Hitler wasn't a socialist

>Hitler wasn't a socialist

Fuck off PJW

Does anyone unironically claim that he wasn't?

I mean I constantly see people on Sup Forums spewing that "Nazism was not socialism"

That's /leftypol/. Ignore them.

>National Socialism is not socialism

It could be argued that Hitler deviated away from the a few of the original 25 points of NatSoc but he always remained generally socialist. Also what said, leftists get triggered when people try to create socialist states without referring to the works of Marx.

No, it's always right wingers on Sup Forums saying this whenever anyone implies that socialism could be good or like "Sup Forums always forgets the 'socialism' part of National Socialism" and then you get 50,000 replies being like "hurr Nazi Germany wasn't socialist"

The National Socialist German Workers' Party
AKA Nazi Party

...

>right wingers

You're referring to the faux-fascist memelords who think muh gabidalism is the ultimate truth yet also want to call themselves National Socialists because they think its cool.

Then those are the newfags. They like Hitler but still any to do with 'the Left' as bad so they try and hide the socialist aspect. But it wasn't Marxian socialism, it was NatSoc, and this difference is not understood by everybody here.

*still hate anything to do with

Hitler didn't destroy his nation, we did because we're kike puppets

>Marxism is anti-property; true socialism is not.
Funny, since the Nazi party's own stances were for land redistribution to the state.

Heil hitler friend.
At this point the only answers are either NatSoc, or anarcho primitivism (leading to tribalism etc etc) when the world glasses itself over for the last drop of oil or whatever.

Hitler's definition, not the NSDAP's

>ANTIFA ARE THE REAL FASCISTS

>the Nazi party's own stances were for land redistribution to the state

Otto Strasser's branch perhaps, the rest of the NSDAP believed in maintaining private ownership.

>But it wasn't Marxian socialism, it was NatSoc
*Posts hitler quote*
What the fuck does that even mean? Why would you even need a state for that? It doesn't explain shit about NatSoc. I feel like it's just a meme and people only like it because of Hitler. I'm very ethnonationalist and I lean towards minarchism/libertariansim. I don't see why a white society would need any form of central planning.

So are there honest to god unironic fascists actually on Sup Forums? How would your economic system work without just being communism?

D-delet this right fucking now.

The basic idea is that the industry will be divided into national corporations, each in charge of their own specific sector. Private companies must then function under the leadership of their respective corporations, whose roles are to ensure that companies do not take advantage of the nation. This way the country benefits from the healthy competition between private companies without the risk of being taken advantage of by greedy business owners. This same idea is applied to the banks.

>be hitler
>send workers for vacation to norway for free and other bs
>create huge debts
>realize you cannot borrow more money
>create Mefo bills of a fictional government factory so you can borrow more money
>create even bigger debts
>realize you cannot borrow more money cuz inflation
>switch to war industry hoping to steal the sources elsewhere

"not socialist"

>wants to get rid of commies
>thinks more capitalism is the answer

Look up "realpolitik".

without the war, his germany would have economically collapsed soon, that's a fact, I consider myself a centrist btw

I was referring to your image of Pinochet