How would you convince a libertarian that fascism/national socialism is better than a society with individualism and...

How would you convince a libertarian that fascism/national socialism is better than a society with individualism and freedom at its core?

I'm willing to be convinced. Give me essays/books/anything.

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP
youtu.be/0Gnov1TdIA0
youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion
youtube.com/watch?v=lmGqG3grTrg
unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2010/02/from-mises-to-carlyle-my-sick-journey.html
newswire.ca/news-releases/jd-power--associates-reports-satisfaction-is-highest-among-wireless-customers-who-use-their-carriers-online-service-and-sales-channels-512389831.html
youtube.com/watch?v=s6StVNfcttc
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

80% of the Mises founders were kikes ever wonder why that was? Lolbertarian individualism has fucked our nations by destroying cultural bonds and opening up the borders. That was the whole plan, the white man won't vote for judeo-communism and will crush any revolution so they'll simply replace us with people that will vote for one world commie government.

The greatest threat to the European races is not a strong government but the very opposite.

OK, so provide me with something. A book, essay, anything.

You're not helping national socialism by saying it is just naming the jew. It is much more than pointing out cancerous ideologies

The NSDAP banned ~1,600 mostly Jewish books for obscenity. This was a mistake. The current German government bans more than 200,000 pieces of literature. America has "freedom of speech" but your career will be ruined at the very minimum, and you'll be destroyed if you are notable, if you even so much as mentioned this.

The NSDAP taxed the working man from the farmer to the lawyer far less than the most libertarian county, in the most libertarian state, in the most libertarian developed nation. They all but nationalized all banking, gave interest free loans to all new families (25% shaved off the principal for every kid you have) abolished usury, land speculation, and unearned income though and guess who doesn't like this. Most of Sup Forums could agree to a modernized version of this I imagine.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP

It was a bulwark against Jewish communism. This is why so many supported it, they seen this happen. They watched Jew NKVD head Yagoda and his merry band of kikes famine 6,000,000+ European Christians around the Black Sea in the 1930's don't forget.

>A book, essay, anything
You will be hardpressed sometimes to get anything less than muhhh jewssss.

What i recommend you do is listen to George Lincoln Rockwell's speech here.

youtu.be/0Gnov1TdIA0

He gives an amazing tl;dr of the concept in a way that we as freedom loving colonials can appreciate. I hope you enjoy.

National Socialism was chiefly about liberating the German people from what they seen as world Jewish subjugation through capitalism or communism.

youtube.com/watch?v=kzIRG525l6s

He warned us almost a century ago and gave us a way out.

Jewish Capitalism from the west, Jewish communism from the East. Hitler and the Germans were stuck in the middle ideologically as well as geographically.

The Monopolists from America also reacted against Jewish Communism in the form of McCarthyism and other movements. Notably, the line seemed to be blurred between "communism" and hyper-capitalism. The monopolists - primarily oil men from Texas - would rail against communism and, in the same breath, decry media concentration in the US.

The one thread tying both of these things together - communism and concentration of capital in most industries, was Jewish members. Even back then though, to be labelled an anti-semite was a horrible thing.

It is no coincidence that McCarthyism affected above all else, Hollywood. That was the source of propaganda, against the monopolists who held power, in favor of the financial oligarchs of international character, who sought dominion over the US as they had it before WWII, before the monopolists wrested it away.

Hitler knew in the 1930's that fervent capitalism would lead to the fall of the western civilization and eventually Jewish communism. National Socialism is the third way. Socialist ethnonationalist states with a free market for consumer goods, like Israel, are the future.

Lad you aren't really selling the concept. You need to see where he is coming from; he is open to the idea but as a libertarian he doesn't want a bootheel crashing down on HIM nor the restriction of free enterprise and other foundations for a free society. What you need to do is explain that in many forms of Fascism the rights of the individual and to free enterprise are retained and protected, but at the same time the predatory practices of banks and multinationals will be cut off. Libertarianism doesn't really have anything besides 'the market will sort itself out' in that regard, fascism does.

You NEED to be able to communicate your ideas without invoking boogeymen. Acknowledge the JQ like an adult and then move on.

I could point out how affirmative action was a Jewish creation in both Canada and in the USA, how they were the driving force behind opening our borders, how the lawsuits that allowed near unrestricted abortion in our countries were both lead by kikes or hell I could lay out the thousands of hooked noses behind the drug/porn/tranny degeneracy they target our children with. But I won't.

Rather i'll ask that whenever someone in this thread witnesses societal/political rot ask yourself, and don't be afraid to do some digging if necessary, if a certain sunken eyed inbred tribe is behind it.

Also i'm not trying to sell the NSDAP or Hitler but rather a modernized and tailored version of this.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP

Hitler is a symbol not only for nationalism but also that even socialism (as it was at that time) was able to be a prosperous system given the right conditions. He didn't love me as an Anglo-Celtic mongrel Canadian, he loved his people. Why on earth could I not admire that? Nationalists want their own Hitler not Hitler himself (unless they're German/Austrian)

That is honesty my leaf friend.

Just look around you my man, America used to be libertarian and what is it now?
Shitskins undermining the middle class and the men and children of men who got rich off america move all their assets out without a second thought on how this will affect purchasing power of their own products.
Banks are free to gamble away the lives of honest people.
And the current healthcare system is a disgusting frankestien inflating in costs daily.

Adolf's only mistake was taking on too many adversaries at one. Durr, Can't fight the jews, Grat Britain and the Russian dumbasses all at the same time. Pick your fight Adolph, win one at a time. Fuck the jewish issue, kick the Queen and then maybe Russia. Do not declare war on the USA when a strong fascist element existed in the US. Man, one battle at a time, Adolf. Kick the Brits, then regroup and refocus on the next big thing (Russia) Attack when it is in your favor, not September in that cold assed land. Never fight on two fronts, despite the Dunkirk retreat you had them all but beat. Man, what a failed plan mein Furher

It is true that they were a bulk against communism and its barbarity, but their desire to create "living space" from a defeated Russia devoid of life was sick and twisted as well.

At the end of the day, the Nazis were just a tool of a different organization, the western establishment, to defend itself from the bayonets of the communists and to perform inhumanity under another identity.

Borges - "Hitler believed he was fighting for a nation but he was fighting for all. Even those he detested and attacked."

An important aspect of National-Socialist propaganda (which is unfortunately often overlooked) is the monetary one.
Yeah, normies are hardwired not to cosnciously think form perspective of their race, so make their greed do the work. They should realize that in National-Socialist state their living standards would be higher, etc.

>thegreateststorynevertold.tv

Meth is a hell of a drug.

So if I want the economy to continue growing I have to be open to some form of immigration?

I accept

This is comprehensively erroneous. Mises praised fascism for fighting communism and had many traditionalist opinions. Most prominent libertarians in association with Mises oppose open borders or endorse legal ethno-racial discrimination (Block, Hoppe, Rockwell). Jeff Deist is sympathetic towards alt-right ideas. Rothbard wrote in defense of traditionalist values, racial realism and also endorsed Dr. David Duke. Hoppe is a race realist and is for ethno-communitarianism.

In contrast, modern statism has not only allowed open borders (which palaeolibertarians oppose) but has forced ethno-racial diversity and integration via coercion, has made you pay by force for degenerative propaganda (see, BBC, German state TV) makes you fund universities which indoctrinate your people, and enforces a progressive media oligopoly via onerous regulatory bureaucracies, and subverts your nation in innumerable other ways (all of which we palaeolibertarians oppose).

Consider yourself and others of your ilk BTFO. It is true freedom which brings order, personal responsibility, and community and it is The State which brings chaos and actual degeneracy.

If you knew anything about anything you'd know that he had no choice.

After Poland he offered peace to the Western allies on numerous occasions but was denied. This is why he had to push them out and conquer France. After Dunkirk he again offered the British peace, they refused.

All the while, Roosevelt was funding the war and looking for an excuse to join it. This is why he did nothing to stop the attack on Pearl Harbor despite already having cracked the Japanese code.

The Soviets were planning a full scale invasion of Western Europe scheduled to begin only 17 days after Hitler (who sensed a Soviet offensive was coming) preemptively launched Barbarossa.

kys

All central and fractional reserve banking should be abolished. We need free market banking free of fraudulency (fractional reserve banking) and using hard money.

>it is better to have party elites to rule over you

just vote democrats if you want fascism you autist

Never trust a kike let alone a group led by kikes. We cannot be liberated until we slay the beast.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion

>implying we live under capitalism and not internationalist corporatism

Read a book, nigger.

I'm right wing but also for government being as small and hands off as it can be while still being able to function. Comments like this guy's go a lot further to making me see the fascist point of view than simply ranting about Jews and Jewish conspiracies.

I've never understood the obsession with the free market, it usually boils down to 'muh innovation' which is funny because the Germans contributed more to science in those 12 years than virtually all other nations combined. Americas greatest technological achievements were virtually all government run programs.

Capital or labour. That's the choice we face.

You fucking ignorant faggot. Rothbard and Von Mises are BASED.

Dont TOUCH those intellectual giants with your jewish conspiracy BULLSHIT.

Rothbard didnt believe the six gorillian either.

>jewish conspiracy
Jews have their own ethnostate and are only 1-2% of the population. Why must they run every western political movement?

We need a movement for the 98%. We've tried the Jew for 50 years and it has destroyed our nations. No more. Goyim need to lead goyim.

Not an argument. I fully acknowledge The JQ but you're taking it into an anti-intellectual extreme. You didn't refute a single point I made, you stupid leaf. Keep worshiping statism and enjoy being forced into paying for White privilege courses and forced into associating with niggers and mudslides.

Back to Le_Dahanald you LOLbiterian.

Not an argument.

American individualism is destroying the west. The 'free market' created your Jewish ruling class and feeds the international Jewry machine. Giving up hope on the collective will doom us to 5/8 babies being born to non-Europeans and mass suicides/drug abuse just as it has in America. We need dream big and will it into being.

youtube.com/watch?v=lmGqG3grTrg

Hitler dared to dream.

Fascism is necessary to allow us to get to a point where Libertarianism is possible.
You cannot have a free society with niggers, mudslimes and kikes.

Wrong.
Hitler was a Pan - Aryanist.
He wanted to free all of Europe from Judeo Bolshevism and Communism.
He wanted all of the Aryan Tribes to come together and create a Mega Reich.
A Fourth Reich, a United European Reich is the destiny of the White Race.
This is how we save our civilization.
We have to unite together as one Volk and fight Jewish Tyranny and embracing National Socialism which was meant for every European not just a German.

Still believe that Lebensraum shill meme?

You have to to back to Le-Dahanald Plebbit

We don't have free market capitalism.

Also, see: .

The State is why we are declining: The State is you paying for White privilege courses; The State and its odious regulation is behind Jewish media oligopolies; The State is destroying your purchasing power through central banking; The State teaches your kids that they should hate their race and makes it illegal for you to associate freely with your race; it is The State not libertarianism that is our great epochal usurper and destroyer.

The true Red Pill is, always has been, and always shall be palaeolibertarianism.

National Socialists, and Italian fascists, were far better to small business than the most lolbertarian states.

They just didn't tolerate pseudo competition in large industry. In Canada for instance they would have nationalized the three big telecom companies that never innovate and only price fix with each other and combined them into one government monopoly, but they would have allowed any domestic company to produce and sell whatever handsets the market wanted.

Once again proving that LOLbiterianism is a kike shill ideology.
And it promotes Civicuckism
Automatically goes into the trash.

It's you who is probably from leddit since you can't formulate an actual argument.

>We don't have free market capitalism.
You're right, it's slowly been eroded due to open borders. Your future is jewish communism voted in by non-whites. Did you not pay attention to Bernie?

A COMMIE STATE does all of that.
A NATSOC State will do the opposite of that.
Sparta was the first NatSoc State, hell Nature is also a NatSoc.
NatSoc focuses on Race
LOLbiterianism focuses on stupid socio economics.
Can't have any sort of governmental , political, or economical ideologies if there is no people.

I don't have to argue anything, your ideology is stupid and was made up by Kikes, enough said.

>three companies competing is bad

>so let's install a monopoly

Fascist "economics" everyone.

We don't have free market capitalism and I don't support open borders; i'm basically an ethnocrat. Try again.

>Lolbertarian individualism has fucked our nations by destroying cultural bonds and opening up the borders
Libertarians did not open the borders the liberals have and they have used gibs as a way to promote immigration here. It is clear even a country that allows immigrants in that the more gibs provided by the government equal the more immigrants from foreign nations as immigrants generally don't travel here without some form of gib.
>the white man won't vote for judeo-communism and will crush any revolution so they'll simply replace us with people that will vote for one world commie government.
Women voting is the problem that allows most of the immigrants in.
>The greatest threat to the European races is not a strong government but the very opposite.
A government which blocks free expression and free association is far worse then what a libertarian society would bring (meaning you could build white only neighborhoods, cities, towns, venues companies etc under libertarianism without government regulation as it is up to the free market to decide its fate. Big governments block it from happening with diversity and affrimative action).

Rothbard was supportive of ethno-nationalism; Hoppe is an ethno-communitarian. The idea that libertarian economics and a racially homogeneous polity are mutually exclusive is utterly fallacious.

Just want to say, I'm enjoying this thread.

Not OP, but I'm a lolbertarian as well. Lately have been feeling myself drift NatSoc more and more. I hate to say it, but Antifa are responsible for a lot of it. Bulkinization sounds more and more appealing everyday.

this link is pretty damn good for libertarians/ancaps to read:

unqualified-reservations.blogspot.com/2010/02/from-mises-to-carlyle-my-sick-journey.html

>The problem with Mises as guru is that Misesian classical liberalism (or Rothbardian libertarianism)
>is like Newtonian physics. It is basically correct within its operating envelope.
>Under unusual conditions it breaks down, and a more general model is needed.
>The equation has another term, the ordinary value of which is zero.
>Without this term, the equation is wrong. Normally this is no problem;
>but if the term is not zero, the error becomes visible.
>
>Just as Newtonian rules only make sense at low speeds,
>Misesian rules only make sense in a secure order.

and

>Here is the Carlylean roadmap for the Misesian goal.
>Spontaneous order, also known as freedom, is the highest level of a political pyramid of needs.
>These needs are: peace, security, law, and freedom.
>To advance order, always work for the next step - without skipping steps.
>In a state of war, advance toward peace; in a state of insecurity, advance toward security;
>in a state of security, advance toward law; in a state of law, advance toward freedom.

>The Newtonian envelope of libertarianism is the last of these stages.
>Once the state of lawful government is reached, that state
>can generally improve itself by minimizing its interventions
>and applying a policy of laissez-faire - advancing from enforced to spontaneous order.
>With the caveat, of course, that this policy not jeopardize
>the more important achievements of peace, security, and law.

>When a state finds itself outside this Newtonian window,
>however, Mises and Rothbard are of no assistance whatsoever in helping it get back in.
>Worse: Rothbardian libertarianism can be a positive hindrance to the Carlylean roadmap.

I was a libertarian until I realize we need security and especially military and border patrol. I also realize the importance of laws that prohibit degenerate products and trade and the importance of traditional values to form a high moral productive society. There's a reason all first world countries sit on the authoritarian right of the political compass. It's the tried and true power-horse. Now Fascism and National Socialism(don't get confused by this, Hitler added free market at some point and Rockwell said the importance of capitalism) is the ultimate power horse in that it will secure absolute removal of kikery and turn the nation to asian level discipline and progress.

I'm a neoreactionary who agrees with palaeolibertarianism but believes it can only be achieved via neocameralism. I think Moldbug is right in a way: you need peace for security, you need security for law, and you need law for freedom. The issue is engineering an incentive structure for gorvements so they don't become (classically) fascistic and overreach (which Moldbug's idea --- if misapplied --- could lead into). He provides a good solution which Land brilliantly expounded upon: neocameralism.

Neocameralism is what realistic anarcho-capitalism looks like (and you could even have competing commercial courts in a neocameral framework).

Based AF.

>dat get

They don't compete they price fix and never innovate. It's absolutely ridiculous ask any Canadian. 90%+ of the population hates the big three for damn good reason. It's a giant cartel and a private monopoly would be better than what exists.

Btw we didn't have a Reagan and still have tons of government monopolies in Canada so we can see it first hand. The highest rated telecom company, and the cheapest, is run by a provincial government. Our most widespread political agreement, mandated government monopoly on health insurance, is the most supported post-war government program in Canada.

newswire.ca/news-releases/jd-power--associates-reports-satisfaction-is-highest-among-wireless-customers-who-use-their-carriers-online-service-and-sales-channels-512389831.html

Kek.

>They don't compete they price fix and never innovate. It's absolutely ridiculous ask any Canadian. 90%+ of the population hates the big three for damn good reason. It's a giant cartel and a private monopoly would be better than what exists.

How do you know government entry barriers aren't creating an artificial oligopoly?

>Btw we didn't have a Reagan and still have tons of government monopolies in Canada so we can see it first hand. The highest rated telecom company, and the cheapest, is run by a provincial government. Our most widespread political agreement, mandated government monopoly on health insurance, is the most supported post-war government program in Canada.

It's parasitical: why should I be forced into paying for something by gun point?

Libertarianism is a fringe ideology even among whites and it's a ideology of retreat and defeat. Left wing nationalism, which is suppressed by all elites the hardest for a reason, will win power again. It's exponentially easier to get a group of regular people to rally against usury than for it, for example.

There is a kike in my old town on the waterfront that robbed Ukraine for more than a billion dollars and escaped to Canada. He makes more in interest every year on this stolen money than the Surgeon General, Attorney General, Governor General, and Prime Minster will make in their entire lives, combined. Nobody can justify this.

Because I live in this country you fucking rat. They've been busted before and they always raise their prices at the same time. Again they are hated by virtually everyone in this country.

>ethnocrat
When have ethnocrats won elections? I doubt you could get 100 votes. National Socialists not only won elections but they won 95%+ unification plebiscites after they abolished democracy. National Socialists were only destroyed because their fellow European was conned once again to fight his brother for the Jew. Thankfully that won't happen again.

"He smiled very pleasantly, and indeed had a sort of appealing and affectionate look in his eyes. My sizing up of the man as I sat and talked with him was that he is really one who truly loves his fellow man and his country ... his eyes impressed me most of all. There was a liquid quality about them which indicated keen perception and profound sympathy (calm, composed) - and one could see how particularly humble folk would come to have a profound love for the man."

William Lyon Mackenzie King writing about his meeting with Hitler in 1937.

10th Canadian Prime Minister (Liberal), 1935-1948.

Then it should be provided by local gorvements on a voluntary basis.

Japan, Israel, Korea, Hungary, I could go on. Whites just need to stop being cucked and advocate for their ethnic interests.

Telecom infrastructure should be run by the state just as it is in Saskatchewan (highest rated/cheapest in country, highest wages for employees) and just as radio was in NSDAP Germany. Industry can supply radios and other gadgets on the open market to consumers.

Wouldn't NatSoc be more of a centrist ideology? Probably more leaning to the left I suppose...

Not an argument.

It's neither right nor left. The stated goal was to unify the classes in purpose but not in practice (impossible) such as in communism. The swastika was the symbol of unification, distinction, and mobility between the classes.

Hitler demanded a rigid and defined hierarchy, but he also demanded that the lowliest German peasant must be able to rise through the ranks and one day lead the reich if he was the best man to do it.

excuse the typo not my translation

He's factually right. White guilt and white pathological altruism is the reason why whites act like some heroic martyr race helping others instead of their own. Generations of brainwashing has been a major role into turning whites this way, however another factor is that whites live in first world countries. This means they have been living in the closest we can get from utopias in this planet. This makes them more generous and kind to reach out and help others. This also makes them demean third worlders, where they treat them as victims that need pandering and care. Coupled by the fact most first worlders have a cognitive dissonance to the outside world, most think third worlders are as kind and friendly as they are. Adding all that up and it's a sure recipe of a brutal reality check once muhamad baby sits your kids.

Weimar Germany had this problem and the NSDAP solved it very quickly.

youtube.com/watch?v=s6StVNfcttc

I know people keep shitting on me for mentioning the JQ all the time but it's relevant.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Feminists_by_religion

>dat focus on family, character development, and sustainable society

Now all we have are SJWs and aimless Millennials.

national socialism only works when the people in power are unbreakable, intelligent people, he almost has to be a philosopher himself and know the classical works, it only works when you have everything worked out, and have a system to delegate the power to protect what you have built
the problem with national socialism is that every position of power is a weak link, it leads to corruption, the individual lacks power, the individual is a rat lab for what the man in power decides what his values should be and what he should do. It just doesn't work, we've been through this in history
Hitler did it right cause he knew what he was doing, mussolini was an idiot. For every hitler in 30 years, you'll have 1000 years of mussolinis

Example, what would happen if Trump mentioned this on holohoax day? NatSoc can win with truth alone. As I said above the NSDAP banning those Jewish books for obscenity was a major mistake that nobody else will hopefully make again.

I'd rather dare to dream and fail than sit around and watch everything my ancestors worked for be destroyed around me.

No socialism can work --- even under guidance of a noble philosopher-king --- because no central planner --- no matter how wise --- can allocate resources as effectively as a market. The market is an intelligence vaster than any mere human planner; The Economic Calculation Problem renders all socialism an ignominious comedy.

in a free country you can have national socialism in a region and masturbate to eachother, only if you don't let the people decide if they want to be there or not, meaning you can't use coercion
that's what cities or even state rights are for

national socialism has nothing to do with the marxist meaning of socialism

That image was an enormous Red Pill for me.

*only if you let people decide if they want to be part of it or not
so, free movement of people, and no violence against people unless they do want it

You're the least socialist country on the planet. Your situation (majority non-white births, drug/suicide skyrocketing, stagnant wages, widening wealth gap) is exactly what we want to prevent.

The problem was never socialism (NSDAP and even post-war Western Europe proved this) that's a Jewish meme they blast at you from birth to turn you off left wing nationalism. The only political movement that threatens the status quo. 1930's socialism didn't pit the working class vs. the professional class. It pitted all classes against the international capitalists/communists.

sorry, developed country

What about with the three people held chiefly responsible for this?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holodomor

NKVD head (((Gengrikh Yagoda))), Stalins right hand (((Lazar Kaganovich))), and Minister Vyacheslav Molotov, yeah that molotov, who wasn't Jewish but sure enough was married to a very prominent kike. I can thank the ukes out west for making our teachers teach us this shit.

Removing his brain would be a good place to start.

It differs only in rejecting international proletarianism and class dialects. The Economic Calculation Problem still applies whether you centrally plan for volkish or proletarian dictatorship.

Go national libertarian?

There's nothing saying you can't have nationalism and FREEDOM.

Too much freedom leads to degeneracy.

National socialism was a nice balance. It focused on the individual and the group.

It was focused on improving the individual because a stronger individual makes a stronger group. It was focused on the group because a group is always stronger than an individual and is the only way to fight off other groups who want to dominate your group.

A system strictly focused on the group is dangerous because the individual is basically seem as just a cog. Systems strictly focused on the individual are dangerous because it leads to an anything goes attitude, and erodes away at group cohesion and shared values.

This guy knows about freedom

Libertarianism and National Socialism are diametrically opposed.

They cannot be resolved.

La dottrina del fascismo
-Giovanni Gentile

Full version only in italian, read it leaf

Muh free market,see flag related,free marhet ruined our private sector after the 89 revolution it had just taken off and we had an economic boom,3 years later people were literally starving and we still
have not recoverd from it even today,corporations have taken over the market and even tho our pay is 5 times lower the prices are the sam as in western developed countries.
Fuck the market,the people are retarded and dont know what is better for them we need a colective dictatorship,fuck individualism.

You can't have freedom with usury. You can't have freedom with land speculation driving up the cost of living more and more each decade. You can't have freedom with private cartels running entire industries. You can't have freedom when war profiteers are met with anything but death.

National Socialism is freedom.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_Program#The_25-point_Program_of_the_NSDAP

>The greatest threat to the European races is not a strong government but the very opposite.

Agreed.

Capitalism is the enemy.

We used to have obscenity laws in the US. porn and other forms of filth were never covered under the 1st amendment until Jewish lawyahs used our own laws against us to push their weaponized deviency.

When we had obscenity laws we actually had freedom of speech and didn't deal with any of the thought/speech crimes we deal with today

Fpbp,fuck these lorbertarian faggots,they will get the rope too.

Capitalism and communism are international ideologies based on capital that lead to the destruction of history and culture

>Hitler demanded a rigid and defined hierarchy, but he also demanded that the lowliest German peasant must be able to rise through the ranks and one day lead the reich if he was the best man to do it.

Do you have a source for this claim?

Sounds too good to be true