How do you feel about YouTube putting them out of a job?

How do you feel about YouTube putting them out of a job?

Hila has a career doing porn now.

i'm really happy to watch them cry about muh ads

literally who?

Can't believe I am interested in this but...sued by whom? I actually like this Jew.

Google is legitimately becoming a serious problem

I recognize the one on the left but I don't know who these people are

literally who

>literally met each other at a Holocaust museum

Care to elaborate?

jews

They look like cucks, who are they?

Some fuck they made fun of in a vid. Can't remember his name but he took himself waaaay too seriously. Apparently they're gonna win the case, though.

As for youtube; they can lick my festered gooch desu imo.

False flag jews can't melt youtube gold beams

>Trusting Google ever
They got what was coming to them.

>eceleb thread
Fuck off

Just because something worked once doesn't mean you are entitled to it forever and should be given to you. Youtube was and is treading new ground and one of the large monetizing factors in ads has been feeling their investment and have decided to narrow down their focus a bit.

This is 100% up on youtube to decide and consumers to react to in how much they want to use the service.

So my feelings are that youtube takes a hit as diverse content won't be incentivized as much but it's not like it's some great tragedy or not understandable and h3h3 should look for other ways to make money or to adapt by not having offensive content anymore.

YOU DON'T SAY?

h1z1 sucked anyway

>""""""job""""""

They're in an ongoing lawsuit, been running a while but recently youtube ad restrictions has flagged a lot of their videos and they cant live anymore. watch their latest video Goy

All these meme farmers who dont expand their horizons

it's okay as long as you're going for the comedy

Here's one she did with her own brother.

>you can still upload to youtube, but we won't pay you if your content isn't advertiser friendly
>FUCKING FREEDOM OF SPEECH, YOU'RE TREADING ON OUR FIRST AMENDMENT

Where were these faggots when animators got the boot because youtube started favoring watch times over view counts?

Why dont they just make a patreon, theyd probably be on 30k plus a month with all the kids with their parents credit cards

Well did you expect the old media to never fight back and after donalds win they knew they lost the narrative so of course they buy out all the ads and make a big deal out of it. Its entirely there to kill conservative youtube celebs.

I dont get it. Why do Youtubers rely on the ads Youtube puts on their video? Why not cut the middle man and go directly to advertisers and ask for their shekels and they in return put the ad in their video itself?

E-celeb cancer doesnt belong here

Fucking disgusting

creepy

Wow very real

what the fuck is this autism, what is wrong with ppl LOL

I'm glad theyre being sued I hope they go to jail as well. This man is doing gods work for suing them and winning.

Why would they need to complain as.much as this?

...

i kind of like these guys. they arent SJW enablers so i will tolerate them.

Who e fuck cares?

MODS do your fucking job

I don't give a fuck if post-gamergate animal avatar going political for the first time cringefest, loose their """job"""
its not a motherfuckinging job, seriously you are making crappy videos with shit quality that only garners audience by thumbnail and title, you are clickbait if clickbait was a job.
Fuck 'em
i hope youtube gets nuked.

Some of the channel i watch have started doing this.
You can't really skip it accurately
No adblock can remove it
Cons are that they can't be sure you watched it, can't be targeted, don't have any idea on the efficiency of the ads.

Looks like the face is shopped over the body

...

>kikes
>working

>t. Pajeet Rajam, pixel expert with a Microsoft certification in Paint.

NO SHIT SHERLOCK

Seems like Google is still pissed about the millions of bukkaros they invested in Clinton.

because letting youtube do it is zero effort

They can be sure you watched it. YouTube analytics measures when people stop watching and when they skip parts.

Easier said than done i suppose

Jews fucking jews? HUEHUEHUE.

Aren't these faglords from Vice? I swear i've seen them narrating some stupid shit project in a video and vice is the home of that kind of stuff.

Them being sued is not the reason for them scaling back on Youtube. They're stopping Youtube for the most part because Youtube doesn't give them much ad revenue anymore.

The ongoing lawsuit is something they should easily win. It will be expensive though.

I think youtube dun goofed.

They had two options here - Let their business get raped, or fight back.

They spent so much time and effort building youtube up as a viable alternative to legacy media and then let it collapse and burn after one little media battle.

Seriously;

>Murdoch publishes a bunch of articles talking about how evil Youtube is
>Pressures advertisers to pull ads

The solution was simple. Google simply delists every single reference to News Corp. or 20th Century Fox products and subsidiaries. You google "Alien" and you get nothing. You can't find a trailer anywhere on youtube. You can't find a link to anything regarding Fox News. Just blank them on google and youtube and android platforms etc.

Any advertiser that joints in with them, like say, pepsi...same deal. No more pepsi via google or youtube or android.

Hell even have Waze delist cinemas that show Fox movies.

I mean, just go all in and wreck them.

Instead they're basically going to scrap youtube after spending all that retard time on youtube red etc.

The big question is if Twitch steps up and basically takes youtube red's space. It's the perfect opportunity, but would require a lot of money to fix up and get ready, PLUS it's owned by Amazon, who probably aren't keen on dealing with "controversial" content.

leaf, kys and aid humanity

They're were the kikes at Vice that endorsed white genocide and BLM.

The guy on the right was one of the ones that drank the cum cocktails with some Vice interns.

h3h3 is good peoples.

The adaptation will be people simply leaving youtube for new platforms and youtube dying IF a platform that provides slightly better service comes along. They'll become myspace 2.0

Twitch is the likeliest competitor, but it would require a big investment they may not want to bother with.

>Seems like Google is still pissed about the millions of bukkaros they invested in Clinton.
No, it's completely related to that WSJ article outrage about "racism on Youtube." Advertisers boycotted Youtube and pulled a lot of ad campaigns. There weren't and still aren't enough ads to go around. Youtube then offered better tools for advertisers to exclude certain categories to appease advertisers. This means that anything even remotely controversial is going to make no ad revenue.

Google themselves most likely didn't want this at all. The advertisers forced them into making it safe-space friendly.

I personally like them, but fuck off with this shitty slide thread.

They aren't associated with those queers called """"""""vice"""""""""

meant the guy suing h3h3, want this jew to go down. There used to be a barrier so to speak in which the jews couldn't break into the top youtuber circles and now this jew is there so hopefully this law suit takes him down.

>The solution was simple. Google simply delists every single reference to News Corp. or 20th Century Fox products and subsidiaries. You google "Alien" and you get nothing. You can't find a trailer anywhere on youtube. You can't find a link to anything regarding Fox News. Just blank them on google and youtube and android platforms etc.
>Any advertiser that joints in with them, like say, pepsi...same deal. No more pepsi via google or youtube or android.

good idea, never thought of that. youtube will fuck themselves up in the end though if they continue their crusade against independent content creators. they are why youtube was great in the first place. youtube cant just turn their back on them.

omg really? good catch

The smart ones do.

Here's the thing - People are saying this will ruin youtube...BUT, apart from Pewdiepie, the most financially successful youtubers are women. And their videos are mostly advertising for make up products, diet products, other stuff. Casey Neistat is the same - they generated revenue from youtube ad rolls, sure, but it was the product shilling that made them the significant money.

Then you have guys like Red Letter Media who used to get youtube bux, but their main source was Patreon.

People like h3h3 were producing content more like normie TV. You can't stop to shill a product during a skit.

Or you could, but it wouldn't work.

Why would you put Ruth Ginsburg on par with those racist ass Jews how do you know she's anything like those Jews

Yea it really is easier said than done. I mean, the problem is two fold: Why would someone want to advertise with you, and if someone would want to advertise with you, why not just buy ads on youtube?

You have to look at it as an opportunity cost. Youtube advertisement is actually really good, it's very well targeted and I've heard that it doesn't cost the advertisers as much money if the viewer doesn't watch the whole ad so they save money on fans that aren't engaged and can maximize their budgets.

Especially with ads costing so low right now, why would an advertiser want to pay some youtube sheckler more money for what they could already get now with less money?

The only answer is if they could pay for influencer marketing, which is something you'll probably see. Not sure how good of a thing it'll be. It'll either be cancerous as shit, or I hope it'll actually be good.

I'm kind of hoping someone uses this chance to influence youtube goys to buy products that actually support freedom of speech and aren't swayed by liberal cuck bitching. If you pay attention you'll notice that MSNBC will run ads for like, coke and pepsi, while Fox has ads for gold and walk in showers. This is probably because Coke and Pepsi don't want some liberal cunt breathing down their necks, the jew has tainted conservative news so much that they've convinced Coke that it's a bad idea to support conservative news. This means there's a broad population of people who are no longer being advertised to by major companies because they're bad goys, and those goys sheckles are dirty.

Same thing is happening with youtube. (((they))) don't want the youtube goy's dirty money influencing (((their))) precious marketing schemes.

So maybe there will be a new surge in free speech companies who will use negative media as a Streisand effect to boost their visibility.

Or you'll just see youtubers sheckling for patreon and for you to turn of that pesky adblock. idk senpai

We're already teetering on the brink of corporatocracy, does it really need to be an autocratic one too?

this isn't a slide thread
it's about MSM dominating all media outlets

Lies

>The adaptation will be people simply leaving youtube for new platforms and youtube dying IF a platform that provides slightly better service comes along. They'll become myspace 2.0
No platform is going to have the resources to compete on this. Video broadcasting is too expensive bandwidth and processing-wise.

Twitch doesn't offer anywhere near the opportunities that Youtube does. Twitch takes a bigger cut of revenue from you. Twitch offers lower quality bandwidth. Twitch doesn't keep videos hosted in the long term.

They are millionaires, they are still going to post weekly on youtube and they are posting twice a week on twitch where they can get tips.

They will make more money now than ever.

If they have supporters they should just start a Patreon and disable adds on their videos.

A hurr durr everything is Reddit that I can't relate my NEET lifestyle to. This isn't even about e-celebs who the fuck are these two heebs anyway this is about censorship you splerg.

They were funny at first, but alot of their humor is basic and relies only on memes. It's a cringy-a.

There's thousands of dudes making bank from patreon. They litrially don't need a single add on their YouTube channels.

All the faggots complaining atm are they ones that make content for edgy kids, who don't have PayPal, who don't have access to patreon.

Nothing of importance was lost.

Oh India....

Yeah I bet these literal israeli bernie sanders shilling jews are being censored.

I used to like him, but he has become such an oppurtunistic leech-faggot lately.
>He collabs with the biggest fucking faggots like Neistat and Ty Lopez just because they are famous on YouTube, despite previously saying he disagrees with/dislikes them.
>"Hey man, buy that shitty phone-case and sign up for cheap razors!"
>"Pewdiepie is my friend! I met him twice at a con and he gave me an autograph"
>"Oh my god we´re losing money our lawyer is taking all ma money, look at my Dracula wife crying"

cool shoes pupper

You should have.

We're Australian.

When Murdoch tried to pull shit like this on Kerry Packer, Kerry simply sent James and his goons around to beat the shit out of him and trash his printing presses.

The American Jew just doesn't understand how to deal with the Down Under Anglo.

>Youtube can't turn their back on them

They probably can - But it seems like a pretty big waste after the last couple of years of them building youtube creators UP.

>Here's the thing - People are saying this will ruin youtube...BUT, apart from Pewdiepie, the most financially successful youtubers are women. And their videos are mostly advertising for make up products, diet products, other stuff. Casey Neistat is the same - they generated revenue from youtube ad rolls, sure, but it was the product shilling that made them the significant money.
That's the thing. These women won't really be affected, because everything they make is completely non-controversial.

Basically when you buy ads now for Youtube you can tick a box that says "no religion," which means that no videos that have some loose relation to religion will get these ads. Because this is judged by bots it often just means that if you mention Christianity or Islam in some way that you're included in that category.

These are essentially categories that will exclude a lot of the interesting content. Advertisers obviously don't want their ads appearing on the controversial topic videos, which means that the make-up chicks will be the ones left.

Oh, and apparently there's a special case for channels like the young turks that seem to have an exemption. It might be politically aligned, but it might just be a coincidence.

No it doesn't wtf

What this just means is that Youtube failed as a middleman between its creators and its advertisers. What it can do is allow more flexibility when buying adspace. To literally buy ads for a specific channel. And also provide a platform where you get oldschool agencies that buy targeted advertisements and negotiate deals for its clients, the creators. All can be fixed by making the system less automated.

I'd rather have corporate wars than simply allow one run by Murdoch run over the competition. The fucker HATES the internet and will not stop until it's snuffed out.

You're lucky. You have anti-trust laws.

That wrinkly old fuck owns 75% of the media outlets in our country.

>Twitch doesn't offer anywhere near the opportunities that Youtube does. Twitch takes a bigger cut of revenue from you. Twitch offers lower quality bandwidth. Twitch doesn't keep videos hosted in the long term.

That's why I said it's dependent on Amazon WANTING to do it. The investment would be huge, but potentially profitable.

maybe they should move out of jew york or wherever it is they live

Yeah, so instead everybody has to play by the tune of the media organizations? So if WSJ publishes an article claiming you're a nazi you're just fucked? That's literally what happened to Pewdiepie.

>They're millionaires

They said they were making the equivalent of 50k a year.

That's not much.

Onision, who is larger than them, at his peak made 400k in one year.

Amazon sells everything from A to Z. If they can find a platform to advertise their dragon dildos they will do it.

Poo in Loo

Those women make stuff FAR more controversial and that would get them delisted - Many of them have shown that already (generally sex and language related).

But it doesn't matter to them. They are "influencers" not "creators" and they are paid to lifestyle vlog and shill products.

>it might be politically aligned

That was happening before this latest dust up anyway. Anything right of center would get delisted and anything left of center not only got an exemption but also got promoted. That's to be expected.

>What this just means is that Youtube failed as a middleman between its creators and its advertisers. What it can do is allow more flexibility when buying adspace. To literally buy ads for a specific channel. And also provide a platform where you get oldschool agencies that buy targeted advertisements and negotiate deals for its clients, the creators. All can be fixed by making the system less automated.
This is the shit Youtube IS doing. That is the problem. Imagine that you're Pepsi: would you want your ads to run on a channel that has made jokes about religion? Probably not, so you take out all the channels that talk about Christians or Islam or anything like that. This means that you just cut out any channel that has ever talked about politics.

Now some channels seem to get a free pass on this. BBC, CNN, The Young Turks seem to be able to get ads fine even on controversial stuff, but that's not the case for most youtubers.

Twitch doesn't allow you to even say "faggot," because it's owned by Amazon.

Is that Conan's sidekick Andy? I remember how disappointed I was when he left the show originally. I loved their interaction in the 90s.

It's also owned by Bezo's who is a rabid leftist.

So far he's left Amazon alone (he spends most of his time fiddling in shit his newspaper), but lately he's had some content pulled. Holocaust Denial books for instance. Apparently they also pulled confederate memorabilia or something too awhile back.

WHO?

>kikes

They live in commiefornia now

>That was happening before this latest dust up anyway. Anything right of center would get delisted and anything left of center not only got an exemption but also got promoted. That's to be expected.
That's not true. Most of that was fringe channels that went on about crazy shit. Now we're seeing it affect channels like h3h3 or defranco. Channels that don't seem to shill anything.

His twitter is an utter trainwreck

But they just refuse to broadly do display ads on some 4 categories. What I mean is that pepsi is aware of the content h3h3 produces and knows they are ok and makes a deal with them to advertise on their channel. Right now channel by channel flexibility is not available on youtube.

Just because you disagree with someone doesn't mean you don't like them

Those are very jewish looking trannies.