What´s your ideology faggots?

What´s your ideology faggots?
strawpoll.me/12807066

Other urls found in this thread:

strawpoll.me/12807196
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>having convictions
where's "centrist" you political extremist?

Manual drive.

Ideology is a spook.

bump

Nationalist Conservative

>it's another "centrists only sit on the fence" episode

Fascist

Falangist

Just to be sure. Falangist = syndicalist?

fun map

based on ruling party ideology

Key?

its like a mix between corporatism and syndicalism, with a strong nationalism and catholicism

Nvm I'm blind

Ideology is a spook.

You need some populism on that list. It's not an ideology per se, but none of these options really match what people like Marine Le Pen are.
Correct me if I'm wrong.

I mean on the poll. What did you mark Falangism as?

I'm anti-ideological, but if I has to choose, I'd say somewhere between Traditionalist Conservatism and Communitarianism, leaning more towards the National Anarchist end. I like the aesthetics of Fascism though.

look at the bottom left corner

fascism

bump

i don't know :(

I do like the tenants of Falangism. I feel that Hitler should have implemented more workers sovereignty, Strasserism and Mussolinism seem a little too bureaucratic. However I did have to give my vote to National Socialism because they are the ones who brought race into the equation.

>National Anarchist
I only found out about them fairly recently. They seem interesting.

yeah, I think that would be National Populism. Also I forgot to put conservatism

Governments of Iran and Saudi Arabia are just good old fashioned Traditional Conservatives and those of Hungary are national socialists. Oh look Hamas is marxist! Did you fill this out?

>mfw starting to make the move from lolbertarian to NatSoc

Should I be worried?

You should be moving to fascism instead

Strasser did nothing wrong

Not to bust your balls but why should I?

Im actually very curious, also I'm not white and the fact that I'm starting like the sound of NatSoc is fucking with my programming

Bump

Yeah bit of a shame over what happened...

No. This is normal.

fuck off TRS shill

Nat Soc is the true path. Fascists is for faggots and Italians which are practically the same thing

Here, have a fasces.

Saudi Arabia and their confederates should be Fundamentalism ill make that change

Fidesz does have a national socialist platform
it isnt
>le gas jews :DDDDDD
its social conservatism with economic corporatism

>Hamas
The West Bank is ruled by Fatah a spin-off the PLO, a marxist party

Also to bump the thread

its interesting if you look at the poll results in the context of coalitions

this how the numbers pair up with similar ideologies.

NatSoc 23
Reationary 14
Fascist 16
Neo-Con 3
+++++++
Third Position United 56

Libertarian 13
Liberal 13
Ancap 7
+++++++++++
Liberty Coalition 33

SocDem 5
Synd 1
Communist 3
Socialist 1
++++++++
Left Bloc 10

>No centrist intellectual
Have you ever heard of horseshoe theory? Have some based black guys in Trump hats and maybe that will make you see the error of your ways goy.

libertarian-anarcho-techno-socialist with mutualist leanings.

Nowadays, claiming to be NatSoc will mean you won't be taken seriously and people will consider you a LARPer.
Fascism is the future for heroes of the Imperium.

thats pretty weird man

Disgusting to think I am sharing this board with Neo Conservative swine.

theyre in the same coalition

essentially it would breakdown:

>Nationalist bloc
>Libertine bloc
>Socialist bloc

they hate the other 2 more than you

swine has to bed somewhere ;)

I'm NatSoc at heart, but realistically I realize that NatSoc was a peculiarly German manifestation of the Fascist state, and wouldn't function organically in countries like the US. Fascism, however, is adaptable and can be molded to fit the cultural quirks of most any people. Thus, I am a fascist, who holds NatSoc as a sort of spiritual ideal manifestation of fascism.

Where is conservative nationalist you degenerate?

Marked Social Democrat for lack of a better option, I'm a slightly right leaning centrist. Regular conservative couldn't be an option?

>centrist

Just to clear up some terminology.

a CENTRIST is a person that borrows ideas from different ideologies to synthesize policy

a MODERATE is a person who negotiates from his ideological extremes to a pragmatic position.

Two different things.

It is possible to be a radical centrist if you borrow radical ideas.

It is possible to be a moderate in any ideology since you are negotiating. If you dont negotiate, then you belong the extremist left or right.

I can only agree with that, however much we could want NatSoc back, it simply will not come back. But it is true that fascism, as an ideology, is fundamentally adaptable and should be a guideline to our way of thinking. We ought not to long for the past but to extract the ideas of fascism to think for ourselves, as the problems we are facing aren't that of 20th century Italy or Germany.

What would a real Fascist America look like?

Couldn't you implement some aspects of NatSoc to it?

Then I'm a radical centrist.

The US under FDR was literally copied from Mussolini's corporatism.

NEW IMPROVED POLL

strawpoll.me/12807196
strawpoll.me/12807196
strawpoll.me/12807196
strawpoll.me/12807196

Are you socially conservative too? Then you're somewhere on the fascist spectrum.

silly socialist, if you truly believed that your countrymen were superior you'd let them run wild and free
ancap for ever

my friend

fascist dont fit neatly into the conservative vs left paradigm.

they depart from tradition while being socially conservative

they also prefer populist economic stances contrary to conservative mercantilism or lazzeis-faire.

You probably could, but the point, you should not seek to implement aspects of NatSoc purely for the fact that they are NatSoc. If we were to implement a fascist state, we should not simply copy previous fascist states, for their actions were responses to precise needs, and because fascism is not a mere set of measures, fascism is a philosophical ideology that needs to guide our way of thinking about how to solve the problems we face. To quote the doctrine of fascism : "If Fascism does not wish to die or, worse still, commit suicide, it must now provide itself with a doctrine. Yet this shall not and must not be a robe of Nessus clinging to us for all eternity, for tomorrow is some thing mysterious and unforeseen. This doctrine shall be a norm to guide political and individual action in our daily life.

I who have I dictated this doctrine, am the first to realize that the modest tables of our laws and program the theoretical and practical guidance of Fascism should be revised, corrected, enlarged, developed, because already in parts they have suffered injury at the hand of time."

a classic coyote-scorpion routine

a liberal and fascist will never allign

a conservative and fascist will never allign

a leftist and anyone else will never allign

a liberal and conservative will never allign

I know. Hence why they consider themselves Third Position. But hypothetically it's radical authoritarian centrism.

NEW IMPROVED POLL

strawpoll.me/12807196 (embed)
strawpoll.me/12807196 (embed)
strawpoll.me/12807196 (embed)
strawpoll.me/12807196 (embed)

get in here faggots

So it'd vary depending on where Fascism takes root?

As in Fascism in the US wouldn't be the same as Fascism in France?

quite correct


technocratic governance excels under fascism.

Exactly, for several reasons, be it cultural, economic, or society. Western societies have enough of a common cultural background for fascism to bloom in any of them, as at its base it is a philosophy, an approach, a methodology, whatever you want to call it, but a fascist state still needs to implement some measures, and those would vary in form, depending on the nation.

im happy to see all the Libertarians Heartbrothers

NatSoc

blood and soil baby

It depends on the issue. I guess I'd consider myself slightly social conservative.

I value public spending a lot, but I also believe in balanced budgets. I also think the private sector should be involved to reduce costs, but I also think there needs to be reasonable regulation of businesses for various reasons.

I think maybe I'm just a centrist, but I've voted for conservatives consistently even though I disagree with some social positions (social issues aren't important to me).

Took the political compass, here's the result. Not sure what it means.

The US would be a tough beast to tackle though with its current state

Wouldn't you need to kick out the horde of third worlders invading it?

Would all minorities have to be expulsed?

I would be all for kicking the kikes and niggers out but I'm a bit on the fence about it since I'm not white either but I like the idea of fascism

Stop being a weak willed faggot. Go read something other than Sup Forums

>I value public spending a lot, but I also believe in balanced budgets. I also think the private sector should be involved to reduce costs, but I also think there needs to be reasonable regulation of businesses for various reasons.
That's sensible and agreeable.

>I think maybe I'm just a centrist, but I've voted for conservatives consistently even though I disagree with some social positions (social issues aren't important to me).
You got to understand politics is a downstream from culture. Think of it in terms of herd mentality. Normies will follow whatever they are told, and what is popular. The Jews realised this, which is why they control the media.

NatSoc obviously