Do controversial speakers have a right to speak at a public university Sup Forums?

Do controversial speakers have a right to speak at a public university Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/KSGuzv-2qUY
youtu.be/KGsFMmcIfOw
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Yes. Freedom of speech motherfucker

...

Yes they do and if you stop them they should get paid triple.

...

Your rights end where my feeling begin!

If its a public university and allows some speakers then they should allow all.

>Do controversial speakers have a right to speak at a public university Sup Forums?

No, universities are private institutions. They're no more public than starbucks.

This is THANKS to neo-liberalism and conservatism making them private organizations by defunding them and selling off public assets.

Public universities, yes. A lot of schools have preacher guys who stand outside on campus and yell at students about blasphemy and whatnot, it's public land so they aren't removed. Professional speakers are certainly no different.

Do you faggots really think we're going to kill all of you?

Yes because freedom of speech shouldn't only apply to liberals

>Assault with a deadly weapon = Freedom of speech
Here's your (you)

>(((Epstein)))
Is she?

What the fuck kind of question is this? These people are fucking cancer.

Let's have some antifa speakers then?

Everyone does, even the sjws.

At Berkeley they're called teachers.

>triple

sure, why not

No because it hurts my feelings :(

Do people like Hitler, Göbbels and OP deserve to live?

If you can't have freedom of a speech at a fucking University, where else can you?

Literally it is a place designed for political and social discourse to clash, unless it's dealing in a specific industry like medicine or agriculture. You contain the turmoil of controversy in a university without unleashing it upon the world.

Now, controversial thought is in the open and the response of colleges is to retreat inwards and construct extremely narrow alternate realities.

It really goes to show that

a) Don't let women hold authority in a place of learning or national defense
b) Don't let jews hold authority in a place of learning or national defense
c) Paying for universities is not actually a good thing, since it forces colleges to just sell an experience to trustafarians and SJWs, rather than have an environment that students are drawn to naturally.

freedom of speech is not a license for hate speech,

I love that these cunts are all getting that dopey hairstyle so we can more easily identify them. Add it to the pile of warning signs along with the problem glasses and neon hair.

They already teach classes at the university you fucking retard.

>11 posts before this

I swear this board has such a revival of JIDF going on right now.

it's called academia

>TRIPLE

SO IT IS SAID, AS IT WILL BE, ANN COULTER GETS PAID TRIPLE, AT UC BERKELEY

underrated post

They get federal funding they arent private. Private colleges like notre dame or byu are private religious universities.

Yes it is, you dumb motherfucker. It's a right to criticize, a right to question, and a right to hate.

Utter fear of someone else's argument speaks volumes about your own arguments.

Hate Speech is a made up-word and the concept doesn't exist.

Anything you can construe as "hate speech" (inciting violence, deliberate slander, impersonation) already had an established definition beforehand.

That's right.
It's not a license, it's a human right.

This is the problem with our third world population. The niggers, muslims, and spics would rather kill people who disagree with them than engage in an intellectual clash of ideas. It's an inevitability of the mongrelization of our country. 40% of Millenials are nonwhite, and 40% of them do not believe in free speech as a right. That's not a coincidence. I'm not saying it's 1:1, but if we keep mongrelizing, we will lose this right that we inherited as white Americans. Europe has already done away with the idea of free speech entirely and the increased rate of replacement in recent years is astronomical.

somebody has to have drawn porn of that girl by now

Anarchists don't want to talk, they want to be angry

by the same logic, you are currently killing my family. You actually are, replacing my people and my family and threatening my way life and my family's lives with everything you do. You openly state you wish to ethnically replace me.

Why should I not just kill you?

When did Ann Coulter become an "extremist" exactly? She was merely "annoying" to liberals 5, 10 years ago, seemingly over night when Trump won all of the sudden she's a far-right fascist Neo-Nazi extremist?

Also Angela Davis literally speaks all over the country at universities. She is a convicted cop killer, and I never hear one word of protest or violence toward that fucking cunt

>I know nothing about the California univeristy system the post

this

>he browses Sup Forums ironically

Depends on who defines the controversy is

...

How long until language that criticizes the government becomes "hate speech"?

This

>Do controversial speakers have a right to speak at a public university Sup Forums?

I can't believe this is even being debated in the US right now. Anybody who thinks it's okay for the government to censor people from speaking because they've determined their views to be controversial deserves to be hanged.

In theory, yes, they should.

In current practice, only if they are controversial leftists.

Richard Spencer is only controversial he's not even an example of hate speech.
The students who are like OOGA BOOGA YOU GOT PUNCHED FUCK WHITE PEOPLE are being way more toxic than Spencer.

Mrs. Epstein brings up an interesting question.
So why haven't this been retweeted more than once? perhaps Twitter is suppressing certain opinions from being shared on their platform?

No, fuck all this shit. We need to go full fascism. Liberal professors with marxist views should be fired and executed on a ditch. It's time for a purge.

Define hate speech in clear and concrete terms and explain exactly what immediate measure of harm they have on a group or individual, and how that outweighs the good of having free discourse.

Public universities are private institutions...

...wait, or do the terms mean something else in Kangaroostan?

Everyone should have a right to speak if they go through the proper channels and pay the money to do so
You should not be allowed to take away someone's rights by arbitrarily deciding they are "controversial" to your own opinions and beliefs. Especially with such a vague umbrella term that just translates to "people I don't like"

Hard to talk through a mask while hiding your face.

>How long until language that criticizes the government becomes "hate speech"?
Ypu havent heard of Sweden and Germany yet do you?

((((controversial)))) only in the eyes of the blinded left

>Epstein

if they let retards like shaun king and literal commies speak at my school, which happens, they should let others speak too
there's more leeway if it's a private school
but if it's a public school and my taxes are going to an place that silences "incorrect" political opinions then that's fucked

No of course not. The have a right to say what they want but the university is under no obligation to host them or provide them a platform. This isn't a free speech issue it's a Sup Forums being retarded issue.

hate speech is not a thing

>Do controversial speakers have a RIGHT to speak at a public university Sup Forums?

"I'm glad you asked that question. Let's define what a right is..."

Saged
>1 post by id
>free speech us free bud
>happenings else where

Oh this is a slide for sure

>british freedoms

>even making this question
[oven revving in the distance]

At 9:40 thats how it is in Sweden.
youtu.be/KSGuzv-2qUY

California universities are under obligation to host guests of on campus organizations. They are required to provide them a platform.

(((Epstein)))

Every fucking time.

AU here, Maxine Waters speaking tonight

other's have responded adequately, i'll take a different tact, hate is an emotional response. Therefore it's natural and intrinsic to the human experience, denying hatred is to deny humanity. It's like cutting off your nose to spite your face.

Don't forget this
>Before Trump won the election fair and square
>MSN and it's subjugates were running 24/7 articles that "Trump is going to start a war with Russia"
>After election
>"TRUMP IS LITERALLY RUSSIA, TRUMPLETTS HOW DOES IT FEEL TO BE RUSSIAN AGENTS"
Also how MSN essentially coined the term Fake News for anything pro-Trump or Anti-Clinton and when Trump started using it to mock them by applying it to blatant media lies and MSN has the fucking gall to say calling things "Fake News" is Trumps attempt to take away the freedom of speech

Fuck off leaf

She isn't demanding to speak there just for no reason. The GOP student body asked her to speak there, if the leftist speakers can do this at university without hundreds of masked right wingers throwing explosives, bricks and bottles at them I think she should be able to!

>h-hate speech is not f-free speech
(variant) speech is not (mode of being) speech
(mode of being) speech is not (variant) speech
>A- is not akin to A
>A is not akin to A-

no, nobody has a right to an audience at a public university. otherwise every crazy bum off the street would be up there talking all day.

here are some better questions:

should universities ignore these speakers? if so, why?

why do so many university students respond with violence when confronted with different ideas, as seen in Berkeley?

are public universities deciding who speaks based primarily on politics? and if so, does this mean the university is a political body? if so, does this endanger their public funding?

How about worry about your own country if you have no idea how the schools they go to are funded.

I can never tell if an antifa made this or an antiantifa made this.

I agree. A private institution doesn't have to give you a platform to speak. However, what's happening here is a little different. A controversial figure who is INVITED to speak at the University should be given a platform to do so, even if a proportion of the student body is angered/appalled by their beliefs. That is where the free speech aspect comes into play.

1 major problem with you asshole antifa shiiwipes is you won't let OTHER PEOPLE DECIDE WHAT THEY WANT TO HEAR

you fuckwits are so convinced you are "right" that it is ok for you asshole pieces of shit to actually suppress, oppress & eliminate any & all disagreement with your opinions

gee, isn't that some kind of fascism ?

Nah, you're right, controversy is bad.

Better clear all future speakers with all students ahead of time. If any students describe them as controversial in the survey, remove that speaker from consideration.

Otherwise, tell me how you measure controversy, and what degree of controversy justifies a ban. Then explain why.

you just KNOW

isn't there a lefty fetish of getting banged by a conservative?

why can't I hate you?

wow you're retarded

>Epstein Ojalvo

Is this article written by a mexican kike?

>1st world country

not for long Sweden... not for long...

>Does someone that isn't a leftist have the right to speak?

Unbelievable.

No you stupid nigger, it's communism.

There is nothing remotely fascist about then in any way. They are the complete and total opposite or fascism. They are the thing that caused fascism to be created as a defensive measure against it.

You are so conditioned in the leftist culture victory you grew up in that even when people loudly scream "We are communist who want communism", the worst insult you can come up with is to accuse them of being right-wingers. Try posting again later after you've lurked for a few months.

((Epstein))
Fuck off jew

Sure but i dont know how long a vrowd is going to sit and listen to the "stop nazis" chant

This

>Do people have a right to speak?

what if i really do want to kill them all. not just kill at this point either, bring back the wheel and cross.

sounds like a fascism hmmm

Imagine an organized debate between a far right conservative, far left Democrat, Libertarian and Totalitarian. That would be great to see.

Colleges are just left wing echo boxes.

Did George Lincoln Rockwell.

youtu.be/KGsFMmcIfOw

The comic clearly has the Antifa kneecap the man with an aluminum baseball bat (a deadly weapon)

It's just leddit familia, they don't understand (((coincidences))) or even where to look
>lol this jew is based xDD MILO WE LOVE YOU

You, sir, are a complete and utter dumbass.

You better know what you are talking about before you open your mouth. It makes you look like an idiot.

>freedom of speech doesn't mean you can... you know... speak freely

I just saw Daniel Tosh make abortion jokes at Indiana University. I think anybody should be able to speak.