This thread is for Discussion of Capitalism, Libertarianism, Paleolibertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism, and the PHYSICAL REMOVAL of COMMUNIST FAGS from our board of peace. Reminder that this is the Libertarian RIGHT General. Aleppo Johnson-fags, Left-Libertarians, and other Shit-Libs need to fuck off. Voice your complaints to r/libertarian.
>Recommended Reading list
libertarianright.org
>Vanilla /lrg/ pastebin- CREATE IF YOU DONT SEE ONE IN THE CATALOG
pastebin.com
>Bump for Life, Liberty, and Private Death Squads
/lrg/ LIBERTARIAN RIGHT GENERAL - PRIVATE DEATH SQUAD EDITION
Daniel Bennett
Other urls found in this thread:
liberalstudies.ca
mises.org
il-rs.org.br
iea.org.uk
mises.org
lewrockwell.com
mises.org
mises.org
riosmauricio.com
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
archive.lewrockwell.com
archive.lewrockwell.com
lewrockwell.com
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
mises.org
libertarianright.org
youtube.com
dailymail.co.uk
youtube.com
youtube.com
terapeak.com
epicmilitaria.com
newsroom.ucla.edu
wnd.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Liam Campbell
CORE READING:
>The Law – Frédéric Bastiat
liberalstudies.ca
>Economics in One Lesson – Henry Hazlitt
mises.org
>Free To Choose – Milton and Rose Friedman
il-rs.org.br
>Hayek’s The Constitution of Liberty – Eugene F. Miller
iea.org.uk
>Liberty or Equality – Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn
mises.org
Owen Sullivan
HOPPE READING LIST:
>Articles by Hans-Hermann Hoppe
lewrockwell.com
>The Economics and Ethics of Private Property
mises.org
>A Short History of Man: Progress and Decline
mises.org
>Democracy – The God That Failed
riosmauricio.com
>A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism
mises.org
>From Aristocracy, to Monarchy, to Democracy
mises.org
>The Myth of National Defense: Essays on the Theory and History of Security Production
mises.org
>The Private Production of Defense
mises.org
>Economic Science and the Austrian Method
mises.org
>What Must Be Done
mises.org
Sebastian Reyes
ROTHBARD READING LIST:
>Big-Government Libertarians
archive.lewrockwell.com
>Race! That Murray Book
archive.lewrockwell.com
>More on LewRockwell.com
lewrockwell.com
Books:
>Man, Economy, and State with Power & Market
mises.org
>Anatomy of the State
mises.org
>Egalitarianism as a Revolt Against Nature, and Other Essays
mises.org
>The Ethics of Liberty
mises.org
>What Has Government Done to Our Money?
mises.org
>America’s Great Depression
mises.org
>For a New Liberty: The Libertarian Manifesto
mises.org
Gavin Sanders
MISES READING LIST:
>The Mises Reader Unabridged
mises.org
>The Anti-Capitalistic Mentality
mises.org
>Marxism Unmasked
mises.org
>Profit and Loss
mises.org
>Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis
mises.org
>Human Action
mises.org
>Omnipotent Government: The Rise of the Total State and Total War
mises.org
>Bureaucracy
mises.org
>Liberalism: In the Classical Tradition
mises.org
Noah Gomez
>b-but Gary Johns...
Shut it you low energy fag. We ain't some retarded 420 blaze it faggots. We want liberty and the responsibility that goes with it.
>b-but somalia a-and warlords ???
Gotta read that shiet
mises.org
mises.org
Somalia is the corpse of a fucking socialist state and it's better off now than before it collapsed.
>b-b-but .. ROADS !
If there's a need for roads, they're going to be built by private construction companies, payed by covenants and maintained my said construction companies. They even generate money, because it's like that parts or the road are for rent in order to set up advertisements at the sides.
Or there's no need for roads, because we're the fucking gyrocopter master race
Ayden Jenkins
>Reactionary Libertarianism doesn't wo-
Jace Nelson
What kind of ethnostate would be necessary to ensure the successful implementation of Libertarianism and why is it White people?
>freedom
>death squads
>remove commies
I like this. I usually think NatSoc is the solution to many of the modern worlds ills, but I cannot see it having massive popular support in the West - ever again.
Does the Libertarian Right support multiculturalsim? I hope you aren't yet another deluded fool imagining that it works(pro tip, it doesn't) If not I am listening.
And what is the stance regarding the JQ?
Christopher Gomez
kek
We need more 'joke' memes
Like: Hans-Hermann "Get to the chopper I'm the commie stopper" Hoppe
David Edwards
>Does the Libertarian Right support multiculturalsim?
No, see pic.
The JQ can be solved as politicians and state-run media no longer have any influence.
Kayden Richardson
the problem with NatSoc is that Socialism is still a shit economic system, even in a ethno-state
>Does the Libertarian Right support multiculturalsim?
hell no, I don't want third worlders coming over here demanding gibsmedats
Libertarianism will only ever succeed in a western culture. Political values are dependent on culture and non-western cultures have proven time and time again to prefer more authoritarian forms of government.
that's why exporting democracy like the neo-cons do is ridiculous, and that's why importing third world peoples will lead to third world political movements thriving in western nations
>And what is the stance regarding the JQ?
Jews that spread degenerate shit like cultural marxism should be physically removed from society, those that keep their mouths shut can stay but preferably they should move to Israel, their own ethno-state
Wyatt Hall
Thank you, it sounds good so far. Will spend time tonight reading libertarianright.org
Gotta admit "Hans-Hermann 'Get to the chopper I'm the commie stopper' Hoppe" has a nice ring to it. I'd vote for that! Kek
Also what is this black/yellow pepe I keep seeing all about?
Michael Stewart
Shit nigger thats alota links
Top kek
Bassically and
John Martin
It's Hoppe frog ancap meme
Liam Howard
Yeah true, I wonder how far Hitler would've gotten if international capitalists weren't financing him from the start.
>Does the Libertarian Right support multiculturalsim?
>hell no, I don't want third worlders coming over here demanding gibsmedats
>Libertarianism will only ever succeed in a western culture.
>And what is the stance regarding the JQ?
>Jews that spread degenerate shit like cultural marxism should be physically removed from society
Honestly this is sounding better and better. I'm going to look into it. Based Hoppe especially.
Soo... one thing - the Libertarian Right respects traditional hierarchy like Fascists do, but are not totalitarian. How would they ensure a healthy, traditional society when everyone has the liberty to be unpunished degenerates? (Even if culture distorting jews have been removed).
I know that's a broad question but that's the first thing that came to mind for me and surely you guys have thought about this already.
Bentley Roberts
Ok sweet, cheers m8
Ryan Sanchez
What would you do if a socialist goverment got elected in your country?
Luis Brown
...
Jeremiah Watson
We believe in voluntary association rather than state control. Western governments are obviously incompetent and completely adverse to the production of a peaceful and healthy society - the only moral and practical solution is non-aggression and total secession by preferably peaceful means. The state should be replaced by superior governing authorities in the form of covenants, churches and free nations
Oliver Moore
>unpunished degenerates?
That's where you're wrong. Punishment can work without law. Can you go scream in a supermarket and shit on all the products? Of course not, state law isn't necessary for this, only a structure that enforces property rights.
Right-libertarianism allows discrimination through property rights, and any demographic that is seen as bad, and, subsequently, has higher costs associated with it, will have market forces drive it away from society, just as bad products are driven out of the market in many countries today.
If a city dislikes black people, then they'd be willing to pay more to not live near black people, and this becomes a more profitable endeavour - landlords would jointly disallow black people from moving in.
Even better, though - incorrect ideas about what is bad and what is good get disproven through market forces in right-libertarianism. Think that multiculturalism is great? Go live in a multiculturalist area. If it's great, costs for your own security protection will be low because crime is low, schooling will be to a higher quality and will be cheaper as it'll be somehow less difficult to tutor people from multiple cultures and backgrounds, and courts will be cheaper as multicultural societies will somehow be able to resolve conflicts more easily and quickly as they obviously agree on moral issues.
Clearly, this is not the case, and all of the above will be cheaper in areas resembling ethno-states. I don't see it being likely that there will be 100% white ethnostates - I see no reason for a Thomas Sowell, so to speak, to be excluded from a prosperous nation on the basis of market forces.
Regardless of what I think about the merits of a ethnostate in a libertarian society, though, the market will unearth the true costs and merits of multiculturalism and diversity through competition.
Adrian Mitchell
>How would they ensure a healthy, traditional society when everyone has the liberty to be unpunished degenerates?
Degenerates are self-destructive in their nature
in a heavily privatized society where they can't rely on handouts people who set low standards will be "destroyed" by people who set high standards
the fat pink haired feminist with a liberal arts degree isn't so threatening when she's unemployed living under a private bridge because nobody in the country will employ someone that useless
Josiah Parker
I'd like to add something which might make parts of this more clear:
In a current state, "public services" are a tax on those who use them less and a subsidy on those who use them more. It follows from this that market forces in current states do not correctly punish living in high-crime areas, living in multi-cultural areas and living in extremely diverse and untraditional areas, as a growth in these currently hinders said areas only as much as it hinders traditional and prosperous areas. Being a slob will finally be punished by monetary costs, as will being in an area in which you're likely to be a target of crime, as will being a criminal yourself, as will endorsing communism or democracy (the violation of property rights).
Dominic Nguyen
desu they'd be pushed so far away from civilisation that the only place they could be without violating the NAP would be the unclaimed waters at the centre of the pacific ocean.
beautiful
Tyler Torres
Degeneracy in general is not economically viable, most prosperous members of society don't want to be exposed to degeneracy in their neighborhoods.
This leads us to believe that conservative, white covenants will be the most prosperous, and if the market teaches us something is that the best formulas will be imitated and eventually adopted by everyone.
I always recommend doing the exercise, go step by step, start thinking what happens once a rich guy decides to buy a huge chunk of land and offer parts of that land to buyers (or built houses) in exchange for certain restrictions on behavior to make sure the rest of the houses raise or at least maintain their value. Eventually these rich guys would offer deals where security is included, etc, and the market would show which options are the cheapest and which internal rules allow for the most prosperous results. There's no doubt in my mind that degeneracy has no room in such world.
Mason Long
cry about it and shitpost Salazar memes on Sup Forums
Zachary Reed
>voluntary association rather than state control
Ok, that's fair enough because with the JQ resolved people will know much more clearly what is and isn't good for them, and would probably choose to associate with what is good, for the most part.
>Western governments are obviously incompetent
>The (shill) state should be replaced
Absolutely. It would be very interesting to see what kind of men were produced living with a higher degree of self-governance, and responsibility, rather than the laughable mentality of
>gibs
>vote once every 4 years
>hope things change
Jayden Gutierrez
That last line sounds like a libertarian 14/88.
12/??
Samuel White
The most important and easy thing to bring out of Hoppe is an application of the tragedy of the commons to democracy. Private property is looked after better than public property, and a democratic state is public property leased out to a new demagogue every four years, throughout which the prime incentive of the demagogue is not to form capital for future growth (akin to planting seeds in your own private field), but to take as much present value as he can for himself (akin to harvesting half-grown wheat and not replanting, as the field will be used by someone else after you stop watching it)
Parker Perry
12/888
Hans-Hermann Hoppe
Josiah Cooper
That makes alot of sense. Are you basically implying that the Libertarian Right would be highly likely to enable Castle Law (to defend property rights...) Because that is fucking awesome if so.
Sounds to me like minorities with an undue amount of influence over the (normal, healthy) majority, which almost always comes at the expense of the majority, would also be put in their place via the market. Excellent.
Doesn't have to be a 100% White Ethnostate, but it would be rather amusing if the market self-regulated (purged?) into something very similair anyway. LOL
Logan Russell
...
Caleb Kelly
YES!!!! That is perfect. I have always been at elitist, not because "muh virtues" but because some people clearly work harder and excel in certain fields when others are just pure useless unproductive shit - yet demand to be seen as equal.
Might be time to make a folder full of based Hoppe memes. You lads may have a potential convert on your hands.
Christian Young
It's essentially castle law, though the justness of your level of violent response to a violation of the NAP upon you would be decided by the most economically viable court that you can access. Obviously a guy going 81MPH on a 80MPH road wouldn't be justifiably shot by the road owner.
William Cox
In my opinion, the best book to read to get started is Mises' Human Action. It dismisses anarcho-capitalism (when it talks about it, that is, which is only for one of the 700 pages), but the objections to it are unjustified and the rest of the book is a fantastic, grounds up construction of Austrian Economics and future ancap doctrine. The most important one after that is Hoppe's Democracy: The God That Failed
Kevin Baker
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it sounds like the unproductive bludgers, degenerates, and ghetto types are finally going to be held responsible/punished (in a way) for being unproductive bludgers, degenerates, and ghetto types while the productive, civilized White man prospers.
Sounds good to me.
I am finally beginning to understand why one of my mates from school went hardcore Libertarian and never shutup about the free market - it really does solve a lot of problems.
David Hernandez
Its not about conversion. Its about making up your mind through an exchange of ideas in the free thought market, an unalienable right. If you find that the evidence isnt enough, feel free to keep your natsoc views. Or be selective of what you think is a good idea. You can have disparity in certain issues, its perfectly normal. Hemogony on every issue eventually leads to total stagnation on every level.
Asher Martin
Would I still be classed as a libertarian if I believed in a very small state limited solely to policing borders, levying a national military and enforcing contracts? Or if I believed in a police force or constabulary but only by town or city, with no supernational level?
My guiding philosophy is "as little government and as little interference as is physically possible", but I'm not sure if I draw the line too near or too far to be classed a libertarian per se.
I'm also not sure how to prevent the growth of the state in good times
Lucas Bennett
That's certainly Libertarian and the same as most of us here. You'd probably be a Minarchist.
Elijah Robinson
>Paleolibertarianism, Anarcho-Capitalism, Minarchism
LOL, your meme generator is gonna melt if you keep this up!!
Matthew Jenkins
Market prices are simply a measurement of resource cost in units of human value. As such, the society most valued by humans, giving due weight to each human's values dependant on their value of each human to society, will emerge in an unfettered market.
You're entirely right regarding your first line, yes.
Hudson Evans
come this way sir
Josiah Russell
Yes, you'd definitely be a libertarian or minarchist. Why can't there be competition with regards to who gets to police the borders of a town?
Jaxon Kelly
Would anime prosper in an area in which degenerates are physically removed, or would the weebs be physically removed too?
Ayden Clark
I don't think any healthy, normal, productive person wants to put up with degenerate shit in their neighbourhoods. But currently in the West, we are forced to. To speak about against it is 'hate speech' or 'racist' or, you know, that thing called honesty.
I can see this having a far greater appeal than NatSoc to the average Westerner- particularly those in Europe who are experiencing the opposite of what you describe.
Ayden Cook
The weeb would never prosper, I do enjoy the meme though.
Brody Carter
I want to expand a bit because maybe it is not clear how I reach the belief that rich guys will decide to buy chunks of land.
Many skeptics against libertarianism will come with the typical, "how would a libertarian society do X".
In the end, we might think of potential solutions, and there's always at least one, but there is a point where managing 900 subscriptions gets time-consuming and becomes just an annoyance in general. People want easy living.
This is where private cities come into play, by offering "packages" of services in direct competition with other cities, including law, which would suggest that the NAP is not even necessarily enforced, but just a logic conclusion of market forces leading people to areas where the NAP is the law. People want the minimum amount of laws that restrict their personal growth applied upon themselves, while accepting renouncing certain liberties in order to have a prosperous community, so people will migrate there where this is true, and the NAP is, I believe, the most basic set of rules that can achieve maximum prosperity levels.
Cooper Reed
Anzu a cute.
Wyatt Carter
More libertarian than the Libertarian Party that's for sure. Also for preventing state growth I would first consider decentralisation in the form of states' rights, secessions and independence movements. Although in the end, no matter how small you make a government it will invariably get larger over time. The best solution is no state at all, throwing governance to the forces of individual economic power.
Caleb Diaz
weebs wouldn't prosper but the anime industry would definitely survive
anime is the way it is because they know their target audience, they're capitalists at heart
Andrew Lopez
I'm not in theory opposed to introducing competition in police forces, at least in the same way as one uses competition for contracts in commissioning ships and buildings and the like. Households could choose from various local competitors the same way you buy private insurance, or small villages could keep their own police akin to neighbourhood watch
Noah Gomez
In an era without true 3D maidens, the only female structure that pushes the young man towards virtue and prosperity is the notion of being good enough for his purest waifu. With this in mind, I see anarcho-capitalism resulting in competition between waifus and 3DPG until the 3DPG can once again compete with the most pure of waifus. Waifus, and, by extention, animes, are the perfect competition to increase the quality of the real female, so to speak.
Jacob Kelly
Yeah id totally classify you as libertarian. Prevention of growth in terms of government institutions is relativley hard to combat especially if its over a long period of time. The best way in my opinion is to keep fundamental control to the individual and the rights we all hold dear and not budge an inch when it comes to them.
Then again its never so simple, look at nowadays in america, the second amendment is consistently under attack.
If the government is reformed, I would leave it in the constitution that no rights can ever be breached on a fundamental level as described in the constitution, and that the government cannot grant any power unto itself, and is simply seperate and outline the notion that the responsibility of the government is strictly responsible for the protection of the nation and international relations or whatever else you might belive in that doesnt strictly give the government authority to tread on you.
Henry Price
Thanks for answering my noob questions guys, this has been a real eye opener. Serious appeal here and real solutions not based on idealism. It's nice to think Total Race War may not be the only solution after all!
I'll start my reading tonight, gotta go get dinner now. Have a bump and some (you's) and you may see me in a Libertarian Right general on here again soon.
>keep NatSoc views
Nobody will ever be able to convince me ethnostates aren't supreme or that death squads aren't cool.
Hail Based Hoppe!
Evan Thomas
Mutatis mutandis, so to speak, brother.
Wyatt Gonzalez
No problem my dude, always keep those neurons firing, you dont want to be like those sjws and automatically denounce everything not in your little bubble.
If someone is a moron and disagrees with you, argue with them and win, and if its in public all the better.
Noah Davis
when the technology to make waifus real exists 3D women will lose their market share
Carson Morris
James Green
With true libertarianism, the free market will always naturally seek more workers and more consumers- no corporations are going to willingly give up the 50% of the population that is female. That means women working and women having their own money, that means atomization into disparate individuals and the destruction of the family unit/gender roles. Likewise, they will naturally want to import more workers without regard for their ethnicity. This alone makes an unrestricted free market a communism-tier meme. Certainly you need to keep some firewalls to preserve race and family.
Adam Johnson
>no corporations are going to willingly give up the 50% of the population that is female
luckily for them they don't have the power to say no. the willingness is on the part of the female, who must revert to a family role once the state ceases to entertain the role of the husband and extract a quarter of a million dollars per male and give it to each female over the course of her lifetime. there's a reason why the growth of the welfare state has the same incidence as the growth of females in the workplace.
with regard to "importing more workers without regard to their ethnicity", tell me why this didn't happen when capitalism was at its highest historical form, and why it would happen if we passed that point even further. read the thread for answers. if other ethnicities are bad, costs are associated with them. as such, it becomes better to employ better ethnicities. currently, all costs that are borne from employing a bad ethnicity are distributed upon the good ethnicities, too - higher crime rates are paid for by high-tax paying whites, the destruction of natural law is paid for by high-tax paying whites, the entire state apparatus is a subsidy from the most productive members of society towards those who generate the most social costs.
Cooper Perry
>free market
>corporations have the right to force women into the workforce and enforce open borders
nice meme
in a true free market women get to decide whether or not they want to wageslave or stay at home with the kids, and there are a lot more women who would prefer to stay at home than feminist bullshit would indicate
also friendly reminder that women who stay at home are happier
dailymail.co.uk
Robert Sanders
We /Classic Liberal Composers/ now?
youtube.com
>When World War I broke out, Elgar was horrified at the prospect of the carnage, but his patriotic feelings were nonetheless aroused
>Throughout the 1920s, Elgar, saddened by his bereavement and by the social and musical changes brought about by the war, lived in virtual retirement, outwardly content to live the life of a country gentleman in his beloved Worcestershire with his dogs, sometimes emerging for the occasional visit to London or for a conducting or recording assignment.
>Elgar will never make /lrg/ compositions.
Jeremiah Fisher
Exactly, in both traditional and egalitarian societies, woman prefer being in certain roles, its a well studied phenomena that has its roots in sexual dimorphisism between males and females. Thats not to say women shouldnt interact in the market in certain ways, its clear that some women and some people from minority groups clearly preform above their peers. These people should be given the same opportunities as anyone else so they can thrive. Not allowing them to do so would be a diservice to society.
Nathan Morgan
tybAfrica
Juan Morris
Heil, from NatSoc brother.
David Ward
I put it in the context of the opening of Chateu Autiste, e.g.
youtube.com
Owen Nelson
>destruction of the family unit
Government destroyed marriage with no-fault divorce, alimony, child support and subsidizing single mothers. If you let people make contract the way they want and not to benefit lawyers it's likely nobody would agree to the terms of marriage the way they are today.
William Sullivan
Fuck socialism
Aiden Gutierrez
I'm more of a Romantic guy - Chopin, Liszt, Dvorak, Brahms, Beethoven...
Anthony Brown
Good man. He should use the intelligence he possesses to better his society and community. Also I agree anglos certainly have quite a bit to be proud of.
Lincoln White
>this kills the libertarian
Connor Jones
>implying its real socialism
David Mitchell
Even if Keynesian theory did anything other than misallocate capital and allow stealth taxation, it would still be a blithe misunderstanding of how governments act under constraints and incentives, and as such ought to be dismissed out of hand.
Henry Watson
Yeah dude, getting America out of the depression and making it a global superpower is nothing!
Sebastian Collins
...
Landon Gutierrez
Literally what the fuck is that supposed to mean.
Jose Gutierrez
>getting america out of the depression
retarded notion
>making it a global superpower
retarded notion
these aren't even worth entertaining. without keynes we would still be in the great depression right now, it literally would have never ended, i'm sure
Jeremiah Cooper
Maybe read a book nigger so you can find out.
Luis Harris
> Just print more money
Are you the futa connosaire libertarian or the portuense one?
William Ortiz
Keynes was a homosexual who did not care about the future.
Cooper Wilson
We need to print a brain as well.
Juan Hill
What kind of currency does Australia have? I have looked at it, and says commodity based? Wouldn't that be similar to a gold standard.
Benjamin Wood
>without keynes we would still be in the great depression right now, it literally would have never ended
That might actually be true. Just trying to wait it out just didn't fucking work. Why on earth would waiting even longer have magically fixed it? Face it dude, when libertarian economics failed during the great depression, keynesian economics came in and saved the day.
Christian Collins
>when libertarian economics failed during the great depression, keynesian economics came in and saved the day.
this has to be the bait
print a brain if it isn't
John Butler
do Porto, mas não sei se sou o mesmo user a que te estás a referir
Aaron Young
The results speak for themselves. Keynesian economics got America out of the depression and made it a global superpower.
>BUT MUH NAP
Completely fictional.
Landon Evans
Muricans
Isaiah Hughes
That's a cool hat. I'd do it if I had more cash
terapeak.com
Isaiah Russell
> so many argued assumptions
Slow done
Chase Perry
Why are you calling yourself socialist then? And how are you not a socialist?
Noah Collins
Look at the South Sea bubble for reasons as to why Kensian Economics is retarded.
Lincoln Cooper
kek, you would know if you were him. Seems like Porto is strong in this board kek. If you were either the futanari one or the "portuense" one you would know.
Carry on
Christian Wright
>Keynesian economics got America out of the depression and made it a global superpower.
US was already a global superpower after WW1. And the reason it became a world hegemon is WW2. It had nothing to do with retarded economics.
Jose Hill
>"High wages and high prices in an economic slump run contrary to everything we know about market forces in economic downturns," Ohanian said. "As we've seen in the past several years, salaries and prices fall when unemployment is high. By artificially inflating both, the New Deal policies short-circuited the market's self-correcting forces."
newsroom.ucla.edu
>Despite the varied theories espoused by many establishment economists, it was none other than the Federal Reserve that caused the Great Depression and the horrific suffering, deprivation and dislocation America and the world experienced in its wake. At least, that’s the clearly stated view of current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke.
wnd.com
youtube.com
Hudson Robinson
Worth noting that Herbert Hoover already implemented some proto-New Deal policies just after the recession hit.
Tyler Nguyen
Let's take this a step further. In a lolbertarian paradise, what prevents somebody from just printing out unlimited money? In real-life, the government carefully controls the cash supply. People who try to print their own money get arrested. But what happens in lolbertarian-ville? What stops me from just getting a high-quality printer and printing all the money I want? Eventually everybody else would also do this, causing hyper-inflation, and making the money worthless. It's horrifying to even think about. Thank god we have a government that prevents this from happening.
Jacob Allen
You're literally just an ancap who is trying to bait other ancaps, aren't you?
Ryder Richardson
you should get the extra flags extension, it's pretty good
shame barely anyone on Sup Forums uses it, it's much more common on Sup Forums
Liam Perry
>what prevents somebody from just printing out unlimited money?
What would prevent people from seeing his currency as worthless?
> In real-life, the government carefully controls the cash supply.
Yet it struggles with forgeries. And before governments existed we still had currency.
>People who try to print their own money get arrested. But what happens in lolbertarian-ville?
Nobody uses their money, people will switch to hard to forge cur ency like cold or silver.
Nathaniel King
...
Ryan Hughes
>And before governments existed we still had currency.
Shitty bait. 0/10.
>BUT THE TRIBES USED SEA SHELLS WE SHOULD JUST GO BACK TO USING SEA SHELLS FUCK MONEY