"Trump's Sanctuary Cities Order Blocked by Federal Judge"

bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-04-25/trump-s-sanctuary-cities-order-blocked-by-federal-judge

lol

Other urls found in this thread:

archive.is/ndFBo
nation.foxnews.com/2016/05/23/obama-threatens-hospitals-perform-sex-changes-or-lose-federal-funding
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

So the judges decided that illegals are more important than the law?

Awesome.

It's time for the tar and feathers.

DRUMPF BTFO

Trump still can't get things past judges and/or congress.

Trump is a mess! Low energy!

Why did no judge do this to Obama? Literally wtf

Drumpf make maga again winning !!

Fuck off hook nosed kike

>I'm the best at making deals, guys

left or right, he's going down as the shittest president in history, kek

>implying trump isn't literally the biggest kike the white house has seen in decades

behave yourself burger

...

better than a cuck loving """"im so redpilled xd lol""""" bitch

cause nigger muslim shielding

So being the president is just some formality I guess.

desu this sets a really fucking weird precedent though doesn't it? break the law, be rewarded, never face reprisals. Is this only for shitskins? If whites have white privilege, is this the shitskin privilege? It's such a confusing timeline for a white heterosexual male. The dude who I watched talk about volcanos in middle school now preaches transgenderism in toddlers.

if you think bill nye doesnt care about anything but money youre retarded

it's the only reason """"""""save the world"""""""" was greenlighted. money.

Trump could probably solve this in an instant if he wanted to.

This has got to be a game. Just fire the guy. You're the president.

Anyway senpai about to go to bed, I leave you with this; is there even a point to being a citizen now? Seems to me it's actually a detriment in today's pro-illegal society. I'd be fine with not paying taxes ever again and getting a boatload of free everything just because MUH BRAVERY. I wouldn't want to be a nigger or mexican though, so it's a conflict there. night Sup Forums

Our cucked nation have the judicial branch to the kikes long ago

Mate I've not even gotten past the point of that intro song and have no plans to. I can gather that it's money, but for me personally it's just so fucking out there I didn't even bother formulating a "why" just hit stop and moved on with life seemed like the best choice.

fuck I replied to myself, I better get to bed

No, they decided that the federal government can not extort a local jurisdiction to change its immigration policy by threatening to cut grant funding.

>has no idea how the government works

lol holy shit

>USA history fundation is about a bunch of foreigners coming and literally stealing the land
>now this is somehow unfair

>implying natives found it fair

once we become the victims, we realize the brutiality of our own actions

or you could be like every MAGA altright faggot and blame someone else

>the federal government can not extort a local jurisdiction to change its segregation policy by threatening to cut grant funding.

How the fuck does this work?

the settlers did not go into Indian camps and nig their food and homes. they built homes on land and killed some when they got aggressive

oh and they also traded land for beads so there is that too.

Under what basis? And it isn't policy, it's open rebellion against the federal government. The mayors should be arrested.

quints of truth

you're comparing to a way of life that no longer exists and your argument is invalid because of it

settlers where stronger and more advanced they deserve all the spoils of war as the greater civilization. stop being a cuck and supporting the weak which includes dipshit immigrants who refuse to strengthen their countries and instead leech. you cucks let them too and this is why you are having issues with muzzies and mexishits.

>us kicking out the natives is supposed to be reason for us to let other peoples kick us out
If anything that just gives us more incentive to keep you out. Not that much is needed for a country that beheads people on the regular

dont care didnt read because you are wrong

Art of the Gigantic Faggot

you're not the first illiterate mexishit Paco. cant wait for the wall.

what way of life?

It shows just how fucking stupid every white person who uses that argument is. They KNOW they're cheering for their own death, and they still do it.

get angrier i love it

stay out of it fag your country is a shithole anyway

????

Can't we just citizen-arrest these judges?

Fuck democracy, fuck the separation of powers, fuck the judicial branch.

I'm serious. Gas all these traitorous shitskin lovers. Fascism is the only way forward.

Ha, this is retarded.
The federal government can do a lot of other shit though by threatening to cut funding.
Of course illegals are the exception.

You shills sucks.

Here's my sheriff. He wants to declare Law and Order of Kern County.

here's a link to article

archive.is/ndFBo

Can someone please tell me how anyone can EVER defend protecting illegal immigrants?

It just boggles my fucking mind, I can't comprehend it.

Immigrants break US law by entering unlawfully
Immigrants disrespect the US by getting the benefits of living in a great country without the costs of legal migration

They're selfish criminals, no ifs or buts.

And people fucking defend them????

>state immigration policy

They the protected class in United States

It's this sick game that liberals play with each other. They compete with one another to test the limits of absurdity that society will accept before reaching a breaking point.

"Hey guys, what's the next craziest thing that we can do to the country?"
"I know. Let's make it socially unacceptable for people to acknowledge biology. We're going to push this transgender crap on culture and ruin the lives of anyone who tries to go against it. We'll brand them as bigoted/privileged/etc."

We are well past the point now where liberals have made it socially unacceptable to support the existence and sovereignty of a nation. This is why anyone who is against illegal immigration is now deemed racist by polite society.

Mark my words. A few years from now, liberals will try to make it socially unacceptable (for white people, at least) to breathe oxygen, or drink water.

"If you drink water, you are a privileged racist scumbag yadayadayada. It's current year! What's wrong with you!"

Just recently, Oxford told their students that if you don't look at someone in the eye, that makes you a racist. There truly is no end to this twisted game that liberals play with each other. They are fully committed to testing the limits of what society can accept.

I feel bad for you guys. All the degeneracy I see comes out of America. Anytime I go on snapchat and read anything other than National Geographic I see fucking degradation: open relationships, being a sex worker is trendy, why porn is good.

Your culture went straight into the bin.Why is Trump not doing anything?

Hold the fuck up.
Why can judges block a presidential executive order? This is the third time it's happened. Can't Trump just take it to supreme court? Some burger pls reply I don't know much about Murican law systems.

>what are drinking age laws

Immigration is a federal matter, based Jeff Sessions will find a way to force them to cooperate

Immigration is a federal issue. Obama used that argument to block Arizona when they tried to enforce their fucking border. Sanctuary Cities and their Obama-appointed jew judges trying to protect them have nothing to stand on. Don't like it? Try to Commiexit, and get a taste of what the South got when they tried to defy the Federal Union and tell it to fuck off.

any sauce on that buddy?

Yes he can and that's the plan with the new supreme court judge being appointed.

We won this land fair and square, of course we're going to defend it

>Can't Trump just take it to supreme court?
he would if he thought he could win. I'm guessing it's actually true that the method employed to get the cities to comply is unconstitutional and that he'll just look for another way to make them cooperate.

>latvia

No, you are suppose to be less degenerate then the rest of us.

He will take it to the Supreme Court. That's the plan.
The Democrats are playing a retarded losing game.

The issue is that when Trump wins this all presidents will have the backing of the Supreme Court from now on on this kind of matters. So one day when this kind of action would be justified the president will just tell everyone to fuck off, the Supreme Court already said that is okay once.

what a person wants to fap to time to time should be a more sacred and respected matter even if a bit degenerate at times

>by threatening to cut grant funding.

Yes you can cut funding, that's literally the function of congress, there's nothing unconstitutional about congress using its powers of the coin, or the president affirming the law be executed like it should be, with an "executive order."

See the term "executive order?" What do you think it means? What do you think it's used for?

A R T

O F

T H E

D E A L

Oh, ok. So it's only legal when Democrats do it.

nation.foxnews.com/2016/05/23/obama-threatens-hospitals-perform-sex-changes-or-lose-federal-funding

...

Deal we got.

Honestly, California is setting a dangerous precedent with their insolence, and brazen defiance of the federal government.

This isn't just a matter of one state's litigiousness. It's about a state that openly refuses to acknowledge the laws and existence of its senior government. If they had the means, I wouldn't put it past them to use violence against the federal government if they wanted to.
Granted, what's happening now with California is not quite like what happened with the CSA revolting against the government and firing on US troops, but it comes from the same line of thinking.

>"Fuck this stupid republic. If things don't go my way, I will just ignore laws and make my own nation with its own set of rules."

There's a reason why Lincoln had to put harsh measures on the south after their rebellion. I'm thinking Trump will have to do something similar to the Commiefornians.

>by threatening to cut grant funding.

The government can cut funding if a city so much as changes the fucking speed limit.

Really surprising, no one saw that coming :^)

anyone know how to filter IDs on this shit site

>setting a dangerous precedent

Makes me laugh at liberals freaking out about North Carolina trying to reban same sex marriages. Meanwhile they are all going against federal law legalizing weed.

Only for gold card members.

ITT utterly retarded Clapistanis who don't understand their own political system, being led by an incompetent orange muppet they worship.

Oh my. :^)

Not under the authority of the executive branch. All he really can do is march down there and make them redact their contradictory law by force. Congress could take the funding away because they are constitutionally authorized.

Because Obama appointed this particular judge.

Life tenure; it's in the Constitution.

Pushing transgenderism on kids is retarded, but do you have an issue with an adult being transgendered?

This judge shit is fucking out of hnd, where were these judges when Obama did all this summer shit? Seems like one judge went out on a leg with the immigration ban and then everyone realized oh shit this retarded shit actually works.

What is to stop the federal government from just not sending checks? What would California do about it?

There's these things called laws, checks and balances and overreach. What Trump doesn't seem to understand is that he can't rule like himself and the fever dream Clapistani mongrels on pol are wished wished for :^)

Stop. This is not what the court said.

>The Left
The judiciary should uphold that the Federal Government has no right to withhold grants from any city/county/state for any reason at most or for illegal immigration at least.


>Right
It is within the executive's purview to withhold any grant from anyone for any reason at most, and Homeland Security grants in relation to non compliance with the DHS at least


>US District Court
Intermediary position : the order was too broad. It must be rewritten with a narrower scope and it will be valid. The president ultimately will be able to withhold certain grants in certain situations such that he has the congress wrote in the ability for the executive to do so in the grant, and the withholding has specifically to do with the scope of the grant .


Lrn2civics

>Shitpost in american political threads because our country is still important unlike Germany aka refugeeland

Knowing that you must understand that there are several aveneues for recourse available to trump now.

The most obvious being take it to the supreme court.

Checks and balances work in everyones favour hans.

What the fuck? Hiroshimoot ate my image.

Nah it's just it's too hilarious to see you Clapistanis are still willing to suck off a complete failure any chance you get. :^)

How's that '100 days deal between the voters and Donald J. Trump' (actual quote by the incompetent hack) coming along? I'll tell you how: He's way out of his depth and so much of a failure he just threw his deal with you gullible inbreds over board and declared the whole 100 day review to be nonsense because he is such a failure :^)

Yeah good luck taking an obvious overreach matter to the SC just to get rekt AGAIN :^)

SCOTUS probably won't hear the case, and if they do they'll probably say the thing courts say to almost everything :
1. Have congress do something about it, preferably writing something with specificity and severability
2.
Have the executive rewrite the order, with greater specificity
3.
Combination of 2 and 3

What we need is for congress to strangle the sanctuary cities of grants, projects, appropriations, services, etc. directly instead of having Trump play footsie.

Tinyurl/repealhartceller7

>but do you have an issue with an adult being transgendered?
Yes.
Adults who undergo the surgery and hormone treatments are deliberately misinformed by political advocacy groups who insist that the surgical procedure is the right way to go.
The numbers clearly say otherwise. Surgery, hormone treatments, and language policing do not in any way reduce transgender suicide rates or mitigate their mental health issues.

Transgenderism is not transgenderism. It's a disorder called gender dysphoria, and any doctor who or activist who tries to con some delusional person into undergoing the surgical procedure is a sociopathic kike who should be put in prison.

We own the SC atm you Fucking krautistani

no one ever said the kikes wouldn't fight back.

Kek, this.

>president does just about anything
>autistic "checks and balances reeeee" screeching in the distance

The judge himself said it would be under Trump's authority for very specific grants and such that it relates to the issue to which the grants relate.

We need to get McConnell, Conryn, and Johnson uncucked though.

Obama was a constitutional law professor, trump doesn't even know what the constitution is, let alone relevant SCOTUS decisions.

Surely a teo tiered approach is needed where those suffering frim gender dysphoria are psychologically evaluated to ascertain whether surgery or psychiatric treatment is better.

Also i don't think you can draw parallels from the suicide rates since these people are undoubtably outcasts or hated by large portions of society. Regardless of undergoing surgery.

>Someone didn't listen to Fash The Nation

The idea was supposed to be we mobilize millions of people to force Trump and Congress to get straight on immigration, trade, and peace, and ensure they know they work for us, not vice versa.

We fucked up on that part.

'We' - you and what millionaire rich kids playing politicians who don't give a shit about you? :^)

>or the president affirming the law be executed like it should be, with an "executive order."

LOL

I don't think I've ever seen this level of retardation.

Waiting until Ginsburg kicks the bucket would be good, just take everything to the Supreme Court

One of the conservatives on the court is a bit of a cuck, so 5-4 isn't a sure bet yet

>Not under the authority of the executive branch. All he really can do is march down there and make them redact their contradictory law by force. Congress could take the funding away because they are constitutionally authorized.


Really, america?

Your government can't ban/unban alcohol without a constituional amendment.. Yet you let them ban ALL drugs without ANY LAWS being passed WHAT SO EVER.

Just reinterpet the existing laws on books(interstate commerce clause..) and tell the courts to go fuck themselves, like you always do

Many such cases. Sad!

That implies trump has a decent grasp of how thelaw works in America, and even the most rabid trump supporter has to realise that his legal knowledge is limited to property and general business law.

>retards ruin it for everyone by not knowing when to stop
it's always the same