Tfw you realize government in all of its forms is pure cancer and finally take the anarchy pill

>tfw you realize government in all of its forms is pure cancer and finally take the anarchy pill

18+

Meanwhile organized communists take everything away from anarchists.

>Govt is cancer
>Implyimg anarchy isn't death
Hey kiddo. It may be the time to start reading up Hobbes and Locke. Your naiveness is showing

fuck that they beat the commies and fascists for two years with no outside help . they only lost when hitler air bombed. viva anarchy

Minarchy senpai, literally the smallest, most free and optimal government.

(((anarchy)))

Government has layers that operate at varying speeds based on contact with the populace. Furthest from the center have the most contact with the people and the center functions on a level that deals with policies and regulations, but not people. As the inside turns it pulls the outside causing acceleration. Without the core the whole thing falls to enthropy and the energy is dispersed in an anarchist soup of chaos. Particles in the soup attract other particles and make more vortexes.

Living in anarchy means never being sucked into the system, but being aware of it's existence and very real threat to life and liberty.

(((taxes)))
(((laws)))

I seriously will never understand this. Communists have anarchists on a fucking leash. They will do whatever they command, adopt all of their symbols, and believe in ideals that are inherently incompatible with a stateless society because "Hey at least they aren't Nazis!". It's pathetic dude.

you are pathetic , do some research not all anarchists are socialists . we just believe people can make up their own mind . dinguss

People are their own best form of government, destroy all other forms that resist or usurp it. The US Constitution is the only and longest suceeding anarcho-communism compact to yet exist. Republican Anarchy and Constitutional Anarcho-Communism now.

That is such a good pupper. He should be proud of the dog he's become.

Anarchist in name only. They are commies.

You guys ever feel like you're living in Groundhog Day, only it's more like Groundhog Lustrum?

I feel like I've been living the last 5 years of my life over and over and since the period of time that gets repeated is relatively long, and my memory and perception are foggy, I just continue to dwell in this state of limbo.

Anyway, today I learned that a period of five years is called a lustrum.

good digits

everything moves in epicycles, no reason why the greater rhythm of a person's life won't follow a periodic activity pattern and there's no reason why you can't become generally aware of this

that and people are prone to pattern-seeking when in difficult or uncertain states of their life, so it could all just be cloud-bursting on your part

>Be anarchist
>Achieve state of lawlessness
>Get killed by neighbouring warlord
>Power centralises again

>Anarchy
>being without rules instead of without rulers
you need to go back to school, kid.

This is why I can't take anarchy seriously. A group that bands together will be able to outcompete individuals.

I feel like you and I must have just watched the same Jordan Peterson video.

K. Have fun with absolute chaos. No laws.

But there's no rulers/authority to enforce the rules....

>being without rules instead of without rulers

So is this the fabled true communism I've heard so much about?

The anarchy pill is a cyanide pill
Kys

Jesus doesn't like gubbernment either. Read the book of Mathew.

Pick up a copy of the constitution and tell me, it's only potentially lethal flaw is being a flirtatious dance step away from communistic democracy and having no mechanism to reinforce loyalty to the system outside of good sense and reason.

>replace one big state with hundreds of small kingdoms
>""""anarchy""""

the people enforce the rules or gain new rulers that aren't themselves, this is the militia's core function

>it's
I used to never make this type of typo, thanks internet.

>tfw you realize government in all of its forms is the organized means of violence
>tfw you hate commies.

People are cancerous. Evolution was a mistake.

the man is a modern sage, sadly I don't have the time for full videos, but the snippets alone do wonders to solidify one's ration

Excellent doggo

...

The rejection of anarchy is the acceptance that if you don't organize your own means of violence, others will organize theirs and your well-being most likely isn't a priority in them.

after chaos comes creation, perhaps something better will come after the previous cycles destruction

it is about time to tear down our governments desu, we have too much faith in them for them all to turn out exactly how greedy, power hungry, lying and deceitful politicians all turn out to be

How do you protect your stateless society from being conquered by foreign states? No state means no army.

Ancapism isn't real anarchism.

>

That's the name of the game my dude

Unless you are a /fit/ 16-30ish male that is part of a loyal gang (where everyone knows their place and would never back stab each other) that has control of area you live in and has a lot of available resources you are fucked.
Also you would need to live in a quite mountainous region for protection. And if America you would need a lot of guns. Anywhere else, at first no, but eventually you will need guns. Living in a city is a definite no.
Also you would need a healthy population under your control that are loyal to your gang and will alert you of any trouble. And you will need some form of Defence system for the inevitable attack on your lands.

All human progress would grind to a halt and there would be non stop war.
I mean give me one reason why my gang shouldn't break into your house at night, slaughter you like an animal, and steal all your resources? Oh yeah I forgot you live in a fortress.
Anarchy is impossible.

are you dumb or are you stupid?
private military contractors would work better than any govt military
now fuck off

Mercenary armies were tried and failed in Carthage, Italy, and a thousand other places. National standing armies are almost, without exception, more effective than mercenary companies.

Beyond that, who will give orders to the mercenaries? Will all the people who would have to contribute thousands upon thousands of dollars each take a vote on each individual action? That would be impossible, meaning a leader would have to be appointed and then you've created a state.

>I mean give me one reason why my gang shouldn't break into your house at night, slaughter you like an animal, and steal all your resources?

I mean you could try, but me and my 12 sons would decimate you in a barrage of bullets from our fully automatic rifles

>anarchy
Anarchy a shit. The optimal solution is strong, representative local governments with a small federal government.

Taxation is still theft though.

anarcho-communist

Least government possible by establishing the absolute most government possible

>i can't handle organizing with other humans
>please conquer me

non-voluntary self-renewing annual taxation is theft

>Micro nation Pill

What happens when you run out of ammo? If you had anything worth stealing your house would be under siege and get burnt down. And how would you leave your house? There would always be someone there waiting to kill you

in a WROL situation, lay low > build up. otherwise yeah I agree with everything you mentioned

you seem to have this idea that there would be complete destruction and chaos when i don't think that'd be the case. government and laws aren't some civilizing things, good people would band together and prevent bad things. communal strength and the wellbeing of your neighbor would be the driving force for altruism. but maybe you have a more pessimistic views about humans

The difference between Anarchists and Communists is that while both parties really just want to steal other people's stuff. Anarchists want to consume the shit they steal. Communists, on the other hand, intend to hoard it to introduce artificial scarcity and political control by passing crumbs out to the plebs like crack to a monkey in a Skinner box.

why do you try to make it a matter of opinion? just look at cases where this has happened. you lack perspective in your view of humanity

>but me and my 12 sons would decimate you in a barrage of bullets from our fully automatic rifles
Yeah, and how are you going to feed them?

Mainstream anarchists who have no idea what actual anarchism is are absolute retards.

If you take away all governments, new governments will naturally form over time. Humans lived in an anarchic state hundreds of thousands of years ago, and as communities began to develop, whether agricultural and sedentary or nomadic, a hierarchy and leadership arose to protect people in exchange for a loss of certain freedoms.

You can't possibly be delusional enough to think that human nature would cut out all governments forever.

your dead bodies

not really comparable. the conditions they started out on were hellish (no water, electricity, were blockaded by an army). it was a forced survival situation, not an organic anarchist society

>government disappears
>gov provided services disappear
>things allowed to unfold naturally without rule of law
>"not organic"

....

>forced blockade
>organic

but also

>bosnians
>humans capable of emotion

So do you suppose if people were allowed to spread out to the surrounding areas things would go differently?

Final (You) for the helpless retard clinging to fantasy. Saged

yes and also they'd be better equipped to form their own protective services. don't be mad baby

Let me tell you something
Most people aren't like you
I'm very poor and live in a poor area and all my friends are poor
Not being edgy now dead serious
If we killed enough people, the quality of our lives would greatly improve due to the greater availability of resources and land
Why shouldn't I?