Provacative Moves From Russia: Bombers Spotted off Alaskan Coast Twice Within 24 Hours

What's their endgame, Sup Forums? Do they want to start a fucking war? Look at that piece of shit bomber - straight out of the 1950s.

Other urls found in this thread:

newsmediawatchdog.com/single-post/2017/04/19/Provocative-Moves-From-Russia-Bombers-Spotted-off-Alaskan-Coast-Twice-Within-24-Hours
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_F-117A_shootdown
foxnews.com/us/2017/04/19/russian-bombers-again-fly-near-alaska.html
usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/04/01/us-military-suicides-remain-stubbornly-high/82518278/
microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/Navy handbook/4.11 Radar Cross-Section (RCS).pdf
youtube.com/watch?v=XmqLyn4Q15U
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

>stop moving international airspace so close to our bases

Forgot the (((source))):

>newsmediawatchdog.com/single-post/2017/04/19/Provocative-Moves-From-Russia-Bombers-Spotted-off-Alaskan-Coast-Twice-Within-24-Hours

Can you Russian fags even compete? Pic related.

Tu-95 is a supersonic missile platform. It can drop nuclear armed Kh-101 off the Alaskan coast and hit the LA

B-2 is a WW2 tier bomb truck capable of delivering freefall dummies. It has to fly directly over fixed target to hit anything with its payload

>Can you Russian fags even compete?
By specializing our military on destroying NATO infrastructure, US CBG's and annihilating western civlization. Instead of wasting largest military budget on chasing dunecoons stuck between 1950s and stone age

> most efficient counter rotating engine design
> piece of shit

or were you talking about the euro fighter

>B-2 is a WW2 tier bomb truck capable of delivering freefall dummies. It has to fly directly over fixed target to hit anything with its payload

A stealth bomber that you can in no way detect, so yeah, dropping bombs directly overhead on your capital is perfectly feasible and kind of a slap in the face desu.

>A stealth bomber that you can in no way detect,

But has it been tested against drunk Serbs with rusted Soviet surplus?

>defending a piece of shit, out of date prop plane
kys

You do realize the B-52 is just as old as the Tu-95 Bear, right?

BTFO

kek

Fake and gay for sure. Maybe if they'd stop drinking vodka and lifting to impress their gay comrades, they could make a next gen bomber.

Why are you unironically infatuated with the idea of starting WWIII with the Russians? You jews need to get over your ass pain when it comes to them.

Oh, and it was supposedly a F-117 (((stealth))) fighter, not a B-2. Still looks fake.

>Fake and gay for sure
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_F-117A_shootdown

>Thinking a U-2 is the same as a B-2

Do all slavs start drinking their vodka at 2am? Go home, you drunk.

It is kinda funny how people forget you guys are right next door. I think the way maps are designed might confuse people.

this shit happens ALL THE TIME. it is nothing,

old tech isnt always bad tech.

Not in the Trump era. Expect ICBMs to launch at any moment. Don't fuck with us, slavfags.

>start drinking

They never stop.

link a proper source

foxnews.com/us/2017/04/19/russian-bombers-again-fly-near-alaska.html

>piece of shit bomber
one of the best EVAR, fgt pls
Lrn2aviation

Is that you, Rupert Murdoch? Fucking die already.

I guess so. I guess so. I don't even think if it came down to nuclear war we would even have to drop a bomb. Just light a match at the whole country would go up. Their blood alcohol is probably over 150 proof.

Fuck off proxyfag. Look me in the eye and tell me this thing is the best.

It's just media spin. Russia is only 82 miles off the coast of Alaska, and the article I read said that the planes were 41 miles off the coast. The article could basically be "Russian bombers spotted off the coast of Russia".

its all just bluffing by russia

Those Tupolev's show up at least once a year here in the Netherlands as well. They do it for the lulz. We sold all our aircraft except two fighters, the only reason being that we need them to intercept the Russians lel.

Long-range bombers are useful for a lot more than just WWIII. Honestly I don't get why smaller countries never seem to show interest in them, especially considering how they lack the global distribution of overseas military bases that we have (and all the force projection that offers).

Fellow burger, I know American education dampens some of us to the point where ego shits itself over logic, but hear me out. They been doing this since for decades. Tu-95's have always hugged around Alaskan airspace to antagonize. That doesn't mean 'war' though. Also, Tu-95's are very cheap and many of which are just used for show. Would they be used in actual combat? Not in the scenario you're thinking of no.

We only have 11 B-2's in total. They can't be everywhere at once. And even as far as repairs go, it can take up to 4 months to repair one.

It uses the same stealth technology fellow burgerlard, so yes. You claimed how stealth can't be detected and that's entirely false.

wow does the B-2 actually have WHEELS on it? LEL that technology is thousands of years old.

>A stealth bomber that you can in no way detect
Are you fucking retarded?
Stealth that is not visible on radars at all is not openly presented to public.
B2 only looks smaller than a plane on a screen, but it's still there.
The purpose of it to confuse AA operators to dismiss the target in case of massive application of stealth.
If operators have instructions to shoot AA missiles into each and every geese pack they detect - this stealth is worth shit.
We can talk about mythical TR-3D "Aurora" if you like, but it's urban myth tier of aircraft.

>Kh-101
>air to surface missiles
Not going to lie, that's pretty badass Ivan.

Your logic won't fool me. Plus:

>Tu-95s are very cheap and many of which are just used for show

What kind of shitshow are they trying to pull? Those piece of shit bombers aren't impressing anyone and are an embarrassment.

Thanks for the picture with a Euro fighter and not the F-22 that sent them off of my home. Fuck you 48ers.

>Still looks fake.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1999_F-117A_shootdown

What the fuck are you smoking? How is it fake? Because the United States military confirmed this when it happened. Is the pilot faking it as well? Is this some type of new conspiracy meme by retards?

This isn't the first time they've done this, Google it.

It's just all fear mongering by the jew media. I'd like to see those russian fags actually try something. All their men keep dying from drugs and alcohol and their women keep coming to America to get fucked by niggers in porn. I give them another decade before their country collapses.

Same reason why we use b-52's to bomb ISIS and other Islamic terrorists? Despite the fact that the b-52 dates all the way back to the mid 50's?

Are you a goddamn radar operator? Nah, just a drunk commie like gif related. Fuck off and build some better planes.

"When you point at the sky - the fool looks at the finger".
You're retarded to disregard the payload.
They're no different from your C-130 in that regard and the reason Russia don't have stealth bombers?
Because we don't go attacking stone age donkeyfuckers across the globe and they're about the only one current stealth tech is useful against.

Yeah.. I doubt it. It may not look it, but Trump and Putin are not enemies. they are going through the usual dance moves so neither one looks weak, but it's all going to end up with them being buddies.

>Look at that piece of shit bomber - straight out of the 1950s.

Fucking retard.
Turboprop engines are the most fuel efficient aircraft engines ever and allow the greatest range possible.

The bomber is designed for launching nuclear capable cruise missiles from a safe distance.

>All their men keep dying from drugs and alcohol and their women keep coming to America to get fucked by niggers in porn.

It's amazing how much they have in common with us.

usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2016/04/01/us-military-suicides-remain-stubbornly-high/82518278/

Enhance your bait.
B-2 is not better than B-52 or C-130: it's much more expensive and it's stealth is only useful against stone age donkeyfucks.
Hence the reason you have it in the first place.
Your military might have something much more serious either planned or already in deployment, but it's not known to public.

American education

Constantly fighting stone age donkey fuckers for decades has made us battle hardened war machines. BTFO.

>his planes have propellers

>little to no resistance
>little to no AA
>little to no losses
>battle hardened war machines
Topkek.
I'd like to see how fast your population will remove your government when american soldiers start arriving back home in closed caskets en masse.

They're just proving that they can do it. Not that it would actually succeed. It's like them floating around that piece of shit aircraft carrier they still cling to. That thing is more of a threat to the people on it than anyone else, but they sailing it around making the point they can still do it.

Again, not a serious threat to anyone. Just making points.

t. american bested in argument, falling back to sad insults and attempts at humour.

dawww, the little eurotriangle is watching it

lol. saved.

>fighting for Shlomo's wars made us battled hardened war machines.

You mean suicidal?

see:
Friendly reminder, people tend to get old user. The 18 year old boys who went into Iraq in 2003 are now 32, past their prime. 7th year with highest suicidal rates for men in the military primarily those who fought in Iraq; a war that costed us over one trillion dollars.

Good luck with that Ivan when a F-22 launches an AIM-9 from 500 miles away and blows your turbo prop cucked bomber out of the sky.

To be honest the F-117 shoot down was a case of a very clever and on the ball radar operator. He was emitting on a long wavelength which let him pickup the F-117 when it's bomb bay doors opened and the NATO forces at the time were flying on an extremely predictable flight pattern.

The radar operator and what he did should be a shining example for everyone in the future that you shouldn't get complacent and assume your enemy is as backwards as you think he is.

Literally been happening for decades. This is nothing new.

>Those piece of shit bombers aren't impressing anyone and are an embarrassment.
They are impessing everyone who knows what they can do.

Like programming cruse missile onboard during the flight after the carrier group has been located before it can get away

t.irrelevant country chiming in and trying desperately to bring the bants

Shit was happening when I was in the navy in the 80's. Still happening. Never quit happening.

You imply an awful lot, user.
Like those bombers would fly without escort and evasive action from retribution will not be taken.

>F-22 launches an AIM-9 from 500 miles away

Max operation range of an AIM-9 is 22 miles. Also, missiles lose accuracy as distance widens and allows the opposing enemy to react in a proper manner of time.

>Hurr stealth is a perfect invisibility cloak
>Hurr stealth is just a disguise to make plane look like bird

You're both wrong. Stealth is mainly about reducing the radar's signal-to-noise ratio to make the aircraft unresolvable amongst background noise (which I suppose might include geese, but also includes ground clutter, chaff, stray radio signals, jamming noise, hardware electrical/electromagnetic interference and even echoes of the big bang). Even a non-stealthy aircraft can achieve this at extremely long distances, but a stealth aircraft, by reducing the amount of signal reflected back at the hostile radar (typically by a factor of ~10,000 or more over other aircraft), dramatically reduces the range at which it will be resolvably detected. Inversely, at extremely close ranges, even a stealth aircraft (or a goose) can produce a strong enough return to be tracked, but ideally a stealth aircraft should be able to avoid this through avoidance, low flight and, if necessary, jamming/ECM.

Here's a super-basic overview of RCS factors, not that I expect you to understand it anyways: microwaves101.com/encyclopedia/Navy handbook/4.11 Radar Cross-Section (RCS).pdf

So no, stealth doesn't make you impossible to detect... but on the other hand; no, you can't defeat stealth simply by SPAAG'ing every goose you see on the scope either.


>t. /k/

protip if a bomber was spotted but they dindu any bombing then it's just a show of force.
It's fucking nothing, call me when there are fighters or bombers who actually BOMB something

Could America beat Russia in a conventional war?

I mean these are the guys that lost to some goat farmers hiding in tunnels and trees

>ever getting into range of engagement
What part of CRUISE MISSILE did you not understand?

It's body looks too small compared to the rest.

>you can't defeat stealth simply by SPAAG'ing every goose you see on the scope either.
But I really wanted to.

Russians were the first white people to settle on Alaska and the whole west coast. Anglo jew discovered these territories only hundreds years later. Russia is basically flying over it's own land that the Jews stole from them and made it into a multicultural zoo.

B-52s have been upgraded numerous times over the years and aren't fucking turbo props.

>I mean these are the guys that lost to some goat farmers hiding in tunnels and trees

Then your question isn't about "can." It should be "Would US civilian leaders ever unleash the military to its full extent if they deemed it necessary?"

>we have to take out their families

Granted, it is old and looks from WW2 or something, but far from a POS.
>I heard somewhere it's so fucking loud that people get hearing damage from it
don't know if true but it's believable

Russia would retaliate with controlled nucler strikes at enemy fleets and sarin right away.

>straight out of the 1950s.
Just like B-52?

So anyone know what's going on with America coming so close to every single nation in the world?
1100 foreign bases? Russia have like 2 (two) bases?
Keeping on with bombing sovereign countries and create wars and terrorism in Europe (Yugoslavia, Georgia, Ukraine, all false flag terror attacks in Western Europe) and all countries in middle east?
Sending their fleet and army across the world?

It is when all the vibrations from those turboprops are placing cumulative stress on the airframe.

>sidewinder
>500 mile range
just gas yourself

The downside with stealth is usually flight capabilities, range, maneuverability, fuel efficiency, cruise speed e.g. everything else.
Because constructing an aircraft that is both stealthy and great at flying takes 100500 math and money, don't forget that military have a specific set of requirement for their aircrafts: it's no use if they're stealthy, but not reliable and can't be repaired quickly in the field.
One of the reasons Russia never applied composites to chassis and wings - because a drunken private welder Ivan won't be able to repair them in the field and war is about that too.

It's so loud that apparently those in subs can hear them, it's also got a huge radar signature. Not that Russia cares, it's just the usual show of force.

who knows...

Provided US manages to draft enough people for reasonable rooster and solve trans-atlantic logistics before Russia panics and starts sinking ships in the Atlantic - probably yes.
Though it will take few years to erode AA and industry potential and reach Moscow.

>Could America beat Russia in a conventional war?

War is ultimately about logistics, not just tech, and thousands of factors are relied upon for a country to win a war or rather sue for peace.

If a conventional war were to occur, then the US would have to declare a draft. Now, with that in mind, how many would be willing to go into a draft?

In a Western society, would a draft be even possible? Would a generation of softened up marshmellows who need safespaces for words alone be able to mentally take the idea of being shot or watching others be shot? Or what about the obesity epidemic in our country. How many people are even qualified for service? Or how about overall loyalty to the United States of America? Who's being drafted? Why should I, a white male, fight in a war that doesn't benefit me? I don't want to risk dying so Jemal and Juan can tell me I'm an evil whitey when I return home.

This has been happening for decades now, OP.

Hey, I'm not gonna tell you how not to remove honk... just don't expect to bag any B-2s in the process.

>Russians
>white

Pick one

>controlled nucler strikes at enemy fleets
Why? Aren't you supposed to take out the nukes on the land first and then the subs and carriers to minimize retaliation?

Just saber rattling faggotry from Russia. They know they're shit but still have to put on a show.

All those expensive and super stealthy new jets will be lost in a proper war between real powers. Eventually you guys will be shooting and bombing each other with recently returned to service F16s, trainers, and the Russian equivalents.

>All their men keep dying from drugs and alcohol and their women keep coming to America to get fucked by niggers in porn

that's literally what's going on in big cities across the usa and california

>Aren't you supposed to take out the nukes on the land first and then the subs and carriers to minimize retaliation?
Any strike on land will result in total retaliative glassing.

"Willing to go into..."

Selective service is not optional unless you consider imprisonment an option.

>nukes on the land first
>US
>nukes on land
user 90% of US nuclear payload are on Toledo's.

>completely dodging the question
Fuck off proxy.

The stealth doesn't work against first rate powers. Low frequency radar easily detects them. B-2 F-35 and so forth can all be shot down by any missile system using low frequency radar. All Russian and Chinese air defence systems utilize this. Stealth is a waste of money and can only be used against third world countries or 2nd world powers that haven't upgraded yet.

US have much deeper aircraft and pilot pool for the exchange.

B52 has had numerous upgrades over the years

>A stealth bomber that you can in no way detect
youtube.com/watch?v=XmqLyn4Q15U

in the pilots own words

>"Would US civilian leaders ever unleash the military to its full extent if they deemed it necessary?"

What's this even mean? We did unleash the full extent of our military when we invaded Iraq. This isn't Dragon Ball where someone only uses 10% of their power to fight. We spent over a trillion dollars in Iraq alone.

Considering how Trump is now just a pawn of his Jewish son-in-law I wouldn't be surprised if he's manipulated into the bidding of Kikener.

Based Ivan. Pls no bomb, vodka and blini instead.

>F-117 (((stealth))) fighter, not a B-2
Now I understand, he was an ordinary invisible and b2 mega super invisible.