Redpill me on why women want the Chad and nothing else?

Why do 80% of women go for the 20% of men?

Biology.

before the sexual revolution chad could not fuck anyone but stacy without getting stabbed by a crazy yet hot girl. Now he can tell Stacy to fuck off and do as he pleases until Stacy either finds another chad or goes back to him.

Human mating behavior is much different than animal mating behavior. Have your shit together, look presentable, and be a genuine good and fun person and you will meet someone. Plus, you'll have a body count with you too, so suddenly a girl sleeping with 4-5 guys in her past suddenly isn't a big deal.

Shallow people seek out other shallow people. Also biology.

>one life to live
>having kids is a huge investment
>do you want the father of your kids to be a rich Chad with alpha genes that is the father for dozens of kids
>or do you want the father of your kids to be some loser white guy that isn't rich, isn't handsome, and doesn't have awesome genes

Women would rather share a Chad than have an average guy to themselves. Just the way it is. And because Chad is more than willing to fuck as many women as possible, that shuts out 80% of men from every pairing with a woman.

Literally deal with it. This is human evolution at it's finest. Survival of the fittest.

But even if the chad doesnt have money and the loser white guy is rich. The women will still always be attracted to the chad

Same reason people look for the "SS" and "GT" moniker on your Camaro or Mustang - and laugh at you if you don't have it. They want that V8 inside them, not the ecoboost or V6.

>women seek to breed with the strongest male

this conundrum has boggled many great minds. can Sup Forums solve this thousand year old riddle?

Because he is the fittest. Fucking deal with it.

If technology ever gets to the point where men don't need women for children then women are going to really feel the brunt of that impact. Men don't need women the same way women need men. I expect lots of regulation if not out-right ban of this.

Biology mixed with shallowness and retardation. Women want a fit and good looking mate on a biological level. If the women is smart she'd also seek out a smart and mature male but many women aren't so they end up fucking guys left and right then end up trying to settle with betamax. The average person is a fucking retard, don't expect them to be able to know how to look for a good spouse.

women want a man who's secure in himself and fit, who makes them feel good. they're trying to secure the best mate for their children. they fuck chads to get get good children, regardless of whether he has money or not, because the govt and beta males provide for her

I don't understand how that would change a single thing. Women will still get Chad, except now they'll do even more for Chad. All that happens is that betas can breed with their hands, alone in a corner now.

Because you're fat and ugly

>falling for the chad myth

I noticed that women fall for "striking" looking men. For example, your mug can be overall ugly, but if you have at least one model-tier feature, like , cheekbones, or a attractive smile,... it is on.

Same reason I want a thin, fit woman.

...

This and Chad are made up memes by flaming gay alt-right Sup Forums homosexuals who crave these guys and project onto women

Nothing special about this guy or these guys.

You're a fool if you cannot see the implications being able to bypass a woman to give birth.

This is exactly the reason women leans left. If there is no suitable father, they can force all men to be the father through the government.

What's the source on that statistic? I feel like it doesn't add up

This.

Necessity

How would that meaningfully change sexual relationships? Women and Chad will still get together and now Chads value is even higher on the sexual market and now the 80% of loser men will effectively leave the market and masturbate with sexbots and give birth to kids made from their masturbation sessions.

This only changes what happens to loser betas. Chad will literally be higher than a 10/10 hot woman. He would be able to fuck groups of women every night.

Pareto Principle duhh

Watch Jordan Peterson lectures to find out more!

because that's what a real man is. Without technology you'd all be dead in a day.

Hypergamy.

>so suddenly a girl sleeping with 4-5 guys in her past suddenly isn't a big deal.

Shhhh. Let the children learn this on their own.

Same reason why 80% of men go for 20% of women. You're not a nice guy and you will finish last cause your face looks like you got bear with a shovel.
Welcome to life OP

thats what separates humans from monkeys. Are you saying this guy and women haven't evolved?

Same reason 100% of men go for 10% women. People end up settling quit being pissed at stuff you have no control over.

>Nature has made it the calling of the young, strong, and handsome men to look after the propagation of the human race; so that the species may not degenerate. This is the firm will of Nature, and it finds its expression in the passions of women. This law surpasses all others in both age and power. Woe then to the man who sets up rights and interests in such a way as to make them stand in the way of it; for whatever he may do or say, they will, at the first significant onset, be unmercifully annihilated. For the secret, unformulated, nay, unconscious but innate moral of woman is: We are justified in deceiving those who, because they care a little for us — that is to say for the individual — imagine they have obtained rights over the species. The constitution, and consequently the welfare of the species, have been put into our hands and entrusted to our care through the medium of the next generation which proceeds from us; let us fulfil our duties conscientiously.

>But women are by no means conscious of this leading principle in abstracto, they are only conscious of it in concreto, and have no other way of expressing it than in the manner in which they act when the opportunity arrives. So that their conscience does not trouble them so much as we imagine, for in the darkest depths of their hearts they are conscious that in violating their duty towards the individual they have all the better fulfilled it towards the species, whose claim upon them is infinitely greater. (A fuller explanation of this matter may be found in vol. ii., ch. 44, in my chief work, Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung.)

>Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual. This gives to their whole being and character a certain frivolousness, and altogether a certain tendency which is fundamentally different from that of man; and this it is which develops that discord in married life which is so prevalent and almost the normal state.

Um, men do the same when it comes to women. Just sayin.

>Um, men do the same when it comes to women. Just sayin.

Literally not true, which is the point. Men will be with women 4/10 and above. Even Chad will get with 4/10's. 1/10 women can get with 6/10 men. I laugh at this shit that says that men are incredibly picky. They aren't, they'll sleep with obese hamplanet feminist whores.

men's body count and women's body count are totally two different things in term of how pyschologically efefct them. The larger women's body count, the harder for her to be in any sort of stable relationship. Science Bitch!

>Why do 80% of women go for the 20% of men
Well, I don't think that there are so much Mediterranean gods on the world
But it is common sense that every female ethnicity want them for breeding

why do 99% only want to pass on their own genes? when 90% of men have inferior genes?

many factors actualy. just to name some with good old green text

>self confidence is a indicator that one is able to navigate social structures, thus be able to provide for his family and partner. self confidence looks good in social intercourse, and thus woman can transmute her weaknesses and blandness trough reliable lens.

>Women care more about how the world sees them than how they see them self. Thus they also want from their partner to be extrovert that makes them look good.

>in vast majority of cases, the confidence is a trait of lower intelligent people. because the intelligent man will spend too much time doubting his every move, because of his awareness of his every move.

>stupid stubbornness is more reliable than intelligence, because intelligence can have many directions and does not guarantee socio/economical success of a Man. So in a nutshell it all depends on what kind of Intelligence one possesses and his will to act upon that intelligence in outward world.

>disregarding the body shape, social success and position. One thing Women can not stand in Man is: Social aversion, indifference or outright rejection that many Man of high Intelligence actualy practice. That is because for Intelligent Man common people are; transparent, too simple, uninteresting. For he finds pleasure in exploring higher concepts, complicated systems, apstract notions.


All of this works if u reverse the roles, and find Highly intelligent Woman, but because of the rarity of such phenomena, the general rule is that the Man are those that occupy high IQ sphere of humanity.

tl;dr Schopenhauer:

Women purpose is reproduction.
Natural imperative is for women to seek the best among men.
Natural feminine instincts always communicate that the young, strong, handsome, dominative, violent and powerful are the best suitable for reproduction.
Nature wants that precious genes more than mediocre genes.
Nature unconsciously demands women to serve those men, for doing so, women serves humanity best, by giving the next generation, the best genes.

Collective struggle above the individual struggle. Women can't control themselves, because they are not made for self-control, but for reproduction, and all their psyche, looks, instincts and survival mechanisms are made to optimize her role on the reproduction of humankind.

Nature made them evil and bad, to seek the strong seed, and not giving much thought and heart about anything else at all. Her second instinct is her survival, and nature demands that women orbit the wealthy males, and use and abuse beta labor.

Chads dont look like that

lmao he is not the fittest anything

There is just a bunch of fags who give him automatic preference/privilege/etc. because they're flaming gays, cucks, or flaming gay cucks.

Flaming gay, exhibit A. Also wrong as all fuck.

>shallow
Kek, stay mad uglyfag. Sorry but my dick wont get hard unless she is fine.

Put a Chad and a rich billionaire next to each other. Women will choose the Chad as a partner 95 times out of 100. And it's solely because he was born superior.

More like, men go for all kinds of girl, fall in love all around the spectrum from 5 - 10, while women only keep their hearts and minds on the 8-10 spectrum.

/thread
And to add to that, it works both ways you literal retards. What man doesn't want a 10/10 qt?

Same reason u want stacey and not the tumblr whales as wives.

Everything mentioned here only studies why intelligent man are having a hard time appearing attractive.
Social Awkwardness does not belong only to them, there are also many that are failing because of the false expectations, "i dont like my body (mind), so no one can" type of deal, that is in great measure propagated by the western shallowness.

>Chad
This guy looks scandinavian af, he probably sucks Somali dick.

Fpbp

it is the nature of the free market.

certain qualities and features are mostly universally agreed on as 'valuable'. Chiseled chins, height, confidence, money. Women want these high value items, much like men want cute faces, large breasts, slim waistlines.

You also need to understand that your partner determines your social status. If a poor woman marries a rich man, her status will increase a lot. Same with a moderately attractive woman marrying a handsome man. Everyone wants to increase their status