to raise the kids knowing that you probably killed their actual father, and of course make some kids of your own which could possibly lead to larger family size than intended.
Not very common. Women are traitors. They willingly fuck and breed with the winners.
Why don't you just taste your own blood and find out?
>His wife, children and belonging are now yours,
So are the kids now considered the kids of the alpha male who have taken over even though they aren't his blood?
Non-blood adoption have actually existed in China for thousands of years - it usually is preceded by /abduction/ of the adopted child by a household with no heirs, and the kid is added to the family tree and continues it.
War rape is a myth.
When a stronger alpha male conquers a land and kills her husband, it's only natural that a woman will want to breed with him instead.
Only if he legally adopts them, which is something that happened a lot in Rome. Mostly for political reasons though, I'd guess it would be a rare occurrence in these scenarios
Those were all the women who didn't run, of course. Not counting the ones who did.
Humans have been raping the enemy's women since tribal times. This is inevitable, as the invaders who rape will have their genetic material survive more than those who do not rape. Women also willingly spread their legs for the invader, as their female ancestors who denied sex to the new alphas were more likely to be killed. The instinct to rape after a victory exists in virtually all men, and the instinct to accept the invader exists in virtually all women.
>They willingly fuck and breed with the winners.
This is one of the more depressing facts about human nature, desu. Even if a woman genuinely loves her husband, she'll submit to a greater alpha if the household gets conquered. Women can *genuinely* love their captors and rapists.
The only known anti-dote to this is extreme honor culture - like in Islam or in India.
>Germnigger propaganda
I hope we actually finish the job properly this time.
Dude it were not even consider rape because to those civilizations women were just things. Women in those civilization knew that if there men lose they were gonna be sex slaves and the young ones were gonna be wife's for those soldiers. Men who were teenagers were all kill and kids were sold as slaves. The concept of rape is NEW women could not be rape in the pass because they didn't have any control over there sex lives
He lives in Germany, i think it's because he's used to "rape culture" there.
Part of a VICTORY is to make the conquered population became assimilated, what better than spread the victor GENES,while bonding with the conquered??
It actually happened exactly like that though.
>Whites people are evil.