Smuggies thread
starting off with some oc
Smuggies
Austin Bennett
Parker Walker
...
Brody Hall
...
David Rivera
...
Oliver Howard
...
Brandon Diaz
...
Kayden Long
...
Camden Hall
...
Xavier Stewart
Looking for the one with the truck ploughing through a bunch of people while they're saying "he's just a troubled young man." or something along those lines.
Brayden Nelson
...
David Turner
...
Dylan Ramirez
uh someone like this wouldn't name the jew....
Ryan Gutierrez
...
Jacob Walker
...
Lincoln Walker
...
Noah Fisher
...
David Martinez
[spoiler]neither will the person that starts these threads every day[/spoiler]
Ryan Myers
This one is one of my faves.
Logan Cruz
Find a flaw.
Joseph Green
You aren't infringing on someones constitutional right by refusing to bake them a cake
Carter Green
god this one
Cooper Parker
Theyre called counter-signal memes newfag
Ian Allen
Private business tho.
>congress shall pass no law, etc. etc.
Angel Perry
This one is gay.
Chase Jones
Okay how about this, you are forcing someone to do something in the first example while discriminating against a specific set of ideas in the other: There may be no legal argument but there is a moral one
Cameron Evans
Morality is relative, innit? One could argue that refusing a cake to a gay person is immoral.
Christopher Carter
Except the gay person can always get a cake from someone else
Justin Cox
But in that case, you can go to some other social network which won't censor anyone.
Dylan Sanders
Making a religious business support something that they believe is sinful (essentially denying them freedom of religion) != making a business allow all varieties of opinions on their platform regardless of the owners own opinion.
Especially in this case where its easy to find another bakery that can offer the same service whereas finding a social media platform that has the same level of reach is much harder
Camden Gonzalez
Facebook and a local bakery just can't be compared. The Facebook executives need to be aware of the immense power and influence they hold - essentially at a level unmatched in modern western society. Sensoring opinions of one side, literally half of the population (conservativism) is outrageous and is more than a slippery slope, it's goddamn Niagara Falls. Whether they have the right to sensor or not, they should realize the questionable morality and far reaching implications of doing so. A local bakery not serving a couple gays affects absolutely nothing.
I'm not dumb enough to think that Facebook doesn't understand the implications, though. They're aware that can be a huge part of destroying conservative thought and promoting globalism and SJW values, and they're more than happy to do so, I'm sure.
John Hernandez
>Especially in this case where its easy to find another bakery that can offer the same service whereas finding a social media platform that has the same level of reach is much harder
Put it this way: the same constitution that protects free speech also protects against unreasonable search and seizure. However, when you walk into a sports stadium or board an airplane, you must consent to being searched for any reason. Otherwise, you must leave. There are certain rights and liberties you must forfeit to do business on private property.
If you want to bring a gun on an commercial airplane, you're out of luck. There are no airlines that will honor your second amendment rights. So why should a social network because required to honor your first amendment right?