My socialist professor wants to see my political compass, give me something to show him

My socialist professor wants to see my political compass, give me something to show him
Also political compass thread

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=oXWgJSpvbic
twitter.com/AnonBabble

political compass is worthless. I'm basically a fascist and yet I always place in the bottom left quadrant. Go figure.

Show him this

...

Self bumping with mine

give him this

...

...

I think I should hide my powerlevel a bit desu
Also id is changing cos I'm switching mobile data on and off

It should only be one line

State to no state

It doesn't make sense to have state control over economy but little socially -- the government will always want to control it all.

then just say you are a libertarian. No one can hate those people

>Conservatives have a higher ego than libertarians
no.

Give him this except done properly and not on a phone

...

never a bad option

...

...

get off my board you nazi!

...

...

...

...

I don't get the top right part

Maybe this?

Forgot pic

...

OP picture is shit

Greetings, fellow Hitler

...

r8 my results
>Choose mostly Free Market answers with mainly Authoritarian Stances on the social side of things
>Mostly free market in the sense that I support 95% free trade, but some regulation needs to be present since Capitalism is the most efficient economic model, but it's TOO efficient, and will harm those who can't keep up.
>I'm not a retarded edgelord who misquotes Natural Selection as justification for fucking over impoverished people. Sue me.
>"No, I do not think that fucking weed should be legalized. If we legalize one drug that just leads to more and more fucking problems and degeneracy."
>"No, the enemy of my enemy isn't my friend. That's what got us into this fucking stupid cluster fuck with ISIS in the first place."
>"An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth. If a fucking nigger goes and slowly tortures an innocent woman, then that nigger should have the glorious privilege of being able to experience the same trauma he inflicted on her in her last moments. Fuck rehabilitation. There is no rehabilitating someone like that."
>"Schools SHOULD make classroom attendance compulsory. We need educated citizens, not fucking retards."
(Then again, I am iffy on this. We have '''''educated''''' citizens now, and look how that's working out for us.)
>"What's good for the most successful corporations is always, ultimately, good for all of us." doesn't make much sense, because a corporation =/= a fucking civilization.
>"If we had a one party state, then there'd be less stupid bullshit. The only issue is it'd have to be a party that isn't totally fucking retarded."
>"In a civilised society, one must always have people above to be obeyed and people below to be commanded." IDK about this. Humans are naturally jealous of those better off than them, but if the person above wasn't a total idiot and passed laws and policies that would actually benefit everyone then woo hoo

>Get pic related

Okay, so what the fuck does this shit mean? Am I Sup Forums or?

kghfcjvhkfjggvhmfc see u cunt

t. Mosley

Use mine user.
Your jew powers are weak user, if the people get fucked over by corporations its completely their fault, in a free market the consumer has absolute power. Also savages in Africa literally don't matter.

Here's an actual Compass, for the image.

b-but it is true

...

Bullshit chart

At the end when you get to your compass the coordinates are in the URL. You can edit them to whatever you want.

kek

...

...

...

there are mine, reminder that economic protectionism (fascism) is left

Im at a loss. What could it mean?

Op here
Thanks mate I might actually use this, it's not too extreme

Are you saying that economic protectionism is fascism?

yes

>if the people get fucked over by corporations its completely their fault,
I understand how it may seem like I didn't think of this, but I was thinking,
>Okay, so people being fucked over by corporations is their fault because they were stupid. If a corporation is lying to the public and their product doesn't do what it says it does, then word gets out, and that corporation dies off. That's fine.
>But, what about the cases where the corporations are good at lying? Like giving out a pill made of sugar that says it makes you have more x in your shit or something. Then again, is that so bad? People are still using their money and buying shit from that corporation and putting it into the economy.
So it boiled down to those two scenarios, both "I agree" and "I disagree", and it also lead to me realizing I hate political compasses.

I fucking really dislike how black and white these fucking tests usually are. I know centrism is frowned upon here because of meme reasoning, but some issues I think it's better to be a centrist since things fucking vary in the real world. Why can't "It depends" be an answer?

Also, savages in Africa don't matter. I agree. Not sure why you brought that up out of nowhere. I honestly think we should just pull out of Africa and let them fucking die. I don't really have much edgelord positions like that, but I seriously don't care for Jamal and his 50 children dying of AIDS.

If people care about Africa, they can start up a business that takes donations and voluntarily goes there. i shouldn't be forced to pay for it.

Ansnekistan is truly the greatest idea.

How so? Countries have been pursuing protectionist policies long before the idea of fascism was even conceived. Besides, fascist states usually go above and beyond protectionism by working towards totally cutting themselves off from the global market.

Oh, and also, on the subject of people getting fucked by corporations being their fault, what about if a corporation released a product and it was discovered that it was actually slowly killing the person using it? Should they not be held responsible for that? How would the average person in that case be able to tell if the corporations product was screwing them over, if they require using a fucking laboratory to test the product's actual effects?

This leads me to another big issue: that means that I support some regulation, but I always have thought that some regulation of a free market inevitability leads to more regulation, which isn't always a good thing and could easily go and backfire.

where's national socialism, user?

Show him this

Number 1: look up the fascism quadrant.

>weak men in the green
>being this ignorant of history

>posting some arbitrarily abstracted cycle
>being this ignorant of nature

...

>I'm not a retarded edgelord who misquotes Natural Selection as justification for fucking over impoverished people. Sue me.

Mainly. I have literally no problem with corporations essentially carving out parts of other continents as long as their paying for it.

>Should they not be held responsible for that?

Only if you can prove it was intentional. For example with lead toys, nobody knew at the time, it was an honest mistake. These sharklike feeding frenzies in regards to corporate legal disputes need some type of recourse on behalf of the corporation too. You shouldn't be able to just get a commission based lawyer and suck millions out of a corporation whenever it makes a mistake (and sometimes when it doesn't make a mistake). You need some regulation I agree but there's this constant idea that you should have regulation and the corporations can't lobby on behalf of their position at all which doesn't make any sense.

I still have difficulties dealing with protectionism though. I don't think legislation should protect American companies in the global market but at the same time I don't think that its fair when they have to compete with china having free slave labor. I guess I'm still anti protectionism because I believe that a good company can make money even when competing against companies that have the backing of their government.

...

This

Fixed

took same test on different site, same questions. much different result

javascript:quote('123214508');

check out this vid
youtube.com/watch?v=oXWgJSpvbic

Someone post the Jordan Peterson compass please, OP can just switch his name with Jordan's

Pepeson has done the pol compass test?

Stop advertising your shitty jewtube videos cunt

r8 my moms results

Literal fucking retard.

The mom is always the mom even if she's a social democrat.

For some reason it fills me with joy and the desire to profiteer.

Different test:

You are a: Objectivist Libertarian Ultranationalist Traditionalist

Collectivism score: -83%
Authoritarianism score: -50%
Internationalism score: 0%
Tribalism score: 83%
Liberalism score: -33%


Explanation key:

Collectivism refers economic intervention, whether the society or state should intervene in the economy to redistribute wealth from the more to the less successful. The negative percentages indicate opposition to such intervention.

Authoritarianism refers to state power to control the actions of individuals to prevent them from harming others or themselves, and also to establish the will of the majority over society. Negative percentages indicate opposition to state power.

Internationalism refers to political involvement in other nations or global affairs, either via war, treaty or international organizations. Negative percentages indicate isolationist beliefs, and the belief in national sovereignty.

Tribalism refers to identity or nationalism, favoring your own nation over foreigners. Negative percentages indicate opposition to national or ethnic identity and oriented towards pan-humanism.

Liberalism refers to acceptance of historically illegal or immoral social practices or customs. Negative percentages indicate opposition to such acceptance.

Typical baby boomer.

This shitty "compass" is a tool to make people think they are moderate and "agree 90% with Hillary Clinton".

You got to answer edgy on purpose to get to authoritarianism.

Naw it's just a meme

You have no sense of freedom if you're not in the middle off the Auth/Lib axis. Your dream society would end in total monopoly or a shitty mess. And if you're too far on the Right, you might still be an okay person, but you lack vision. Both the market and society are much more effective when all members - even the degenerates - are accommodated for.

mine

here

If you're authoritarian you're shit. Instead of big government taking care of people with federal aid you'd chose big government deciding peoples beliefs, what they do in their own home, what they teach in schools etc. Actual social liberalism eg. believing in the liberty for people to fuck up their own lives is the only morally correct choice. Anything else is just forcing your beliefs through martial might because they're too shitty to exist on their own.

I'd rather sacrifice effectiveness for morality. If you're liberal right wing you believe in true freedom and equality. The most effective society has no failures, everyone contributes to their ability, but that's not equality or freedom, those can't exist without the freedom to fail and the freedom of self destruction.

Different test.

Starting to thing tests are bullshit user

It's just a reddit tier meme.

someone post the Memri version.

>sacrifice effectiveness for morality
>freedom to fail

I'm not authoritarian. My point was that even if you were, you wouldn't get high up on that compass.

>believing in the liberty for people to fuck up their own lives is the only morally correct choice.
Objectively the morally correct choice is the choice that leads to the most happy mammals/animals that feel happiness

>abstract merchants
its an abstract merchant

of course they are, all personality test are bulshit, but their good bulshit.
In reality they do more building of your personality than discovery of it.

>tfw to smart too be autistic
dipshit

...

Oh, this is that abstract of the miscarriage comic.

Your perspective of morality is wrong. Its not what leads to the most happiness. It's what the right or wrong thing to do is. If a criminal commits a crime like murder the morally right thing to do is dispense justice in the agreed upon method of the society in which you live, which will probably lead to unhappiness for the murderer. If you believe in freedom then you accept the cost that people are going to make the wrong decisions and the government shouldn't get in the way or try and correct those decisions through legislation. It should be up to the local community such as the church, neighborhoods, or family to correct morally wrong behavior.

>Objectivist
Absurdism is far more probable.
>Libertarian
People require leadership.
>Ultranationalist
Most nations are weaker than Fortune 500 now.
>Traditionalist
Ugly collection of obsolete methods.

nice meme

...

>implying monarchsim doesn't coincide with other political philosophies
There can be authoritarian monarchies, libertarian monarchies (minarchism), "progressive" liberal monarchies, etc. People who justify monarchism because it makes them feel different and special are as retarded as le radical centrists.

labels label me not, asshole

>It's what the right or wrong thing to do is
According to whom? The Mosque, the Church or the Temple? That's subjective morality.

Objective morality would have to be measured in something, like hapiness. If a criminal commits a crime, you punish him so to prevent more crime/give people justice which in the long run very probably make more people being happy.

If NatSoc is what makes the most people happy (ignoring the supremacy part), then that is objectivly the correct ideology.

>tfw you are slowly becoming Hitler

If I were given the choice to become a national hero at the cost of my happiness or even my life, I wouldn't hesitate.

The caption on the green part is fucking stupid and was probably written by an economic illiterate.

Libertarian left is the only sensible ideology, but most of Sup Forums are brainlets so they simply lack the capacity to understand this.

>Happiness
>Objective
You're a retard