How long until women are obsolete

how long until women are obsolete

newscientist.com/article/2128851-artificial-womb-helps-premature-lamb-fetuses-grow-for-4-weeks/

Other urls found in this thread:

newscientist.com/article/2123360-artificial-embryo-grown-in-a-dish-from-two-types-of-stem-cells/
geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/10/14/artificial-wombs-will-they-become-possible-and-what-does-it-mean-for-reproductive-rights/
theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/12/feminists-get-ready-pregnancy-and-abortion-are-about-to-be-disrupted
mirror.co.uk/tech/sex-robots-sexist-feminist-says-7373559
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A
cnn.com/2016/09/14/europe/mice-sperm-reproduction-eggs/
speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.454/sweden-to-become-a-third-world-country-by-2030-according-to-un.html
youtube.com/watch?v=Howj6QXmDMs
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

bump

When we prefect artificial milk; I'm not giving babies formula.

In about 20 years

IVF, Surrogacy, embryo freezing, embryo from skin cell and now ectogenesis VR porn and sex bots, everything is slowly falling into place.

Of course the feminist will try to ban it. but banning it will only make it go underground and unregulated, just like banning porn prostitution drugs and guns doesn't work well and makes it go underground

The best thing is It's not some patriarchal conspiracy to replace women it's just that modern women suck so much at having babies that man has to create a technological replacement.

Add to that the future dominate cultures Islam and china are patriarchal, it really doesn't look so good for women

Nature has a way of fixing itself
The natural order of male dominance will be restored

I posted earlier about this. The paper's there too.

And I suppose the men will raise the children? All male children?

>And I suppose the men will raise the children?
They seem to do a generally better job at it nowadays. Sadly enough.

Israel is already producing motherless Aryan babies. The technology has existed since early 2000s.

Probably.

oh shit a nature paper
this is quality shit

They will stay at home to raise their male children, and support their family by....?

Sounds pretty gay, desu. Unless they take drugs to suppress testosterone and puberty hormones.

Hopefully not long. They really burned down western civilization this time. There is no going back for them. It's now "replacement or bust"

Why should feminists try to ban it? It would finally emancipate them from pregnancy and it would please both pro life and pro choice activists as it will allow women to end their unwanted pregnancies without "killing" the embryo/fetus. Then lefties would love to statalize it and we could use it to produce milions of state owned children finally fixing the west demographic problem.

THEY SAY THAT MY VIBE IS TOO DARK MY EYES ARE TOO HARSH

Never. It wouldn't be in the elites best interest to destroy the only leverage society has over men. Just imagine what society would look like if women had no power because men are being sexually satisfied by Westfield humanoids and men can have kids all by themselves with top tier eggs. Men will no longer want to be the beasts of burden.

this pic is true
the whole concept is really interesting
we can already make humans with artificial eggs AND sperm too
newscientist.com/article/2123360-artificial-embryo-grown-in-a-dish-from-two-types-of-stem-cells/

>ha wanting a family is gay.
you know there are plenty of ways to work and raise a family right? and what the fuck is this about taking drugs to suppress testosterone? you you fucking mental?:

The idea is usually side by side with robotics. Swap the wife for a robo-wife thus saving yourself the effort of having a rabid insane biological female anywhere near you.

Women spend the most money in capitalism. They are the reason useless jobs exist.

>Robo nurses.

Because the womb is the source of female power. It'll do to women what the welfare state did to men. Feminists love to have their cake and eat it too.

We have XY chromosomes, women only have XX. If women try to reproduce by themselves, they'll only be making clones(parthogenesis), we add diversity in the mix.

Whata time to be alive.

The same reason they want to ban sex robots, It changes the power structure.
And in theory make women not obsolete but in many ways redundant
They have been discussing it for sometime now

geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/10/14/artificial-wombs-will-they-become-possible-and-what-does-it-mean-for-reproductive-rights/

theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/oct/12/feminists-get-ready-pregnancy-and-abortion-are-about-to-be-disrupted

and banning sex-bots
mirror.co.uk/tech/sex-robots-sexist-feminist-says-7373559

It's all about power and they are losing it

Here's my prediction - which I think it's pretty obvious to everyone - I believe in the future children will be reared through machines and women, hopefully, will be phased out in favor of men.

AND THEN!!!! GAY UTOPIA!!!

MWAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

But they would be doing what the elite need of them then. They'd have to work to afford all of this crap. As long as they're willing to work to afford the stuff they enjoy and to have children, and are willing to raise them, what more can the elite want?

There are the globalists among them who have different plans, but the whole thing is crashing down now.

It's not like it's women who are motivating men to have families and raise the next generation. Maybe it used to be, but right now it's the opposite. Men want *stable* families but women make it impossible.

Agreed on the robo-wife. Bitches be crazy.

I'm curious what kind of plastics are used for the artificial womb. Many plastics have endocrine disruptors that mess with hormones and stuff.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bisphenol_A

Not only that, but once the tech becomes wide spread. The elite might change their minds about the kind of society they want. Namely because the greatest evil that exists will be rendered powerless. The amount of stress that will disappear from all of men's lives will be enough to launch us into an age of productivity and happiness.

this

women are sluts because its rewarded by men
once men dont need them for sex they will panic

i honestly think if men thought about sex as much as women, we would've have 2017 technology by the 18th century

I see why they could think so, i'm just saying it all depends by the way it will be presented to the public. Anyway, concerning the sex bots, they could be right to see their role diminished by them (or at least they would be coherent with their dumb ideas), because a man would unilaterally decide to use a sex bot. In the case of the artificial womb, instead, it could initially be presented as an alternative way for couples to have children, so that the female presence would still be required.

DELET

This seems pretty immoral but it's at least better than getting an abortion (If they would be able to move the fetus into one of these).

here's a you, now come back home and join the rest of us

Neat.

It would make men and women more equal too. Women wouldn't have as much power over men, so they wouldn't be as much on easy mode. They'd still have it easier (society and men will always be more protective of them), but not as extreme.

Right now, the education system and economy was artificially engineered to get them and keep them into the work force. That wasn't easy to do. But it is currently unsustainable. Our cheap imports and massive government expenses (which employs the most women) are made possible by the petro-dollar scheme, which leads to incessant conflicts and will collapse at some point.

Women have been getting used to work in these ideal circumstances. Now things could slowly be made more equal.

If feminists want an equal world, they should see all of this as a good thing.

Perfect, now the pedophile ring among the elites can receive child sex slaves more conveniently.

Yes.

Mate, there's already feminists who are trying to ban sex bots, even though these sex bots should hypothetically free thousands of women from sexual slavery and limit rape and perhaps pedophilia. You have to understand that feminism has always been about power. Feminists are very much aware of the technological threats to female power. They're not stupid.

What are you going to do with sexual urges with no women around? How are you going to explain puberty to your children? And yes there are ways to work and raise a family, why aren't you doing that now? You don't need robowombs to do that, just go adopt a little nigger.

Children raised by robots, what could go wrong?

any femanons here have any thoughts on this?

some of them will be assigned female and given estrogen injections.

Same as how long until men are obsolete. This goes both ways faggit.

Nothing. Men do all the teaching anyway.
>Inb4 you were taught by female teachers all the way through school.

I personally think that pedophileia originates from a person basing attraction solely on acceptance, which children do far more readily. Rejection memories are triggered by behavior in other people, when a pedo sees that behavior, they associate it with age. Therefore, if a better alternative is created, we can feel the acceptance we long for, no children required.

No one cares what the terrorists think.

I'm a bit hesitant on the idea. Once the making of artificial creation of life is complete, what do scientists/elites intend to do with them? Will they use them as slaves? Sell them? Raise an army to rule over the entire world? It seems like a great idea, however, such an idea could come with many dangers as well.

I could give a shit. was right and I am not invested in humanity, nor do I have anything to gain by exploiting beta orbiters or whatever these people think. This world is doomed in a few centuries anyway because everybody is terminally obsessed with cock.

>femanon here

You people are terrifying

>1488
checkd

artificial wombs dont go both ways nigger
youre talking about artificial sperm, which is already only introduced as an alternative for infertile men

sex bots will really make them obsolete

tits or gtfo

>men
>obsolete
Nice try ctr fag, but 99.99% of women can't do men jobs.

Fap to your own, gaijin piggu

I thought it was already possible to fertilize an egg without sperm using another person's dna/cell?

Face it biocunt, your days are numbered. Society that you burned to the ground will be recreated with you in mind, just not to your benefit.

TICK FUCKING TOCK

Yes this is the way to preserve the race after too many women have absorbed shitseed.

>It would finally emancipate them
You believe too much in the feminist rhetoric. Feminism is about putting women first in every single way. There was a time when this *may* have put women and men on equal footing, but we are long past that and feminism is clearly about elevating women above men.

Families and children are not feminist at all because they come with the difficult choice of putting herself first or her family first but they can't ever get rid of families and children so the next best thing is control. If families and children can occur without women then that control is completely lost and feminists can go eat a dick thus it's in their best interest to ban.

it is, that was part of my point
its also possible without eggs
cnn.com/2016/09/14/europe/mice-sperm-reproduction-eggs/

I said I don't care! I didn't burn anything to the ground, I'm a fucking NEET. I have not bothered anyone about feminism in 10 years, I do not fucking care about society or people or babies. Just live your pointless life and stop being such a drama queen.

Genesis 3:4, 6,000 years ago. My boipucci is reddy

I KNOW IM 35 AND IM HAVING A HARD TIME BEING OLD

You can't stop progress

It requires... a fertilized egg.

Reveal mammaries or exit forum.

>Check'd
Kek is in support of artificial wombs and robot Waifus.

How long until the narrative switches from migrant rights to clone rights?
How long until education is de facto 100% indoctrination? How long until natural parentage is phased out? We are on track to becoming cattle born and raised to work for an elite with no opportunity to decide our fates

What did Jesus say against artificial wombs again?

That's up for you to decide. Just grab a note pad and jot it down. Then publish the long lost book.

Holy shit trips.

^^ Witnessed

Exhibit bosom or remove oneself.

>Psalm 77:7
blessed are thy men
who invent artificial wombs

>Matthew 14:88
blessed are thy men
Who invent robot waifus

From the lost of book kek

It's gonna be great, OP, we're going to be able to control reproduction and femcunts can't do anything about it, men will also gain more control over their children's lives.

WE NEED TO START DEMONIZING OPPONENTS OF ARTIFICIAL WOMB AS ANTI-CHILDREN WOMEN, THE EQUIVALENT OF A WOMAN WHO ABUSES OR KILLS HER OWN KID.
(propaganda wars coming, get ready)

The ancient Romans considered actually loving a woman to be a pathetic weakness. We need to get closer to that. Not that sometimes a rare woman can't be worthy of love, but it's rare as fuck.

Most girls are just fucktoys and babymachines.

>how long until men are obsolete
Dunno mate, but I know it's going to be long, long after women are obsolete.

Remember that even if men weren't needed to reproduce, they would still be needed for the functioning of society. I don't hate them, but you've got to admit women are too retard to take the place of men.

holy shit i just noticed i got quads

I LITERALLY ONLY WROTE LESS THAN 20 POSTS IN MY ENTIRE 3 YEARS HERE WTF

>i honestly think if men thought about sex as much as women, we would've have 2017 technology by the 18th century

So this just means you'll be doing more butthole diving in post-wymyn society. Poking another man's prostate won't cause the second industrial revolution to occur, you must stop focusing so much on sex in general or you will just find other things to have sex with.

Does this not make sense? Did Tesla beat off to catgirl traps all day or did he do important things?

The lambs that come out of this process are probaly sickly, retarded, and cost 10000 times as much as perfectly healthy naturally born lambs.

>Poking another man's prostate won't cause the second industrial revolution to occur

well traps kind of did bring forth the computer revolution

maybe some kind of fiber based sheet

In lot of ways we are already obsolete, but as long as we can get an upper hand over women- and not depend on them for the future (i.e. marriage and childrearing), then we can eventually establish a male supremacist society.

Imagine how great life would be if women were just completely controlled and submissive.

>male supremacist society
Why is it that the only politics one can talk in here are either homotopia or nazitopia

...

How much of that had to do with the fact they were traps though? Serious question.

>Implying Tesla didn't start his work on the basis of lifting skirts remotely.

Case in point feminist Sweden

>Sweden to become a Third World Country by 2030, according to UN
speisa.com/modules/articles/index.php/item.454/sweden-to-become-a-third-world-country-by-2030-according-to-un.html

>raising your biologically enhanced sons to colonize the Solar System.
Yeah it's gonna be cool.

Seems like you're evaluating men based on height and shoulder pads. Try to imagine a scientist in a negro society, would he be omega or delta? Men succeed at fullfillment based on their environment. I guess the society depicted in your picture is one based on height and shoulder pads. Just my observation.

Nuclear families still raise children better than single fathers.

>Tesla
To be fair he did die childless and destitute so maybe he's not the best example.

>he hasn't even read normie's first Sup Forums literature

>Why is it that the only politics one can talk in here are either homotopia or nazitopia
male supremacy isn't a fucking homosexual thing, retard, most societies that have ever existed have made men supreme over women.

You are hardwired for it. All men are.

Was every pre-1900 society homosexual? gtfo

He's an example of someone whose name we remember and it's not because he spanked his monkey all day over the idea of keeping women in zoos because they laughed at his korn backpack.

Technology develops fast. Just look at the Industrial or Silicon Revolutions and how quickly they took place. Perhaps we will see a Genetic Revolution in our lifetime.

Literally 100%

youtube.com/watch?v=Howj6QXmDMs

if english homos hadn't tried to turn Turing into a cat trap then he wouldn't have gotten depressed, wouldn't have said computers are persons, and our ideas on computers would be completely different, like the last 60 years of sci-fi would have been completely different

Is that why so many fucked up kids come out of homes where the parents divorced while they were teens?
Women are a negative influence on children. They are only tolerable because men have more important things to take care of.

>turn Turing into a cat trap
a feline with a secret cock in a skirt? what?

>4weeks
>lamb
wow so science.

cant wait to never hear about it again when this one dies too.

>In lot of ways we are already obsolete
Are you a self loathing cuck or a women ?

The most powerful people are still men
The richest people are still men
The smartest people are still men
The most influence people are still men
Majority tax payers are still men.

Yes western society is biased against men but this is exactly why it's falling apart.
The more freedom and power a women has the more dysfunction and degenerate the society becomes and eventually collapse

At the end of the day women still need to men to pay bill, child support alimony welfare
and to defend their borders and to police the system

It's a mans world and will always be a mans world.

Look at feminist Sweden. it's falling apart

My dad died when I was 7, then my momcunt raised me. I'm telling you, women aren't fit to raise children or be in control of anything.

A household with a strong man can make the woman OK, otherwise she's going to be a nutjob.

IN.
A
LOT
OF
WAYS

Not in all ways.