What do you guys think of our new aircraft carrier?
USS Gerald Ford
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
callofduty.wikia.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
You worthless fucking faggots might find this interesting. Now KYS.
>Ford
lmao what a shitty vehicle
What class?
>no ramp
10/10
Ours doesn't have a ramp. The Brits said theirs had to have a ramp?
Who's right?
I think it should stay at home.
H-hi.
You're a b-big sh-ship...
Ford
You could say that again when India has anything remotely close to what the carrier is worth.
That's a sexy warship.
Say thanks to daddy Rothschild amerifaggots.
Seems like Europeans and Russians like ramps. Idk why. Maybe it's because they produce shitty aircraft.
That's the Nimitz you stupid faggot
Another Flagship for the American Reich...
Not exactly sure the Rothschild's have anything to do with this. The Rothschild family supports liberal politicians and liberal politicians want a smaller Military, like Obama.
So what you said makes no sense, you stupid faggot Muslim.
already obsolete
The new catapult system is partly electromagnetic, right?
It looks very expensive and unnecessary.
Are you fucking stupid? I took this off the USSGF webpage you dumb faggot nigger.
Every single military operations ever done by America were Jewish.
Prove me wrong.
both are right, there are different philosophies involved. the Ford Class is made to produce as many sorties as possible and basically improve on the Nimitz Class design with more modern tech. as a trade off for this very effective design comes a very large crew and high cost which is fine if you can foot the bill. the British design was done to streamline the process and automate as much as possible to keep a small crew and maintaining consistent sorties whilst keeping costs down.
I wonder who is behind these posts
Needs moar aircraft
They need a ramp because they're poor.
you do know that we are using the same aircraft right? just a different model
Liberating Europe from the Nazis was because of Jews?
Sending soldiers to support France during WW1 was because of Jews?
Kill yourself you Muslim piece of shit.
And we built it you whore.
>not buying Holden
>naming anything after Gerald Ford
Why? Did you guys run out of presidents?
You're just upset because you can't poo on it. Look at the brand new designated street on top, just begging for it.
POST MORE SHIPS YOU GODDAMN FUCKS
KRIOV REPORTING
>if you dont like Jews, you're a muslim or Nazi
gb2 redditfaggot
Literally says CVN-68. That's the Nimitz. You're literally dumber than dog shit, faggot.
>Gerald R. Ford
>John F. Kennedy
>Enterprise
Which presidents do you have left to name the others of the class?
mite b cool
Imagine what the carrier USS Donald J. Trump will look like.
and we taught you to share and be nice.
>Nimitz
Sounds jewish
CVN-82 is named the USS William Henry Harrison.
The answer is yes to both of those questions user. Read a fucking book
Technically, any dead one for sure, but they'll never be a USS Nixon thanks to Democrats being such faggots.
Harvey Milk however, sure he gets a ship!
Carter, Clinton, W., and some nigger.
it wont exist since the nuclear fallout will make shipyards uninhabitable for 200 years
the year is 2022
thats an attractive ship, not gonna lie.
The Electromagnetic launch system is supposed to cut costs as well.
That's if they can get it working correctly.
IVAN'S NOT HOME
Carter got a submarine
Its a really beautiful piece of high technology that can be taken out by a single tactical nuke or even harder to stop hypersonic missiles.
They are good for projecting power against weaker opponents but are giant primary targets in battles with opponents with sufficient technological and military capabilities.
I personally cannot wait for the USS Obongo
Main differences between this class and a Nimitz?
Helium mix optimal
The other three aren't getting shit, all of them were disasters
EMALS needed another 5 fucking years of testing... CVN-78 should have had traditional CATOBAR steam systems and the EMALS should have gone on 79 or 80.
Only connection I can make is that Gerald Ford's VP was Nelson Rockefeller, who is in fact from the famous Rockefeller family. So you could say that there maybe was some form of connection with the wealthy elite. Plus some of the Rockefellers did intermarry with the Rothschilds to my knowledge.
This is a nice flag
A Carrier Deck is not as long as a runway. And a carriers purpose is to launch aircraft.
The idea of the ramp is to help loft the aircraft for more initial lift on take-off and climb-out. We in Merica don't fuck around with baby carriers anymore, so we have more deck space, meaning more speed and lift during take off. Catapults and deck space negates the need for a ramp.
Smaller CVs need that extra bump of lift to launch aircraft. I think Russia did it because it was easier to engineer than a similar catapult system to ours.
Im a layman whose stoned stupid and I can figure it out...
Ya'll fuckers are dumb as hell.
Look at that earth curve.
>Its a really beautiful piece of high technology that can be taken out by a single tactical nuke or even harder to stop hypersonic missiles.
if someone nukes a Supercarrier it means the end of the world is happening so at that point it really ceases to matter.
This is the dumbest fucking argument ever.
Mainly because if someone fires a nuke at our carrier, we are going to fire a nuke at their country. So fuck off idiot. Any country that manages to take down one of our carriers would be laid to waste and turned into a radioactive wasteland.
Couldn't find a better president to name it after?
I'm so glad I never bought a single one of those fucking gay ass games.
I'd imagine a lot of gold, also four catapults for launching aircraft, not the puny two
the nintendo wii was an attractive console but that didn't mean it was fucking good at playing games
The Wii was fine, hell it was king of the console sales for a while there, the problem was software and Nintendo's inability to capitalize on those sames, same problem Nintendo has had for years.
Psst! Look at the angled landing deck of all Nimitz-class carriers. They have two catapults for scramble operations.
You can theoretically launch 4 birds (a full flight) at one time.
youtube.com
I just love the intro movie on this one.
>Look at that earth curve.
That is lens distortion.
when you get an aircraft carrier, will it be names Trudeau?
L ying
E vil
A grevating
F aggot
>i know fuck all about modern carriers but love a my meme president
More crewman.
Longer deck.
More space for more planes.
Larger engines.
Thing is literally just a bigger Nimitz with improved radar and communications.
Not really, nobody would name it after Nixon, or LBJ.
Some people pushed for Goldwater kind of like Vinson, but it was shot down by leftist fags.
>then sticking a chev badge on it
Bet you'd love to drop a speck on that deck.
How can the rest of the world even compete?
The United States Navy has over 440 ships in both active service and the reserve fleet, with approximately 70 more in either the planning stages or under construction, according to the Naval Vessel Register and published reports.
>New Aircraft Carrier
Awwww yeah
>98,000 tonne floating bagel factory and holocaust museum and gift shop.
>More crewman.
uwot Ford is suppose to have a few hundred less
Congrats to the British on their new Queen Liz supercarriers.
>mfw did that
Jews have had some degree of involvement in every major conflict since WW1
takes 10 years to build, attacking one is considered the same in millitary doctrine as nuking NYC...
Commissioned (USS);
1 Afloat forward staging base
10 Aircraft carriers
9 Amphibious assault ships
2 Amphibious command ships
10 Amphibious transport docks
52 Attack submarines
14 Ballistic missile submarines
1 Classic frigate (*see USS Constitution)
22 Cruisers
63 Destroyers
12 Dock landing ships
4 Guided missile submarines
8 Littoral combat ships
11 Mine countermeasures ships
13 Patrol boats
2 Submarine tenders
1 Technical research ship (*see USS Pueblo)
God Damn, the rest of the world even fucking trying?
Why do you keep building these huge useless things?
The US has enough fleet power to dominate the world In case of a small war and If something big happens carriers won't protect you from radiation.