Besides immigration and extremist shit (tranny agenda, blm, etc)...

Besides immigration and extremist shit (tranny agenda, blm, etc), there is literally nothing wrong with democratic societies. Prove me wrong.

Miscegenation.

>except for all this shit it's great!

Good like finding a democratic country with a populace that can be trusted to educate themselves and make informed votes.

But you can marry a white woman and have white kids if you want to...

Whats wrong with immigration brazil? You're doing fine because of it?

- welfare
- feminism/equality poison
- victimhood
-entitlement

It's pretty shocking how, historically, democrats in the US were the most toxic and insidious of them all

Yes but other can choose not to as well.

"~Where have all the native Americans gone, fuck if I know~"

That's an example, I'm actually white.

Democratic societies enable and contribute to mass immigration and "extremist shit".

They contribute to immigration when democratic leaders learn that they can secure votes by importing third worlders who typically vote one way (See Labour in the UK). They also contribute to extremism by refusing to stand up for the traditional backbone of a society while it gradually rots away due to constant attack by progressive forces.

Politicians end up looking at short term reelection instead of long term goals. No massive projects or long term focuses that matter.

Also, people inevitably vote for gibsmedats. All it takes is one fuckup generation to get that ball rolling and creating welfare systems that will never go away.

Better than having to obey a dictator. People can change their minds and vote better in a democracy.

But authoritarian governments also have welfare and redistribute the wealth.

I recognize that this is bad, but dictatorships have their downsides too.

Well, everyone can make their own choices.

Democracy don't exist with elections, the plutocracy controls the media
The only real democracy is the Fascist Democracy

Muh duur freedom duur

The real freedom only exist with order, if you have the freedom to get addicted to pleasure, you don't have the freedom to exit the pleasure

>people can change their minds and vote better in a democracy

People don't change their minds because the media controls their minds, it's impossible to make the people smart in a "Democracy"

>there is literally nothing wrong with democratic societies.
Democracy is currently the best system (or rather, the least bad) but the biggest problem is that democracy means politicians have to appeal to the lowest common denominator, and it incentives keeping people stupid (to make it easier to appeal to the lowest common denominator).

Also all the shit you named is just a petty nuisance, and the problem with immigration today is that we're past "immigration" and are in full on migration due to various unresolved humanitarian crises

Free will? Abomination!

People react to where the food is coming from. Government can easily plunder the productive to produce a moocher class which only votes.

Democracy was fine when it took land to vote.

The only thing that has advanced our standard of living so much is technology. Otherwise, we would still be working in the fields...

there is 1 think ... democracy
2 alcohol addicts who dont know shit about politics and voting because they got free sausage on the street from someone hired by an elect
have more voice and power than 60 years old economics professor
-democracy rules of the stupid
80% are stupid/uninformed
elect in election dont have to say whats have to be done , hi have to say what majority want to hear

>I recognize that this is bad, but dictatorships have their downsides too.

Every form of government has downsides, but we've been led to believe that Democracy is the least worst of the lot which under closer inspection is plainly untrue.

Nigger, democracy always leads to socialism.

>Besides immigration and extremist shit (tranny agenda, blm, etc), there is literally nothing wrong with democratic societies
That's all you need.

Every social institution that stands today and holds us up will be gone in 60 or 70 years' time if we keep up our current trajectory.

No man is an island; if we tend only to ourselves then we will die alone.

>fascist democracy

What in the actual fuck are you talking about.

Instead of individualist bandits (Indirect Democracy) or 90% individualist idiots, we make organizations called public corporation, that acts like a trade union and basically is a united trade union (junction of the Employers Union and Workers Union) and the people join the corporations to represent the people in legislative power

The junction of the Employers Unions and Workers Union stop the class conflict, and the people need to collaborate to each other to make a better country in a vertical collectivism

It assumes the general populace a smart enough to run a country, which they absolutely are not. The whole reason we flood our country with niggers is because the masses are emotional retards who can be swayed by the most simplistic arguments and slogans. Take a look at normiebook whenever there's a major democratic event, it's full of weak soundbytes.

>an*me poster
fuck off

There is a case to be made for center-left policy stances but those policies were conceived in and intended for nations and locales with homogeneous populations. A role for the public sector in health, education, pensions, funding for arts and science, and a safety net of some sort isn't a radical notion. Social cohesion and economic vitality and opportunity is the name of the game and unfortunately minorities make it nearly impossible.

A pew research paper found that something like 60% of people get there news entirely off social meda and 70% of people only ever read the headline, never the actual news.

Democracy only works if the citizenry are informed and interested in participating.

They are not, which is why, legendary propagandist and founder of modern public relations declared that the people need to be led - that even when they have a free choice (what brand to buy, what politician to vote for etc) that must be a choice presented TO them from a selection that already exists. That if you just make somebody choose from all the things in the world he'll go mad.

So no. Democracy doesn't work like its meant to

"Their"

Fuck, should have spell checked

Niggers

Obese

Most of the problems of democracy exist in all other political systems.

Tyranny of the majority is replaced by tyranny of the minority in any system where a small elite group is meant to steward the rest of society.

Propaganda and corruption on the societal scale is replaced by political manoeuvring by the 'stewards'.

>People can change their minds and vote better in a democracy
We're practical here. Democracies give the right to vote to every retard, they don't look at the information and think about it.
Only about 10% even think about politics outside of a team sport, maybe at most 1% actually have a decent understanding of it.

It would actually be fine if the dumbasses weren't interested in participating.
But they are, and your vote is equal to the worst of them.

But not replacing of the people with foreigners just for the sake of gaining votes.

hurr durr democracy = demographic replacement

AFAIK no one voted for the migrant crisis.

Democracy is an unstable transitory system of government.
It is the transition from a free society to communism

>AFAIK no one voted for the migrant crisis.
While leftists are pathetic, it is not nice to dehumanize them like that