>Under the measure, evidence of physical resistance is not required to prove that a sexual crime has been committed.
No presumption of innocence for you, goy. If she says you raped her, then you raped her.
Enjoy your progressive western values
>thehill.com
>Baltimore
statistically speaking, most sex in Maryland probably is rape
Women ruin everything.
Film at 11
>evidence of physical resistance is not required to prove that a sexual crime has been committed.
wtf i love having sex with unconscious chicks now, haha the west is so cucked lmao they dont even make it ok to fuck a girl when she's not awake
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to be mugged
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to get murdered
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to get your store robbed
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to be assaulted
> If you're raped, you need to prove you fought back
The strongest women are almost as strong as some of the weakest men. Unless the woman happens to be armed, there's no realistic situation where a woman can mount a resistance that doesn't get her beaten or possibly killed while she's being raped.
Yes there is you stupid fuck cause rapists are degenerate fucks and a women being raped will have adrenaline which will give her strength so she can EASILY fight back and escape pretty much any rapist
Sheeeeeit
>he raped me
>no I didn't, she consented
That's all the evidence you have, what the fuck do you do? Which side is more credible and why?
>less than 50% white state
whoa boy
Look, we get your point. But this is just another step towards women just using their word to throw men in jail and nothing else.
And that's beyond fucked. I don't want women raped but there is a fucking reason we should require evidence for crimes.
The woman is more credible shitlord.
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to be assaulted
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to get your store robbed
> No evidence of physical resistance needed to be mugged
You need evidence to press charges for all of these things, you goodest goy. I didn't even point out the murder one because it's retarded, much like yourself and the pair of people who conceived you.
>a woman can mount a resistance
Wait I am confus isnt the rapist who mounts the resistance?
Thank
I want off this ride
this is why i stay out of site of women, especially at night, they might rights rape me
>The woman is more credible shitlord.
Says who?
Fucking passed out drink girls is not rape, dumbass. Getting drunk and passing out around men is consent.
looks like the MGTOW faggots were right after all
So progressive. Seriously though I am genuinely curious to see what crosses the mind of people like him when they make statements like that, although it's probably something long the lines of what you said.
>they might rights rape me
Kek
yea fucking right, have you ever dated?
there's a reason men make better leaders and no it's not sexism
Society our controllers.
Meanwhile in Russia:
rt.com
this is great. start accusing women of rape.
this is why I always have a girl escort me to my car after midnight, a women's word is worth more than a mans. What if there us a chubby blue haired whale waiting in the parking lot for helpless men to yell 'rape' at?
Well, this would be a great way for prostitutes to take down corrupt politicians I guess.
Oh, leaf. . . .
I'm not sure if you're underage or if you're a female who actually believes this. By that logic, then no rape should happen at all because all women can "EASILY fight back and escape."
I only wish in your life you can experience this first-hand. The worst part is when you are trying as hard as you possibly can to fight back and you still hear the zipper go down, and you still feel the tearing as you're penetrated. And you're still trying but you can't move, and then the pain kicks in.
lel
>No presumption of innocence for you, goy. If she says you raped her, then you raped her.
Which is why feminists call every form of "oppression" either rape or whateverwordPhobia: they are aweful terms and everyone gets behind the victims, i mean who would even support a rapist right?
It's also the weapon most women use to tip the scale in their favor whenever something bad happens to them. remember what happened to kesha? same deal, everyone knew it was fake but i've personally met a lot of girls who actually fell for it
>poor kesha was raped by her manager
>but she could never prove it
>so? she said he did why would she lie about it?
>pic related
So, let me get this straight....
All sex with women is rape, except when muslims gangrape and behead an 11 year old girl, and then it's just "Culture", right?
>I only wish in your life you can experience this first-hand. The worst part is when you are trying as hard as you possibly can to fight back and you still hear the zipper go down, and you still feel the tearing as you're penetrated. And you're still trying but you can't move, and then the pain kicks in.
Go on...
The male equivalent of being raped is false rape claims. Seriously, the only thing that would ever make a non-rapist rape a woman would be only because he was falsely accused of raping someone.
That shit will ruin your life and should not be taken lightly. Why is it hard for people to have a balanced perspective of intent vs potential for abuse? I understand this law but it's clear how easily this will be abused. And that of course will ironically enough hurt ACTUAL RAPE VICTIMS in the long run if this law is shown to be as abused as much as I expect it to be with enough rape claims exposed as false claims.
>make sex rape
>actual rape skyrocket because why the fuck not at this point
when you about to nut, but her face says you will be sent to prison, might as well throw in the old chokero, genius
>That's all the evidence you have, what the fuck do you do? Which side is more credible and why?
Wouldn't matter. Testimony from a single person alone is not enough evidence to convict someone of rape.
>What is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
Testimonial evidence is the weakest kind.
No....women have a strangely high rate of reporting false rapes. Higher than any other crime (some estimates put it like 30-40%)
It's not about rape victims. It's about getting feminist lobby money and votes.
>confusing european laws with american ones
>98% of the statistics on Sup Forums are 100% bullshit
Fucking newfags. Not even a sauce to pretend. You all need to go back to fucking reddit.
That's kind of what I was getting at, yeah.
>walk down street
>see girl you know
>say hi
>get accused of rape
>go to jail
Good thing this won't happen to any of us.
I don't think "women" on a collective level want to be able to protect girls who lie about rape, because anyone with half a brain sees how that is fuel for the fire and does nothing but hurt actual victims.
It's a situation that can't be handled well regardless of what approach is taken, because the best way to eliminate the problem of rape is to make sure everyone is armed. And that causes an entirely new set of issues depending on what area of the world you're talking about.
Realistically, what would be a better idea?
yup, they are vindictive as fuck but simplistic and narrow minded
makes for a fucked up recipe
So what now do I have to go to a notary to sign some papers everytime I dick a girl consentually?
Google it yourself faggot, even the lowest number given is 8% which is extremely unusual
It's not about rape.
You have to undo this problem first. Then these weird fucking "sexism" laws will probably evaporate.
remember the dave chappelle consent skit?
that's will become reality soon
>>confusing european laws with american ones
Implying we have that long for there to be no difference.
Listen and believe.
This is fine as long as they don't reverse the presumption of innocence.
Even if you don't need evidence of physical resistance, that lack of evidence means you can never be convicted.
What we need though is to prosecute "victims" for purjury and really throw the book at them when there is proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that they lied.
>What we need though is to prosecute "victims" for purjury and really throw the book at them when there is proof beyond a shadow of a doubt that they lied.
Too bad that's illegal.
give rape and false rape the same sentence
although feminist would probably cry about muh patriarchy, meanwhile good men have had their lives ruined over immature cunts
Only solution is to have a sign outside door saying recording occurs inside so you consent to recording by entering.
So if she tries some shit you can show the jury hours of her consentually slobbering on the dick.
Eugene kanin
It's shite though, only works once
>first time offenses not resulting in bodily harm will be punishable by fines between 5,000 and 30,000 rubles, 60 to 120 hours of community service, or 10 and 15 days of police detention. Repeatedly assaulting relatives or causing bodily harm to family members remain criminal offences, with the punishment unchanged – a fine amounting up to three months
Pretty much just a demo-version of domestic abuse for $500
One could design a smartphone app for this. I imagine it may become quite popular.
Same her in germany, they changed it after the cologne happening. It obviously has nothing to do with the fugess though.
>no violence, no threats, no insults nothing needed
>if the women feels she got raped, even 2 years later, youre done
I agree, but of course to be fair the false rape should be proven beyond resonable doubt as well. So if there is doubt in both directions nothing happens.
Which is fucking ridiculous.
Call it smash app, just smash your phones together and bam.
If an user makes money of this, include me in the screencap
Honestly, feminists come out of the woodwork just to argue whenever someone points to statistics about this, so it's pointless to discuss them.
That being said, who DOESN'T know at least one person who has falsely accused someone of rape, or has casually claimed to be raped? How many people on this site have been accused themselves?
Yes, feminists want the woman's word to be the final authority in every one of these cases just to be "safe" and there are thousands of girls who with utmost clarity, see how that can be weaponized. So now, god forbid, people will have to take more time to show better judgement of their character before associating with them in ANY way.
Manipulative sociopaths are not cute. They should be ostracized and left to die.
Sick burn
Yup.
Yeah who the fuck goes outside?
Can't wait for all the anti MGTOW tradcons here to be in jail
With the current legal climate? I sure as fuck don't.
that's the way it should
rape is a fucked up thing but it's been diluted beyond repair this past decade
>see how that can be weaponized.
Why do you think they are doing this?
IT's not about protecting women, it's about circumventing the rule of law to destroy lives.
Say something that the state doesn't approve of?
Having sex with a female?
CIA mind controls her into destroying your life with a word.
Eugene kanin "false rape allegations" puts the number at 41%
>Enjoy your progressive western values
I got an idea. How about you keep your dick in your pants and dont ever be alone with a woman you have any doubts about?
>you need to have sex at all
if a women sees you and declares rape, a man is guilty until proven innocent in spain, isreal, and soon america with how things are going. How well can you document and show where you have been all hours in the past year?
according to the FBI false rape claims are a little over 10%
it's fucking unreal, no other crime even comes close to this many false claims.
It seems like the only way to get rid of the problem IS to arm everyone, nuke rape entirely so that the probability of it happening is so low, it would be almost impossible to report one falsely.
>en.wikipedia.org
Some go as high as 90% but that's a bit extreme.
>The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (July 2014)
But this here describes the entirety of the problem. Facts are considered opinions to liberals.
>tfw I live in Maryland
>cia mind controls her
Oh for fuck sake are some people still brainwashed so thoroughly by their mother o still believe women are little angels?
Women are pretty shitty people, no need for CIA mind control.
I think fbi counts dead cases too (so a claim get submitted and then no additional evidence is submitted and the claimant stops perusing the case) which are usually fake
I like this idea. This law is some sort of extreme Darwinian shit and maybe it's what we need.
You raped me. Go to jail now.
So we need the government to tell us what to do? While you're at it let's make people all wear masks so they look the same and keep buzzers in the ears of smart people to keep them all equally stupid.
It's a conspiracy against the public in general, men are just collateral damage in this case.
>This is what rapists actually believe
Jap Bantz are the best
Sex is overrated anyway
They rightfully should, if you make a claim as serious as this, then abandon said claim, only means you were completely full of bullshit. It's one thing to investigate and not find enough evidence, that's a different issue.
>HELP HELP I'M BEING WORD RAPED
I always thought of just having a digital recorder on me at all times to prove my innocence. I'd wear a shirt that stated that I was recording at all times to get around the laws regarding illegal recording of people, and act as if it was a social experiment or something.
Usually the woman accusing you of rape will be someone you know or work with so there will most likely be a normal interaction before the accusation.
I know there were a few greentexts relating to guys getting off lucky because they had a recorder set up. Can't find them though.
>Women are pretty shitty people, no need for CIA mind control.
How do you think they got so shitty, user?
Does that mean, rape is legal now.
Who cares anymore about laws then ?
I mean they are so unjust, that u basically cimmit a crime if u follow laws, if u kbow what i mean.
Then again : will this finally create the violent outbreak against government, thats so needed now ?
>have sex with women
>get charged with rape
>ask woman to sign consent form for sex
>have sex with her
>get charged with rape because in her head she was saying no
>have sex with woman
>record sex to prove that it was consensual
>get charged with voyeurism
>also get charged with rape
If you get blackout drunk you deserve whatever stupid shit happens to you.
Whiteknights are the lowest lifeform on this planet.
Wait... what if they are trying to make it less worthwhile to risk having sex outside of marriage?
I sense a meme being born here.
Thanks for the tip mohamed.
>legal climate
I'm sure that is a convenient bonus since it's just another way to make it easier to control people.
He's right you know. No decent self-respecting woman would get piss drunk at some random party with chads. It's like trying to get some sleep on rail tracks. You either have to want it, or be a complete retard. Either way, nothing of value is lost once you get the effects of the situation you've created for yourself.
>got
How did you think bears got so aggressive? They're bears.
Maybe (((someone))) is responsible for letting them out of the enclosure though.
This meme is so old it's already in and is about to be falsely accused of rape.
This.
And exactly how i said :
One thing west can learn from islam culture alot :
About women and how to treat them.
For instance they know exactly, that women just lie lie lie.
Would never happen in islamic country methinks
People who drink in public are idiots in general, more at 5.
Bars are literal containment zones. Real alcoholics stay home.
This has been going on in various states in the US for a while. If you call your wife a bitch you can be charged with Domestic Violence, which carries prison time and prevents you from holding a job as anything related to government or public safety. Note I say Charged, not even convicted. I have lost security guards because their license to operate was suspended despite no physical contact even having taken place, all on the word of a single hostile witness.