What if we provided subsidies or funding to certain groups like urban black women in order to get IUDs for long-term...

What if we provided subsidies or funding to certain groups like urban black women in order to get IUDs for long-term birth control? Not only would it make up for their irresponsible behavior and prevent unintended pregnancies which would lead to increased welfare spending and lower-IQ culturally destructive demographics, but they could also get better jobs without having to worry about pregnancy and could thus help improve economic productivity.

Other urls found in this thread:

nytimes.com/2015/07/06/science/colorados-push-against-teenage-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Stop trying to get creative, and just abolish the welfare state. Most problems will autocorrect themselves after a decade or so.

This sounds like Eugenics Lite. You'd take business away from Planned Parenthood.

>kill welfare state
> "nonprofit" organizations step in to provide aid to the starving poor african youths

/thread

Hey, just came by to say that she pretty thicc
peace out

Yeah but pragmatically there's no way in hell that would happen, whereas I could even see Democrats getting behind something like this without realizing what it was on the basis of helping at-risk mothers or something.

this

(((NGOS))) will just get more power

>nogs recognize they get gibs if they're starving
>purposely starve even more
>over reproduce
>get more gibs
>still starving
>children die due to malnourishment partly because not enough food partly because you're eating their food
>some live but due to malnourishment wind up stupid as fuck and aggressive.
>excuse to send more aid

An analogy would be a cat lady whose pension doesn't cover the rapid explosion in cats who are all sickly and turn into disease carriers.

That's what i'm calling racist, awesome idea

No. Just get rid of welfare instead of playing whack-a-mole with the problems it causes.

Also, if such a sterilization program were started, blacks would be bitching for muh reparations in 10 years.

...

Blacks aren't bitching about a "genocide" or anything from abortion though, even though there are almost as many blacks aborted as birthed nationwide.

>abolish the welfare state
>nigs unable to feed themselves
>nigs with guns rob, loot, and murder in anger
>civil war erupts
>millions die

Better to phase out the welfare state. Just cut their funding by 10% every couple of years.

more like the cats get trained by the wealthy (((neighbour))) who is feeding them now and uses them to terrorize the neighbourhood.

seriously: NGOs making politics are probably the most serious problem today

Blacks already abort at a rate high enough that their population merely replaces itself. The demographic shift in America isn't due to the native black population, it's due to immigration policies implemented in the past few decades and hispanic breeding.

We could offer the same program to inner city high-risk Hispanic women, they also have insanely high out-of-wedlock and youth birthrates.

They experimented with this in colorado with huge success.

nytimes.com/2015/07/06/science/colorados-push-against-teenage-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html

I imagine its only a matter of time before "at risk" (see poor minorities) teens are provided IUDs for free to stop unwanted births. It would be nice if to even have the IUD removed they had to show evidence they were capable of caring for a child/cohabitated with the father for 1 year+.

It is not going to work, it is going to be counterproductive. Schemes like these always are because it is:
a) voluntary
b) depends on the good judgement of the individual.

Result will be that you limit the number of babies of the smarter, more responsible ones somewhat. But not the target demographic.

hitler was a loser on many losers, but the lie the jews tell about him being a genocider is completely right.

Enemies must be eradicated. Look what happens when you let them survive.

But like said, Colorado pursued a similar project, and it worked astoundingly well. The groups that were overwhelmingly predominantly affected were low-income minority women.

nytimes.com/2015/07/06/science/colorados-push-against-teenage-pregnancies-is-a-startling-success.html

Nah, this is cheaper.

Or you could remove the welfare program entirely like Bill Clinton tried to do. The percentage of babies born out-of-wedlock for all races was decreasing under him. Stop subsidizing undesirable behavior for minorities. They didn't need welfare under people like Eisenhower and births were in wedlock and they were prospering economically.

>Or you could remove the welfare program entirely like Bill Clinton tried to do. The percentage of babies born out-of-wedlock for all races was decreasing under him. Stop subsidizing undesirable behavior for minorities. They didn't need welfare under people like Eisenhower and births were in wedlock and they were prospering economically.

So they reduced the number of babies from smart low-income women with a sense of responsibility who took up the offer.
That still leaves the stupid ones that did not.
Net result: Colorado's IQ is going down.

Sanger is miles ahead of you, blood