Can we all agree that the green square doesn't exist?

It's an oxymoron. There's no way to have a "Libertarian Left" government.

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/r/politics/
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

btw yes I am a very biased ancap.

that chart is for schools of thought, not schools of practical application. hippies are the green square - there is no 'man' and everyone is always nice to each other. it's green for a reason.

I agree. Left libertarianism doesn't exist

t. Fellow ancap

Capital and private property are not morally justified concepts and defy consent.

Are there any tests like this that are more in depth?

Being in the centre but on the blue square is the way to go in this quiz. How a normal human being should function.

i never understood how the green square is even supposed to work

it's a fucking oxymoron like ancom or anfash

Thats just how your masters want you to think. FYI: Gaining a "Permit" is when the government takes something away from you and sells it back to you.

>implying you couldn't have a minarchist government with socialist policies

this

>(((Murray Rothbard)))

remove the green!

I would agree based on the history of leftist movements.

Leftist governments, ideals and leaders tend to form totalitarian regimes. Robespierre, Fidel Castro, the Bolsheviks, political correctness etc.

Because you literally can't. You cant want more economic control and be a libertarian. The hippies in the green squares are just "Useful idiots" to be sheep for the red square.

>Anyone with any Jewish heritage is part of the "racist against whites" Illuminati conspiracy

Fuck you.

>(((non arguments)))

but then who I am

A useful idiot for the red square to use to rise to power and then control

Your civic nationalism is showing, cucks

>the test tells me what to think
You're a fag

>civic nationalism
I'm in support of privatized borders. If you don't want to have niggers in your community that's fine, but keeping lowlife white trash out of there aswell is your right, too. AnCaps advocate for a right to discriminate, nobody should be able to force inclusiveness.

The term libertarian was originally about leftists.

Not an argument

>Anyone who doesn't immediately hate every non-white skinned person and doesn't believe that every white person is completely perfect is a cuck

Go back to your neo nazi circle jerk stormfag

Nice meme. Some of the most vocal dissidents in the Eastern Bloc and such countries were leftist or socialist. Both the Hungarian Revolution and Prague Spring were led by socialists.

Not an argument.

mmmmmmmmmmmmmBOP

Not an argument.

feel like I have no place on this board

Go on Sup Forums, whenever they have political compass threads they will attack anyone who isnt far left

Most of the modern libertarians are very close to the nazi. I mean world wide, not just murrica.

...

...

explain to me like I'm five why the green square is impossible

Ayyyyyyyyyy

Read the thread fuckface

I was honestly surprised. I hate commies...

Consider myself a Monarchist

good job guys

Read "The Road to Slavery" by Hayek.
In short, introducing more control of the economy inevitably leads to less political freedom.

The failure of communism caused Jews to split. They're all looking out for themselves, but how they think is best to attain this is different.

more like any board other than Sup Forums
whenever compass threads show up on Sup Forums they're all retarded lefties
not surprised, though

...

They literally provide examples of all the corners on the site you dipshit.

Also if libertarian left is impossible then by the same logic authoritarian right is impossible.

Pic related is mine.

>codifying economic policies to promote fairer market practices for all participating buyers and sellers
>not libertarian

you should go to bed, kid. you have school tomorrow.

he said, jewishly

It's called 'the road to serfdom' but yeah definitely read it.

I get bored way to easily.

>>>reddit.com/r/politics/

Rate me guys. I consider myself libertarian/minarchist.

but that's just the econimic aspect. The social aspect is libertarian, ie. *provided* you pay tax, you are free to live however the fuck you want *provided* it doesn't infringe on others abilities to do the same

See you on the other side.

because the green square relies on redistributing wealth
who is going to do that if you don't have a large state to forcefully do it?

>it all makes sense now.

They exist they just believe blatant contradictions the doublethink is real in the name of their red quadrant over lords.

I sit, I observe, I learn. Wheres the harm in that?

what if people willingly paid into a socialist system and it wasnt a mandatory tax?

you clearly haven't learned enough if you're still in the green square
I'll give you some leeway since that site is biased as fuck to green

but the y-axis is the measure of libertarianism and that's an indicator of social authoritarianism, not state 'size'. I mean, you'll will need a police force and judiciary to ensure taxation, but the y-axis score is the sum total of all aspects of government and if everything else- drugs, religion, freedom of speech, sexuality etc- are 'don't tread on me ' issues then wouldn't the overall score put you in the green rather than the red

it wouldn't become socialist because no one is going to willingly pay half of their income to the government, which is how much money is required to maintain your system.

you won't get the 'dont tread on me' freedoms while in a socialist government for long, it's only a matter of time before your government overlords will deem it 'evil' or 'unnecessary'

...

Except your country has shitloads of oil owned by the state. That's how USSR managed to provide massive welfare (free apartments, small countryside houses aka dachas, pensions and so on) while having the sole income tax of about like 1% and 7% for people without children. However, when prices collapsed the system went down as well.

TAXATION IS THEFT

Way too esoteric.

I see this as being more a function of state population rather than the design of the system itself-- that is the average distance of the average person from the centralised government

If you have a small state with same 5 million people like denmark I think it could work

I gladly pay 40% tax and the authority of my state is not derived from force. That was proven in the economic collapse when the protesters outnumbered police and could have dismantled the state if they wanted but decided not to. The power of force is held by the citizens who voluntarily agree to certain social contracts like enforcing laws using police paid by taxes. In a "collapse" situation I know I can still trust my neighbors.

Social cohesion is everything and it relies mostly on a common cultural framework but a common ethnicity helps a lot. Immigrants of different ethnic groups form subcultures and fracture unity, there is no justification for allowing them to continue to break down what our fathers built. Strong father figure politicians help cohesion but if they go too authoritative they encourage resistance and fracture the nation even more despite good intentions.

Fuck green.

left libertarianism is just the left trying to coopt yet another enemy ideology.

why, I voluntarily pay my taxes

that's because left and right are everchanging concepts that aren't easily measurable
honestly, the square is all kinds of stupid. there's tons of things you can put there instead of economic.
when you go down to libertarianism then government ability to intervene in the economy drops as well. the square should be a triangle.

Denmark and Sweden had and still maintain to some degree free market economy. Taxes and regulations for corporations are not as heavy as in say Germany. In 1960-70s they had less government spending than the US, just for the record.

...

...

They want more government but more freedom. It's pretty simple, they want more government to force the rich to pay for welfare, and they want more freedom so they can sit on their ass getting the gibsmedats and being a general menace on society.

>my government is only looking out for my interests
you really think they're using that 40% efficiently, and more efficiently than you can?
Nobody spends somebody else's money as wisely as he spends his own.

Opposingly, right wingers can also want less government stealing everyones money, but less freedom for subhumans to chimp out and sit on their ass.

can you stop if you want to? no? then it's not voluntary.

Your argument would make rape voluntary because there are some sick women with rape fantasies.

t. radical centrist
how do rightwingers want less freedom for leeches? explain.
people don't have a 'right' to another person's money.

...

sounds ebin until you find out the third position is living in the woods like a nigger

funniest one

Right wingers don't necessarily want less freedom, but they can. I didn't imply that you can't want more freedom and less government at the same time

Maybe a better example would be Right Wingers can want less government but less freedom for mothers to kill unborn children.

>all third position is Varg

does this guy take acid before every post he makes?

>murder is good
we can have this argument later.

The purple square doesn't exist either. Rule by wealthy elites is still rule.

I can stop it by owning my own land and dropping out of the system, growing my own food and reverting to a trade and barter lifestyle

But taxes are part of being part of the big society. If you want to drop out of the big society, then don't expect to receieve any of its benefits like public health engineering, emergency services infrastructure, defence infrastructure, modern manufacturing and its products (because products are made in part on dependance on the exsitence of the things listed above). It is a net of interbeing, a web... and you are entangled with everyone else.

No man is an island [...] ask not for whom the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.

Is the OP of the picture fucking dumb? pol has quite a lot of libertarians, especially hoppe fans

What happens when literally one single person refuses to pay?

If you're OK with him not paying, it's no longer left. If you're not ok with it, it's no longer libertarian.

Murder can be good and bad. I didn't even say it's necessarily bad.

*Necessarily good

>Maybe a better example would be Right Wingers can want less government but less freedom for mothers to kill unborn children.
Don't confuse right wingers and conversatives.
Modern right-wingers/alt-right are en masse pro-choice, pro weed, pro free speech and pro guns. But also we hate muslim immigrants, welfare and buracracy run by faggot baby boomers generation.

I took a chart but this time I had a more authoritarian attitude

Sounds like an anecdote:
Can't decide if I like abortions or not. I like because it's the murder of children, but on the other hand it gives a choice for woman.

no

This is your brain on libertarianism

...

'left' and 'libertarian' and libertarian are not absolutes, they are aggregates. You can be libertarian on 75% of things and authoritarian on 25%

'My parents let me me do whatever the fuck I want, as long as I've cleaned my room and done my homework'

>you really think they're using that 40% efficiently, and more efficiently than you can?
No not efficiently, it's a bloated mess but it still works remarkably well for every day purposes and more efficiently than some unofficial club for road building or whatever. My taxes pay for roads, healthcare and most importantly the education, youth programs and border protection without which my windows would not stay unbroken. My money only has the value it does because of our governments monetary policies, the tax rate is not important compared to the value of my work.

Also there is an open government budget with a good UI online, I can see pretty much exactly what my taxes are spent on.