Is there such a thing as Pro-White Neoliberalism? I'm a neoliberal at this point, pro-free trade, believe that abortion, drugs, prostitution, etc. should all be legal, universal healthcare is a good thing, certain industries being nationalized, among other things considered social democratic or neoliberal, but at the same time I also recognize the differences between races and think demographics are very important. Is there a name for this ideology? I don't think it's NatSoc.
Is there such a thing as Pro-White Neoliberalism? I'm a neoliberal at this point, pro-free trade, believe that abortion...
James Morgan
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
archive.is
en.wikipedia.org
who.int
pnhp.org
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com
google.dk
theguardian.com
wolf.org
telegraph.co.uk
en.wikipedia.org
politico.eu
twitter.com
Daniel Moore
So your a degenerate slut? okay then.
Christopher Garcia
there really isn't a difference. Humans are humans and they generally behave the exact same way if placed in the exact same circumstance.
I think maybe you're alluding to cultural differences or maybe you are just uninformed? not sure.
Tyler Wilson
It's called common sense.
Adam James
What? Explain how.
There really is a difference in what? Between what I was describing and NatSoc? I don't think they're similar though, NatSoc is pretty socially conservative, I don't think the NSDAP would be okay with drug legalization, abortions, prostitution, etc. I'm just looking to see if there's some ideology that already exists which is succinctly named that describes what I was talking about.
Jose Myers
>I also recognize the differences between races and think demographics are very important
this was the part that I was commenting on.
Connor Baker
There is a difference between races, whether the causes of that are biological or not.
Chase Perry
I don't think he said that there weren't
Luke Ortiz
>here is a difference between races, whether the causes of that are biological or not
not really. human behavior is human behavior. humans will generally behave the same way if placed in the exact same circumstance. So, my point is and i think the point that you are clumsily trying to make is that we have cultural differences. Those differences are due in large part to different circumstances and experience rather than race.
Nicholas Moore
He did, in this post:
Aaron Powell
but there is... It's fucking science...
William Morgan
What I'm saying is that race correlates with behavior, whether there is a causal link between the two of those or not.
Ian Price
Oh, good point, I must have missed that
There are biological differences between the races that are pretty substantial though.
Dylan Jackson
>but there is... It's fucking science...
the study of human behavior is also a science.
Mason Baker
>is there such a thing as pro-white degeneracy?
no.
Blake Harris
>openly a neoliberal
Only one solution for you.
Isaiah Brooks
>ace correlates with behavior, whether there is a causal link between the two of those or not.
well if its a casual difference, than why the need to segregate?
can provide an example of a behavioral difference due to biological factors that make you believe this way?
Connor Roberts
>well if its a casual difference, than why the need to segregate?
I said "causal", not "casual".
That said, I always judge people based on their behavior, not their appearance.
Brayden Adams
>That said, I always judge people based on their behavior, not their appearance.
so you have absolutely no reason for recognizing the difference between races and the importance of demographics, to paraphrase your OP?
Chase Cox
What's wrong with neoliberalism assuming a pro-white country?
It isn't degeneracy, do you think the war on drugs is a success? Do you think banning porn or alcohol would actually work?
Jayden Rodriguez
I recognize that racial profiling can be useful, which is why cops do it. Other than that, no.
Aiden Thomas
>Is there such a thing as Pro-White Neoliberalism?
No, neoliberalism always results in collapsing racial boundaries. There are no two ideologies (if neoliberalism can be called an "ideology") that are more opposed by nature.
Michael Scott
It's called traitorism. Go suck government dick commie.
Carter Green
>I recognize that racial profiling can be usef
ok, many types of profiling can be useful or counter productive if its not executed correctly.
So, it looks like you're just a liberal and not a pro-white neoliberal.
Angel Watson
Wrong. First I prove the fundamental difference between men and women. Pic and essay related.
archive.is
Now I prove that there is fundamental difference between races. Now, it can be proven with bonemarrow transplant, but we want to prove it their is difference between what the races think.
The Australian aboriginals have evolved isolated from the rest of mankind for about 25.000-40.000 years. 100% pureblooded aboriginals can't build a modern house without the help of other races or hybrids, and they can't be taught no matter the training.
A border collie and a wolf can breed, one has the genetic inclinaton to herd sheep, the other will never learn no matter the training. It's the same with australian aboriginals. We could remove all the coloured peoples right to vote and say, you get it back when 100% pureblooded australian aboriginals build a modern house without help from other races or hybrids.
"In the 2007 paper "Genetic Similarities Within and Between Human Populations",[21] Witherspoon et al. attempt to answer the question, "How often is a pair of individuals from one population genetically more dissimilar than two individuals chosen from two different populations?". The answer depends on the number of polymorphisms used to define that dissimilarity, and the populations being compared. When they analysed three geographically distinct populations (European, African and East Asian) and measured genetic similarity over many thousands of loci, the answer to their question was "never"."
Ethan Allen
>It's called traitorism. Go suck government dick commie
calls others traitors but probably supports the traitors in the confederate states.
Brody Reed
That girl is tits. Nothing more.
What a sad existence...
Ryder Moore
>Is there such a thing as Pro-White Neoliberalism?
No
> pro-free trade
No such thing truly exists. There is a cost and (((someone))) will always get ahead of the other.
>believe that abortion
Only in the matters of rape
>universal healthcare is a good thing,
Obviously you forgot where you are. You live in a constitutional republic. Now where in the constitution is the word healthcare. Go ahead and go look, I'll wait.
> certain industries being nationalized
Again, you forgot where you live. Where in the constitution does it give the federal government the authority to take over an industry? Go ahead and look, i'll wait.....
> Is there a name for this ideology?
Yeah it is called leftist stupidity
Lincoln King
it would be more of a success if the kikes weren't pushing nigger shit into the culture and making everyone think drugs were totally kewl maaannn. yes banning porn would work. just because something is not 100% effective doesn't mean it doesn't work. all this stuff is much more of a cultural issue than a technocratic/administrative one. basically the cultural channels are clogged with kikes shitting in them. neoliberals are garbage.
Benjamin Peterson
>So, it looks like you're just a liberal and not a pro-white neoliberal.
I'm not OP, I never said I was a "pro-white neoliberal". Then again, I do support heavy restrictions on immigration, but that's motivated by "xenophobia", not racism as such.
Austin Brown
>A border collie and a wolf can breed, one has the genetic inclinaton to herd sheep, the other will never learn no matter the training. It's the same with australian aboriginals.
What?!!?!
Wolves and dogs are entirely different species! Jesus, go back to high school biology.
Elijah Powell
>wants Gibs
>hates nigs
You're the Republican establishment
Aaron Morgan
my bad and I don't feel that restrictions on immigration is xenophobic or racist.
Carson Bailey
I'm obviously not a Constitutionalist so I fail to see how you think I would care about this or that it would mean much to me. I'm also not a Leftist, I don't believe in social justice bullshit, I don't believe in the abolition of private property or economic classes, I'm supportive of capitalism within a reasonable regulatory framework.
I'm not a communist at all, learn what one is before stupidly labeling people with meanie words you don't like.
Mason Watson
It's called stupidity
Colton Evans
>Wolves and dogs are entirely different species! Jesus, go back to high school biology.
Well...they might be different species, but they can breed, so that is kind of your problem. You just proven how dumb you are
en.wikipedia.org
"A wolfdog (also called a wolf–dog hybrid or wolf hybrid) is a canid hybrid resulting from the hybridization of a domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris) to one of four other Canis sub-species, the gray (Canis lupus), eastern timber (Canis lycaon), red (Canis rufus), and Ethiopian wolves (Canis simensis)."
Idiot, and most likely a black idiot.
Jaxson Lee
> Wants gibs
> Implying free healthcare is gibs
> Implying there aren't other reasons to want it like the fact that it's most efficient
Look up economist Kenneth Arrow's arguments and essays about information economics and healthcare. A competing collectivized healthcare provider actually reduces information asymmetry in the market and makes healthcare as an industry more efficient overall.
who.int
pnhp.org
krugman.blogs.nytimes.com
Tyler Cox
you know that you're not allowed to have the freedom to evenly apply logic and critical thought to each situation on Sup Forums
you must be blinded by ideology and your brain must live in a black and white world in order for it survive with so few brain cells.
you're going to have to leave.
Carson Thompson
>I'm obviously not a Constitutionalist so I fail to see how you think I would care about this
Well, considering you live in a constitutional republic.......
Isaac Reed
>Well...they might be different species, but they can breed, so that is kind of your problem. You just proven how dumb you are
you used 2 different species to compare the difference between races . I may not be brilliant but I am not the dumb one here.
Leo Smith
Get a Jewish Girlfriend and she'll help you to think beyond dumb boring bitch...Seriously, just mate down, fill you holes with wildlife cock and shut the fuck up.
Isaiah Ross
>the west is circling the drain
>heh dont you know, fellow goys, that what we need are minor technocratic tweaks in the right places, if you want big changes that means you're a rural and suburban retard that is blinded by ideology
Christian Russell
>What?!!?!
>Wolves and dogs are entirely different species! Jesus, go back to high school biology.
Check out this fucking idiot.
google.dk
This is why people are getting fucking fed up with black people. You are so fucking dumb.
theguardian.com
"The dividing line between species is not always clear-cut, but is usually drawn at the ability to interbreed. Precisely for this reason, the domestic dog and the wolf used to be considered as seperate species, "canis familiaris" and "canis lupus", but the dog is now regarded as a sub-species of the wolf species "canis lupus familiaris"."
wolf.org
"Wolves and dogs are interfertile, meaning they can breed and produce viable offspring. In other words, wolves can interbreed with any type of dog, and their offspring are capable of producing offspring themselves. Although hybrids can occur naturally in the wild, they are rare because the territorial nature of wolves leads them to protect their home ranges from intruding canines such as dogs, coyotes and other wolves."
You understand how fucking dumb you are?
William Ward
The line or definition for species isn't concretely defined though, since different "species" like wolves and dogs (which were bred from wolves originally) can have fertile offspring, even though the definition of species is supposed to be a collection of organisms which can have fertile offspring with each other. Also he did make a point using cited research earlier about the differences between different human population groups, most of which is established scientific fact, and you continue to ignore it and claim that all humans regardless of race are fundamentally the same, which isn't true.
Christopher Ross
Nope. You are just a black idiot. You lack common sense, and a simple google search shows how wrong you are. YOU wanted to call them different species.
Joseph Torres
>is this a name for this ideology?
American education. A hundred thousand dollars invested to become a complete ignorant. Congrats.
Brandon Thomas
Its called being sane. All kekes aside, i think most people here on Sup Forums will agree with you on trade, abortion ect. and still don't like to see their country overrun by shitskins and sand niggers.
Bentley Gray
>"The dividing line between species is not always clear-cut
you must be fucking with me.
the reasons why science uses the Taxonomic Rank is to be clear cut about what categories life on earth are to be placed.
Are you saying that different races are not part of the human species?
Sebastian Baker
Man you got some ass backward believes, why the fk would you be against abortion? Praise that fking shit like the sun, you knock some sloet up and your not stuck for 18 with bills.
Jonathan Price
>Nope. You are just a black idiot. You lack common sense, and a simple google search shows how wrong you are.
I'm not black you dumb fuck. so you're already wrong.
ALso, if a simple google search can demonstrate that i'm wrong, then why cant you articulate why I am wrong?
Anthony Carter
> the reasons why science uses the Taxonomic Rank is to be clear cut about what categories life on earth are to be placed.
And that doesn't have anything to do with what he was saying. Can you not see that the definition of species is somewhat fluid if different species can interbreed and produce fertile offspring? Besides, this topic is derailing the thread, it doesn't even really have anything to do with race since race is a matter more of subspecies instead of species.
Blake Hernandez
>Are you saying that different races are not part of the human species?
NOPE. YOU said wolfs and dogs were different species! Then I replied, ok whatever.
>Well...they might be different species, but they can breed, so that is kind of your problem. You just proven how dumb you are
Now if you want to call wolfs and dogs different species, that is your problem, not mine!
I even gave you the quote.
>theguardian.com
>"The dividing line between species is not always clear-cut, but is usually drawn at the ability to interbreed. Precisely for this reason, the domestic dog and the wolf used to be considered as seperate species, "canis familiaris" and "canis lupus", but the dog is now regarded as a sub-species of the wolf species "canis lupus familiaris"."
Wolfs and dogs are not different species, because they can breed and produce fertile offspring, and australian aboriginals and europeans are not different species, because they can produce fertile offspring!
HOWEVER.
>A border collie and a wolf can breed, one has the genetic inclinaton to herd sheep, the other will never learn no matter the training. It's the same with australian aboriginals. We could remove all the coloured peoples right to vote and say, you get it back when 100% pureblooded australian aboriginals build a modern house without help from other races or hybrids.
That is just a fact.
Ryan Young
>(((we))) all know the goyim on Sup Forums are inferior
Jason Gray
>Get a Jewish Girlfriend
Why the fk would that help, maybe to have your taxes done cheap?
Samuel Roberts
Neoliberal is an insult used by commies to describe all of capitalism after 1970. Doesn't mean anything.
Sebastian Rogers
>Is there such a thing as Pro-White Neoliberalism? I'm a neoliberal at this point, pro-free trade, believe that abortion, drugs, prostitution, etc. should all be legal, universal healthcare is a good thing, certain industries being nationalized, among other things considered social democratic or neoliberal, but at the same time I also recognize the differences between races and think demographics are very important. Is there a name for this ideology? I don't think it's NatSoc.
Common sense.
telegraph.co.uk
"Winston Churchill considered blocking all immigration to Britain because he feared a growing "coloured population" was posing a threat to Britain's social stability.
Churchill, then 79, told Cabinet colleagues that he did not "want a parti-coloured UK". At a Cabinet meeting on February 3, 1954, the prime minister told colleagues: "Problems will arise if many coloured people settle here. Are we to saddle ourselves with colour problems in UK?"
"Maxwell Fyfe said: "We should be reversing the age-long tradition that British subjects have right of entry to mother-country of Empire. We should offend liberals and also sentimentalists."
The notebooks reveal that Churchill thought the way round the issue would be to let "public opinion develop a little more before taking action".
The Tory leader thought that would be "politically wise"."
To bad women are the majority of voters and have no commen sense eh?
Pic related.
Levi Morales
Have you never heard of John Rawls? Perhaps the most important and well-known political philosopher of the 20th century, and a neoliberal? Neoliberalism is the dominant political paradigm of our time.
Camden Hughes
Hayek, Friedman, etc usually get the label neoliberal. If Rawls fits in, it only fuels the idea that it's a meaningless term used by anti-capitalists for all of modern capitalism.
Aiden Harris
Actually no I don't. Slavery is abhorrent and needed to end. I say though that there is nothing in the US Constitution that says a state or group of states cannot leave if they wish. Saying "we don't want to e in your club any more" is not being a traitor. On the other hand saying "government should take over certain industries" most certainly is because it violates the small government, maximum individual liberty and personal responsibility principles America was founded on. Suck my star spangled cock
Parker Murphy
I agree with you Ameribro, this approach takes the best from both worlds and is the most realistic approach.
Lincoln Thompson
Being on the very tip of being intelligent.
What liberals are afraid of is that if people begin to think races are different they'll be more violently opposed to other races. Which is true. But the real way to deal with the race problem is to recognize races are different, but don't hate races for their difference. This road is the harder path to take the the other two. This is true progress. I'm not sure how you can be a neo-liberal or social democrat and want to remove non-whites from your country. You should recognize there's no inherent purpose or goal in life and thus there's nothing wrong with hosting less competitive races. As a state it should equip all of its people with the ability to do whatever their personal goal is in life, no matter their born inclinations.
Jaxon Lee
So you are basically like a European Social-Democrat, without the 3rd world fetish? Denmark is somewhat like that.
Jacob Gray
Wolves and dogs are the same species you stupid fuck
Jason Clark
>I'm not sure how you can be a neo-liberal or social democrat and want to remove non-whites from your country. You should recognize there's no inherent purpose or goal in life and thus there's nothing wrong with hosting less competitive races. As a state it should equip all of its people with the ability to do whatever their personal goal is in life, no matter their born inclinations.
That is easy for you to say. Can you please name what homeland the european natives are allowed to have? Because right now USA, Europe, Australia are all being overrun. And the white population has to pay for the other races through the welfare state. But I guess in your viewpoint Dalai Lama is just a son of a bitch.
politico.eu
"“There are too many refugees in Europe,” and this “makes it difficult in practice,” the Dalai Lama said in an interview with German newspaper FAZ published Tuesday.
The Tibetan spiritual leader said everyone has a responsibility to help refugees, but added that “there are now too many.”
“Europe, and for example Germany, cannot become an Arab country,” said the Dalai Lama, who himself fled from Tibet to Dharamsala, India in 1959."
And yes, the man is talking about ethnicity. Just as Tibet are talking about ethnicity when they don't want to many chinese in their country.
Austin Thompson
Canis Lupus and Canis Familiaris are the same genus but not the same species.
Oliver Gomez
"Canis familiaris" is properly classified as Canis lupus familiaris, and is a subspecies of Canis lupus, though.
Jose Gray
Hayek and Friedman are much more classical liberals or libertarians than neoliberals.
Eli Allen
>Can you please name what homeland the european natives are allowed to have?
You type this as if there weren't constant migrations and mixing for centuries to get to the point you are now. You type this as if people moving to a more prosperous place is outlandish and something that didn't historically happen. It's just that now it can happen from further away now that the globe is more unified and aware of each other (planes, internet, cameras, etc).
The conglomeration of people that currently fused to make Europeans now will continually merge and mix, as it always had, to make whatever identity it'll have in the future. And they'll identify with the region, as the people always have, and they might even try to fight off immigrants like you to preserve their race. Do you think you're the same exact people as the ones living in the Denmark area in 2000bc? Do you think the French are the same people as the Franks or the Celts before? Do you think the Italians are Romans? It's only natural the areas won't continue to exist in the same way for the rest of eternity, no matter how hard you try.
Most of what you base importance on is a nation state. A relatively new concept in the history of humanity. Are nation states good or bad? Does it matter? I don't think so personally. Just let natural selection do its thing.
Kayden Mitchell
>Do you think you're the same exact people as the ones living in the Denmark area in 2000bc?
No. But why do native people have to pay for the immigration? >I don't think so personally. Just let natural selection do its thing.
It's not natural when it's being forced upon us. But let me guess.
>You should recognize there's no inherent purpose or goal in life and thus there's nothing wrong with hosting less competitive races.
You're a woman, are you not? Can you at least have an honest discussion? Because if you are a woman, there is nothing more to discuss with you, so far, everything you said has been utter shit. And you sound super fucking retarded and as a complete worthless human being. Besides, if there is no meaning in life, stop caring about what other people do.
Thomas Barnes
It is natural when they can live in your country and outbreed you, ami. White Europeans won't die out if you didn't have negative birthrates. They won't die out if they don't mix. If white Europeans find traits in immigrants desirable and mix then there's nothing wrong. If white Europeans fail to procreate and another race takes their place then there's nothing wrong. Such is the way of life. Also one problem here is lumping all Europeans into a single race. They're Danes, French, English, etc. Lumping all Europeans into a single white race is a very American thing to do.
>You're a woman, are you not? Can you at least have an honest discussion? Because if you are a woman, there is nothing more to discuss with you
Oh, c'mon user.
Liam Jones
>Oh, c'mon user
Dumb cunt.
Jackson Collins
>Pro-White Neoliberalism
Southern Democrat is the term you seek.
Luis Garcia
We just call you a starry eyed retard.
Jaxon Kelly
Sauce on the juggs.
Jonathan Morales
I'm a retard just saw the name of the pic.