WWI REDPILLS

Can someone redpill me on WWI?

Who were the good guys?
Who were the bad guys?
What major milestones changed the outcome?
How would Europe look like if the Germany etc had won?

Drop all the pills you got!

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=7XExjrZxTdk
youtube.com/watch?v=MQW3VefRozc
dancarlin.com/product/hardcore-history-50-blueprint-for-armageddon-i/
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Cherep-Spiridovich
youtube.com/watch?v=1Jg7fFYL3z4
youtube.com/watch?v=0I71VX5RyGA
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Germany would have won but Hitler got shot in the balls.

>Who were the good guys?
>Who were the bad guys?

Sven, does this kind old grandpa look like someone that could do evil?

You got some ad rem on that?

>realising that the Western and Eastern front didn't cause Germany's downfall but the Macedonian front did

Nigga just study history

>that yugo

Well, that's what I'm trying to do now...

We were the good days.

Looking for people to redpill a liberal class in NYC

Wilhelm did nothing wrong.

I suggest to you read about the Balfour Declaration. Also 'The greatest history never told' deserves a watch too.
youtube.com/watch?v=7XExjrZxTdk

Listen to all 6 episodes of Blueprints for Armageddon to get a good grasp of ww1

This is a surprisingly good video if you haven't seen it.
youtube.com/watch?v=MQW3VefRozc

no wonder he started a massive war. that fucker was in SS before it was mainstream

i rly want to hit you with sledge hammer right now

This are some good stuff, thank you

Another dumb German cuck who fucked up Europe

UK like always

Germany had precoce war ejaculation and fucked all the treaties that could be done by Russia-Austria Hungary on Serbia

+ they tried a early blitzkrieg that was obviously going to fail
just build artillery to fuck up the french forts

No good guys.
No bad guys.
Just 19th century war tactics that met 20th century war technology. And politicans that had the balls to start a war but not balls enough to end a war.
Well, some things never change.

>Who were the good guys?
>Who were the bad guys?

There are no good or bad guys in a war. Just opposing interests

Roastie detected

wait how do you know. also
>calling women roasties
r9k needs to leave

But who had the best ideas? Who would benefit the world the best?

Why did it come to full out world war and not just a European war?

WW1 is just a family fight using peopleas chesspieces. Kaiser Wilhem, Tsar Nicholas, King George, Franz Joseph are all related

If Germany won it would have been the new world power. Germany would have taken loads of land from Russia and turned it into lots of tiny puppet states whilst anexing stuff themselves. Austria and the ottomans would have colapsed no matter what. France would have Germany like repirations inposed on them. Britain would most likely not get invaded and not have anything imposed on them. Italy would have most likely joined in on the German side instead of on the french one and gained land from France. And the USA as always gets rich off war loans.

>Kaiser Wilhem, Tsar Nicholas, King George, Franz Joseph are all related
wow thanks for history lesson from second grade Kojima

>by 1
JUST, should have just put :3 behind my post

dancarlin.com/product/hardcore-history-50-blueprint-for-armageddon-i/

there are 5 parts.

i am time traveler i was in ww1

Do you think that the level of degeneracy in the world today would be the same under Germany rule? Or would it just be as now, but only it happened sooner?

It was not about ideas but empire building.

Well, Russia "lost" and lost its Eastern European colonies, doubt it would have been much worse in any case.

The world would not benefit from autocracy and neither we benefited from full democracy.
We need to understant that there's no right ideology, they serve our needs. You need soclib when you a mentally retarded, you need auth-right when your country is menaced by external powers, soc when the elite/(((they))) is fucking up the general populus and so on.
We would be fucked up either way, but at least with democracy we can say that the Kaiser is a cuck without 3837 prussian soldiers invading your city, but in the other hand we have 482637 shareblues trying to "troll xd" us
tl;dr 1900~1800 ideologies are shit, take down God and build others

The German rule would be more of a Monarchist authoritaria one under the kaiser. So even less decency

>lost its Eastern European colonies
its funny how russia is only case out there where collonies were more rich and people were better of there then country doing colonizing. kek

How would you think the Jew power and Israel would look like in this alternative timeline?

Since the ottomans where German allies they would probably strike a deal of some sort with them, instead of falling under British rule.

If Germany won WWI, it would have boosted the legitimacy of the military High Command in the eyes of the citizenry.
Such an outstanding victory in the face of overwhelming odds would have lead to a synthesis for Germany; transforming them from a nominal imperialistic monarchy into a more full-fledged military dictatorship with some secular leanings.
Such a force would serve as an effective counterbalance to the large population of (((socialists))) and (((intellectuals))) in Germany, who were just waiting for the right moment to pick apart Germany's corpse in the event that they lose the war.

>Nobody was the good guy
>Tens of millions of whites died for nothing
>allies won a Pyrrhic victory
>only the USA and the Soviets came out of the war in a better position than they went in

There were no good guys and no bad guys
History is not this black and white as jews make you think.

It never should have been fought.
Why did we fight? What did we earn?

Why does the dolphin have a cross? Are Faroe people pious Christians?

Serbia is at fault

Serbia always at fault

So by that, communism, socialism, feminism etc would not have had such influence on us today you think?

But there is always one alternative that is more pleasing, i think that if Germany etc would have won, Europe would have been a lot more nationalistic today, OR we would all be under German rule as today with the EU infiltrated by the Jews and their agenda.

A Major General in the Tsar's Army, Major General Count Arthur Cherep-Spiridovich, claimed that a clique of Jewish bankers engineered World War I so they could profit from it.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Cherep-Spiridovich

The only people who seem to have profited from World War I were the Zionist Jews who got:

(1) The Balfour Declaration
(2) The destruction of the Ottoman Empire (so they could create their Zionist state)
(3) The destruction of Tsarist Russia (so Jews could leave the Pale of Settlement)
(4) Germany, France, Austria, the UK, the USA massively indebted to Jewish controlled banking institutions

Also, the Chancellor of Germany in 1914, Theobald von Bethmann Hollweg, who was coincidentally a cousin of the Rothschild family, mobilised the German army in response to the Austrian Archduke being assassinated while the Kaiser was out of town. In addition, he tampered with the British cable at the start of the war and pressured the Austrians to attack Serbia.

The alternative was peaceful, but in the timeline of that no idpol would have turn up but you would expect a more authoritarian world.
Semi-constitucionalism would be the "liberalism" we would get. The punishment would be the same as happened with the germans but would happen to ALL ALLIES, and maybe USA would have a hard time fighting facists.
But we would see mutations like Democratic Fascim et cetera like we see with socialism witch would be the "first enemy of democracy"
The jews would not suffer from anti-semitism because many fought for the German Empire em Habsbourgs in WWI

...

>So by that, communism, socialism, feminism etc would not have had such influence on us today you think?
Yes, because the German military/state leadership would not be able to reconcile their values with those held by the socialists.
The socialists were firmly antiwar and anti-military. The German high command was not.

>good guys
>bad guys
user, I can tell you that in history there are no good or bad, just people with different views. The saying that history is written by the victor is a redpill in and of itself.

Major milestones include:
>Brits realizing they can't just solve a problem by throwing more men at it. I'm serious they went full Soviet Union the first year of the war.
>Airplanes switching from a primarily and purely reconassaince role to more combat oriented ones, which made warfare 3D for the first time ever
>One of the most obvious: use of chemical weapons, but its effect was more of a morale killer than a major milestone of combat
>Another obvious one: the tank, as it actually helped break stalemates all along the fronts
>Finally, an extremely minor one, but set the stage for future weapons development, was the expansion of sub-machine guns and the improvement of regular heavy machine guns

Had Germany won? I guess it depends how early they'd won. Had it been before 1917, it would have a much bigger effect, so I'll say things on that.
>Germany wins in Summer of 1915
>France probably loses even more territory than they did back in 1871
>Monarchism is still alive and well in Europe and it wouldn't surprise me if France had its monarchy restored or if the Russians had someone more German friendly put on their throne
>Soviet Union isn't formed when it does, but there's very likely still to be civil war in the 1920's
>Middle East stays under Ottoman control and they likely make territorial gains in Africa and the Caucuses
>Balkans probably would still Balkanize at some point, but they stay under Austro-Hungarian rule for much longer
>Germany remains, and grows, as a major player in Africa itself
>America stays isolationist for much longer and doesn't experience the great economic boom, or at least on the scale we did, in the 20's
>Stock Market probably still crashes in either the 20's or 30's, but it hits America and the losers of the war much harder

The real red pill is both sides started this war fairy needlessly. but no one talks about the genocide in Serbia or the fact germany had every right to fuck them up considering the assassination of Franz Ferdinand was perpetrated by the Serbian government. Also Wilhelm was a bipolar nut with am itchy trigger finger. But there are always two sides. None of them we're completely right

WWI was not a war of ideologies. Autocratic empires decided they want to fight for influence so they did exactly that.

>there is always one alternative that is more pleasing
not really, the amount of dead whites and the rise of communism negate any benefits that could have been gained, but honestly they weren't fighting for ideas just shitty scraps of land.

During the WW1 the germans tried to issue a warning in the USA to enter the waters between germany and Britain as they will just sink anything there, but since the USA searched for a reason to enter the war they blocked the warning from being published. Additionally they took the RMS Lusitania, loaded a bunch of ammunition on it, and sent it on a cruise with a lot of civillians to britain. arrived at the dangerous waters the Lusitania was told to even slow and of course it got sunk. The USA then announced this was an aggressive act against the US and had a (((reason))) to join the war.

Pretty much like with Pearl Harbor where they knew the attack was comming in WW2, but didnt forward a warning to the base since then they only would have wrecked some ships and equipment, and not human life which wouldnt have been as good for propaganda

Anyone follow The Great War channel that goes through it week by week? Seems pretty interesting even if it does devolve into saccarine "muh war is hell" every other week, like no fucking shit man get over it.

Oh fuck I didn't know the ss skull symbol was preexisting. Cuckolds love to site that skull as actual proof that the Holocaust happened and stuff

I've been watching it is bretty good, the specials on people like Hitler and Mussolini are the best parts.
>mfw I realized that the brits and french were covertly funding fascist newspapers to try and get Italy involved in the war

youtube.com/watch?v=1Jg7fFYL3z4
youtube.com/watch?v=0I71VX5RyGA

Something like a Proto-EU is likely, I disagree that it'd be a military dictatorship though. Germany experienced something akin to a military dictatorship but only near the end of the war when things got really dire. It wouldn't be a true liberal democracy or anything like that for sure, Germans are not Anglos.

As for the Jews, while they had a ton of influence economically they were quite ocstracized socially and degeneracy of any kind wouldn't have made too much of an in-roads, Germany was after all the birthplace of both the HRE as well as the Reformation, the people were quite religious and the state pretty strong.

Overall the war was a waste in any case.

The Jews put Hitler in power

Fun Fact: The man who invented
>curling irons
>amusement park rides
>inhalers
>incandescent lights
Was an American emigre to Britain, was knighted by Queen Victoria, could NOT stop banging British and French chicks, was busily working on a new electrical patent when he was visited by a colleague who complained to him of the crowded Paris streets:"Why don't you invent something to kill all of these people?"

So Hiram Maxim invented the Maxim machine gun. It was 1895.

So what is Sup Forums doing with their lives?

Shut up retard

>The more you know