Most Sup Forums approved religion? I'm gonna have to vote for the Moonies cause they are Christian (mostly)...

Most Sup Forums approved religion? I'm gonna have to vote for the Moonies cause they are Christian (mostly), against sexual degeneracy, and do matchmaking.

Moonies?

The center is Roman pagan is it not?

Catholicism.

Confucianism is the only way, no supernatural forces, based moral, functional society and freedom.

The center one on the top row.

>inb4 protestcucks

Discordianism of course.

unironic white nationalist Hindu here, AMA

How did you get your brain damage?

Unification Church (not unitarians), sometimes called moonies after their founder, Sun Myung Moon

I was probably really smart in my last life.

orthodox christianity

Orthodox Christianity.

Celtic neopaganism, Heathenry. Whoever would dare otherwise is either a faggot, a kike shill or both.

No unbroken tradition = no authority.

Even the Lutheran National Church of Iceland has claims to apostolic succession. From what does the Celtic neopagan worldview derive it's authority? Multiple gods used as metaphors for your subjective feeling about things?

Out of these, Orthodox Christianity (namely Russian and Serbian). Some brands of Hinduism, along with Buddhism, Shinto and Sikhism are pretty good. I'm down with Bahai and Jains though they're too cucked for that title. And the other two are absolute "fuck no's".
That's Buddhism, dear leaf.

Any type of Christianity

this desu senpai

Zoroastrianism

Jainism is the best and most logical.

Proof:
"Some foolish men declare that creator made the world. The doctrine that the world was created is ill advised and should be rejected. If God created the world, where was he before the creation? If you say he was transcendent then and needed no support, where is he now? How could God have made this world without any raw material? If you say that he made this first, and then the world, you are faced with an endless regression. If you declare that this raw material arose naturally you fall into another fallacy, For the whole universe might thus have been its own creator, and have arisen quite naturally. If God created the world by an act of his own will, without any raw material, then it is just his will and nothing else — and who will believe this silly nonsense? If he is ever perfect and complete, how could the will to create have arisen in him? If, on the other hand, he is not perfect, he could no more create the universe than a potter could. If he is form-less, action-less and all-embracing, how could he have created the world? Such a soul, devoid of all morality, would have no desire to create anything. If he is perfect, he does not strive for the three aims of man, so what advantage would he gain by creating the universe? If you say that he created to no purpose because it was his nature to do so, then God is pointless. If he created in some kind of sport, it was the sport of a foolish child, leading to trouble. If he created because of the karma of embodied beings [acquired in a previous creation] He is not the Almighty Lord, but subordinate to something else. If out of love for living beings and need of them he made the world, why did he not take creation wholly blissful free from misfortune? If he were transcendent he would not create, for he would be free: Nor if involved in transmigration, for then he would not be almighty.

cont.

Thus the doctrine that the world was created by God makes no sense at all, And God commits great sin in slaying the children whom he himself created. If you say that he slays only to destroy evil beings, why did he create such beings in the first place? Good men should combat the believer in divine creation, maddened by an evil doctrine. Know that the world is uncreated, as time itself is, without beginning or end, and is based on the principles, life and rest. Uncreated and indestructible, it endures under the compulsion of its own nature.

All Christians. Nothing else, except a few faggots here might talk about paganism. Guess some people want to dance around in animal skin and burn wicker men.

...

Sup Forums in a nutshell:
> be alpha
> be strong
> be redpilled
> go your own way
> choose a cuck religion and get cucked by jews

Praise Kek

Is this pasta? It's excellent. It'd be great if there were some christfags here to try to defend against it.

>Confucianism
>freedom

you're shitting me, right? Confucianism might build prosperous societies of the ant-people variety but it sure as fuck doesn't allow for freedom.

Jainism is pretty air-tight logically but I feel like trying to practice perfect ahimsa is impossible in the material world.

I'm inclined to agree. A religion that has died can never really be resurrected. Once the chain of tradition is broken, it's over. That's why I think Indian polytheism (Hinduism) is stronger than neo-paganism.

...

good goyim.